Hi Corey
> On 22 Jun 2016, at 01:42, Corey Woodworth wrote:
>
> Is there still a planned release soon?
Yes, unfortunately I missed the planned window of opportunity a few weeks ago,
and have been unusually busy with the day-job since then. I’m still hoping to
release in the next couple of wee
Is there still a planned release soon?
On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 8:14:24 AM UTC-4, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Now that the editor toolbar work is completed, I’d like to release
> TiddlyWiki 5.1.12 in the next couple of days. I’d be very grateful for help
> with testing this release; there are
Hi Chuck R,
Your tiddlers are saved, you wrote yourself, that your tiddlers were in
your tiddlywiki. You closed the browser tab, so your browser will not
know. If you like the same tiddlers shown when you open your tiddlywiki
again go to control panel, the info tab and then default tiddlers.
BUG: on Windows with Firefox 46.
I'm editing a local HTML file and testing the prerelease of TW5.1.12. I add
2 tiddlers of the markdown type, I edit them, save them, then save the HTML
file. I close that browser tab and open up the TW 5.1.12 again, and the new
tiddlers that were open are no lo
The new CtrlPanel setting to "Choose whether to link to tiddlers that do
not exist yet"
ought not be headlined "WikiLinks" because it is unclear (compare eg to the
more descriptive heading "Camel Case Wiki Links").
Instead I propose the more descriptive heading "Missing Links"
(incidentally same
Hello Mario and Jeremy,
I was not talking about going to one of the alternatives, but rolling back to
the previous default behavior.
About the new features, how hard would be to allow text snippets have
placeholders for default information? In my plugin it was possible using a
regular expres
Jeremy
The link from
http://tiddlywiki.com/prerelease/#%22Dull%20Roar%22%20by%20Jim%20Lehmer is
broken
Josiah
On Saturday, 23 April 2016 14:14:24 UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Now that the editor toolbar work is completed, I’d like to release
> TiddlyWiki 5.1.12 in the next couple of days.
On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:05:36 AM UTC+2, PMario wrote:
>
> I'm also not a fan of the search popup. Actually I don't want to have any
> popups and / or modal dialogs. eg: tags. IMO TW has a better way to deal
> with this. ... But that's my very opinionated point of view, which won't
> work fo
Hi Danielo,
I'm also not a fan of the search popup. Actually I don't want to have any
popups and / or modal dialogs. eg: tags. IMO TW has a better way to deal
with this. ... But that's my very opinionated point of view, which won't
work for everyone.
So I think the default TW experience s
Hi Danielo
> Are you going to keep the search results in a popup? Please not. It obscures
> valuable information behind it and it is specially annoying on mobile, where
> the popup disappears and you are forced to search again. I think this is a
> too polemical feature to be included as default
Are you going to keep the search results in a popup? Please not. It obscures
valuable information behind it and it is specially annoying on mobile, where
the popup disappears and you are forced to search again. I think this is a too
polemical feature to be included as default
--
You received
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 2:17:30 PM UTC+2, David Gifford wrote:
>
> Why does this thread say 'completed' when tiddlywiki.com is still 5.1.11?
>
It's a google discussion group flaw or feature, if I understand; Anyone can
flag a thread as Completed at anytime (supposedly when he or she feels th
Why does this thread say 'completed' when tiddlywiki.com is still 5.1.11?
Dave
On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 7:14:24 AM UTC-5, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Now that the editor toolbar work is completed, I’d like to release
> TiddlyWiki 5.1.12 in the next couple of days. I’d be very grateful for hel
Hi WiM
> -great upgrade!
Thank you! It's a shame that it's taken so long to get it released, but that's
the price we pay for making such substantial changes that affect so many users
at this point in the project lifetime.
> -somehow that the preview-type button is not included in the editors
Hi Jeremy,
When I downloaded the pre-release today. I noticed 3 things
-great upgrade!
-somehow that the preview-type button is not included in the editors
button-bar in the empty.html . According to configuration setting (chevron
pointing downwards is checked) it should be visible. The previe
Le lundi 9 mai 2016 18:39:31 UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston a écrit :
>
> Hi Mark
>
> On 9 May 2016, at 10:07, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki <
> tiddl...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, you can not scroll the preview side of the screen. This
> means that the preview and edit areas can be far apart
Hi Mark
> On 9 May 2016, at 10:07, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, you can not scroll the preview side of the screen. This means
> that the preview and edit areas can be far apart, and impossible to line up.
> This means you end up going back and forth while editing. If y
If it's not too late to make a suggestion.
Currently you can set the height of the edit side of the screen, and turn
it into a scrollable area. Great!
Unfortunately, you can not scroll the preview side of the screen. This
means that the preview and edit areas can be far apart, and impossible to
I have still been trying to figure out why undo was acting strange and I am
so close. I think that the functionality was all there. It is just a matter
of doing something like the following, but I can't quite figure it out how
to capture the text of the hidden dummy iframe after the undo but not
Hi Rustem
The editor should work with custom palettes because that was a bug I fixed a
few weeks ago. Perhaps there's been a regression; I'll investigate.
Best wishes
Jeremy
--
Jeremy Ruston
jer...@jermolene.com
http://jermolene.com
> On 7 May 2016, at 18:04, Rustem <8pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Tobias
> At first I was a little skeptical reading "editor toolbar", that I would not
> necessarily want to see such a thing in the core, but now that I'm playing
> with it, I believe there's some major productivity enhancements in store, if
> only for the editing shortcuts. I assume it woul
> Hard line breaks in the new wikitext edit tools?
There's no shortcut for entering hard line breaks at the moment.
Best wishes
Jeremy
>
> Alex
>
>> On 8 May 2016 at 07:37, Tobias Beer wrote:
>> Hi Jeremy,
>>
>> Congratulations, this looks really good. Will do some more testing.
>>
>> At f
Jeremy,
Hard line breaks in the new wikitext edit tools?
Alex
On 8 May 2016 at 07:37, Tobias Beer wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Congratulations, this looks really good. Will do some more testing.
>
> At first I was a little skeptical reading "editor toolbar", that I would
> not necessarily want to s
Hi Jeremy,
Congratulations, this looks really good. Will do some more testing.
At first I was a little skeptical reading "editor toolbar", that I would
not necessarily want to see such a thing in the core, but now that I'm
playing with it, I believe there's some major productivity enhancements
I use a theme that is not white (Solar Flare), and a bigger font in the
editor. In my opinioin, the new editor needs the following before it’s
released: a possibility of styling it, and an opt-out switch that reverts
to the old plain textarea editor.
I looked briefly at the code. Maybe I mis
I know 5.1.12 is about to be released without undo but I still think it
would be nice to have undo and redo buttons included. I think that the
functionality was all there. It is just a matter of doing something like
the following, can't quite figure it out how to capture the text of the
hidden dumm
I noticed that if you use the macro for excision, that the "transcluded"
text does not include images and leaves out formatting. If you do a plain
transclusion with curly brackets, it does include images. It seems to me
that the macro should do a real transclusion so you you can see what you're
Hi Devin
> On 4 May 2016, at 18:18, Devin Weaver wrote:
>
> Is this a call for new bug fixes or only bug introduced in the recent future?
> I ask based on this pull request I just submitted last night:
> https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/pull/2420
I was particularly interested in bugs
Is this a call for new bug fixes or only bug introduced in the recent
future? I ask based on this pull request I just submitted last night:
https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/pull/2420
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To uns
Apropos the Markdown toolbar, I just stumbled over this that may serve as
inspiration to use it;
http://mediatemple.net/blog/tips/you-should-probably-blog-in-markdown/
<:-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from thi
>
> Warning: avoid using any of the characters | [ ] { } " ' in tiddler titles
>
'Single' and "double" quotes are not sanctioned? ... COME on ... that's
NORMAL language use. Don't mess with it.
J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group
J.
Small point.
If you try looking at the MODALS DEMO under zoomin it is obscured by any
other tiddler open. (on firefox 45.0.2)
J.
On Saturday, 23 April 2016 14:14:24 UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Now that the editor toolbar work is completed, I’d like to release
> TiddlyWiki 5.1.12 in th
Ok, then. I said it just in case.
P.-
El jueves, 28 de abril de 2016, 9:45:52 (UTC+2), Jeremy Ruston escribió:
>
> Hi Pau
>
> There are some strange shortcut behaviours of text editors on Firefox
> 45.0.2
>
>
> The behaviour you describe is intentional: the list-number and list-bullet
> toolbar
Hi Pau
> There are some strange shortcut behaviours of text editors on Firefox 45.0.2
The behaviour you describe is intentional: the list-number and list-bullet
toolbar buttons work on the top level only.
I did investigate trying to make it possible for the toolbar buttons to make
arbitrary ad
There are some strange shortcut behaviours of text editors on Firefox 45.0.2
Both bulleted and numbered lists behave weirdly when handled by shortcuts:
Ctrl-L and Ctrl-N work only at the first level. Trying to nest the items by
composing Ctrl-L or Ctrl-N twice toggles on and off the first item
Hi Jeremy,
Yes indeed , the editor looks and feels really good
One of the things it does is to encourage experimentation right away in the
edit template. With the preview page, I think that seeing the
transformation happen instantly is one of the features that makes TW so
addictive.
For the futu
> Wow, the editor looks perfect to me. This will increase the usability of tw a
> lot.
Thanks Bo, much appreciated.
Best wishes
Jeremy
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop rec
Am Samstag, 23. April 2016 14:14:24 UTC+2 schrieb Jeremy Ruston:
>
> Now that the editor toolbar work is completed, I’d like to release
> TiddlyWiki 5.1.12 in the next couple of days. I’d be very grateful for help
> with testing this release; there are a lot of changes this time around
> which
Wow, the editor looks perfect to me. This will increase the usability of tw
a lot.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googleg
I've now seen the shortcut editor. It's just great.
Regarding translation plugin, I just have a doubt. I see the new
translatable strings on the translators edition. Ok so far, but:
The already translated strings belong to the existing 5.1.11 version, which
I have already revised for version 5
Hi Pau
> a) Ctrl-P shortcut toggles off the preview only. When trying to toggle the
> preview back, the shortcut collides with with the system shortcut, opening
> the print dialog. Would it be possible to make it e.g. Ctrl-Mays-P? Any
> possibility to customise the shortcuts in the editor to be
Hi!
I'm very excited about it. I'm setting up my professional project site with
TW5 and the editor toolbar gives my ~~illiterate~~ windowsofficed
collaborators a more familiar approach.
A quick test tells me drool over some of the enhancements, like the snippet
tool, the preview dropdown, but,
Hi Stephen
> I think you’ll find that after changing the palette you need to cancel and
> re-edit tiddlers to make the editor update to the new palette. The issue is
> that the textarea in the editor is embedded in an iframe in order to allow us
> to preserve the selection, but a side effect is
Hi Devin
> I have released my personal blog site with the pre-release version. I haven't
> noticed any problems yet. If anyone is interested in checking it out feel
> free: https://tritarget.org/
Great to see your site; I’ve added it as an example:
https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/comm
I have released my personal blog site with the pre-release version. I
haven't noticed any problems yet. If anyone is interested in checking it
out feel free: https://tritarget.org/
Figured a *looks good to me* account of things would be helpful.
--
You received this message because you are sub
Jeremy,
The undo/redo buttons *do* work in Firefox if you install the CodeMirror
> plugin.
>
Thanks for info.
>>due to, different browsers so it would be good with a general "if browser
> X then..." kind of command.
>
> but as usual I’m reluctant to spend too much time working around browser
Hi Xavier
> I'm eager to present TW5 to new people who expect that text editors feature
> toolbars!
Ha! Great, we’ll look forward to hearing how you get on.
> I noticed one confusing thing though: the stamp button appears in the toolbar
> when editing a new Markdown tiddler.
Yes; although the
> I’ll investigate hiding the buttons in the specific case of running on
> Firefox with no CodeMirror plugin, but as usual I’m reluctant to spend too
> much time working around browser oddities.
I’ve ended up adding a warning alert when attempting to use the undo/redo
buttons in Firefox:
http
Hi Stephen
> I use very dark themes and palettes with my Tiddlywikis. In the previous
> pre-release I could style the editor but this one I seem to get glaring white
> with black characters no matter what I do. Perhaps it is something very
> simple but I'm missing it.
I think you’ll find that
Hi Mat
> In deed unfortunate.
> I'm thinking that those buttons would then better not show up in FF. If not
> for this release then for the next,
> There are additional such differences in TW between, and
The undo/redo buttons *do* work in Firefox if you install the CodeMirror
plugin. Incident
>
> Mark S has pointed out that the Undo/Redo arrows don't work in Firefox or
> Firefox derivatives. Unfortunately, Mark, that is the Firefox design and
> not a mistake in Tiddlywiki.
>
In deed unfortunate.
I'm thinking that those buttons would then better not show up in FF. If not
for this r
I use very dark themes and palettes with my Tiddlywikis. In the previous
pre-release I could style the editor but this one I seem to get glaring
white with black characters no matter what I do. Perhaps it is something
very simple but I'm missing it.
Mark S has pointed out that the Undo/Redo arr
Let me revise that, since I was using Pale Moon instead of FF.
On FF 43.0.1 the arrows don't seem to do anything, but at least don't give
the NS error. Maybe they work in other browsers so they're worth having
around.
Mark
On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 4:39:30 PM UTC-7, Mark S. wrote:
>
> The
The NS_ERROR_FAILURE seems to still be there with the undo buttons. Might
be better to not have the buttons than to have the error box.
Mark
On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 5:14:24 AM UTC-7, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Now that the editor toolbar work is completed, I’d like to release
> TiddlyWiki
Hi Jeremy,
I'm eager to present TW5 to new people who expect that text editors feature
toolbars!
I noticed one confusing thing though: the *stamp* button appears in the
toolbar when editing a new Markdown tiddler.
By the way, I'm a bit concerned that Markdown might become the default type
for cr
The toolbar is a very nice addition; makes many of my bookmarklets
superfluous ;-)
The adjusted Dutch translation for TW5.1.12 can be found at
http://tw5dutch.tiddlyspot.com/
Cheers,
Ton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsu
Very cool!
That color picker would be handy for the color field in edit template,
where you want to have a list of recent colors used for tag backgrounds.
And if it would not delete this info on closing the file, even better.
Would make it easier to use colors to distinguish types of tags.
Dav
Very exciting!
IMO it makes sense to include links to
http://www.slant.co/topics/1491/viewpoints/6/~single-user-wiki~tiddlywiki
maybe http://www.wikimatrix.org/show/TiddlyWiki
and I just found this
http://7kfinancial.com/business/top-6-wiki-software-to-keep-yourself-organized-2201
<:-)
--
Y
58 matches
Mail list logo
