Hi,
>>Will anyone care if we stop getting Tomcat 3, 4, and Watchdog bug
>>reports emailed to this list, and start getting Tomcat 5 bug reports?
>>
>>Assuming everyone concurs on the above, whom do I ask?
Infrastructure?
>>
>>
>+1. I don't see much use
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Will anyone care if we stop getting Tomcat 3, 4, and Watchdog bug
reports emailed to this list, and start getting Tomcat 5 bug reports?
Assuming everyone concurs on the above, whom do I ask? Infrastructure?
+1. I don't see much use for these lists, so is a TC 5
Hi,
Will anyone care if we stop getting Tomcat 3, 4, and Watchdog bug
reports emailed to this list, and start getting Tomcat 5 bug reports?
Assuming everyone concurs on the above, whom do I ask? Infrastructure?
Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
This e-mail, including any attachments
Hi,
I am doing research on the bug reports in Bugzilla.
Would someone like to tell me that why I can't find the bug reports for tomcat
4.0.5 in bugzilla report system for Apache? If it is possible, where can I
find them?
Thanks,
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...now go to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
Also tomcat 3...
Pier
...now go to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
-jon
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, let me say that I'd like to read the bugs state in this mailing list.
Since there seem to be mutual agreement (I've seen more than 3 +1 and no -1,
I'm going ahead and make changes)
> Tomcat-dev is a team developpement mailing-list, and for people s
>Well... At the beginning bugs were sent here, then on this mailing list
>people complained because of it, so we assigned them to
>individuals, now
>people complain of the contrary...
I'll never understand humans (Mr Spock 27500 AC)
Ok, let me say that I'd like to read the bugs state in
this ma
"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's never been "changed" ... even in the previous installation of
> Bugzilla (that led to the first hack on Apache's web site), there were
> individual names attached to Tomcat components.
On the very first installation, the one on Daedalus, I
alls?
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> -jon
>
> Let me also point out that all of the people who are "responsible" for the
> bug reports are Sun employees.
Jon, in all the time we've known each other, I _believe_ you knew me and
WHAT are my principles... Apparently you don't... WHAT-EVER!
Pier
> Things that make you go h
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nope... Because I check the web...
>
> Pier, you missed the point. I'm trying to say that you and the person
> assigned to the emails are potential central points of failures.
Just because you don't want to click thru a couple of pages? Make me laugh
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/9/01 8:46 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> And I was flamed for setting it up that way when I installed BugZilla on
>> Nagoya...
>
> When was the decision made to change it? Was it done on this list (or
> general@jakarta) or w
)
In any case, I always thought it was pretty convenient. In fact, I originally
started looking into bugs because I would just happen to see something that I
knew about. At the time, I doubt I would have actively hit bugzilla looking for
stuff to fix. IMHO ... a) it means more eyeballs seeing the bug r
on 9/9/01 10:48 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's never been "changed" ... even in the previous installation of
> Bugzilla (that led to the first hack on Apache's web site), there were
> individual names attached to Tomcat components.
Not according to Pier's posting:
>
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
> Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 21:55:42 -0700
> From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Bug reports
>
> on 9/9/01 8:46 PM, "Pier Fumagalli&q
Quoting Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> on 9/9/01 9:17 PM, "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If people can't abide by majority votes and want to bitch and moan
> after the
> > fact, then you have my permission to bitchslap them ;-)
>
> I agree, but I don't remember seeing a
on 9/9/01 9:55 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When was the decision made to change it? Was it done on this list (or
> general@jakarta) or was it done privately behind Sun's walls?
>
> :-)
>
> -jon
Let me also point out that all of the p
on 9/9/01 9:17 PM, "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I honestly didn't intend to piss you off or start an argument. I just thought
> I'd make my own personal preference known, but it's not really an issue I'd
> argue about =)
+1
> If people can't abide by majority votes and want t
on 9/9/01 8:43 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Here is another point: What if one of you goes on vacation and forgets to
>> make the switch to assign it to someone else? The *only* thing that will
>> notify the list of the bug is th
on 9/9/01 8:46 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I was flamed for setting it up that way when I installed BugZilla on
> Nagoya...
When was the decision made to change it? Was it done on this list (or
general@jakarta) or was it done privately behind Sun's walls?
:-)
-jon
I'm sorry buddy ;-)
I don't feel terribly strongly about it, that's just my own personal take. I'm
really the new kid on the block, so I'll go along with whatever most people
want to do.
I honestly didn't intend to piss you off or start an argument. I just thought
I'd make my own personal pre
"Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I, personally, would like to see the full bug report e-mails when they are
> filed, like in the old days.
And I was flamed for setting it up that way when I installed BugZilla on
Nagoya... Now I'm flamed because of the opposite...
I'm fucking damn
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is another point: What if one of you goes on vacation and forgets to
> make the switch to assign it to someone else? The *only* thing that will
> notify the list of the bug is the weekly email. What if it is a security
> hole bug report and the week
I remember that when I set up bugzilla, most didn't want
> to see
> > them, and that's why we changed)...
>
> This is a DEVELOPERS list. The people on this list are the ones who can
> fix
> the bugs and by having the bug reports go here, people can volunteer
> more
&
that when I set up bugzilla, most didn't want to see
> them, and that's why we changed)...
This is a DEVELOPERS list. The people on this list are the ones who can fix
the bugs and by having the bug reports go here, people can volunteer more
easily to fix bugs they are interested in.
Un
I am missing something.
> -Original Message-
> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug reports
>
>
> "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> &
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/9/01 5:46 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think that new bug reports should go to the tomcat-dev
on 9/9/01 5:46 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think that new bug reports should go to the tomcat-dev mailing list. Not
>> to individuals.
>>
>> Edit compon
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that new bug reports should go to the tomcat-dev mailing list. Not
> to individuals.
>
> Edit component ... Initial owner
> Catalina[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Connectors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think that new bug reports should go to the tomcat-dev mailing list. Not
> to individuals.
We have a weekly report + anyone can browse the bugs. If you really want to
flood tomcat-dev, maybe we could also CC: tomcat-dev on each bug report ;-)
> Edit component ... Initial owner
&
I think that new bug reports should go to the tomcat-dev mailing list. Not
to individuals.
Edit component ... Initial owner
Catalina[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connectors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jasper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unknown
on 11/15/2000 11:11 PM, "Hans Bergsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon, what's the status of Scarab?
Well, yesterday we finally hired John Mcnally (he is one of the co-authors
of Turbine) to help me work on it full time. So, that is good news. He kicks
ass.
Given that I currently have been wo
Nick,
> Hans, I closed it for you. What the heck, what is BugRat doing now? It's
> been much better since Nacho and I fixed it (ie, hasn't been wedging mysql
> and sending my system spinning with a load average of, 80.69!)
>
> Now mind you, I've submitted out SQL fixes to BugRat back to Tim Endr
Hans, I closed it for you. What the heck, what is BugRat doing now? It's
been much better since Nacho and I fixed it (ie, hasn't been wedging mysql
and sending my system spinning with a load average of, 80.69!)
Now mind you, I've submitted out SQL fixes to BugRat back to Tim Endres
and he doesn'
I tried to find a way to close the following Bug Report through the
admin interface, but no matter which option I choose I only get the
admin menu:
> Bug report #380 has just been filed.
> [...]
> Synopsis:
> Sessions don't work without cookies
If someone else has more BugRat karma than I do, pl
35 matches
Mail list logo
