magic.
Cheers.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Marco Pöhler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 4:54 AM
To: tomcat-user
Subject: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
Hi,
I'm running tomcat 5.0.19 J2SDK1.4.2_03 on a suse linux 8.1. I wrote a
really simple application, just one
Ha! I said the same thing a month ago and was completely ignored. :-\
-Original Message-
From: Angus Mezick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 6:44 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Digitally Signing Posts
+1
--Angus
-Original Message-
From: George
Any chance you guys would consider NOT sending signed or encrypted
emails to the list any more? They always choke my email client and it
just doesn't seem necessary for the purpose of an email newsgroup. ;-)
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Fiol Bonnín [mailto:[EMAIL
You're kidding? So, by default, I'm writing a freaking session for
every single page? That sounds like a colossal waist of resources.
Thanks though for the tip!
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Fiol Bonnín [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:46 PM
11:46 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat - Automatically writes a session?
You have to specify it on the JSP pages. I can't remember it properly,
but it must be something like:
@page session=false @
Google for it on the Tomcat site. I think you will find it.
Antonio Fiol
Neal wrote
-8859-1
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:44:21 GMT
Server: Apache Coyote/1.0
Thanks.
N
-Original Message-
From: Neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:53 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat - Automatically writes a session
, which may be a good idea - but I don't know what the solution will be if it
is in fact compiling the servlet incorrectly. Any other config opps to choke it off?
Neal
Torsten Fohrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tomcat sents automatically a cookie named jsessionid for session maintain to a
browser
is just straight Tomcat 4.1, no Apache. If you want to see an example of what
I'm seeing, please go to http://www.travelusa.com/.
If you can recommend any filters or anything else like that I should be looking at,
please let me know.
Thanks for your help.
Neal
Jeff Tulley [EMAIL
of 'meta' page (like header.jsp or login.jsp or
footer.jsp) which are included in any number of other pages.
As for filters, people are referring to any javax.servlet.Filter classes
you may have written.
-Original Message-
From: neal cabage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
cookie sent to you, as they are sent to you, including jsessionid
'session' cookies.
-Original Message-
From: neal cabage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat - Automatically writes a session?
Which tool
setting in the Web.xml and/or server.xml file that
I must tweak?
PS - I use Tomcat has my http server, not apache (in case that's
meaningful).
Thanks.
Neal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
I went through th process of applying the new Level 2 3 certs to my cacerts file
using the Java Keytool and the output of the keytool seems to have implied this was
done correctly but I'm still getting the same error when attempting to retrieve a
document over https (SSL):
I suddenly have a problem reading XML over SSL, where the system has
been in place for a year and the problem never existed before! And the
weird part is
that both my dev and production environmets now seem to have the same
problem.
Another interesting tidbit I have noticed is that I *can*
I suddenly have a problem reading XML over SSL, where the system has
been in place for a year and the problem never existed before! And the
weird part is that both my dev and production environments now seem to
have the same problem.
Another interesting tidbit I have noticed is that I *can*
What page at Verisign were you reading this from?
Thanks.
Neal
Mauro Pencov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I was reading in the site of the Verisign, I
found the page that offers for
download Intermediate CA, but this would be used for Apache. And in tomcat?
Somebody already it made
I'm trying to do something as simple as define global constants for my JSP
application. In ASP there is a Global.asa file and the closest thing in JSP is of
course the web.xml file. I defined a value in my web.xml file and assumed I could
retrieve it using the following line:
String test =
Oops, you're right that line would not have compiled...I meant I use this:
DataSource ds = (DataSource) new
InitialContext().lookup(application.getInitParameter(db.jndi.dsn));
...to get a datasource values and assumed the similar line would work for retrieving a
String:
String str =
Ah, thanks Ben. Yes, I tried what I wrote prior and also tried
application.getAttribute ... but didn't realize there was a getInitParameter() method.
That did the trick.
Thanks.
N
Ben Souther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In your web.xml file:
city_name
NY
In your JSP
City:
On
If it's really such a big deal, why not just be somewhat anonymous? Use
a temp email account and an alias.
-Original Message-
From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 4:18 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: google yourself
Hi guys,
I was facing the
Look in your Tomcat/conf/server.xml file. Is there an uncommented
service tag like the following?
Service name=Tomcat-Standalone
This instructs Tomcat to run standalone.
Also, you can confirm this by looking at Tomcat output when it is
stated. When tomcat starts it will write to standard out
Isn't netBeans now SunOne? And don't they now charge an arm and a leg
for it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 6:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JSP Editors
Try netbeans.
Its free.
And you can debug jsp's in
. Is there something
else here that I may be missing however? Can you see a possible explanation as to why
my app's waisted resources would not get cleaned up until I explicitly ran GC?
Thanks.
Neal
Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
Perhaps you are experiencing higher load, which requires more
that correct?
Anyone have any theories as to what this may mean and what the best
solution would be?
Thanks.
Neal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ha! That thing (SunOne) is the bulkiest, heaviest app I've ever
installed on my machine. I have to wait minutes for it to start up and
a good 30 seconds when intellisense recognizes a new class. Besides,
didn't Sun start charging some crazy price for it recently? Use to be
free but I think now
.
Please let me know if there's solution.
Neal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know how I can check to see how much memory is in use or
available on Tomcat at any point in time? I've been getting a
java.error.OutOfMemory error lately and I need to be able to track
what's going on.
Thanks.
Neal
this information on the Apache site, after
having looked for 1/2 hour.
Any thoughts/info would be greatly appreciates.
Thanks.
Neal
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
Thanks. How do I issue such a command? Command line, etc?
Neal
Nathan Mcminn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neal,
This will get you the total amount of memory available to the JVM tomcat
is running in:
Runtime.getRuntime().totalMemory()
And this will get you the amount free
Runtime.getRuntime
Thanks. Out of curiosity, what sort of RAM allocations would you typically do on a
production UNIX machine? Obviously I don't want to use up all of my memory, but this
and mySQL are my only two production apps.
'
Thanks.
Neal
James Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
neal cabage wrote:
I'm
.
But .. it is! And besides I didn't touch my sys variables.
Any thoughts? JDK1.4.1 isn't required here is it?
Thanks.
Neal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
related?
Here's the error:
javax.xml.transform.TransformerException:
org.apache.xml.utils.URI$MalformedURIException: No scheme found in URI
Thanks.
Neal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
are acceptable in Tomcat 4.1.18.
Why would Tomcat be involving itself in such issues? Only thing I can think
of is that maybe the conditions for this Apache Exception were redefined in
4.1.18:
org.apache.xml.utils.URI$MalformedURIException: No scheme found in URI
Neal
-Original Message-
From
Hmm ... I'm wondering how this is going to affect the x-platform-ness of my
application now.
I'm developing on a windows platform and deploying to linux, wherein my
paths actually *should* start with a /.
UUugh.
-
To
this is a bug somehow associated with the context of this
version of Tomcat.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Reynir Hübner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 12:41 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: XML problem with Tomcat 4.1.18 (but was ok in 4.0.4
If that's normal then why did it work in Tomcat 4.0.4 and not in Tomcat
4.1.18?
I can not say positively that it was not adding that leading slash in 4.0.4
but it was the first thing I noticed and when I took it out it fixed the
problem.
What else could it be?
Neal
-Original Message
of
this
version of Tomcat.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Reynir Hübner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 12:41 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: XML problem with Tomcat 4.1.18 (but was ok in 4.0.4)
Hi,
This may have something to do
: Saturday, March 01, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: XML problem with Tomcat 4.1.18 (but was ok in 4.0.4)
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, neal wrote:
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 13:29:08 -0800
From: neal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL
Thanks for the info.
I guess I'm just frustrated because my app broke when I upgraded Tomcat.
:-\
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 4:36 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: XML problem with Tomcat 4.1.18
I am in the process of upgrading from Tomcat 4.0.4 to 4.1.18 and whereas my
app worked just fine on 4.0.4 it now gives me this error when attempting to
parse the first XML document:
Error parsing pageMap.xml:
javax.xml.transform.TransformerConfigurationException:
-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: org.apache.xml.utils.URI$MalformedURIException: No scheme found
in URI
I am in the process of upgrading from Tomcat 4.0.4 to 4.1.18 and whereas my
app worked just fine on 4.0.4 it now
Ah. Good to know. Didn't even know about that list. :)
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 8:08 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5 - 302 issue resolved??? (please please please)
The BEST PLACE
Ah. Do you know then how long it might be until that sort of thing is
implemented? I'm *REALLY* looking forward to it! :)
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Barker
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
There was a discussion a month or two ago about fixing the issue wherein
Tomcat *redirects* to the welcome page rather than forwarding to it. For
instance, www.abc.com would be redirected to www.abc.com/index.html. Was
this issue in fact resolved in Tomcat 5.0?
I attempted to take a look at the
There was a discussion a month or two ago about fixing the issue wherein
Tomcat *redirects* to the welcome page rather than forwarding to it. For
instance, www.abc.com would be redirected to www.abc.com/index.html. Was
this issue in fact resolved in Tomcat 5.0?
I attempted to take a look at the
. Is there something I
am missing? :(
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:44 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta
for 2.0.40? It seems like an out-of-sync
doulbe whammy!
:(
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:40 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
Sorry, you lost me. You asked
-2.0.43 there are only links to (a) the source or (b) binaries for
*Windows*!.
I am sure I am probably missing somethinng ... please tell me what it is?!?!
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:57 AM
To: 'Tomcat
See, I knew there was something I didn't understand. Thanks. I'll take a
look. :)
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 12:42 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
I
.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:23 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
You need Apache 2.0.43. .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't.
Or, you can build your own
* that this is a
feature in Tomcat 5 (please please please!!!)?!?!?! :)
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:34 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Neal,
I told you that solution
to start from the Apache Service
manager I simply get a message stating The requested operation failed..
Anyone know what's going on? :(
Thanks.
Neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
replaced it with the build you were using
(mod_jk-2.0.43.dll) and from there is was pretty much home free!
Now on to doing the same on the Linux server (I hope its reasonably
similar). :)
Thanks again.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
to load the so (?).
I downloaded the mod_jk-2.0.43.so from the Apache connectors archives. I
just used the same version (but as a DLL) successfully on my windows
workstation.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003
Should the mod_jk-2.0.43.so be compatible with Apache 2.0.40? Its such a
minor build I would presume so but I'm getting an error message to the
contrary. :-\
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:36 PM
To: Tomcat Users
to the tomcat virtual app.
Is there a configuration change that must be made or must we dig into the
code and change the URLS?
I mean, is there a way around this in Apache? Do we need to provide those
full absolute URLS or is there some way to configure Apache/Tomcat to know
about this context?
Thanks
Neal
or is something I can set in Tomcat? Is there
something that wouldn't require the overhead of reflecting upon every single
request at the Java level?
Thanks.
neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instance.
In this case, is using WARP for production purposes a bad idea?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Lajos Moczar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:08 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: WARP (Apache-Tomcat)
One more point is that webapp is just
clue what the
problem is? A hunch is telling me to run regsvr32 on the dll. Any
thoughts?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: enLogica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:58 PM
To: Tomcat
Subject: WARP (Apache-Tomcat)
I am attempting to setup Tomcat 4.1
anyone know about the 1st possible issue though (Apache 2
compatability)?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (HP-Boise,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:56 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: WARP (Apache-Tomcat)
there is a good
that it is currently not supported on Windows.
And this is aside from finding an answer to the question of where this works
with Apache 2.0 or not!
Anyone out there using WARP or is everyone using mod_JK?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January
?
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: WARP (Apache-Tomcat)
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:38:55 -0800
From: neal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users
. Is that to say that WARP won't work in a multiple-host
scenario?!?! :(
Thanks
Neal
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:04 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: WARP (Apache-Tomcat)
Really?!?!
But I downloaded it from the win32 archives
, Windows *IS* supported
for 1.3.27 usage ... and its downloadable from the site. Man, Apache should
really update this documentation ... I just waisted the majorty of a day
figuring this stuff out (anyone from apache listening out there??). ;-)
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL
. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:52 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:38:13 -0800
From: neal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL
Its *not* that simple. Pagerank (guaging inbound links from other sites)
would need to all be coordinated to point to that specifc file. This would
be very difficult. PR is the most significant factor in SERPs on most
modern engines and if a good inbound link was to point to your base URL
(which
% or so.
We're selling our applications like crazy, which use Tomcat, but then again,
we use Apache as a rule for things on port 80. As far as we're concerned,
Tomcat is perfect.
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:18 AM
bucking that just
because (a) my ISP will want to get involved and charge me hourly for the
setup of an addt'l app and (b) I will have to get another $300 SSL cert from
Trawte if I go that road. Sigh.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January
: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:17 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
If the site has real value, the customers will find it all by themselves.
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January
Is that right? The key we generated for Tomcat will also work on Apache?!?!
This is surpising (though a plesant suprise) because the method by which we
had to create the key for tomcat was different than what the admin had
apparently done prior with Apache.
-Original Message-
From:
Hiya Neal (and others)
As a counterpoint to your argument about search engines and
small sites I have some real numbers:
From my website referrer stats:
(For an Apache HTTP: http://www.eaves.org)
Direct requests : 28%
Google.com : 1.5%
Google images : 0.7%
search.yahoo.com : 0.3%
Google.ca
.
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
I can only comment on my own experience. I'm assuming that the application
this RewriteRule would be integrated into
Tomcat:
RewriteRule ^/$ /index.html [L]
Thanks!
Neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a feature of tomcat ... I call it a PAIN IN THE ASS,
and a serious oversight for standalone Tomcat.
Anyone know a solution?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 7:16 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE
and Standalone Tomcat
Beat me with a stick if I'm wrong, but RewriteRule is for Apache when using
mod_rewrite, I don't think you can use it in server.xml or web.xml.
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 4:51 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Oh, does that mean it *is* possible to use RewriteRules with Tomcat
Standalone then? :-\
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:04 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Yes
neal wrote:
Oh, does that mean it *is* possible to use RewriteRules with Tomcat
Standalone then? :-\
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:04 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:37 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat version 4
Check the Tomcat log files, in CATALINA_HOME/logs. Typically, you'll want
the file that has a name of the form
?
BTW - I'm currently using Tomcat 4.0.4. I wouldn't by chance already have
this ability would I? I didn't see anything in the docs.
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:25 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE
John,
Thanks for the threads. I will certainly read them.
I can't imagine why Tomcat wouldn't support this behavior unless there is
another issue in Tomcat that this is covering up ... I mean this is basic
http server stuff, I thought. All the same...thanks! :)
Neal
-Original Message
. Because of the search engine spidering implications of starting
off with a 302 redirect, a Tomcat-standalone-hosted website will likley
never place well in most major search engines. So aside from theory ...
this is not a good feature, certainly not a viable one. :(
Neal
-Original Message
finally
getting around to putting it into action, I realized the problem.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:34 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Neal,
I told you
So, in this scenario .. if a url without a directory is given and without a
trailign slash, the redirect would not occur? That would fix this issue.
I could certainly get behind that. :)
if the final element of the path is a directory (or a context) without a
trailing
slash, redirect to the
off such
petty and rediculous issues put forth by the search engine defenses, but at
the end of that argument the issue still exists as does the sobering fact
that this will be a significant problem for anyone who chooses to deploy a
commercial application using the product.
neal
-Original
. but this one little thing would force me to have to go to apache.
IMHO, it would be a shame to not be able to use the product for this one
little reason.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:18 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE
path issues I would see
if I forwarded (rather than redirect) from one JSP to another? If so,
wouldn't this only be an issue if the welcome file was located somewhere
other than the root of the application?
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
on the engine that handles 80% of search traffic.
For anyone out there listening, any change this auto-redirect 'feature'
might have an off feature in future revisions? Or, does anyone know of
away around that redirect issue as of current?
Thanks.
Neal Cabage
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
, etc? Would
there be any clue to a search engine that any of these things aren't what
they appear to be?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:10 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat - a search
guessing this filter thing is something to look at, mod_rewrite too.
I'm also going to take a look at apache - my big hesitation there is that
the SSL certificate is already bound to Tomcat ... I think I'd have to buy
another to work with Apache. Sigh.
Thanks for the thoughts.
Neal
Oh wow ... very cool. Thanks Joel. I'm going to dig into this and learn
exactly what a rewrite rule is first thing tomorrow! :)
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 8:38 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat
Those are both very good points I hadn't considered - thank you!
:)
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 6:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: SEO and servlets
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Cox, Charlie wrote:
Date
it ... but I'm beginning to think perhaps not. :(
Anyway, thanks for your thoughts.
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: SEO and servlets
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, neal wrote
with Google and other major
engines?
Thanks.
Neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Well, the real reason I am worried about this is that I heard a rumor that
this could affect search engine crawling - that is may prevent some engines
from crawling the content. Does anyone know if this is true?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: David Tildesley [mailto:[EMAIL
that is any different from the other pages. In the XsLTs I specify
output as HTML on all the pages. Very confusing.
Any thoughts as to why this might happen or how to correct it? I think it
may be causing me search engine indexing problems.
Thanks.
Neal
attachment: winmail.dat--
To unsubscribe, e
then, I guess the only really difference that I'm seeing so far is that they
read from the request header. but I can't imagine that this would make a
difference. :(
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: micael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:27 AM
and thus should not affect the
output.
In fact, the status code is 200 (not 302 in the case of a redirect). So
then, I guess the only really difference that I'm seeing so far is that
they
read from the request header. but I can't imagine that this would make a
difference. :(
Thanks.
Neal
?
Thanks.
Neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
expectation.
Any thoughts?
Thanks!
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:40 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat redirects to default page
Neal,
I suppose index.jsp *is* the default page. Welcome pages
/index.jsp) is going to knock me down a few pegs on some of the
search engines.
a. Is this true?
b. Is there a way around it or do I have to submit my url at
www.myurl.com/index.jsp, rather than www.myurl.com?
Thanks.
Neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
the difference here may be to forward the user versus
redirecting them.
Thanks.
Neal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
