/benchmark_summary.sxw
http://cvs.apache.org/~woolfel/tc_results.html
I've finished a complete draft of the benchmark results. If you have
any feedback, please email me directly. thanks in advance.
peter lin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:18:59 -0500, Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've updated the document with more charts from the excel spreadsheet
and tried to make the explanations more clear.
I'm really interested in the part of your tests which show certain new
CPU architectures showing a big
http://cvs.apache.org/~woolfel/benchmark_summary.doc
http://cvs.apache.org/~woolfel/benchmark_summary.sxw
http://cvs.apache.org/~woolfel/tc_results.html
I've finished a complete draft of the benchmark results. If you have
any feedback, please email me directly. thanks in advance.
peter lin
Here are some charts for the benchmark results I posted a few days
back. It's taking longer than I expected to create the charts.
http://cvs.apache.org/~woolfel/tc_results.html
enjoy.
peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:15:01 -0500, Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the latest set of benchmark results. I discovered an error in
my test plan for 40K PNG, so the results for that one was off. All of
the other results should be accurate. I re-ran the tests.
Server:
AMD 2ghz
1Gb
quick explanation of errors for 40K png test. The errors were the
result of OS and not Tomcat. For some odd reason, after a couple of
hours of benchmarks, the OS stopped accepting connections. I will
re-run that one test later for my final write up.
I've posted updated testplans including 4 with
Here is the latest set of benchmark results. I discovered an error in
my test plan for 40K PNG, so the results for that one was off. All of
the other results should be accurate. I re-ran the tests.
Server:
AMD 2ghz
1Gb RAM
Redhat FedoraCore1
Client:
Gateway laptop 450
1.4ghz centrino
Windows XP
Per Remy's request, I ran some more tests last night with larger
number of threads. the configuration of the test plan is as follows
1K png: 10, 50, 100, 150 threads
10K png: 10, 50, 100, 150 threads
each thread as was to 1000 iterations.
ramp up times: 1, 5, 10, 20 seconds
Server:
Redhat
Peter Lin wrote:
Per Remy's request, I ran some more tests last night with larger
number of threads. the configuration of the test plan is as follows
What would be nice (since you have infrastructure set up)
is to compare the results with Apache2.
Last time i did it there was only 10% difference
Yup, I plan to try jdk5 with TC5.5.4 per Remy's request.
once I get that out of the way, I plan to work on the enhancements to
the status servlet. I took a quick look at apr-java, looks cool. No
comments yet, but I will post them to tomcat-dev when I do :)
peter
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:30:38
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:11:11 -0500, Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per Remy's request, I ran some more tests last night with larger
number of threads. the configuration of the test plan is as follows
1K png: 10, 50, 100, 150 threads
10K png: 10, 50, 100, 150 threads
each thread as was
Peter Lin wrote:
Yup, I plan to try jdk5 with TC5.5.4 per Remy's request.
Cool, but can you compare the results with Apache2.0.52
when serving the same static content files on the same
hardware?
That would be very interesting thought. Even more then
bare statistical data you've presented.
Regards,
any tomcat user out there have Redhat FC3 installed and want to help
run some tests? I will post the jmeter test plans this weekend.
it would make remy really happy :)
peter
And no FC 3 ? ;) I think it would run fine on your computer, and it's
a higher quality distribution overall (it
yeah, I've d/l 2.0.52 and plan on running a test. Graham O'Regan is
also going to run the tests again Squid for comparison too.
If I have time, I also plan to compare httpd 1.3. All I need now is
some speed so I can go without sleep :)
peter
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:40:16 +0100, Mladen Turk
Peter Lin wrote:
If I have time, I also plan to compare httpd 1.3. All I need now is
some speed so I can go without sleep :)
In my country we are using the thing called 'Rakija' for that.
It has 45% of alcohol, but has some strange side-effects.
Someone are even stating that it can make you drunk
what a concept Schnapps over speed. Wonder what would happen if
someone made a redbull + Schnapps + speed cocktail 8-)
that wouldn't kill you, really.
I'll stop the jokes there.
peter
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:59:57 +0100, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Lin wrote:
If I have time,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:07:37 -0500, Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what a concept Schnapps over speed. Wonder what would happen if
someone made a redbull + Schnapps + speed cocktail 8-)
Use it to chase the diet pills and nodoz, and you may never sleep again. :-)
i've got 5.5.4 w/jvm 1.5.0-b64 on fc3 (2.6.9-1.667,i386).
unfortunately, the hardware is a desktop unit 760 MB ram, ide drive, 2.6
P4 (512 cache). let me know if i should give it a try.
Peter Lin wrote:
any tomcat user out there have Redhat FC3 installed and want to help
run some tests? I
Sure, it can't hurt to try it out. Even if the specs are different,
the data point is a good baseline comparison. I'll post the test plans
shortly to my apache directory.
peter
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:28:52 -0500, Sessoms, Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've got 5.5.4 w/jvm 1.5.0-b64 on fc3
for those who want to look at the test plans or assist, I've posted
the jmeter test plans
http://cvs.apache.org/~woolfel/testplans.zip
peter
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:28:52 -0500, Sessoms, Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've got 5.5.4 w/jvm 1.5.0-b64 on fc3 (2.6.9-1.667,i386).
unfortunately, the
I run FC3, FC2, RH9 and soon will have Debain install going, I would be
happy to help or whatever.
From: Sessoms, Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: more benchmark results
Date: Fri
I've started a series of benchmarks to measure tomcat5 performance for
static files and compare it to apache2. Here are the results I have so
far. I thought others might find it interesting.
Server:
Redhat Fedora Core 1
AMD 2hgz
1Gb ram
jdk1.4.2
TC5.0.x ( have to double check the release number)
Subject: some TC5 benchmark results for static file
I've started a series of benchmarks to measure tomcat5 performance for static
files and compare it to apache2. Here are the results I have so far. I thought
others might find it interesting.
Server:
Redhat Fedora Core 1
AMD 2hgz
1Gb ram
Good question. I haven't run the apache tests yet. I forgot that I
don't have apache2 installed on my linux box, so this weekend I plan
to install and run the tests.
once all the tests are done, I plan to write up a quick article,
generate some charts and zip up all the files, including the
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:16:08 -0500, Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started a series of benchmarks to measure tomcat5 performance for
static files and compare it to apache2. Here are the results I have so
far. I thought others might find it interesting.
Server:
Redhat Fedora Core 1
Hi,
I want to measure the performance of a Servlet that I wrote. To have a
number to compare with i wrote a servlet which does only a single println in its doget
method.
When i measure the throughput of this servlet with ab using this arguments:
ab -n 2 -c 10
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unexpected timeout during benchmark
Hi,
I want to measure the performance of a Servlet that I wrote. To have a
number to compare with i wrote a servlet which does only a single
println
in its doget method
: unexpected timeout during benchmark
Hi,
I want to measure the performance of a Servlet that I wrote. To have a
number to compare with i wrote a servlet which does only a single
println
in its doget method.
When i measure the throughput of this servlet with ab using this
arguments:
ab -n
Hi,
How counter-intuitive...
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Rathje [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 12:41 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: unexpected timeout during benchmark
Hi,
increasing the values
Peter Lin wrote:
today I took the day off, but tomorrow I plan on running more benchmarks. I ran into one weird behavior when I ran the same jmeter test with 10 threads for 5K iterations. Half way through tomcat stopped accepting connections, but was fine. If I wait two minutes, it continue to
: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16
today I took the day off, but tomorrow I plan on running more
benchmarks. I
ran into one weird behavior when I ran the same jmeter test with 10
threads
for 5K iterations. Half way through tomcat stopped accepting
connections,
but was fine. If I wait two minutes
I've done a fair amount of jsp and servlet development since 99 when JSP .9 spec
wasn't implemented in most servlet containers. I doubt I can provide insight into
improving reliability that tomcat developers haven't already thought of.
Most of the projects I've worked on the last three
Peter Lin wrote:
I forgot to mention the Jmeter settings I used.
All tests were with 1 thread for 5000 iterations. The first two image tests used images for tomcat. The third image test with 194.5k image was a simple screen capture of my desktop.
Thanks for the small benchmark. It is a bit odd
for tomcat. The third image test with 194.5k image was a simple screen capture
of my desktop.
Thanks for the small benchmark. It is a bit odd that some tests are
slightly worse, although it's well within the margin of error.
If you have other tests (maybe with a higher load factor), send them
I'm posting some early results of benchmarks I'm running on the different versions.
Hopefully others will find the information useful.
The benchmarks were performed on two systems:
Server: 450mhz p3
512mb pc100 RAM
jdk 1.4.0
tomcat 4.1.12
tomcat 4.1.16
Client: 900mhz celeron
I forgot to mention the Jmeter settings I used.
All tests were with 1 thread for 5000 iterations. The first two image tests used
images for tomcat. The third image test with 194.5k image was a simple screen capture
of my desktop.
peter
Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm posting some
PROTECTED]
Subject: benchmark
Greetings everyone, a quick thanks to the tomcat
developers for their hardwork.
I just spent two week performing benchmarks on tomcat
4.0.1 and I thought some people might like to know the
results I got.
My comparison was between Orion 1.5.2 and tomcat
4.0.1. I used
Greetings everyone, a quick thanks to the tomcat
developers for their hardwork.
I just spent two week performing benchmarks on tomcat
4.0.1 and I thought some people might like to know the
results I got.
My comparison was between Orion 1.5.2 and tomcat
4.0.1. I used JMeter to perform the test
thanks for sharing your info!
B
-Original Message-
From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: benchmark
Greetings everyone, a quick thanks to the tomcat
developers for their hardwork.
I just spent two week
Hi,
I would like to bench my web server( apache/tomcat )
What's the best ?
I would like to indicate a list of urls( with somes params in it )
and that it takes care of sessions.
Michenaud Laurent
- Adeuza -
[ Développeur Web - Administrateur Réseau ]
--
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
Try
http://webperformanceinc.com
We've used it here and its really rather good.
You 'train' it by setting your browser to use it as a
proxy and then go through the bits of the site you want
to test. You login and it records the data you sent
Then you can get it to give your site alot of pain.
:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tomcat benchmark
does anyone have information about tomcat benchmark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED
http://www.orionserver.com/benchmarks/benchmark.html
-Original Message-
From: shlomi sarfati [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 6:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tomcat benchmark
does anyone have information about tomcat benchmark
43 matches
Mail list logo
