gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13419
Weird seg fault on Mac OS X for mod_jk2 + Apache2
Summary: Weird seg fault on Mac OS X for mod_jk2 + Apache2
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.12
Platform: Macintosh
OS/Version: MacOS X
Status: NEW
Se
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12699
Only one cookie sent back to Apache2 with mod_jk2 and Tomcat4.1
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-08 13:20 ---
We have the same problem with 1.3.23 with mod_perl, mod_php, mod_proxy, and
mod_ssl.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mail
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13340
Can not access the mod_jk2 setup docs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Reso
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13340
Can not access the mod_jk2 setup docs
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-07 12:47 ---
There are no directions on how to setup Apache on how to point Apache to
Tomcat to process the servlets. there is only a limited amount of docs on
set
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13340
Can not access the mod_jk2 setup docs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
mturk 2002/10/04 09:23:42
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Uuups wrong editor :) CRLF.
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +11 -11jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache13/mod_jk2.c
Index: mod_jk2.c
mturk 2002/10/04 09:10:38
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Fix the logger.file, using ap_server_root like on Apache2.
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +14 -8 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache13/mod_jk2.c
Index: mod_jk2.c
ause I added printf
>> #6 0x0060df50 in jk2_env_createBean2 (jk_env.c:218)
>> #7 0x0061ee0c in jk2_create_config (mod_jk2.c:351)
>>
>>
>> Anyone has a clue on what could be wrong? Just pointers would help. I
>> tried following the stack trace but am temporarily thrown off
Han Ming Ong wrote:
> I added a super simple workers2.properties file in the same dir and
> tried to start apache. I got a seg fault. Here's the stacktrace from
> Mac OS X default crash logger:
>
> Command:httpd
> PID:853
>
> Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001)
> Codes: KERN_IN
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8107
uninstall mod_jk2-2.0 rpm not possible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Reso
Han Ming Ong wrote:
> Folks,
> I'm trying to trace down a TCP_NODELAY problem and wanted to see if
> it exists on the latest connector mod_jk2. So I configured Apache
> 2.0.42, Tomcat 4.1.12 and downloaded
> jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.1.12-src. I managed to use GN
Folks,
I'm trying to trace down a TCP_NODELAY problem and wanted to see if it
exists on the latest connector mod_jk2. So I configured Apache 2.0.42,
Tomcat 4.1.12 and downloaded jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.1.12-src. I
managed to use GNU's libtoolize to configure (./configu
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12750
Virtual hosts using Apache 2.0.40, Tomcat 4.1.10 and mod_jk2
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-02 20:30 ---
Can you attach the config files used ( workers2.properties, server.xml ) ?
Also - check the log/ directory for messages - it shoul
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8107
uninstall mod_jk2-2.0 rpm not possible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Connector:Coyote JK 2 |Installable Pa
Hi,
The attached patch for mod_jk2 (apache 1.3 and apache 2.0) sends a
REDIRECT_URL and a REDIRECT_QUERYSTRING header if the request inside apache
is redirected (e.g. through the use of the ErrorDocument directive). This
follows the environment variables detailed in
http://httpd.apache.org
mturk 2002/09/27 06:18:26
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Fix the compile warnings.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +2 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache13/mod_jk2.c
Index: mod_jk2.c
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13011
mod_jk2.c (CVS v 1.53) compile messages
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-26 00:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=3231)
mod_jk2.c compile messages
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-m
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13011
mod_jk2.c (CVS v 1.53) compile messages
Summary: mod_jk2.c (CVS v 1.53) compile messages
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.9
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Pr
mturk 2002/09/25 01:11:10
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Add the same uriMap parsing as on Apache2 using
hostname and port for virtual hosts.
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +26 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache13/mod_jk2.c
mturk 2002/09/25 01:04:00
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.dsp
Log:
Add two new Configurations Debug APR and Release APR,
enabling compiling using APR/APR-UTIL and JNI
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +90 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server
mturk 2002/09/24 06:27:03
Added: jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.dsp
Log:
Add mod_jk2.dsp to the repository
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache13/mod_jk2.dsp
Index: mod_jk2.dsp
mturk 2002/09/24 06:22:14
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.dsp
Log:
Use MT DLL for debug build.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.dsp
Index: mod_jk2.dsp
mturk 2002/09/23 10:41:44
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Supply the port to the uriMap call, This is TODO.
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache13/mod_jk2.c
Index: mod_jk2.c
mturk 2002/09/23 10:40:17
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Supply the hostname if not virtual and port if not default to the uriMap
Revision ChangesPath
1.53 +10 -5 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.c
Index
> -Original Message-
> From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I agree that my patch is buggy in the case of a request
> coming from 80 or 443, but if we want to support port bases V
> hosting, we need to pass it down, if not
>
> [uri:www.something.com:8080/someconte
er->port may be 0, ap_get_server_port(r) may AFAIK not.
It is probably not a good idea to use req->hostname by default either,
because it is supplied by the client. For example (with req->hostname) to
have mod_jk2 serve:
http://localhost/context/blah
and http://127.0.0.1/conte
laden.. ;)
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: 22 de septiembre de 2002 11:36
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: cvs commit:
> jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2
> mod_jk2.c
>
mturk 2002/09/22 02:35:46
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Cannot use the hostname:server_port cause the port is 0 for all
host:80 requests. Also is_virtual is used for separating default and
virtual hosts. In case of default server host the hostname provided
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 4:51 AM
>/* As per Servlet spec, do exact match first */
>match=jk2_uriMap_exactMap( env, uriMap,
> ctxEnv->exactMatch, uri, uriLen, reverse );
> -if( mat
nacho 2002/09/21 19:50:42
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriEnv.c jk_uriMap.c
jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Bug#11364 - jk2 appears to forward all virtual host requests to Tomcat
Reported by Simon Stewart
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +0 -1
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: 21 de septiembre de 2002 11:45
> +uriEnv = workerEnv->uriMap->mapUri(env, workerEnv->uriMap,
> +r->server->is_virtual ?
> r->server->server_hostname : NULL,
> +r->uri );
>
I think this
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Reso
mturk 2002/09/21 02:45:27
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Fix the uriMap for VirtualHost, providing server name for virtual
hosts. Thx. to Dimitry Letin for that.
Revision ChangesPath
1.50 +4 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
mod_jk2 doesn't redirect request to the right application server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12762
mod_jk2 doesn't redirect request to the right application server
Summary: mod_jk2 doesn't redirect request to the right
application server
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.10
Platform: PC
OS/
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12750
Virtual hosts using Apache 2.0.40, Tomcat 4.1.10 and mod_jk2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
jfclere 2002/09/12 03:43:37
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache13/mod_jk2.c
Index: mod_jk2.c
Dev Zero G Ltd wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Can anybody suggest what is the difference (benefits/shortages) beetween
> mod_jk and mod_jk2 connectors from the user point of view?
>
> Thanks for help!
>
> Dev Zero G Ltd team.
> http://devzerog.com
>
>
>
>
&
Hello.
Can anybody suggest what is the difference (benefits/shortages) beetween
mod_jk and mod_jk2 connectors from the user point of view?
Thanks for help!
Dev Zero G Ltd team.
http://devzerog.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands,
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-04 06:42 ---
I'm happy to report that at least for me this is not a bug. It was simply a
configuration proplem. I now have a working install of;
Apache 2.0.40
mod
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-04 06:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=2912)
working jk2.properties
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: &l
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-04 06:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=2911)
working worker2.properties
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: &l
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-03 11:32 ---
Modjk2.dll still does not work with Apache 2.0.40.
Apache 3.0.40
Tomcat 4.1.10
Using precompiled modjk2.dll from http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-01 18:46 ---
Build fails when trying to build according to the following link:
http://www.pubbitch.org/jboss/mod_jk2.html
Console output:
C:\Apache Builds\Tomcat\jakarta-
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-29 22:27 ---
Yes, I can access tomcat stand alone using port 8080.
Here's the tomcat startup console output:
[INFO] Registry - -Loading registry information
[INF
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-29 21:02 ---
Ughh, i have surpassed the detail that you were trying the inprocess worker..
First, disregard my previous postings.. and sorry for the waste of time..
I seem
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-29 16:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=2869)
workers2.properties file
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: &l
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-29 13:58 ---
Please post your wk2.p file.., it seems your have been using the jni channel
only, not the ajp13 one, you have been using the inprocess worker?
--
To unsubscr
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-29 13:51 ---
I made the change and now the following message is issues when trying to connect
to the servlet:
[Thu Aug 29 06:47:42 2002] [notice] Parent: Created child p
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-29 09:44 ---
My last comment contains a wrong wording for the disable the JNI channel in the
workers2.properties file it must be..
[channel.jni:jni]
disabled=1
it's
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126
Apache 2.0.40 and mod_jk2 errors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
> Hola a Todos:
>
> Back from holidays, ;)
>
>
>>De: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 10:52
>>Para: Tomcat Developers List
>>Asunto: Re: need examples for mod_jk/mod_jk2 conf an
Hola a Todos:
Back from holidays, ;)
> De: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 10:52
> Para: Tomcat Developers List
> Asunto: Re: need examples for mod_jk/mod_jk2 conf and properties
> Jason Corley wrote:
> > I have nothin
: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 10:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: need examples for mod_jk/mod_jk2 conf and properties
>
>
>
> Hi to all,
>
> I'll need examples files for mod_jk 1.2.0 and 2.0.0beta for the
>
Hi to all,
I'll need examples files for mod_jk 1.2.0 and 2.0.0beta for the
tomcat-connectors rpm I'm working on.
mod_jk 1.2.0 is well know but there is new features like failover only mode in
Load-Balancing (don't remember the exact synthax). Also we need to comment the
new JkOption ForwardDire
Hello and thanks for reading.
Building and then launching the Tomcat 4.0.4 connector for Apache 2 on
FreeBSD 4.4, linux-jdk 1.4 , we get:
org.apache.jk.server.JkMain init
INFO: Starting Jk2, base dir= /usr/local/tomcat4.0.4_1.4.0
conf=/usr/local/tomcat4.0.4_1.4.0/conf/jk2.properties
o
I'm hoping that you don't really want mod_jk2.so for W2K ;-).
The Jk2 binaries for Windows are at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/nightly/win32
/
However, I believe that these are built against 2.0.38. If you have MSVC
installed, it shouldn't b
Hi all,
Can anybody send me a link from where I can download mod_jk2.so? I am unable
to
build this file.
I am using Apache2.0.4, Tomcat4.0.3 in windows2000
Or please send it with attachment.
I am following the instructions given in this link to run apache with Tomcat
http://www.pubbitch.org
mturk 2002/08/15 04:23:04
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Remove the reverse flag from uriMap call.
All the positive/negative mappings is now done inside the uriMap
function itself.
Revision ChangesPath
1.49 +1 -8 jakarta-tomcat
mturk 2002/08/15 04:22:41
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Remove the reverse flag from uriMap call.
All the positive/negative mappings is now done inside the uriMap
function itself.
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +1 -8 jakarta-tomcat
Neat :-)
Bojan
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 19:43, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some comments regarding reverse uri mappings.
>
> This is the simplest way of accomplishing the reverse mapping (I'm not
> sure if this is correct terminology).
>
> There is additional option for the uri map configuratio
Hi,
Some comments regarding reverse uri mappings.
This is the simplest way of accomplishing the reverse mapping (I'm not
sure if this is correct terminology).
There is additional option for the uri map configuration 'reverse' :
[uri:/examples/*.gif]
info=Extension mapping
reverse=1
All the 'n
mturk 2002/08/15 02:27:41
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c
Log:
After succesfull call to the mapUri call the mapUri again with the reverse flag set.
This will decline the 'reverse' mappings.
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +9 -2 jaka
mturk 2002/08/15 02:27:18
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
After succesfull call to the mapUri call the mapUri again with the reverse flag set.
This will decline the 'reverse' mappings.
Revision ChangesPath
1.48 +9 -3 jaka
st 10, 2002 2:04 AM
> > To: Tomcat Dev List
> > Subject: Re: uri_map using regex [WAS: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces]
> >
> >
> > Doesn't mod_rewrite do what you want here? In combination
> > with mod_proxy, it can rewrite URL to URL as well, so you can
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 2:04 AM
> To: Tomcat Dev List
> Subject: Re: uri_map using regex [WAS: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces]
>
>
> Doesn't mod_rewrite do what you want here? In
Doesn't mod_rewrite do what you want here? In combination with
mod_proxy, it can rewrite URL to URL as well, so you can get the
resulting URL back in mod_jk and then just use normal mappings. Or maybe
I'm on a totally wrong track here...
As for IIS, dunno, don't care ;-)
Bojan
On Fri, 2002-08-0
Were i can find some information on compiling and Using mod_jk2 (I know
its on alpha or beta) with tomcat 4.1.X and apache 2.0.XX ?
Cheers,
--
Adrian
GPG Key Fingerprint = 1E78 B604 AA42 B852 1449 0C24 FF6A 1448 A24D 7AF5
Gentoo Linux - Running Linux 2.4.19 with openMosix i686
--
To
costin 2002/08/09 10:45:50
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Few cosmetic fixes. Remove old code ( uriEnv can't be null ).
The uriEnv==null case was used to support SetHandler directive -
which only sets jakarta-servlet handler but doesn't set
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
>
> I thought about this few times - it's a good idea but a bit
> scary ( the build process )
The easiest would be if the guys from Apache 2 move the regex to the
apr-util (I already make the question about that on the apr-
I thought about this few times - it's a good idea but a bit
scary ( the build process ), and not sure if a general regexp
will work as well on the simple patterns we have.
On the other side most regexp impl. use finite machines and
many optimizations - so they may be much faster.
I'm +1 if you
Hi,
Remember the last month advanced URI space resolution I proposed?
Well, I've been working on that for a week or so, and found myself doing
things that are more or less regular expression matching of request uri.
Even existing uri_map code has a trace of that (matching star for
example), so I
Cool!
Bojan
Quoting Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:00 AM
> > To: Tomcat Dev List
> > Subject: RE: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:00 AM
> To: Tomcat Dev List
> Subject: RE: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces
>
> This above sentence is confusing. You probably meant
> configuration option
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 23:55, Mladen Turk wrote:
> > Now I propose that we make something like _not_ URI space
> > filtering. Meaning that one could be able to serve every
> > .html file through TC except for the /*/some_space/ location.
> > Right now we are checking and hoping that the TC will
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Mladen Turk wrote:
> > Now I propose that we make something like _not_ URI space
> > filtering. Meaning that one could be able to serve every
> > .html file through TC except for the /*/some_space/ location.
> > Right now we are checking and hoping that the TC will accept
> Now I propose that we make something like _not_ URI space
> filtering. Meaning that one could be able to serve every
> .html file through TC except for the /*/some_space/ location.
> Right now we are checking and hoping that the TC will accept
> the context, and then we forget that immediate
Hi,
Just been working for a week on a real-life TC-mod_jk situation, and
found some interesting limitations (well, point of views to the
concept).
What are we doing right now is 'favoring' TC over Apache URI resolving,
meaning that if we set something like /*.html, then all the .html
context wil
Quoting Dev Zero G Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Which version of Apache 2.0 did you have ?
>
> We are running Apache 2.0.39 on FreeBSD 4.4
good
> >>--- patch history start ---
> >>Filename: jk\native2\include\jk_mutex.h
> >>
> >>Line #:75
> >>Old line :
> >>#ifdef HAS_APR
> >>New line:
>
Thanks very much for the help.
See below
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Quoting Dev Zero G Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>First of all - many many thanks to everybody who has helped so far - we
>>really appreciate it.. Just one last push required. :)
>>
>>We final
Quoting Dev Zero G Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> First of all - many many thanks to everybody who has helped so far - we
> really appreciate it.. Just one last push required. :)
>
> We finally got mod_jk2.so and libjkjni.so to compile (see patch history
> at the bottom of
First of all - many many thanks to everybody who has helped so far - we
really appreciate it.. Just one last push required. :)
We finally got mod_jk2.so and libjkjni.so to compile (see patch history
at the bottom of the mail), but can't install. We put them into
$(APACHE2_HOME)/module
Quoting Dev Zero G Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello and thanks for reading!
>
> Trying to build mod_jk2 for Tomcat4 and Apache2... with huge problems :(
> Having gotten this far, I have this compile problem:
>
> apache 2.0.39; freebsd 4.4 i386; conne4ctors 4.0.4
>
bojan 2002/07/23 17:44:20
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Kick out DIR_MAGIC_TYPE from jk2_handler() since it is never given to it
anyway. This will have to be resolved later for mod_jk2.
Make sure main request gets the appropriate info when the sub
Hello and thanks for reading!
Trying to build mod_jk2 for Tomcat4 and Apache2... with huge problems :(
Having gotten this far, I have this compile problem:
apache 2.0.39; freebsd 4.4 i386; conne4ctors 4.0.4
snip
[so] In file included from
/usr/tmp/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.4
bojan 2002/07/22 16:18:38
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Initial, most likely *BROKEN* code to handle default directory files. The
code in jk2_map_to_storage() should be OK.
Most critical stuff is in jk2_handler() function, the part of code that
My apologies everyone... Just ignore the part of my previous e-mail marked here
with between the stars. It just plain stupid :-(
**
Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
Quoting Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I *really* don't like the idea of passing DIR_MAGIC_TYPE requests to
> Tomcat, since I tend to set up directories with only static content that only
> Apache knows about. Sending them to Tomcat just gives me very many 404
> errors, so I'd be forced to u
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> >
> > The order of events would be:
> >
> > 1. mod_dir does a sub request for index.jsp
> > 2. jk_map_to_storage() receives the request
> > 3. jk_map_to_storage() engages map_uri_to_worker() <-- this would be
> > new code
> > 4. map_uri_to_worker() finds nothin
- Original Message -
From: "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 9:19 PM
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2
mod_jk2.c
> Quoting [EMA
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> You don't need to ask tomcat - jk should have all the mappings, and
> it can already map any URI. All it has to do is:
> - for each index:
> -- concatenate with the current uri
> -- do the jk mapping ( or internal redirect if you use
> instead of the intern
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Are you referring here to mod_jk2 only or both mod_jk 1.2.0 and
> mod_jk2?
>
> I think it could be done for jk2 ( but not easy ). I'm not sure
> about 1.2 - just forwarding and letting tomcat handle
> it is not the worse thing.
How abou
t term, I think we should just let tomcat deal
> with that, until we have the fix.
Are you referring here to mod_jk2 only or both mod_jk 1.2.0 and mod_jk2?
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t; The lb case is also not an issue - if there are local static files,
> apache can serve them - and dynamic resources are handled by tomcat
> lb.
That sounds good to me.
Bojan
PS. Note that mod_jk 1.2.0 doesn't use DocumentRoot as the base for the request
any more (that was clearly a bug). I fixed that this morning. I have not done
any changes to mod_jk2.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quoting Mark Miesfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was just getting ready to post something saying the fix seems to
> break mod_jk2 altogether for me.
Interesting. I haven't actually checked explicit calls to pages with reversed
order and mod_jk 1.2.0, so I don't really kno
e a hint that the
: handler is JK_HANDLER.
:
: ...
:
: Mladen, what's your take on all this? Do you have a setup handy to verify that
: the changing of hook ordering fixed the problem in mod_jk2?
:
: Mark, does the fix in mod_jk2 work in your environment?
I was just getting ready to post so
27;m not sure if TC 4.x does that
at all (I have seen at least one other report related to bug 9913 with TC 4.x
where my 'fix' didn't actually fix the problem - some fix :-).
Mladen, what's your take on all this? Do you have a setup handy to verify that
the changing of hook orderi
mturk 2002/07/18 08:15:00
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Fix the bug 10789 caused by hook order.
Revision ChangesPath
1.42 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.c
Index: mod_jk2.c
Costin, Mladen, could you guys have a look into this. The fix that I put
into mod_jk 1.2.0 works fine and default pages do get picked up. A
symmetric fix for mod_jk 2 did not work for Mark, the original bug
reporter, so I reverted it.
CVS versions 1.40 and 1.41 of mod_jk2.c are the ones in
401 - 500 of 711 matches
Mail list logo
