RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:01 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ? > > >On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >> So JkMount in Jk2 will point to NOP ? > >No, it'll be commented out ( as long

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > So JkMount in Jk2 will point to NOP ? No, it'll be commented out ( as long as we use jk in parallel with jk2 ). ( to avoid name conflicts ). When jk2 is ready and we decide it's time to stop supporting jk1, we can add back JkMount for backward compatibi

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:36 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ? > > >On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >> Any objection to see JkMount renamed to Jk2Mount in mod_jk2 >> and in gene

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Any objection to see JkMount renamed to Jk2Mount in mod_jk2 > and in general all Directive subject to collisions with the > original mod_jk... I have one :-) If we change JkMount, I would rather change it into nothing ( i.e. get rid of it ). It shoul

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

Any objection to see JkMount renamed to Jk2Mount in mod_jk2 and in general all Directive subject to collisions with the original mod_jk... The both could be installed at the same time ... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

>> No change in CVS tree, just in source to avoid conflict >> between mod_jk(s) even if one is a jk_module and the >> other jk2_module >> >> Rigth now, I'll wait for JTC developpers 'green ligth' to >> do the changes in JTC native2 ONLY :) > >Green light from me. It's an excelent idea. > >N

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >I agree with changing the names of non-statics in native2, > >but need more time to think about changing dir names. There > >are build files, cvs history, habbits that will change as well. > > No change in CVS tree, just in source to avoid conflict > b

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

>> What about renaming native2 (jk2) in JTC to mod_jk2 >> and jk2_module ? > >+1 if you talk about the binary. -0 if you talk about directory/file >names. No only source/binary, without touching anything in CVS layout. >> It will be need to rename all non static references, >> variables functio

Re: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > What about renaming native2 (jk2) in JTC to mod_jk2 > and jk2_module ? +1 if you talk about the binary. -0 if you talk about directory/file names. In mod_jk2 we already removed a lot of 'public' symbols that could conflict if both modules are loaded. I

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

>If we consider native2 as a remplacement for the native of >mod_jk, no. That is >just a new version. >If you thing of easy testing may be... I have libjk.so from >native and mod_jk.so >from native2 and I stop/start Apache for testing both. The idea is that native2 will replace more or less qui

Re: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > What about renaming native2 (jk2) in JTC to mod_jk2 > and jk2_module ? If we consider native2 as a remplacement for the native of mod_jk, no. That is just a new version. If you thing of easy testing may be... I have libjk.so from native and mod_jk.so from native2 and I sto