Re: More on Mirecki

2005-12-09 Thread sblack
On 9 Dec 2005 at 12:46, Christopher D. Green wrote: > > Technically, this is not what "fundamentalism" means. Instead, it has to do > with accepting a series of publications from early in the 20th century > collectively titled, "The Fundamentals" Hey, we could look it up in Wikipedia. What a

Re: More on Mirecki

2005-12-09 Thread Christopher D. Green
p, but in one of the earlier posts, the beaters-of-Mirecki were referred to as "students." They almost surely were not. He described them as men "in their 30s or 40s." -----Original Message- From: Stephen Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005

RE: More on Mirecki

2005-12-09 Thread Marc Carter
> From: Stephen Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:22 AM > To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences > Subject: RE: More on Mirecki > > On 8 Dec 2005 at 12:40, Paul Smith wrote: > > > > I also notice that respect among fundamenta

RE: More on Mirecki

2005-12-09 Thread Stephen Black
On 8 Dec 2005 at 12:40, Paul Smith wrote: > > I also notice that respect among fundamentalists for conservation > of the environment seems to have grown recently from an odd > story in the NYTimes to a genuine > phenomenon. There is, it seems, more here than meets the eye. > According to Bill

RE: More on Mirecki

2005-12-08 Thread Paul Smith
Scott Lilienfeld wrote: > Paul: Perhaps, but referring to fundamentalist Christians "fundies" is > not exactly respectful to students of that religious persuasion. But...but...um... Well, yes, that's correct. Mirecki was wrong to do that. So there. ;) I just read Jimmy Carter's latest book,

Re: More on Mirecki

2005-12-08 Thread Scott Lilienfeld
Paul: Perhaps, but referring to fundamentalist Christians "fundies" is not exactly respectful to students of that religious persuasion. ...Scott Paul Smith wrote: Paul Brandon wrote: Actually it sounds like a bit of both, as well as a reminder that one must assume that anyth

RE: More on Mirecki

2005-12-08 Thread Paul Smith
Paul Brandon wrote: > Actually it sounds like a bit of both, as well as a reminder that one > must assume that anything posted on the Internet (even email) is a > public statement (including postings to TIPS ;-). Well, true, though we should also be reminded that the bias that Mirecki reveale

RE: More on Mirecki

2005-12-08 Thread Paul Brandon
Title: RE: More on Mirecki At 6:47 AM -0600 12/8/05, Paul Smith wrote: Christopher D. Green wrote: > I have it on good authority from a professor at Kansas that Paul > Mirecki, the professor who was beat up on a rural road for making some > disparaging remarks about supporters of ID

RE: More on Mirecki

2005-12-08 Thread Paul Smith
Christopher D. Green wrote: > I have it on good authority from a professor at Kansas that Paul > Mirecki, the professor who was beat up on a rural road for making some > disparaging remarks about supporters of ID, has now resigned as chair of > religious studies. The Kansas City Star is repo