Re: cannot log from a load-on-startup servlet in init()

2003-09-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Henrik Vendelbo wrote: I am running Axis under Tomcat. Both are the latest versions. I chose to use the log4j that is already in the Tomcat directory. When the Axis servlet loads, I get the following. Where does the issue lie ? The important evidence is the "Root Cause" exception below (Except

Re: Tomcat 4.1 -> 5.0 Web-app Porting

2003-09-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:01:57 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat 4.1 -> 5.0 Web-app Porting > > Hi, > I am trying to port a web-

Re: How to get the container within an instance event?

2003-07-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Angus Mezick wrote: > Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:08:33 -0400 > From: Angus Mezick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: How to get the container within an instance event? > > Does anyone

RE: Cookie handling in IE6 and session handling of tomcat 4.1.24

2003-06-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, David Keyes wrote: > Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:59:46 -0400 > From: David Keyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Cookie handling in IE6 and session handling of tomcat 4.1.24 > > IN GENERAL: > > For any two

Re: STRUTS in Tomcat?

2003-04-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Bill Barker wrote: > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 19:49:17 -0800 > From: Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: STRUTS in Tomcat? > > > "Raible, Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL

Re: does the getRequestDispatcher().forward() method returncontrol?

2003-04-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Velmurugan (Java Team) wrote: > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:05:14 +0530 > From: "Velmurugan (Java Team)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Hans Schippers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: does the getRequest

RE: partially updating a WAR file using manager app??

2003-04-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:15:10 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: partially updating a WAR file using manager app?? > > Hi Yoav/Craig, > > I'll

RE: partially updating a WAR file using manager app??

2003-04-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 17:33:06 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: partially updating a WAR file using manager app?? > > Hi Yoav, > > I understan

Re: Stats MBean for DBCP DataSources

2003-04-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Halstead, Chris wrote: > Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:07:53 -0500 > From: "Halstead, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Stats MBean for DBCP DataSources > > Hello, > > I was thinking

Re: Listing all JNDI resources available

2003-03-29 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 18:03:21 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Listing all JNDI resources available > > Hi there, > > Is it somehow possible to

Re: Creating an HTML file with the correct codebase and archivevalueparameters for a jar in the /WEB-INF/lib directory

2003-03-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
served directly to a client by the container." Craig > - Original Message - > From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:51 AM > Subject: Re: Creating an

Re: Multiple databases for basic auth

2003-03-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Michael D. Kirkpatrick wrote: > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:04:37 -0600 > From: Michael D. Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Multiple databases for basic auth > > I am running Tomcat 4.1. > I ha

Re: Creating an HTML file with the correct codebase and archivevalue parameters for a jar in the /WEB-INF/lib directory

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Susan Hoddinott wrote: > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 09:25:45 +0800 > From: Susan Hoddinott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Creating an HTML file with the correct codebase and archive >

Re: Making an application disabled at startup

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Jeff Tulley wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:46:01 -0700 > From: Jeff Tulley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Making an application disabled at startup > > I'm looking for a way to have an application

Re: shared resources

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Pat McGroin wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:20:49 -0800 (PST) > From: Pat McGroin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: shared resources > > Hello. > > I am trying to reference a few JAR files from an out-

Re: Tomcat 4.1.18 config for Servlet ...

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
oy feature of Tomcat and just placed my WAR > file in the webapps directory. Therefore I haven't made any > modifications to conf/server.xml or conf/web.xml. > You've confirmed that my guess about what was going on is correct, and either of the two approaches I recommended wil

Re: Apache vs. Tomcat

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Tiago Ferraz Machado wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:10:54 -0300 > From: Tiago Ferraz Machado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Apache vs. Tomcat > > Hi, > > I know that, for a more

RE: Threads in Servlet2.3 container

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, klute wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:10:55 -0800 (PST) > From: klute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Threads in Servlet2.3 container > > Interesting.. What about the followin

RE: Threads in Servlet2.3 container

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Shapira, Yoav wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:10:40 -0500 > From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Threads in Servlet2.3 container > > > Howdy, > > >Actually, t

RE: overhead running from war rather than unpacked

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Koes, Derrick wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:57:06 -0500 > From: "Koes, Derrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > 'Rasputin' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: overhead running fro

Re: IllegalStateException on JSP page

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr. wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:43:45 -0600 > From: "Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: IllegalStateException on JSP page > > Hello all

Re: Tomcat 4.1.18 config for Servlet ...

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Randy Curnutt wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:13:40 -0500 > From: Randy Curnutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Randy Curnutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Tomcat 4.1.18 config for

RE: Threads in Servlet2.3 container

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Shapira, Yoav wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:28:40 -0500 > From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Threads in Servlet2.3 container > > > Howdy, > > >Can I expec

Re: overhead running from war rather than unpacked

2003-03-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
ject: Re: overhead running from war rather than unpacked > > * Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0312 07:12]: > > Thanks for that, Craig - top perfromacen tuning tips! > > With this in mind, is there a definitive way to > ensure clients get a 'fresh' cop

Re: Architecture Details

2003-03-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Balaji wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:07:40 +0530 > From: Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Architecture Details > > Hi, > Can anyone tell me where to find the overall compo

RE: overhead running from war rather than unpacked

2003-03-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
> -Original Message- > From: Koes, Derrick > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Sent: 3/26/03 6:13 PM > Subject: overhead running from war rather than unpacked > > > How much overhead is there running directly from the war file rather > than > unpacked? > > Thanks, > Derrick On Wed, 26 Mar 2003,

RE: Bug #5585, #11091, #13924, #18040 Workaround ???

2003-03-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Koes, Derrick wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:29:00 -0500 > From: "Koes, Derrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Bug #5585, #11091, #13924, #18040 Workaround ??? > > > Sorr

Re: SMTP Logger

2003-03-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Chris Gokey wrote: > Date: 25 Mar 2003 21:47:43 -0500 > From: Chris Gokey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: SMTP Logger > > Hi everyone, > > Back to this again.. Any help would be

Re: url-pattern problem? Deployed servlet works in Tomcat 4.0.4 butfails in Tomcat 4.1.18

2003-03-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Randy Curnutt wrote: > Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:14:47 -0500 > From: Randy Curnutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Randy Curnutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: url-pattern problem? Deployed servlet works i

Re: Problem with Bookmarking a Login Page

2003-03-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Steven J. Owens wrote: > Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 03:54:23 -0500 > From: Steven J. Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Problem with Bookmarking a Login

RE: Concurrent users accesing JSP application

2003-03-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Sudhir Kumar wrote: > Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 10:10:36 +0530 > From: Sudhir Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Concurrent users accesing JSP applica

Re: User Interface To Tomcat User List

2003-03-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, NormW wrote: > Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 04:56:23 +1100 > From: NormW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: User Interface To Tomcat User List > > Good morning Eric. > I wasn't 'pushing' fo

Re: Possible to have default classes and taglib includes in JSPs?

2003-03-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Gavin, Rick wrote: > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 07:20:55 -0800 > From: "Gavin, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Possible to have default classes and taglib includes in JSPs? > > Hi all, > Does anyone

Re: 1,900 webapp contexts?

2003-03-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, David Boyer wrote: > Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:56:04 -0600 > From: David Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 1,900 webapp contexts? > > We have about 1,900 students and faculty, and we create web spac

Re: Tomcat 3.3 to 4.1 - Changes?

2003-03-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, NormW wrote: > Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 20:58:53 +1100 > From: NormW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat 3.3 to 4.1 - Changes? > > Good evening All. > Working with Tomcat on Netware (no cringing please

Re: Please sign emergency petition to the U.N.

2003-03-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Wilhelm Colln wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:17:07 -0500 > From: Wilhelm Colln <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Please sign emergency petition to the U.N. > This kind of thing is totally off topic for TOMCAT-USER and is an

RE: Simple Question

2003-03-05 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Mike Jackson wrote: > Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 08:58:44 -0800 > From: Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Simple Question > > The web.xml is only read when the server is res

RE: XML problem with Tomcat 4.1.18 (but was ok in 4.0.4)

2003-03-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, neal wrote: > Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 13:59:27 -0800 > From: neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: XML problem with Tomcat 4.1.18 (but was ok in 4.0.4) > > Hmm. I hear what you're s

RE: XML problem with Tomcat 4.1.18 (but was ok in 4.0.4)

2003-03-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, neal wrote: > Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 13:29:08 -0800 > From: neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: XML problem with Tomcat 4.1.18 (but was ok in 4.0.4) > > actually the full URL that

Re: WEB-INF/classes not loading from corrrect classloader

2003-02-28 Thread Craig R
It happens inside the debugger (Eclipse). Basically, what I have come to realize is happening is that Eclipse implicitly includes the current project (in my case the web-app) in the system classpath. So when I start tomcat by invoking Bootstrap.main thru the debugger, the project/application cla

WEB-INF/classes not loading from corrrect classloader

2003-02-28 Thread Craig R
Hello, While I'm having no problems running *outside* a debugger, I am running into a problem with classloading as I try to run 2 web-application through a debugger. The two projects have overlapping copies of the same class files (ie, both projects use Class A). The problem is that when Tomc

Classes are not loaded from WEB-INF/classes when debugging...

2003-02-28 Thread Craig R
Hello, I am running into a problem with classloading as I try to run 2 web- application through a debugger. The two projects have overlapping copies of the same class files (ie, both projects use Class A). The problem is that when Tomcat (4.0.6) is run through my debugger, the WEB-INF/classes a

RE: [BULK] - RE: [BULK] - Re: No processor available

2003-02-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
There's no configuration parameter for this -- it would take a code change in the code that listens on the server socket to pause for some amount of time if we've already allocated maxProcessors and all of them are currently busy. I haven't looked at the code, but it doesn't sound like this should

Re: startup order for applications

2003-02-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Will Hartung wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:00:03 -0800 > From: Will Hartung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: startup order for applications > > > From: "Ben Souther" <[EMAIL

Re: realm getRole() method ?

2003-02-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Donald Ball wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:49:40 -0500 > From: Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: realm getRole() method ? > > >> There is no such facility in

Re: realm getRole() method ?

2003-02-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Donald Ball wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:26:38 -0500 > From: Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: realm getRole() method ? > > On 2/27/2003 at 5:07 PM laurent

RE: Properties file [SOLVED?]

2003-02-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, José Moreira wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:31:23 - > From: José Moreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Properties file [SOLVED?] > > still didnt work ... > > my code :\

RE: Tomcat 4.1.18 session objects

2003-02-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Filip Hanik wrote: > Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:41:45 -0800 > From: Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.18 session objects > > yes, the session can get invalida

RE: Authentication and Roles - case sensitivity

2003-02-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Raible, Matt wrote: > Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:59:20 -0700 > From: "Raible, Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Authentication and Roles - case sensitivity > > > > > Tomcat

Re: Authentication and Roles - case sensitivity

2003-02-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Raible, Matt wrote: > > The reason I ask this is b/c I'm developing a menu application that filters > on roles and hides/shows menus based on a role name. What should I do to > mimic Tomcat's behavior? Should I do an toUpperCase on the rolename and > database role? > > Wha

Re: need 2 appbase settings

2003-02-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, William Claxton wrote: > Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:09:09 +0800 > From: William Claxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: need 2 appbase settings > > We have successfully moved our appbase to a folder othe

Re: getServletConfig returning null

2003-02-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Marc Chamberlin wrote: > Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 14:33:12 -0800 > From: Marc Chamberlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: getServletConfig returning null > > Hello > I am trying to unde

Re: JWSDP

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
levant web connectors (although one could copy them from a Tomcat install). Performance is going to be essentially identical, though. Your best decision basis is to try installing it both ways and see which is easier. > Thanks Craig > > > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Craig R. M

Re: Configuring a custom Authenticator

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote: > Date: 14 Feb 2003 17:21:30 -0700 > From: Bryan Field-Elliot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Configuring a custom Authenticator > > I'm looking at the code

Re: JWSDP

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Xiongfei Wang wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:44:00 -0500 (EST) > From: Xiongfei Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: JWSDP > > > Anybody has any comments on Java Web Developer Pa

Re: Best practices - dev & deploy?

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Sean Dockery wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:05:04 -0700 > From: Sean Dockery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Best practices - dev & deploy? > > Up until recently, I followed

Re: AW: modified jsp-files and jasper2

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Sean Dockery wrote: > [ Aside: Does manager/reload fail if Context.reloadable=false? ] No ... explicitly reloading via the manager webapp does not care wither reloadable was set to true or false. Even when I'm developing a webapp, I don't use the "reloadable" flag at all

Re: Is server.xml DTD case-sensitive?

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Lukasz Szelag wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:57:05 -0500 > From: Lukasz Szelag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Is server.xml DTD case-sensitive? > > Hello, > > I have noticed that resource parameter

Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote: > > I think I'll concede that this is beaten to death, and I'll be diving > into proprietary extensions (such as Tomcat's Authenticator) next. > Thanks Craig for running back and forth with me on this. We'll let it > rest for a day and then perhaps

Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Will Hartung wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:16:02 -0800 > From: Will Hartung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: JAASRealm/LoginManag

Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote: > Date: 14 Feb 2003 11:55:46 -0700 > From: Bryan Field-Elliot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager que

Re: Ant InstallTask

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, José Moreira wrote: > Date: 14 Feb 2003 17:50:30 + > From: José Moreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Ant InstallTask > > hello, i keep getting : > > -- > > > file:/home/moreir

Re: Web app configuration problems

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, White, Joshua A (CASD, IT) wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:14:26 -0500 > From: "White, Joshua A (CASD, IT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Web app configuration problems > >

Re: virtual hosts and manager app

2003-02-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Edgar Dollin wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:29:48 -0500 > From: Edgar Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: virtual hosts and manager app > > The manager app is pretty nice

Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions

2003-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote: > Date: 13 Feb 2003 16:41:08 -0700 > From: Bryan Field-Elliot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager qu

Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions

2003-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote: > > Craig, there is one subtle point I was trying to make, and I'm not sure > if you got it. I was NOT proposing that my Filter perform > container-managed sercurity authentications (as you went on to explain > was impossible). Well, you want to ge

Re: Pro WAR (was Re: Fw: Fight war)

2003-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
This whole discussion is totally off topic. If you want to argue about it, please go elsewhere. Craig McClanahan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How to write custom authentication method forTomcat as well asweblogic/orion?

2003-02-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Soefara Redzuan wrote: > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:38:22 +0800 > From: Soefara Redzuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: How to write custom authentication method forTomcat as well as > weblogic/orion

RE: server-*.xml

2003-02-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Steve Bucknam wrote: > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:14:42 -0500 > From: Steve Bucknam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: server-*.xml > > I have one Tomcat server for many developers.

RE: web page errors

2003-02-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Peter Choe wrote: > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:19:21 -0500 > From: Peter Choe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: web page errors > > do

Re: preview of webapp of Tomcat Performance book

2003-02-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Peter Lin wrote: > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 05:59:21 -0800 (PST) > From: Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: preview of webapp of Tomcat Performance book > > > I plan on releasin

Re: Re-using roles defined in web.xml file

2003-02-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Sean Dockery wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:21:28 -0700 > From: Sean Dockery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Re-using roles defined in web.xml file > > The only way that it c

Re: How to listen for Session LastAccessedTime

2003-02-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Victor Soares wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:28:12 -0800 > From: Victor Soares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: How to listen for Session LastAccessedTime > > Hello, > I've been searching through the

RE: Shutdown.sh does not work when long lasting operations, such as SQL Queries, are still active! (fwd)

2003-02-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Answered a question on TOMCAT-DEV today that also related to a query on TOMCAT-USER yesterday -- here's the forwarded response. Craig -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:06:55 -0800 (PST) From: Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Tomcat Deve

RE: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions

2003-02-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Jim Krygowski wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:48:24 -0500 > From: Jim Krygowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions > > Hi Bryan- > > I've done so

Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions

2003-02-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Erik Price wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:15:04 -0500 > From: Erik Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions

Re: Valve Access to Principal

2003-02-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Erik Price wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:17:31 -0500 > From: Erik Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Valve Access to Principal

Re: Valve Access to Principal

2003-02-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 10 Feb 2003, Peter Kelley wrote: > Date: 10 Feb 2003 17:22:53 +1100 > From: Peter Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Valve Access to Principal > > OK I'm still not sure we are talking on

Re: Valve Access to Principal

2003-02-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
fails in standalone Tomcat and we can talk. If the problem shows up only in Tomcat+JBoss, go talk to whoever built that integration. Craig > On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 14:58, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2003, Peter Kelley wrote: > > > > > Date: 10 Feb 2003 14:

Re: Valve Access to Principal

2003-02-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
on Service Provider Interface for Containers"), but not until that JSR actually has a public release of its spec -- it has only just gotten underway. Craig > On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 18:24, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2003, Peter Kelley wrote: > > > > > Dat

Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions

2003-02-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote: > Date: 09 Feb 2003 17:26:10 -0700 > From: Bryan Field-Elliot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions > > Thanks for all your co

Re: JAASRealm/LoginManager questions

2003-02-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Hi Bryan, A couple of comments interspersed below. On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote: > Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:48:11 -0700 > From: Bryan Field-Elliot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: JAASRealm/LoginManager quest

Re: Is SSI supported in TC 4.1 ?

2003-02-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 17:26:35 EST > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Is SSI supported in TC 4.1 ? > > Has anyone activated Server Side Include(SSI) in Tomcat 4.1 ? > > I hav

Re: Filter problems

2003-02-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Manavendra Gupta wrote: > Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 14:12:38 -0800 > From: Manavendra Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Filter problems > > Hi, > > I have a simple security filter for

Re: Valve Access to Principal

2003-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 8 Feb 2003, Peter Kelley wrote: > Date: 08 Feb 2003 17:29:10 +1100 > From: Peter Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Valve Access to Principal > > I'm writing a valve to associate a request wi

RE: servlet URL

2003-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Felipe Schnack wrote: > Date: 07 Feb 2003 17:11:03 -0200 > From: Felipe Schnack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: servlet URL > > I'm writing a servlet that requires to be a Singl

Re: DataSourceRealm

2003-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Uros Kotnik wrote: > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:58:12 +0100 > From: Uros Kotnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: DataSourceRealm > > I'm using TC 4.1.8 > > I read a instructions for im

Re: Configuring System properties

2003-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Will Hartung wrote: > > Do all of the webapps see the same System Properties? Yes, if they're running in the same JVM. > I can't imagine why > not (assuming they share a JVM), but with all of the isolation that's > enforced between the webapps, it gives one pause to consid

Re: JNDI success, and questions

2003-02-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Joe Tomcat wrote: > Date: 05 Feb 2003 05:52:16 -0800 > From: Joe Tomcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: JNDI success, and questions > > I just set up Tomcat to work as a JNDI source f

Re: Perhaps another class-loader issue... but not so sure...

2003-02-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Gavin Everson wrote: > Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 14:25:24 +0800 > From: Gavin Everson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Perhaps another class-loader issue... but not so sure... > > Hi There, > > We are exper

Re: SendMailServlet problem...

2003-02-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, chris schild wrote: > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:19:29 -0600 > From: chris schild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: SendMailServlet problem... > > Any ideas on what would make a servl

Re: Web.xml mistake results in unavailable !?

2003-02-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Sean Dockery wrote: > Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 16:33:03 -0700 > From: Sean Dockery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Web.xml mistake results in unavailable !? > > Can you post an exa

Re: Web.xml mistake results in unavailable !?

2003-02-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Kevin Conaway wrote: > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:56:28 -0500 > From: Kevin Conaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Web.xml mistake results in unavailable !? > > This isnt a produc

Re: DBCP+TOMCAT 3.2.4 (->4.1.x WORKED OK)

2003-02-05 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Sean Dockery wrote: > Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 11:03:00 -0700 > From: Sean Dockery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: DBCP+TOMCAT 3.2.4 (->4.1.x WORKED OK) > > You can still use DBCP i

Re: FW: jsp:include semantics?

2003-02-05 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, David Keyes wrote: > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:59:41 -0500 > From: David Keyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: FW: jsp:include semantics? > > Hello. > > What are the semantics of in Tomcat 4.0.x? It see

Re: DBCP+TOMCAT 3.2.4 (->4.1.x WORKED OK)

2003-02-05 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, ps wrote: > Date: 05 Feb 2003 11:48:15 + > From: ps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: DBCP+TOMCAT 3.2.4 (->4.1.x WORKED OK) > > Please, how should I interpret the exception mess

Re: session timeout not working anymore :(

2003-02-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Sundar Narasimhan wrote: > Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 23:35:38 -0500 > From: Sundar Narasimhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: session timeout not working anymore :( > > Hi, I'm running out of options -- but

Re: Does TC 4.1.18 actually reuse tag handler instances?

2003-02-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, David M. Karr wrote: > Date: 04 Feb 2003 22:19:58 -0800 > From: David M. Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Does TC 4.1.18 actually reuse tag handler instances? > > I've been following some of the disc

RE: JNDI context in ServletContextListener

2003-02-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Shapira, Yoav wrote: > Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:02:56 -0500 > From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: JNDI context in ServletContextListener > > Howdy, > This is a t

Re: TomCat auto-deployment

2003-02-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Ben Walding wrote: > Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 15:12:33 +1000 > From: Ben Walding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: TomCat auto-deployment > > Is the following behaviour intentional (as it

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >