Don't miss the link to the apparent self-plagiarism database drawn from Medline
http://spore.vbi.vt.edu/dejavu/
It is astonishing the amount of this that appears to have been happening over
the years.
A student of mine came across a case essentially similar to those in that
database when he
Hi
One issue I would have with the article is the mention of 79,000 PAIRS of
articles with duplicate text, which gives an impression that appears to be
wildly out of line with the demonstrated instances of duplicate publication. I
think the large number is a product of at least two factors:
(I don’t mean that he is good at it, just that he knows a lot about it.)
lol. That's funny. Especially since it kinda imply that he couldn't
actually apply the knowledge.
--Mike
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Rick Froman rfro...@jbu.edu wrote:
I have to disagree with Miguel here... agree with Barbato. I have spent the
last decade researching a single paradigm and plan to do so until I retire
probably. It has taken me years to phrase some of the basics in the most clear
way so that others can understand what I mean. I don't want to
I agree with Annette. There are good and better ways to write a succinct
explanation of the concept of contrast effects in sensory research. Once I had
invested a great deal of time crafting what I thought was the best sentence,
why would I change it just to avoid plagiarizing myself? I would
I am somewhere between the two, also.
I have seen cases of self-plagiarism which I find objectionable.
Typically, they have involved a cut-and-paste from one type of
publication (e.g., a Psych Review article) to a completely
different type of publication (e.g., a sophomore textbook). The
rfro...@jbu.edu
(479)524-7295
http://tinyurl.com/DrFroman
From: Steven Specht [mailto:sspe...@utica.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:20 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Self-plagiarism
I agree with Annette. There are good and better ways
. University Siloam Springs, AR 72761
rfro...@jbu.edu
(479)524-7295
http://tinyurl.com/DrFroman
From: Steven Specht [mailto:sspe...@utica.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:20 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Self-plagiarism
I agree
or playing.
To him - he is always doing both.
- Zen Buddhist text
(slightly modified)
-Original Message-
From: Jim Clark [mailto:j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 1:31 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] Self-plagiarism
Hi
Scott O. Lilienfeld notes:
*At the very least, I think, we need a different term, as self-plagiarism
strikes me as an oxymoron. Plagiarism by definition (at least all
definitions I've ever seen and can locate) means appropriating others' work
without attribution.*
The APA code of ethics refers
I agree with Annette here. Plagiarism has slightly different meanings in
different disciplinary contexts (because we chiefly concerned with the
originality of different aspects of the writing in different
disciplines). In the context of a primary report of a new scientific
study, plagiarism
The question of the appropriateness of publishing an article in part or in
whole that is identical to a previously published one boils down to whether the
reader and, therefore, the editor is clearly informed about the nature of the
duplication, particularly duplication involving data. Yes,
I'm pleased to have a term for the occasional (well, we hope it's
occasional) practice of handing in the same paper for another course.
My favorite example of this is when a student handed in a paper with
plagiarism from some website sources. He was irate at the F I gave him, and
told me, The
13 matches
Mail list logo
