Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Yep I see what you mean know (fog of stupidity lifts).
Ok so to iterate, the problem is that since linux
has multiple workers, these workers will want to attach
themselves to their own tomcat instance.
How about this then..instead of launching
several tomcat instances (
> -Original Message-
> From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
>
> Yep I see what you mean know (fog of stupidity lifts).
> Ok so to iterate, the problem is that since linux has
> multiple workers, these workers will want to attach
> themselves to their own tomcat instance.
> How about this then..
Mladen Turk wrote:
Look at the thread.
Unfortunately the JNI isn't of much use on Linux, or to be more specific, on
any multi child mpm.
If you manage to maintain the single worker process (like winnt-mpm does),
then you can use the JNI.
The reason for that is quite simple; You cannot have two TC
or the documentation.
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 17:54
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
> From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
>
> I thought I had a rough understanding but it turns out
> From: Nikola Milutinovic
> Sent: 9. siječanj 2004 10:18
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
>
> >>
> >>What is the real benefit of running TC from within Apache via JNI?
> >
> > It should be a faster, caus
Mladen Turk wrote:
That was the thing that I considered, but again if you have
multiple
workers, what would be the benefit of having that much Tomcat
instances running.
What is the real benefit of running TC from within Apache via JNI?
It should be a faster, cause there is no socket channel in
> From: Nikola Milutinovic
> Sent: 9. siječanj 2004 7:31
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
>
> Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> >>From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
> >>Sent: 8. siječanj 2004 16:34
> >>
> >>Would
Mladen Turk wrote:
From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
Sent: 8. siječanj 2004 16:34
Would it not be possible to bind JNI under a single worker
and then isolate that worker from the rest of the pool
(possibly provide the ability for workers to carry some sort
of identification bit with regards to who can
> From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
>
> I thought I had a rough understanding but it turns out that I
> dont %-) Do you mean that JNI will work only under one worker
> containing a single child process?
>
Are you using the Tomcat as in or out of the process?
In process tomcat (invoked from webserver
>That was the thing that I considered, but again if you have multiple
>workers, what would be the benefit of having that much Tomcat instances
>running.
>So either you have a single worker with the single TC instance launched or
>none.
>Having single worker running TC, keeping the rest 30 withou
OK . . . when I take a break from job searching I'll
look at that and the missing -laprutil-0 in
server/apache2/Makefile
It's probably missing in the appropriate mod_jk
Makefile as well.
/mde/
just my two cents . . . .
> Yes.
> Few months ago we decided to use the APR as
> mandatory for JK2.
>
> From: Mark Eggers
> Sent: 8. siječanj 2004 18:09
> To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
>
> I've tried compiling the jk2 code in
> jakarta-tomcat-connectors from CVS and get the following
> err
I've tried compiling the jk2 code in
jakarta-tomcat-connectors from CVS and get the
following error for this file:
common/jk_channel_socket.c
common/jk_channel_socket.c:74:2: #error
"jk_channel_socket is deprecated"
Any thoughts?
I've gotten both IP and UNIX sockets to work on Fedora
Core 1 usi
> From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
> Sent: 8. siječanj 2004 16:34
>
> Would it not be possible to bind JNI under a single worker
> and then isolate that worker from the rest of the pool
> (possibly provide the ability for workers to carry some sort
> of identification bit with regards to who can ac
RE: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
> From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
> Subject: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Bringing the woes of jk2+JNI again here with the dreaded
> "Can't find child xx in scoreboard", since I haven't fo
> From: Yiannis Mavroukakis
> Subject: mod_jk2 JNI question for the brave :)
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Bringing the woes of jk2+JNI again here with the dreaded
> "Can't find child xx in scoreboard", since I haven't found a
> satisfactory answer by anyone.
> Using TC5 with Apache 2.0.x under Linux
16 matches
Mail list logo