Hi,
>>Will anyone care if we stop getting Tomcat 3, 4, and Watchdog bug
>>reports emailed to this list, and start getting Tomcat 5 bug reports?
>>
>>Assuming everyone concurs on the above, whom do I ask?
Infrastructure?
>>
>>
>+1. I don't see much use for these lists, so is a TC 5 list actually
>
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Will anyone care if we stop getting Tomcat 3, 4, and Watchdog bug
reports emailed to this list, and start getting Tomcat 5 bug reports?
Assuming everyone concurs on the above, whom do I ask? Infrastructure?
+1. I don't see much use for these lists, so is a TC 5 list act
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, let me say that I'd like to read the bugs state in this mailing list.
Since there seem to be mutual agreement (I've seen more than 3 +1 and no -1,
I'm going ahead and make changes)
> Tomcat-dev is a team developpement mailing-list, and for people s
>Well... At the beginning bugs were sent here, then on this mailing list
>people complained because of it, so we assigned them to
>individuals, now
>people complain of the contrary...
I'll never understand humans (Mr Spock 27500 AC)
Ok, let me say that I'd like to read the bugs state in
this ma
"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's never been "changed" ... even in the previous installation of
> Bugzilla (that led to the first hack on Apache's web site), there were
> individual names attached to Tomcat components.
On the very first installation, the one on Daedalus, I
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/9/01 9:55 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> When was the decision made to change it? Was it done on this list (or
>> general@jakarta) or was it done privately behind Sun's walls?
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> -jon
>
> Let me also point out tha
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nope... Because I check the web...
>
> Pier, you missed the point. I'm trying to say that you and the person
> assigned to the emails are potential central points of failures.
Just because you don't want to click thru a couple of pages? Make me laugh
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/9/01 8:46 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> And I was flamed for setting it up that way when I installed BugZilla on
>> Nagoya...
>
> When was the decision made to change it? Was it done on this list (or
> general@jakarta) or w
Quoting Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> on 9/9/01 10:48 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Whining about practices that have been consistent (on Tomcat at least)
> for
> > a couple of years is a waste of everybody's time :-).
>
> Of course. However, I'm going on Pier'
on 9/9/01 10:48 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's never been "changed" ... even in the previous installation of
> Bugzilla (that led to the first hack on Apache's web site), there were
> individual names attached to Tomcat components.
Not according to Pier's posting:
>
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
> Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 21:55:42 -0700
> From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Bug reports
>
> on 9/9/01 8:46 PM, "Pier Fumagalli&q
Quoting Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> on 9/9/01 9:17 PM, "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If people can't abide by majority votes and want to bitch and moan
> after the
> > fact, then you have my permission to bitchslap them ;-)
>
> I agree, but I don't remember seeing a
on 9/9/01 9:55 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When was the decision made to change it? Was it done on this list (or
> general@jakarta) or was it done privately behind Sun's walls?
>
> :-)
>
> -jon
Let me also point out that all of the people who are "responsible" for the
bug re
on 9/9/01 9:17 PM, "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I honestly didn't intend to piss you off or start an argument. I just thought
> I'd make my own personal preference known, but it's not really an issue I'd
> argue about =)
+1
> If people can't abide by majority votes and want t
on 9/9/01 8:43 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Here is another point: What if one of you goes on vacation and forgets to
>> make the switch to assign it to someone else? The *only* thing that will
>> notify the list of the bug is th
on 9/9/01 8:46 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I was flamed for setting it up that way when I installed BugZilla on
> Nagoya...
When was the decision made to change it? Was it done on this list (or
general@jakarta) or was it done privately behind Sun's walls?
:-)
-jon
I'm sorry buddy ;-)
I don't feel terribly strongly about it, that's just my own personal take. I'm
really the new kid on the block, so I'll go along with whatever most people
want to do.
I honestly didn't intend to piss you off or start an argument. I just thought
I'd make my own personal pre
"Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I, personally, would like to see the full bug report e-mails when they are
> filed, like in the old days.
And I was flamed for setting it up that way when I installed BugZilla on
Nagoya... Now I'm flamed because of the opposite...
I'm fucking damn
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is another point: What if one of you goes on vacation and forgets to
> make the switch to assign it to someone else? The *only* thing that will
> notify the list of the bug is the weekly email. What if it is a security
> hole bug report and the week
I, personally, would like to see the full bug report e-mails when they are
filed, like in the old days. It can be cumbersome to hit nagoya and query for
bugs every few days just to stay current. I think that the weekly summaries are
an excellent tool and should continue coming, as it's a nice s
on 9/9/01 6:49 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I agree with you, maybe "responsible" is the wrong word... I have no
> problems in moving all emails to the list (as I get a copy of each single
> mail bugzilla sends). Sending mails to individuals IMO is better because the
> pe
I am missing something.
> -Original Message-
> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug reports
>
>
> "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> &
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/9/01 5:46 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think that new bug reports should go to the tomcat-dev mailing list. Not
>>> to individuals.
>>>
>>> Edit component ... Initial owne
on 9/9/01 5:46 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think that new bug reports should go to the tomcat-dev mailing list. Not
>> to individuals.
>>
>> Edit component ... Initial owner
>> Catalina[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Connec
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that new bug reports should go to the tomcat-dev mailing list. Not
> to individuals.
>
> Edit component ... Initial owner
> Catalina[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Connectors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Jasper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think that new bug reports should go to the tomcat-dev mailing list. Not
> to individuals.
We have a weekly report + anyone can browse the bugs. If you really want to
flood tomcat-dev, maybe we could also CC: tomcat-dev on each bug report ;-)
> Edit component ... Initial owner
> Catalina
26 matches
Mail list logo
