ARIMA modeling requires a longer series.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/26/05 5:00 PM >>>
> I'm sure that this would work if I had more Ss. However, with an N
> of 1 wouldn't that leave me with 0 degrees of freedom? I'm not sure
> that's possible.
That's what I wasn't sure about. So maybe time-series
If you want to approach this using hypothesis testing, what is the null
hypothesis? No shift in preference? No systematic shift in preference? (Given
the strong initial preference, I'm not sure what a "non-systematic shift" would
look like.)
The best statistical technique might be "point and
Don,I'm no stats guru, but I'll throw this out as a way to characterize the bird's behavior with respect to probability:It seems to me that "chance" in this situation would be defined by the bird's normal feeding behavior. So, if you know how often (before your manipulation) it goes to the right fi
I'm sure that this would work if I had more Ss. However, with an N
of 1 wouldn't that leave me with 0 degrees of freedom? I'm not sure
that's possible.
That's what I wasn't sure about. So maybe time-series analysis, which
SAS does in PROC ARIMA?
--David
---
You are currently subscribed to tip
Thanks David,
I'm sure that this would work if I had more Ss. However, with an N of 1
wouldn't that leave me with 0 degrees of freedom? I'm not sure that's
possible.
-D.
David Epstein said:
> Normally I don't like "top posting" (leaving several screensful of
> quoted material at the bottom of on
Normally I don't like "top posting" (leaving several screensful of
quoted material at the bottom of one's post), but it seems expedient
here.
You've got repeated measures on a binary dependent variable, and what
that suggests to me is that you want to use either a GEE (generalized
estimating equa
Hi Tipsters-
I need some advice on the best statistic to use. I'm doing some work
that's outside of my normal area. I'm collaborating with a colleague in
the Biology department and we're investigating learning in Raptors. In
particular, red-tailed hawks. So far we have preliminary data on only one
Apologies to the list re your receipt of the private message below
directed to Bill Southerly.
SHC
>>><<
"If you're going through hell, keep going."
- Winston Churchill
Stanley H. Cohen, PhD
Professor
Faculty Senate Chair, 2002-2003
Department of
Hi Bill. Quick question very unrelated to TIPS. I recently heard that
Gandolf's (restaurant) had a fire and closed last fall. Do you know its
current status? The website hasn't been updated recently. Any rumors
about its reincarnation?
Best,
Stan
>>><<
"If you're going throug
Just a reminder that if you wish to change your TIPS email status go to the
following website:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=engl
ish
Bill
Bill Southerly
Department of Psychology
Frostburg State University
Frostburg, MD 21532
301-687-4778
[EMAIL PROTECT
Bill,
I just got the following from you. What does it mean?
Bob
On 26 May, 2005, at 14:01, Bill Hill wrote:
set tips nomail
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
You are currently subscribed to tip
set tips nomail
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Thanks for the link.
APA has been clueless for the last decade, and lost me a while ago.
Especially when it became more of a socio-political group.
Yeah, they lost their focus all right...
Dr Jim Guinee
Ex-APA Member
-
I am not familiar with the research saying they don't do better on makeup
exams. I give make-ups for all chapter exams (on 2-3 chapters each).
In my experience, some students do no better or, rarely, they do worse, but
most do improve, with some doing dramatically better, up to 20 points
h
14 matches
Mail list logo
