It is not the first time homosexuality was portrayed by the villain (the
assassins in Diamonds are Forever are). I guess I just find it odd that anyone
could take anything seriously from the films. I mean there have been so many
different villains over the years with all kinds of issues.
Deb
De
I guess I wasn't paying as close attention to the dialogue as others were.
That is indeed a more positive dialogue than one would expect from the history
of the Bond films. I recall that in the first Bond film starring Daniel Craig
there was actually a scene in which Bond and one of his "girls
I don't know what Maslow would say. I was told by, I think a reliable
source, that when Maslow was President of APA that he came to the Board
meetings, but was so terrified that he refused to leave his hotel room and
someone else had to conduct the meeting. I also seem to recall that he did
not giv
Yes, you are right Mike; thanks for add the complete reference. And thank
you for your input that I also share.
This is a wonderful passage and very important even in political and
historical perspectives;
Thanks
My best, Jose
_
Jose Ferreira-Alves
School of Psycholog
In the text that Jose quotes below, he does not provide a reference.
I assume that he is quoting one of the following:
(1) Frick, W. B. (1971). Humanistic psychology: Interviews with Maslow,
Murphy, and Rogers. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
or
(2) Frick, W. B. (2000). Remembering Maslow: Re
Marie
I agree. While Michael's point is well taken, I also was pleasantly surprised
by the remark made by Bond in response. It certainly implied a prior homosexual
encounter, but even if only masculine posturing, it certainly did not fit the
more expected disgust or aggressive reaction. One migh
I actually thought that scene was noteworthy for Bond's reactions to the
villains overture (the villain strokes Bond's scars in a - shall we say -
erotized way). Bond says something to the effect of "why do you think you'd be
my first". In other words, the tough and masculine Bond does not shy f
I heard there was a little controversy surrounding the villain in the latest
Bond film. Well I finally saw the film and I guess I can see why. At one
point when the bad guy (who clearly is "not right in the head") has captured
Bond and has him tied up there is an implication that the villain i
I found a deep interesting passage about this issue by the words of Maslow
himself; I just take a small portion but the entire interview is compulsory
to those to want to answer the question Annete raised. Apologize for the
extension but it is a really interesting passage for me.
"Frick: Dr. Maslo
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:24:20 -0800, Annette Taylor wrote:
[snip]
[A colleague asked Annette:]
Would you mind posting to the board this question: "Does Maslow believe he
was
self-actualized? Can you provide a scholarly reference for the answer?"
---
Since I al
Blesséd be Wikipedia.
Chris
---
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada
chri...@yorku.ca
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/
=
On 2012-12-12, at 11:53 AM, Jim Clark wrote:
> Hi
>
> I forgot the link:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org
Hi
I forgot the link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Charles_Darwin
Jim
James M. Clark
Professor & Chair of Psychology
j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca
Room 4L41A
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
Dept of Psychology, U of Winnipeg
515 Portage Ave, Winnipeg, MB
R3B 0R4 CANADA
>>> "Mike Pali
Hi
The Wikipedia entry has a number of quotes from Darwin, which suggest some
worthwhile readings. The site makes the important point that the original
posthumous publication of Darwin's autobiography was "cleansed" of references
to Christianity by his wife, but the passages were included in a
In the search I've made I found the following paper: REMEMBERING MASLOW:
REFLECTIONS ON A 1968 INTERVIEW.
The abstract made me think that perhaps this paper could say something about
the topic; however as my university has not this title I could not access
the article.
The abstract is the following
Good 12/12/12 to you all.
My colleague, who is not on teaching lists, but knows that I am, asked me to
post this question: (Frankly, I could not help!) Also this is a cross-posting
so please delete if you've already read it on that other list.
-
I have a quest
This is what I was thinking as well. We can't see into Darwin's heart, as it
were. My impression, from lots of reading I've done about Darwin (including the
Browne biography Louis recommended) is that he was never a deep believer in
conventional Anglican theology. His discoveries in South Americ
I assume that the guesses about what Darwin was thinking will continue to
evolve.
On Dec 12, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Louis E. Schmier wrote:
> I'm not sure you would call Darwin's change of religious attitude a "crisis
> of faith." Though he denied "revelation," an atheist he never became.
> Denyin
I'm not sure you would call Darwin's change of religious attitude a "crisis of
faith." Though he denied "revelation," an atheist he never became. Denying
Divine revelation and involement, but as a "first cause," he was closer to
being a deist or theist, maybe an agnostic. Since I haven't been
I would appreciate suggestions for readings on how Darwin dealt
with the issues of reconciling his religious faith with the implications
of his scientific observations and explanations. And what can be
said about his final position. TIA.
-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu
---
You are
Gibson and Walk visual cliff research demonstrated the
possibility that visual depth perception and its parameters
could be inborn: babies would not crawl across the apparatus
to the awaiting arms of their moms.However,recent observations
that babies as young as 4 weeks old can be taught to swima
20 matches
Mail list logo
