On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 11:20:40 am Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> If you are already paying the price of the asymmetric crypto (in terms
> of flash usage/CPU speed/RAM utilization then just switch to a raw
> public key or a certificate based ciphersuite (since there is very
> little additional over
My 5 cents.
For the IoT environment this ciphersuite is not very useful.
If you want the best possible performance, lowest RAM utilization and
use as little flash as possible then you go for a plain PSK ciphersuite
(without DH/ECDHE).
If you are already paying the price of the asymmetric crypto
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 08:17 -0700, Sean Turner wrote:
> All,
>
> draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead includes some cipher suites that
> are needed for TLS1.3. We need to get these officially registered so
> the chairs would like to hear whether there is WG support for
> adopting draft-mattsson-tls-
to limit ECDHE_PSK to CBC.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andrei
>
> -Original Message-
> From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sean Turner
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 8:22 AM
> To: tls
> Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for WG adoption of draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk
Just to make note on-list, I support adoption of the draft. I've already cited
it in the current TLS 1.3 draft as a normative reference, and thus consider it
required for completion of the new version.
One objection to part of the current draft, though, which I think needs
changing. It currentl
I support adoption of this draft. No reason to limit ECDHE_PSK to CBC.
Cheers,
Andrei
-Original Message-
From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sean Turner
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 8:22 AM
To: tls
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for WG adoption of draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe
sigh and here as well - they should have been 20160510.
spt
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 08:17, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> All,
>
> draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead includes some cipher suites that are needed
> for TLS1.3. We need to get these officially registered so the chairs would
> like to hear
All,
draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead includes some cipher suites that are needed
for TLS1.3. We need to get these officially registered so the chairs would
like to hear whether there is WG support for adopting
draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead. Please let us know whether you:
- Support adop
