David wrote:
> Since Miguel specifically mentioned my signature file, I thought I would
> explain my logic. My knowledge of the copyright laws is a bit out of
> date; so, some of the logic might be based on assumptions that have
> changed because of court rulings.
>
> 1. Something which made
Since Miguel specifically mentioned my signature file, I thought I would
explain my logic. My knowledge of the copyright laws is a bit out of
date; so, some of the logic might be based on assumptions that have
changed because of court rulings.
1. Something which made available to the public i
Stephen Black wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Bill Southerly wrote:
>
> > I think Rick's excellent summary reflects closely my own
> > thoughts. Whether it is legal to forward someone's message
> > to TIPS without their permission, I believe is still open to
>
At 10:47 PM 1/17/01 -0500, you wrote:
>So I would suggest that seeking permission to use a post is at this time the
>most defensible approach.
I guess I'll stick to the old "ask for permission policy" if I want to forward
a TIPS message, except for Stephen's--and I know I'll be using a few of his
David wrote:
> Has it slipped people's minds that TIPS is fully, publicly archived?
> See http://www.mail-archive.com/tips@fre.fsu.umd.edu
Not at all--but being publicly _archived_ isn't the same as being in the
public domain.
For example, if I write an article for a jou
: 757.825.3807
-Original Message-
From: Bill Southerly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:47 PM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Policy to forward TIPS posts?
TIPSters,
I think Rick's excellent summary reflects closely my own thoughts. Whether
it is
leg
Has it slipped people's minds that TIPS is fully, publicly archived?
See http://www.mail-archive.com/tips@fre.fsu.umd.edu
--David Epstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Bill Southerly wrote:
> I think Rick's excellent summary reflects closely my own
> thoughts. Whether it is legal to forward someone's message
> to TIPS without their permission, I believe is still open to
> interpretation from the various
TIPSters,
I think Rick's excellent summary reflects closely my own thoughts. Whether it is
legal to forward someone's message to TIPS without their permission, I believe is
still open to interpretation from the various rulings I have read. This is
particularly true since TIPS messages may be con
>From what I've seen of the posts so far (Miguel Roig, Gary
Klatsky, and Rick Adams, everyone has good points, although
they're not entirely compatible.
So I think we've gotta decide for ourselves what we want. For
myself, I'm happy when anyone uses my posts in whatever way
they like, intact, edi
Gary wrote:
> My 2 cents is that since TIPs is essentially a public discussion forum,
> there should be no restrictions on distributing the posts. If the
> group was closed and our discussions reflected the limitations of the
> membership then I would want approval to distribute my commen
Message-
From: Miguel Roig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 2:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Policy to forward TIPS posts?
At 12:29 AM 1/16/01 -0500, you wrote:
Tipsters, on occasion I forward TIPS posts to students or others who might
be
interested
At 12:29 AM 1/16/01 -0500, you wrote:
Tipsters, on occasion I forward TIPS posts to students or others who might be
interested in the contents of the post. Typically, I ask the author of the
post for permission to forward the material. Lately, however, I was thinking
of routinely forwarding rel
13 matches
Mail list logo
