On Feb 5, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
1) Eclipse support (nobody has mentioned a different IDE yet)
http://subclipse.tigris.org/
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 19:16:03 -0800, Costin Manolache
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like SVN a lot - and for a new project probably I would choose it if
there is a choice - sf.net or other places are cvs only. But I don't
think all the pain for switching tomcat is justified, and switching few
Just noticed an email on commons-dev.
Subclipse doesn't support the synchonize feature yet.
Hen
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:57:35 -0500, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tool-wise, Subclipse is an Eclipse plugin that seems to work fine for
standard development (checkout, update, diff,
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
I've not heard anything about it being mandatory yet, but the numbers
speak for themselves.
It is not mandatory at this time. And won't be anytime soon.
So I assume at some point there'll be pressure to turn off the CVS server.
There is that - as
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 3:25 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List; Henri Yandell
Subject: Re: SVN migration?
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
I've not heard anything about it being mandatory yet, but the numbers
speak for themselves.
It is not mandatory
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 3:25 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List; Henri Yandell
Subject: Re: SVN migration?
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
I've not heard anything about it being mandatory yet, but the numbers
speak for themselves.
It is not mandatory
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well I'm using Eclipse and if the SVN support is not 100% supported,
I'm a little worry about switch tomcat / jasper /
jakarta-tomcat-connectors on SVN.
Yes, I'm also using Eclipse :( Whatever productivity is gained are over
CVS will probably get eaten up by less efficient tool
On Feb 4, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Whatever productivity is gained are over CVS will probably get eaten
up by less efficient tool integration for me.
Right, Ant doesn't have a svn task yet. Isn't that reason enough not to
jump ship yet?
--
Sandy McArthur
He who dares not offend
The last time I looked at the Eclipse SVN plugin it just called out to
the native svn binary to do the real work-- I wonder how well anything
but basic operations can be integrated until it is using a java svn
client. Then again, maybe that has been written since I looked at it
last. I'd be
Sandy McArthur wrote:
On Feb 4, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Whatever productivity is gained are over CVS will probably get eaten
up by less efficient tool integration for me.
Right, Ant doesn't have a svn task yet. Isn't that reason enough not to
jump ship yet?
I do all my CVS stuff
Well, numbers are statistics do speak for themself - but may tell
different things. Apache may have most projects in SVN, but the world
has most projects in cvs. And most tools (finally) have some good, first
class built-in support for CVS, most people are (finally) familiar
enough with using
Just to add, as far as I know the following are the Tomcat modules:
jakarta-servletapi/
jakarta-servletapi-4/
jakarta-servletapi-5/
jakarta-tomcat/
jakarta-tomcat-4.0/
Is this mandatory ? I suspect there'll be a lot of build
script/doc/habits/tool changes involved. CVS is working reasonably well
at the moment, and a lot of tools have (finally) very good support for it.
Costin
Henri Yandell wrote:
Just wondering if the Tomcat community have any thoughts on a
I've not heard anything about it being mandatory yet, but the numbers
speak for themselves.
The www.apache.org site has 24 coding projects. There are 22 projects
listed on the svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi page. 2 of those are dead, so
20 out of 24 ASF projects have an svn presence of some kind.
14 matches
Mail list logo
