Hi Dave,
I think, in general, other than for showcasing purposes — but even for
that, too — embedding one TiddlyWiki in another ain't a great idea...
printing issues being just one aspect. Better use a hub or shared menu
so as to quickly switch contents. If you want an independent menu accross
Hi Rich
Yeah I knew there would be no way to access the data from my central TW.
But since you can click links and open tag pills, I thought there might be
a way to click a button in a tiddler in the viewed file, and have it
execute an action of grab permalink, and open it in new tab.
Does the
From what I understand the TW Aggregator gets bigger, but it only takes
data like the title, creation date and creator from each tiddler so it
shouldn't get too much larger unless you have a huge number of tiddlers in
it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
When you use _canonical_uri you are including the entire X or Y.
So if it is an image you get the whole image.
If it is a website you get the website the way it is designed, some
dynamically load, TW HTML loads in the entirety.
So if you take 5 TW's and put them all inside a TW using
Thanks Rich.
But, just making sure, the canonical_uri and the objectframe only add the
TW file *while the tiddler is open*, and it disappears when the tiddler is
closed, right? So if I had a dozen object frames to one site each, but only
opened one at a time, I would not be using 12x the
I do believe that canonical_uri loads only when you go to that tiddler.
So if you open one at a time then it loads that data one at a time.
What I don't know is if you then reload after you close the Tiddler or if
that is buffered or cached?
Again I know how it works just have not tested to see
Dave,
do we take it that you are back
Alex
On 24 February 2015 at 19:06, RichShumaker richshuma...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been off the boards for a bit as you can tell because I am just now
responding to this ;)
Thanks Dave for the kind words as I do live backwards, #heheh, and yes
Rich,
That sounds awesome. It sounds like taking the philosophy of tiddlers and
applying to wikis themselves where you can have a wiki focused on a very
specific subject that is connected to other wikis forming a broader
knowledge base. This could greatly simplify sharing large groups of
@Alex, not really, unfortunately! But when I get an idea that will help me
with my goals I will share it and/or ask for help/feedback.
@Jed: A knowledge base using a central TW linking to other more specific
TWs is something I have been doing a long time, at recursos.giffmex.org in
Spanish. But
Hi Andrew
1. Oh, so you are the one who created this thing that took up my Saturday,
not Rich! :-) Great work!
2. Yes I realize it is an iframe type of animal, not an includeplugin type
of animal. Nevertheless, with certain restrictions, the way I have it set
up it can be used to access numerous
I have been off the boards for a bit as you can tell because I am just now
responding to this ;)
Thanks Dave for the kind words as I do live backwards, #heheh, and yes
good-natured joke back at you.
I have always enjoyed the stuff you do so keep up the great work.
Now my TW of TW's
For
3. There is no way to permalink a tiddler from the Psalms file while
viewing from the Infinitiddly file. The Infinitiddly file is what stays in
the browser address bar.
I don't think there is anything you can do as you are not actually viewing
the real TW file you are viewing a
Bump.
Hi guys, I always forget not to post on weekends. I never get any feedback
from anyone when I do. Or maybe people were uncomfortable and didn't
understand that my comments about Rich were a good-natured joke, given that
his object frame inspired me to use most of my Saturday playing
If you revisit the page where Rich links to my page you'll find that the object
viewer pretty much does exactly the same thing that native external image
viewer does with _canonical_uri field. The only reason I created my object
viewer was so that I could display pdf files. Since my company
14 matches
Mail list logo
