Hi Charlie,
in general the first thing to do in such a case is to use the search engine
of your choice and look for a polyfill for the "offending" code, which
often thanks to a lot of wonderful people already exists.
In your case though since you are only using this in one place for one
parame
Hi Rika,
maybe it is just a generational thing, but I feel like the article, while
having a somewhat valid core theory, leaves out the very important part of
how the web, who uses it and the perception of it has in general changed
over time in favour of becoming a rant about how back then every
ething down
>>> as quick as possible that is good enough (a process of progressive
>>> elicitation?), and then slowly/incrementally/iteratively adjust as
>>> needs/requirements ( information-bits / structures, the pictures) dictate
>>> (become clear.)
to anything
> can be done quickly. (Unlike dealing with a bunch of separate
> files/documents in some hierarchy of folders.)
>
> Very organic to fit my granola personality.
>
> Oops. I got wordy. Hard thing to fix ...
>
> Cheers !
>
> On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 11:19:5
Sorry a little late, but my brain was out of commission for the weekend so
I only finished my solution now, but good to see that Charlie could help
you already.
Still if you are interested: I used two macros working with the given
titles/tags to make it more modular so it can be extended in the
Hi Charlie,
somewhat off-topic, but your answer to Atro led me to a question regarding
another kind of template. Seeing how streamlined your wiki is, but having
not seen anything in this direction: Have you thought about using templates
to create certain tiddlers, either by cloning the template
.
>
> четверг, 15 октября 2020 г. в 03:45:54 UTC+6, Felicia Crow:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> first question since it is a javascript macro: Have you reloaded your
>> wiki after saving/importing the macro? Unlike wiki text macros javascript
>> macros only get loaded
Hi,
first question since it is a javascript macro: Have you reloaded your wiki
after saving/importing the macro? Unlike wiki text macros javascript macros
only get loaded in when the wiki itself is loaded.
The reason I am asking is because when I try to call your plugin after a
reload it gives
Hi Charlie,
looks interesting, and makes me wonder if I could change my field and
filter approach for my podcast player to multiple tiddlers and a
transclusion template similar to your youtube video template. Thanks for
sharing as always.
Kind Regards,
Felicia
On Wednesday, 14 October 2020 2
Hi,
Sorry to not be able to answer with a concrete solution, but I am not sure
I understand the problem correctly, which can totally be my fault for
missing the obvious.
Would the output in tiddler 1 for instance be literally a + b or whatever
is in the text fields of tiddlers a and b combined
> On Thursday, October 1, 2020 at 4:54:46 AM UTC-3, Felicia Crow wrote:
>>
>> Hi Charlie,
>>
>> sorry for the late reply.
>>
>> As for the formatting as I said depending on your preference. I am just
>> personally more used to it, that's why
> tiddler links with transcluded little fishy links
> <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/NX0sPUvzF1k> .)
>
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 5:20:57 AM UTC-3 Felicia Crow wrote:
>
>> Hi Charlie,
>>
>> it is great to see your progress overall with your
Hi,
yes as long as all the macros are defined at the beginning of the tiddler.
Empty lines to seperate the individual tiddlers work, but everything else
in between will trip tiddlywiki up and won't let it recognize the \define
following.
Regards,
Felicia
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 08:47
Hi Charlie,
it is great to see your progress overall with your wiki, but especially
with macros and filters when thinking about our last conversation a few
days ago. Thanks for sharing.
One suggestion: Depending on your preference of visualization you could use
the sup tag to add a superscript
Hi,
if you have a way to filter for all site tiddlers you could then use the
contains operator to see if the site is contained in the sites field.
Something like this:
<$list filter="[!has[draft.of]tag[Site]sort[title]]" variable="site">
<$link to=<> />
<$list filter="[!has[draft.of]has[sites
little projects.
>
> FUN!
>
> On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 8:31:27 AM UTC-3, Felicia Crow wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> so actually the answer is probably not going to be much longer it just
>> contains a macro example and an explanation of how it works. The macro
Hi,
so to extend Jed's solution I assume three things: Each tiddler for a
person has a buyer-id field, each tiddler for an artwork has an artwork-id
field and each person tiddler has an bought-artwork field that contains a
space separated list of artwork-ids. If the artwork ids don't contain
sp
hanged versions of
Contents, Title, Subtitle - that you can just import and everything is set
up as I described above should you prefer this route.
Kind Regards,
Felicia
On Monday, 14 September 2020 04:00:09 UTC+2, Felicia Crow wrote:
>
> Seeing how I may should eventually remember that sl
s" tiddler and
> "Title" tiddler can call some macro that does what your code does, but
> works generically for every tiddler that needs it?)
>
> On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 9:22:13 PM UTC-3, Felicia Crow wrote:
>>
>> Charlie,
>>
>> so fir
Hi,
since you linked so nicely from our other discussion to here I decided to
leave my thoughts on this project where it is relevant.
I have to say I find the whole system very interesting, especially using
hard links to one tiddler to pull everything together.
May have to borrow the idea and
> That aside: I'm kind of proud to have figured out a little something about
> filters in my last post
> <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/ItNqeGWYX7Q>.
>
> On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 6:03:04 PM UTC-3, Felicia Crow wrote:
>>
>> Hi Charlie,
>>
>
Hi,
yes this is absolutely expected behaviour and a problem that pops up in
this group from time to time.
Tiddlywiki only recognizes hard links - everytime you use [[Link]] directly
in the wikitext mostly - as references.
Everything else - links coming from macros, variables, transclusions, etc
Mario,
here is the link:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/tiddlywiki/E32yX5RGv4A/AV0KSxvaAgAJ
It was actually not the original discussion that triggered it, but me
providing a javascript solution to the problem and Tony then asking if
something like this was possible now that I had gotten s
Hi Charlie,
yes that was what I meant. I always find it interesting to learn the
thought process behind someones solution, since it often gives a different
perspective on things that I would not have considered before, leads to
learning something new or both. So when I saw a solution I would no
d the most cursory look, but you could allow an optional
> widget parameter that determines the storage tiddler, allowing restricting
> scope where desired.
> Perhaps also consider using a $:/temp.. or $:/state... prefixed tiddler
> for the storage.
>
> Cheers,
> Saq
>
>
Hi Charlie,
love the concept and very impressiv what you managed to put together, thank
you for sharing.
If you don't mind asking, is there a specific reason for placing the
decision for what to transclude in the two templates themselves and always
calling both of them?
Personally I would have
Hi,
to add to Tony's answer: Personally I would say it depends more on your use
case than on efficiency.
If there are multiple instances, not just one list, where for instance you
want to have a person formatted as given in your example with nothing ever
changing in your formatting a template
Hi Tony,
glad it is fixed.
While localstorage can have its problem - never experienced it, but heard
of item dropping, although it seems to have gotten better with the years -
in this case to its defence it only held corrupted data.
>From the error message it seems one of the saved strings coul
ddlywiki
>operates
>- From a users designer view point it is however in my view an
>important gap to fill
>- I can name dozens of cases where this would help.
>- The key difference with such a variable is its use need not be
> inside an open and close,
ber or set a flag = yes, such that the value can
> be accessed outside of the list widget?
>
> This is a missing mechanism as far as I can see.
>
> Regared
> TW Tones
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, July 24, 2020 at 8:34:52 PM UTC+10, Felicia Crow wrote:
>>
>>
Hi Eric,
I am fascinated by what is possible with tiddlywiki alone. Thanks for
sharing your solution and letting me learn more about it.
Regards,
Felicia
On Friday, 24 July 2020 at 18:45:16 UTC+2 Eric Shulman wrote:
> On Friday, July 24, 2020 at 3:34:52 AM UTC-7, Felicia Crow wrote:
>&
Hi,
so after playing around with filter operators and trying to find a way over
a data tiddler I wrote a javascript macro I attatched below.
The only caveat with this is that you have to close and reopen the tiddler
calling the macro due to how javascript macros are called. Maybe someone
has an
Hi Eric,
so took finally another look and while I can't say which update did it, I
can say that it now also works in firefox without problems.
Regards,
Felicia
On Friday, 17 July 2020 at 12:55:23 UTC+2 Eric Shulman wrote:
> another update:
>
> * changed TiddlyTools/AutoTag/Setup "autotag" fiel
Hi,
I am sorry, I have missed something that is by now obvious to me, but not
necessarily to everyone.
When you wrote that your macro did not produce any output I tested the
macro and since my tests where in the same tiddler due to it being easier
it of course worked.
>From what you are describ
Like the new look with the images and the added functionality.
As for the bug, thanks for trying to solve it even if firefox does not want
to comply.
Felicia
On Friday, 10 July 2020 13:45:44 UTC+2, Eric Shulman wrote:
>
> Another update:
>
> in AutoScroll/Viewer:
> * disable button actions if
52:23 UTC+2, Eric Shulman wrote:
>
> On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 12:15:05 AM UTC-7, Felicia Crow wrote:
>>
>> first this is a wonderful tool, especially with the extensions you added.
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>> One firefox exclusive bug: When using the tool
Hi Eric,
first this is a wonderful tool, especially with the extensions you added.
One firefox exclusive bug: When using the toolbar the text keeps its
transformed position when pressing pause then stop.
I don't think it would really need solving since start then stop resets it,
just thought to
Hi,
your macro works fine for me, except when not specifying a tiddler, as your
actual default value is an empty string, not the current tiddler. As a fix
you could use the emptyValue parameter of the set widget when setting x:
<$set name="x" value=<<__for__>> emptyValue=<> >
For your second
Birthe,
not until you mentioned it since I am still in my reinventing the wheel
phase when it comes to tiddlywiki meaning I try to do things myself at
first or go with smaller parts of the problem to look up to learn what
tiddlywiki can do and how I can use it. So I have yet to take a closer lo
see them stacked
> vertically and my desire to wrap them all in a
>
>
>
> Is not working on top of your solution
>
> Thanks for you response
> TW Tones
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 6, 2020 at 8:34:09 PM UTC+10, Felicia Crow wrote:
>>
>> Oh two pe
. I only see them stacked
> vertically and my desire to wrap them all in a
>
>
>
> Is not working on top of your solution
>
> Thanks for you response
> TW Tones
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 6, 2020 at 8:34:09 PM UTC+10, Felicia Crow wrote:
>>
>> Oh
Thanks for your kind words!
That was why I wrote apparently since I know from years of dealing with my
migraine and observation that larger changes in weather and/or temperature
triggers it - always "fun" in weeks where it gets from sunny to rain and
back from one day to the next - so seeing how
Oh two people one thought, although Saq definitely explained it better.
If scale is not important and it is just about sizing I played around a
little and found this solution using flexbox:
\define preview(filter)
.preview-container{
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
flex-direction: row;
Hi Tony,
Is there a reason you define a width and height and then scale it down?
Scaling like this does not affect the document flow, meaning that while you
see the scaled down elements on screen in the background the size of each
of your previews is still considered 600px when it comes to posi
iddler="$:/smartConfig/config/pairs" field="text"
> tag=input size=80/>
>
> I used this small test opn your example and mine
> <$list filter="[prefix[$:/config/]]">
> <>
>
> Something is not right.
>
> Regards
> Tony
>
Hi,
First personally I would love for challenges like these to become a thing
since not only do I get to learn things I normally would not necessarily
need for myself and second I think it would be interesting to see different
approaches to the same challenge.
Second here is my solution for th
Hi Mat,
it looks really great so far, I especially like the idea of the scribble
area even if it does not fully work within the popup right now.
One thing I could think of for a future version - if it isn't beyond the
limits of tiddlywiki itself - would be to navigate between the suggestions
wi
47 matches
Mail list logo
