Re: SUMMARY: Apache 2.0.35 + Tomcat 4.0.3 under Windows 2000/XP

2002-04-30 Thread @Basebeans.com
Subject: Re: SUMMARY: Apache 2.0.35 + Tomcat 4.0.3 under Windows 2000/XP From: Bruno V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> === I tried to search for guides and howto to install Tomcat and Apache WITH a WARP connector (mod_webapp) Here is what I found so far : http://www.codesta.com/knowledge/tec

SUMMARY: Apache 2.0.35 + Tomcat 4.0.3 under Windows 2000/XP

2002-04-30 Thread Frederick Aubert
Hi Everybody, INTRO: I don't seem to be the only one having problems configuring Apache 2.0.35 and Tomcat 4.0.3. So I am going to try to summarize every tips and problems found so far and I'd like to suggest we all treat this topic as a single topic instead of concurrently having three or four to

Re: Apache 2.0.35, tomcat 4.0.3 and mod_webapp

2002-04-22 Thread Simon Stewart
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 10:04:35PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote: > Simon Stewart wrote: > > >Yet more digging suggests that this could be a bug: attaching an > >strace to the httpd process as it starts up gives: > > > >write(2, "Syntax error on line 1018 of /us"..., 66) = 66 > >write(2, "Duplica

Re: Apache 2.0.35, tomcat 4.0.3 and mod_webapp

2002-04-21 Thread Jeffrey Bonevich
I plan on submitting my 'experiences' to tomcat-dev - the things we all have figured out collectively to get Tomcat 4 and Apache 2 and mod_webapp working. Still trying to figure out why my struts-based webapps won't work when everything else will. Also, the warning does go away if I remove th

Re: Apache 2.0.35, tomcat 4.0.3 and mod_webapp

2002-04-21 Thread Georg Huettenegger
hi, i think you should forward your information to the developer. about your warning: i am assuming that removing -dlopen will make the warning go away (but i am not quite sure about that). bye, georg On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote: > Excellent point, Georg. I am a bit rusty on

Re: Apache 2.0.35, tomcat 4.0.3 and mod_webapp

2002-04-21 Thread Jeffrey Bonevich
Excellent point, Georg. I am a bit rusty on working with C/C++ compilation. Here is my attempt at getting the proper linking in of libwebapp: /usr/local/apache2/build/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -shared -o mod_webapp.so -rpath /usr/local/apache2/modules -module -avoid-version -I../incl

Re: Apache 2.0.35, tomcat 4.0.3 and mod_webapp

2002-04-21 Thread Georg Huettenegger
hi, it does make a difference whether one puts libwebapp.so into the lib or the modules directory. nevertheless it is quite clear why putting libwebapp.so into modules does work for me and others: the line that is used to link mod_webapp.so includes the rpath statement telling the module where to

Re: Apache 2.0.35, tomcat 4.0.3 and mod_webapp

2002-04-20 Thread Jeffrey Bonevich
Simon Stewart wrote: > Yet more digging suggests that this could be a bug: attaching an > strace to the httpd process as it starts up gives: > > write(2, "Syntax error on line 1018 of /us"..., 66) = 66 > write(2, "Duplicate connection name\n", 26) = 26 > _exit(1)=

Re: Apache 2.0.35, tomcat 4.0.3 and mod_webapp

2002-04-20 Thread Simon Stewart
Yet more digging suggests that this could be a bug: attaching an strace to the httpd process as it starts up gives: write(2, "Syntax error on line 1018 of /us"..., 66) = 66 write(2, "Duplicate connection name\n", 26) = 26 _exit(1)= ? Where line 1018 refers to: We

Re: Apache 2.0.35, tomcat 4.0.3 and mod_webapp

2002-04-20 Thread Simon Stewart
I've been doing some more work on this, and part of the problem appears to be the relative position of the ServerName and WebApp* directives. If the ServerName is declared above the WebApp* directive, there are no complaints about the "invalid server name", but httpd now doesn't start at all (thou

Re: Apache 2.0.35, tomcat 4.0.3 and mod_webapp

2002-04-20 Thread Simon Stewart
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:23:44PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote: > Simon Stewart wrote: > > >Having looked through the mailing list archives, this looks like a > >popular subject, and I think that I've almost got it cracked. Almost. > > > >After following the advice in > > > >http://www.mail-ar

Re: Apache 2.0.35, tomcat 4.0.3 and mod_webapp

2002-04-19 Thread Jeffrey Bonevich
Simon Stewart wrote: > Having looked through the mailing list archives, this looks like a > popular subject, and I think that I've almost got it cracked. Almost. > > After following the advice in > > http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg51557.html > > I just thought t

Apache 2.0.35, tomcat 4.0.3 and mod_webapp

2002-04-19 Thread Simon Stewart
Having looked through the mailing list archives, this looks like a popular subject, and I think that I've almost got it cracked. Almost. After following the advice in http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg51557.html I just thought that people might like to know that the

Re: I'm sure it's a rehashed issue, but I'll try anyway. (Apache 2.0.35 & tomcat 4.0.3) & mod_webapp.so

2002-04-18 Thread Jeffrey Bonevich
Joshua- Refer to the messages under threads: "Creating mod_webapp" and "Error compiling mod_webapp for debian Linux" and "Tomcat 4.0 and Apache 2.0.35 (yet again)" and join the club! jeff Joshua Chen wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been trying to get my

I'm sure it's a rehashed issue, but I'll try anyway. (Apache 2.0.35 & tomcat 4.0.3) & mod_webapp.so

2002-04-18 Thread Joshua Chen
Hi all, I've been trying to get my Apache 2.0.35 & Tomcat 4.0.3 up and running (on solaris 2.7). Apache works great, and tomcat works great as well. But now I try to use the mod_webapp.so file that came with apache 2.0.35, and I get the undefined symbol: ap_pstrdup So I read in a

Re: Apache 2.0.35+Tomcat 4.0.3

2002-04-17 Thread dbgroups
To make tomcat as a servlet container for apache 2: 1) Do i need both mod_webapp.so and mod_jk.so? i make it work fine using mod_jk for apache 1.3.22 and tomcat 3.3 2) i use tomcat-4.0.3 for jdk1.4 with the mod_webapp.so and mod_jk-01.so from Linux-1386. i can make tomcat-4.0.3 run as a de