Re: [tw] Re: Voicing Futures ...

your endeavour! Ákos On Mittwoch, 15. März 2017 00:56:53 CET Eric Shulman wrote: > On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 3:35:46 PM UTC-7, Ákos Szederjei wrote: > > I understand the technical difficulties, and it is ok not being able to > > resolve > > it, or even not wanting

Re: [tw] Re: Voicing Futures ...

TiddlyFox, like TW Desktop, saved the TW file whenever a Tiddler was closed. So no dialog vs. 4 step. Any dialog causes more complexity. Why have word processors / text editors auto safe feature? Because they are convenient and speed up work. You can always safe with File / Save As in the brow

Re: [tw] Re: Voicing Futures ...

Jon, I do not think I (we) lack the appreciation for the complexities of the problem. As a user, we bow to the Almighty Powers of The Developers, but I think you underestimate how important an easy save feature is, as we have it now. The problem as we see it, is very relevant to the use and spr

Re: [tw] Re: FF plugins future (was Vivaldi Browser - Shameless Publicity)

ld work on all platforms, but it beats the current save file situation. Ok, I had too much time to think of the problem... :) Ákos On Freitag, 10. März 2017 17:58:13 CET @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > darn nabbit. you added complications to the complication! :-) > > On Friday, 10 March 2017 1

Re: [tw] Re: FF plugins future (was Vivaldi Browser - Shameless Publicity)

Sorry, for the double post, but the the old 1.x still works after update. Ákos On Freitag, 10. März 2017 16:57:02 CET Ákos Szederjei wrote: > Thanks you for the link, but under Firefox 52.0 (32-bit) it does not > install, it says "addon appears to be corrupt". > > Ákos >

[tw] Re: FF plugins future (was Vivaldi Browser - Shameless Publicity)

Thanks you for the link, but under Firefox 52.0 (32-bit) it does not install, it says "addon appears to be corrupt". Ákos On Freitag, 10. März 2017 13:16:03 CET @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > I suspect there are even users here who don't know of TiddlyFox v2 ... Its > excellent ... Here is the thread

Re: [tw] Re: FF plugins future (was Vivaldi Browser - Shameless Publicity)

ings are always a long stretch, developers are more than busy > dealing with regular development and fixing bugs, but if enough people > bother posting and to showing interest maybe we can gather enough critical > mass. > > On Thursday, 9 March 2017 14:46:40 UTC, Ákos Szederjei wrote

[tw] FF plugins future (was Vivaldi Browser - Shameless Publicity)

On Mittwoch, 8. März 2017 19:14:02 CET @TiddlyT weeter wrote: > I think Mozilla are shooting themselves in the foot. Their lifeblood was > extensions. And the future for TW auto-saving via browsers currently looks > fragile. I think this a real issue here. I understand that it is a difficult one,

Re: [tw] Conveying: Moans about poor documentation

Principally, I am not against MW. Having 24 hours in a day, I simply have no time to learn it's syntax. But this is my priority and if others go for it, it is fine. If potential Mac truck users can only reach the Mac truck user manual with a Ford Escort, it does raise the question why not use an F

Re: [tw] Conveying: Moans about poor documentation

I can only ad my opinion from a user's point of view, so I skip the technical parts. > * The existing documentation isn’t serving the needs of our users Despite that, I found the current documentation a very good for quick starter info. After that the requirements diverge for each users, dependin

Re: [tw] Testing Tech TW on my site. Feedback wanted!

Hello Shay! Good job with the wiki! I think it looks very nice, pleasant colour choices. I liked the coffee cup too! :) Ákos -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [tw] Re: Conveying: Moans about poor documentation

I think it is great that the additional possibilities of TW are organised and made easily available for the general public. Yet, I am not sure that we should replace the current TW file. As it is written on the TW homepage it is a "unique non-linear notebook for capturing, organising and sharin

Re: [tw] Re: tab naming question

This works: <> This does not: <> Ákos On Freitag, 2. Dezember 2016 10:14:47 CET Riz wrote: > Ákos Szederjei wrote: > > No, not the sidebar. Where I have a Tab on the top and the box below is > > for > > the text. Tabs like this one: http://tiddlywiki.co

Re: [tw] Re: tab naming question

No, not the sidebar. Where I have a Tab on the top and the box below is for the text. Tabs like this one: http://tiddlywiki.com/#Community The code is: <> And the [[Tiddly Name|Latest]] syntax is not working. Ákos On Freitag, 2. Dezember 2016 07:30:17 CET Riz wrote: > Ákos

[tw] tab naming question

It seems to me that I can not use the usual [[Link name|tab link]] syntax in tabs. Is there a way to do that. For example I would like to have a tab names "First" but the tiddler name is "First Tab". Thanks Ákos -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "T

Re: [tw] Cross-Browser, Cross-Device Universality ... dream or reality?

Hello everyone! What about Qupzilla (https://www.qupzilla.com/)? It uses QT web-engine. Is it possible to have a TW plug-in there? Not that I could write it, unfortunately. :( Ákos On 11/21/2016 7:43 PM, Josiah wrote: > Ciao Mario > > > So they don't let us do this. period. > > Thank you f

Re: [tw] Re: Interactive fiction with tw5?

Lovely, consider me impressed. Great work, congratulations! Ákos On 10/17/2016 7:13 PM, Jed Carty wrote: > That was actually one of my first experiments with tiddlywiki. You can > see the old version of what I made here > , I am in the middle up updating it and >

Re: [tw] Re: Google Groups is a somewhat UNWIELDY instrument ....

I looked at the alternatives for GoogleGroups for another group, but there is not much to choose from. YahooGroups is the only "commercial but free" solution, but no one know it's future. No point to move there. If one would like to host one's own GroupServer (http://groupserver.org/) comes to cl

Re: [tw] Re: Double Transclusion?

Yep, that is the usual service of the folks around here! :) Ákos On 5/29/2016 12:05 AM, 'Alexander Eckert' via TiddlyWiki wrote: > Wow, what a fast answer > > Thank you BJ & Eric, it works =) > > Kind regards > > Alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

Re: [tw] Re: RoF vs ROF

Should the syntax for tiddlyLink not look like: [[RoF]] ? But you are right, the tilde (~) removes the link. Ákos On 5/13/2016 8:54 PM, 'c pa' via TiddlyWiki wrote: > I think you are looking at the difference between a TiddlyLink to a > non-existing tiddler vs. straight text > > ROF does not

[tw] RoF vs ROF

Another mystery for me Ladies and Gentlemen! Why is abbreviation RoF (captial R, small o, capital F) in italics, and ROF (all letters in capital) not? The same goes for the more naughty version of XxX and XXX. :) Ákos -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [tw] Re: Simple task complex problem

&Ton Garner Thank you, I missed that, or more to my embarrassment, I forgot that option. @Matabele Thanks, that is even better. Never though of that! Ákos On 5/12/2016 9:08 PM, Matabele wrote: > Hi Ákos Szederjei > > I often misuse the definition syntax for this purpose -- i

[tw] Simple task complex problem

Hello TW users and creators! In a tiddler I would like to have the following text: Line1 Line2 Line3 Line4 Is there any other solution besides at the end of the line? Thank you for the help! Ákos, wanna be tiddler master :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Re: [tw] Re: Presenting: QuickTid

Very useful I say! While my Tiddler/text ratio is low, I still found it useful, as it does not take too much space on the top of my screen. Thank you for the great work! Ákos On 4/28/2016 12:43 AM, Mat wrote: > QuickTid updated. > > If you too ain't got no time for no clicking around then you

Re: [tw] To Jeremy Rushton - TW STAND-ALONE is MY thing ...

Hello Everyone! As a simple user, I agree with the well articulated sentiments. TW's one file approach makes it infinitely versatile and usable to many tasks. One could argue that a server "version" is not a bad idea. How to reconcile the two approaches, server and none-server versions, and use t

Re: [tw] Re: font question

Wt! That was it! Thank you very much Archizona V!!! Back to work until the next question! ;) Ákos On 4/3/2016 1:49 PM, Archizona V wrote: > Try to add tag $:/tags/Stylesheet to tiddler with styles > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki"

Re: [tw] Re: font question

<http://akos.hd.hu/font/Raleway-Regular.ttf>') format('truetype'); > } > > body {font-family: 'Raleway', sans-serif;} > > but ttf don't work in IE. for IE use .eot > > > пятница, 1 апреля 2016 г., 21:37:16 UTC+3 пользователь Ákos Sz

Re: [tw] Re: font question

src: url('fonts/a-light-webfont.eot'); > src: url('fonts/a-light-webfont.woff') format('woff'), > url('fonts/a-light-webfont.ttf') format('truetype'), > url('fonts/a-light-webfont.svg') format('svg'); > } > | > > >

[tw] font question

Hello everyone on this lovely list! I just discovered TiddlyWiki, and I am fooling around with the different style settings ,like: CSS, fonts, etc. I have a couple of questions, and I hope I am at the right place. Q1 This code does exactly what is says in each line, when put into a Tiddler in th