On 1/16/13 6:56 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote:
> The two major sponsors of the TigerVNC project are Cendio and Red Hat,
> and we both are focusing on Linux, so it's quite natural that we favour
> build systems that works good on Linux.
>
> Few if any people have the resources to test things on more than
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, DRC wrote:
My suggestion is therefore that we start recommending building FLTK with
Autotools instead. Ok with everyone?
No. Again, goes back to the "eat your own dog food" thing. If
you ever actually tried to build TigerVNC on a real Windows platform,
you would unders
On 1/16/13 6:08 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, DRC wrote:
>
>> On 1/16/13 3:12 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote:
>>> Sure, but we don't have the details. It's not very useful to submit a
>>> bug report that says "it fails on some machines but not mine" :-)
>>
>> Didn't I just supply the det
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, DRC wrote:
On 1/16/13 3:12 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote:
Sure, but we don't have the details. It's not very useful to submit a
bug report that says "it fails on some machines but not mine" :-)
Didn't I just supply the details? And a fix?
Yes, a fix, but I don't understand o
On 1/16/13 3:12 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote:
> Sure, but we don't have the details. It's not very useful to submit a
> bug report that says "it fails on some machines but not mine" :-)
Didn't I just supply the details? And a fix?
>> No, because this is a bug introduced by the patches that Cendio ma
On 1/7/13 4:25 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote:
(3) CMakeLists.txt in the FLTK build system needs to be patched as
follows:
Otherwise, it will try to add -lpng to all of the subsequent function
checks, which causes them to fail on some machines (including mine.)
Have you reported this to the FLTK fol
