some magic.
Cheers.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Marco Pöhler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 4:54 AM
To: tomcat-user
Subject: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
Hi,
I'm running tomcat 5.0.19 & J2SDK1.4.2_03 on a suse linux 8.1. I wrote a
really simple applica
Ha! I said the same thing a month ago and was completely ignored. :-\
-Original Message-
From: Angus Mezick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 6:44 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Digitally Signing Posts
+1
--Angus
> -Original Message-
> From: George
Any chance you guys would consider NOT sending signed or encrypted
emails to the list any more? They always choke my email client and it
just doesn't seem necessary for the purpose of an email newsgroup. ;-)
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Fiol Bonnín [mailto:[
and accept/deny
each cookie sent to you, as they are sent to you, including jsessionid
'session' cookies.
> -Original Message-
> From: neal cabage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:00 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat - Auto
tive. Missing it once will
create a session for every user that hits the page. Look for this
especially in some sort of 'meta' page (like header.jsp or login.jsp or
footer.jsp) which are included in any number of other pages.
As for filters, people are referring to any javax.servlet.Fi
onfig is just straight Tomcat 4.1, no Apache. If you want to see an example of what
I'm seeing, please go to http://www.travelusa.com/.
If you can recommend any filters or anything else like that I should be looking at,
please let me know.
Thanks for your help.
Neal
Jeff Tull
vious thread to look at the servlet being
compiled, which may be a good idea - but I don't know what the solution will be if it
is in fact compiling the servlet incorrectly. Any other config opps to choke it off?
Neal
Torsten Fohrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
tomcat sents automatically
ath=/
Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:44:21 GMT
Server: Apache Coyote/1.0
Thanks.
N
-Original Message-
From: Neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:53 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List&#
oogle for it on the Tomcat site. I think you will find it.
Antonio Fiol
Neal wrote:
>Someone just pointed out that my JSPs are have this in the header:
>
>"Set-Cookie: JSESSIONID=97C8777F16379B8EC2CD17273CE35C3C; Path=/"
>
>The problem is that I'm not setting any sess
You're kidding? So, by default, I'm writing a freaking session for
every single page? That sounds like a colossal waist of resources.
Thanks though for the tip!
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Fiol Bonnín [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 1
here? Is there some setting in the Web.xml and/or server.xml file that
I must tweak?
PS - I use Tomcat has my http server, not apache (in case that's
meaningful).
Thanks.
Neal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
I went through th process of applying the new Level 2 & 3 certs to my cacerts file
using the Java Keytool and the output of the keytool seems to have implied this was
done correctly but I'm still getting the same error when attempting to retrieve a
document over https (SSL): " javax.net.ssl.SSL
What page at Verisign were you reading this from?
Thanks.
Neal
Mauro Pencov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I was reading in the site of the Verisign, I
found the page that offers for
download Intermediate CA, but this would be used for Apache. And in tomcat?
Somebody already it made this
I suddenly have a problem reading XML over SSL, where the system has
been in place for a year and the problem never existed before! And the
weird part is that both my dev and production environments now seem to
have the same problem.
Another interesting tidbit I have noticed is that I *can* acce
I suddenly have a problem reading XML over SSL, where the system has
been in place for a year and the problem never existed before! And the
weird part is
that both my dev and production environmets now seem to have the same
problem.
Another interesting tidbit I have noticed is that I *can* acces
Ah, thanks Ben. Yes, I tried what I wrote prior and also tried
application.getAttribute ... but didn't realize there was a getInitParameter() method.
That did the trick.
Thanks.
N
Ben Souther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In your web.xml file:
city_name
NY
In your JSP
City:
On
Oops, you're right that line would not have compiled...I meant I use this:
DataSource ds = (DataSource) new
InitialContext().lookup(application.getInitParameter("db.jndi.dsn"));
...to get a datasource values and assumed the similar line would work for retrieving a
String:
String str = (Str
I'm trying to do something as simple as define global constants for my JSP
application. In ASP there is a Global.asa file and the closest thing in JSP is of
course the web.xml file. I defined a value in my web.xml file and assumed I could
retrieve it using the following line:
String test = (S
If it's really such a big deal, why not just be somewhat anonymous? Use
a temp email account and an alias.
-Original Message-
From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 4:18 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: google yourself
Hi guys,
I was facing the sa
tion. Is there something
else here that I may be missing however? Can you see a possible explanation as to why
my app's waisted resources would not get cleaned up until I explicitly ran GC?
Thanks.
Neal
"Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howdy,
Perhaps you are expe
Isn't netBeans now SunOne? And don't they now charge an arm and a leg
for it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 6:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JSP Editors
Try netbeans.
Its free.
And you can debug jsp's in t
Look in your Tomcat/conf/server.xml file. Is there an uncommented
service tag like the following?
This instructs Tomcat to run standalone.
Also, you can confirm this by looking at Tomcat output when it is
stated. When tomcat starts it will write to standard out (logs in Unix
or output window
Isn't that correct?
Anyone have any theories as to what this may mean and what the best
solution would be?
Thanks.
Neal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ha! That thing (SunOne) is the bulkiest, heaviest app I've ever
installed on my machine. I have to wait minutes for it to start up and
a good 30 seconds when intellisense recognizes a new class. Besides,
didn't Sun start charging some crazy price for it recently? Use to be
free but I think now
.
Please let me know if there's solution.
Neal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks. Out of curiosity, what sort of RAM allocations would you typically do on a
production UNIX machine? Obviously I don't want to use up all of my memory, but this
and mySQL are my only two production apps.
'
Thanks.
Neal
James Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
neal cab
Thanks. How do I issue such a command? Command line, etc?
Neal
Nathan Mcminn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neal,
This will get you the total amount of memory available to the JVM tomcat
is running in:
Runtime.getRuntime().totalMemory()
And this will get you the amount free
Runtime.getR
can't find this information on the Apache site, after
having looked for 1/2 hour.
Any thoughts/info would be greatly appreciates.
Thanks.
Neal
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
Does anyone know how I can check to see how much memory is in use or
available on Tomcat at any point in time? I've been getting a
java.error.OutOfMemory error lately and I need to be able to track
what's going on.
Th
Thanks for the info.
I guess I'm just frustrated because my app broke when I upgraded Tomcat.
:-\
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 4:36 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: XML problem with Tomcat 4.1.18 (bu
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: XML problem with Tomcat 4.1.18 (but was ok in 4.0.4)
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, neal wrote:
> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 13:29:08 -0800
> From: neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
always find a workaround ... but ... should I have to?
I
>mean, I'm guessing this is a bug somehow associated with the context of
this
>version of Tomcat.
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Neal
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Reynir Hübner [mailto:[EMAIL P
If that's normal then why did it work in Tomcat 4.0.4 and not in Tomcat
4.1.18?
I can not say positively that it was not adding that leading slash in 4.0.4
but it was the first thing I noticed and when I took it out it fixed the
problem.
What else could it be?
Neal
-Original Me
to? I
mean, I'm guessing this is a bug somehow associated with the context of this
version of Tomcat.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Reynir Hübner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 12:41 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: XML problem wit
Hmm ... I'm wondering how this is going to affect the x-platform-ness of my
application now.
I'm developing on a windows platform and deploying to linux, wherein my
paths actually *should* start with a "/".
UUugh.
-
To unsubsc
ot;
suddenly the URLs are acceptable in Tomcat 4.1.18.
Why would Tomcat be involving itself in such issues? Only thing I can think
of is that maybe the conditions for this Apache Exception were redefined in
4.1.18:
org.apache.xml.utils.URI$MalformedURIException: No scheme found in URI
Ne
Is this somehow related?
Here's the error:
javax.xml.transform.TransformerException:
org.apache.xml.utils.URI$MalformedURIException: No scheme found in URI
Thanks.
Neal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
t set.
But .. it is! And besides I didn't touch my sys variables.
Any thoughts? JDK1.4.1 isn't required here is it?
Thanks.
Neal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: org.apache.xml.utils.URI$MalformedURIException: No scheme found
in URI
I am in the process of upgrading from Tomcat 4.0.4 to 4.1.18 and whereas my
app worked just fine on 4.0.4 it now
I am in the process of upgrading from Tomcat 4.0.4 to 4.1.18 and whereas my
app worked just fine on 4.0.4 it now gives me this error when attempting to
parse the first XML document:
Error parsing pageMap.xml:
javax.xml.transform.TransformerConfigurationException:
javax.xml.transform.TransformerExc
Ah. Do you know then how long it might be until that sort of thing is
implemented? I'm *REALLY* looking forward to it! :)
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Barker
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
Ah. Good to know. Didn't even know about that list. :)
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 8:08 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5 - 302 issue resolved??? (please please please)
There was a discussion a month or two ago about fixing the issue wherein
Tomcat *redirects* to the welcome page rather than forwarding to it. For
instance, www.abc.com would be redirected to www.abc.com/index.html. Was
this issue in fact resolved in Tomcat 5.0?
I attempted to take a look at the
There was a discussion a month or two ago about fixing the issue wherein
Tomcat *redirects* to the welcome page rather than forwarding to it. For
instance, www.abc.com would be redirected to www.abc.com/index.html. Was
this issue in fact resolved in Tomcat 5.0?
I attempted to take a look at the
See, I knew there was something I didn't understand. Thanks. I'll take a
look. :)
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 12:42 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with ve
-2.0.43 there are only links to (a) the source or (b) binaries for
*Windows*!.
I am sure I am probably missing somethinng ... please tell me what it is?!?!
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:57 AM
To: 'T
s of mod_jk for 2.0.40? It seems like an out-of-sync
doulbe whammy!
:(
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:40 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
Sorry, you
ild is not available. Is there something I
am missing? :(
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:44 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
http://jakarta.apach
feature in Tomcat 5 (please please please!!!)?!?!?! :)
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:34 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Neal,
I told you that solution in the
hanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:23 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
You need Apache 2.0.43. .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't.
Or, yo
his context?
Thanks
Neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Should the mod_jk-2.0.43.so be compatible with Apache 2.0.40? Its such a
minor build I would presume so but I'm getting an error message to the
contrary. :-\
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:36 PM
To: Tomcat
e LoadModule command to load the so (?).
I downloaded the mod_jk-2.0.43.so from the Apache connectors archives. I
just used the same version (but as a DLL) successfully on my windows
workstation.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
I
replaced it with the build you were using
(mod_jk-2.0.43.dll) and from there is was pretty much home free!
Now on to doing the same on the Linux server (I hope its reasonably
similar). :)
Thanks again.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
logged, and if I try to start from the Apache Service
manager I simply get a message stating "The requested operation failed.".
Anyone know what's going on? :(
Thanks.
Neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
his be a proxy thing or is something I can set in Tomcat? Is there
something that wouldn't require the overhead of reflecting upon every single
request at the Java level?
Thanks.
neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
omcat instance.
In this case, is using WARP for production purposes a bad idea?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Lajos Moczar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:08 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat)
One more point is tha
site, Windows *IS* supported
for 1.3.27 usage ... and its downloadable from the site. Man, Apache should
really update this documentation ... I just waisted the majorty of a day
figuring this stuff out (anyone from apache listening out there??). ;-)
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[
that to say that WARP won't work in a multiple-host
scenario?!?! :(
Thanks
Neal
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:04 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat)
Really?!?!
But I downloaded it fro
?
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat)
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:38:55 -0800
> From: neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
it is currently not supported on Windows.
And this is aside from finding an answer to the question of where this works
with Apache 2.0 or not!
Anyone out there using WARP or is everyone using mod_JK?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, Ja
hine Does anyone know about the 1st possible issue though (Apache 2
compatability)?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (HP-Boise,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:56 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: WARP (Apache<->
l that does is avoid the issue. Any clue what the
problem is? A hunch is telling me to run regsvr32 on the dll. Any
thoughts?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: enLogica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:58 PM
To: Tomcat
Subject: WARP (Apache<->Tom
les and Standalone Tomcat
Hiya Neal (and others)
As a counterpoint to your argument about search engines and
small sites I have some real numbers:
From my website referrer stats:
(For an Apache HTTP: http://www.eaves.org)
Direct requests : 28%
Google.com : 1.5%
Google images : 0.7%
search.y
ection is
taken.
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
I can only comment on my own experience. I'm
Is that right? The key we generated for Tomcat will also work on Apache?!?!
This is surpising (though a plesant suprise) because the method by which we
had to create the key for tomcat was different than what the admin had
apparently done prior with Apache.
-Original Message-
From: Noe
ROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:17 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
If the site has real value, the customers will find it all by themselves.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMA
. I'm also bucking that just
because (a) my ISP will want to get involved and charge me hourly for the
setup of an addt'l app and (b) I will have to get another $300 SSL cert from
Trawte if I go that road. Sigh.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sen
priority one for more than .1% or so.
We're selling our applications like crazy, which use Tomcat, but then again,
we use Apache as a rule for things on port 80. As far as we're concerned,
Tomcat is perfect.
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sen
Its *not* that simple. Pagerank (guaging inbound links from other sites)
would need to all be coordinated to point to that specifc file. This would
be very difficult. PR is the most significant factor in SERPs on most
modern engines and if a good inbound link was to point to your base URL
(which
m: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:52 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:38:13 -0800
> From: neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To:
this the same sort of relative file path issues I would see
if I forwarded (rather than redirect) from one JSP to another? If so,
wouldn't this only be an issue if the welcome file was located somewhere
other than the root of the application?
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Craig R.
but this one little thing would force me to have to go to apache.
IMHO, it would be a shame to not be able to use the product for this one
little reason.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:18 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subjec
the ideal is to sluff off such
petty and rediculous issues put forth by the search engine defenses, but at
the end of that argument the issue still exists as does the sobering fact
that this will be a significant problem for anyone who chooses to deploy a
commercial application using the product.
neal
So, in this scenario .. if a url without a directory is given and without a
trailign slash, the redirect would not occur? That would fix this issue.
I could certainly get behind that. :)
"if the final element of the path is a "directory" (or a context) without a
trailing
slash, redirect to the
x27;m finally
getting around to putting it into action, I realized the problem.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:34 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Neal,
I told you
n
the foot. Because of the search engine spidering implications of starting
off with a 302 redirect, a Tomcat-standalone-hosted website will likley
never place well in most major search engines. So aside from theory ...
this is not a good "feature", certainly not a viable one. :(
John,
Thanks for the threads. I will certainly read them.
I can't imagine why Tomcat wouldn't support this behavior unless there is
another issue in Tomcat that this is covering up ... I mean this is basic
http server stuff, I thought. All the same...thanks! :)
Neal
-Origin
?
BTW - I'm currently using Tomcat 4.0.4. I wouldn't by chance already have
this ability would I? I didn't see anything in the docs.
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:25 PM
To: 'Tomcat Use
?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:37 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat version 4
Check the Tomcat log files, in CATALINA_HOME/logs. Typically, you'll want
the file that has a n
you know what I mean ;-)
Gary
neal wrote:
>Oh, does that mean it *is* possible to use RewriteRules with Tomcat
>Standalone then? :-\
>
>Neal
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:04 P
Oh, does that mean it *is* possible to use RewriteRules with Tomcat
Standalone then? :-\
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:04 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tom
eRules and Standalone Tomcat
Beat me with a stick if I'm wrong, but RewriteRule is for Apache when using
mod_rewrite, I don't think you can use it in server.xml or web.xml.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 4:
"feature" of tomcat ... I call it a PAIN IN THE ASS,
and a serious oversight for standalone Tomcat.
Anyone know a solution?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 7:16 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users Li
RewriteRule would be integrated into
Tomcat:
RewriteRule ^/$ /index.html [L]
Thanks!
Neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oh wow ... very cool. Thanks Joel. I'm going to dig into this and learn
exactly what a rewrite rule is first thing tomorrow! :)
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 8:38 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: T
servlets don't index.
So, I'm guessing this filter thing is something to look at, mod_rewrite too.
I'm also going to take a look at apache - my big hesitation there is that
the SSL certificate is already bound to Tomcat ... I think I'd have to buy
another to work with A
html, etc? Would
there be any clue to a search engine that any of these things aren't what
they appear to be?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:10 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat
lets
to NOT get indexed on the engine that handles 80% of search traffic.
For anyone out there listening, any change this auto-redirect 'feature'
might have an "off" feature in future revisions? Or, does anyone know of
away around that redirect issue as of current?
Thanks.
Those are both very good points I hadn't considered - thank you!
:)
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 6:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: SEO and servlets
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Cox, Charlie
that might be a way
around it ... but I'm beginning to think perhaps not. :(
Anyway, thanks for your thoughts.
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: SEO and servlets
index with Google and other major
engines?
Thanks.
Neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.
Well, the real reason I am worried about this is that I heard a rumor that
this could affect search engine crawling - that is may prevent some engines
from crawling the content. Does anyone know if this is true?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: David Tildesley [mailto:[EMAIL
ose conditions should
>not be applicable to a simple request and thus should not affect the
output.
>In fact, the status code is 200 (not 302 in the case of a redirect). So
>then, I guess the only really difference that I'm seeing so far is that
they
>read from the request
then, I guess the only really difference that I'm seeing so far is that they
read from the request header. but I can't imagine that this would make a
difference. :(
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: micael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1
nse
object that is any different from the other pages. In the XsLTs I specify
output as HTML on all the pages. Very confusing.
Any thoughts as to why this might happen or how to correct it? I think it
may be causing me search engine indexing problems.
Thanks.
Neal
<>--
To unsubscribe, e
requested
from that domain!
2. apparently isn't supported by Netscape 4.7 so even if the above
was working, this still would not apparently be an option for some of the
older but still supported browsers.
:(
Any other thoughts? I'm not to keen on this 'feature'.
Thanks.
Neal
tried everything I
could think of and nothing else worked (e.g. "", "/*", "*", "*/", etc).
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Reynir Hübner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: a
request
using RequestDispatcher.forward("/path_to_somewhere" to what ever place you
want, then remove the welcome-files from web.xml, if you don't want that
functionality.
I think that might work for you.
Hope it helps
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From
the difference here may be to forward the user versus
redirecting them.
Thanks.
Neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
