Hi all,
I have a war that connects to a database pool defined in a Resource
section within server.xml. This war is run in a tomcat v5.0.19
environment as binary released by the jakarta project, and works 100%.
I now want to deploy the war inside a jpackage RPM version of tomcat on
my production
I've just spent about a week trying to get Apache 1.3 with mod_jk
working and Tomcat 4 (embedded in JBoss). I gave up, tossed Tomcat and
swapped in Jetty. I haven't got mod_jk working with that either, but
at least Jetty doesn't balk at web requests every third click.
On Mar 6, 2004, at 9:53
Hi All,
I'm trying to help someone out with his integration of Apache and
Tomcat. He's using the jpackage RPM packages for mod_jk2 and he's having
problems. I remember that someone on this list once got them working and
posted the instructions. I tried looking for that email in the Tomcat
list
Check this
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=106639528807348&w=2
Antony Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Ove Lillegraven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:03 PM
Sub
Hello
I cannot find any more rpm packets for Tomcat installation. I usually found them at
http://jakarta.apache.org
I've got 4.1.24. Is there any newer rpms for Tomcat 4.x, maybe for Tomcat 5.x?
rpm are more suitable for our use than tar.
Thanks
Jens Ove
How To Install Tomcat 4.1.27 Standalone using Jpackage RPMs
---
The Tomcat Team no longer generates monolithic RPMs for the
full or LE version of Tomcat after 4.1.24. Instead, RPMs
can be obtained from www.jpackage.org. Jpackage's app
How To Install Tomcat 4.1.27 Standalone using Jpackage RPMs
---
The Tomcat Team no longer generates monolithic RPMs for the
full or LE version of Tomcat after 4.1.24. Instead, RPMs
can be obtained from www.jpackage.org. Jpackage's app
Our Tomcat production upgrade process has been constructed around the
usage of the full RPMs that were formerly generated by Henri Gomez.
Unfortunately, the binary distribution for 4.1.27 no longer seems to
include the RPMs that were part of 4.1.24. Of course, www.jpackage.org
does have a
;Tomcat Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 4:22 AM
Subject: RPMs
>
> Hello,
>
> I have installed the tomcat 4 RPMs but when I http to port 8080 I see
> nothing despite the fact that I have started tomcat and apache from
> the /
Hello,
I have installed the tomcat 4 RPMs but when I http to port 8080 I see
nothing despite the fact that I have started tomcat and apache from
the /etc/init.d directory. Any ideas?
Thanks!!!
Neil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Never mind.
I got it! :)
Yea!
Thanks a ton to everyone who helped me.
--
***
* Rick Roberts*
* Advanced Information Technologies, Inc. *
***
--
I have a working install using all RPMs.
At least the tomcat examples are running.
I installed the FalseHope RPM, Tomcat4 RPM and mod_jk2 RPM.
The FalseHope RPM uses ports 8092(http) and 8093(https) by default.
If I change the httpd2.conf and the ssl.conf to use port 80 and port
443, I get
Is anyone working on a new rpm distribution of modjk2 2.0.2, the latest
rpm available from the jakarta site is 2.0.1, and of course it would be
nice to take advantage of any bug fixes in 2.0.2. I'd rather use an rpm
because of the ease of administration. Thank you for any information
that you mig
Does anyone know if/when new RPMs for Tomcat 4.1.24, and modjk2 2.02
will be released on the jakarta site?
Alberto
---
Alberto J. Chinique
Network Engineer
LEROS Technologies Corporation
9990 Lee Highway
Suite 500
Fairfax, VA 22030
I am trying to install Tomcat via the PRMs. I know, RPMs are a pain
sometimes, but once I get them working it is easy to install them on a
bunch of machines.
So, I am using Java JDK 1.4.1. It is installed:
# rpm -q j2sdk-1.4.1-fcs
j2sdk-1.4.1-fcs
I think that 1.4.1 comes with all the xml
Agreed. I'm not arguing, just saying that the typical RPM user isn't
someone who is capable of building their own RPMs, yet somehow there is the
perception that "RPMs are safe and easy" just because they do a lot of work
with just one command and someone says "her
forgot the most import issue, we use RPM/MSI for jar files.
IMHO:
You do have many valid points there. To justifty what we do here:
We do not assume, the validity of any package (unless our support
contract covers it). That said we role our own RPMs here.
We put together systems (servers
IMHO:
You do have many valid points there. To justifty what we do here:
We do not assume, the validity of any package (unless our support
contract covers it). That said we role our own RPMs here.
We put together systems (servers?) for our clients. We need the assurance
that we can
* Kevin Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0134 17:34]:
> If you have a Linux box and like to keep your installed programs nice and
> tidy using the RPM program then rpms are essential unless there is another
> program used for managing installation of program from tar/tgz/tar.gz
> ar
Believe me, I understand what/why RPMs (and other package schemes) were
developed. My point was that there is no need for them with Tomcat. A
binary install does nothing to the system. I change Tomcat installations
simply by changing a symlink. There is only one dependency, and that is the
like to keep your installed programs nice and
tidy using the RPM program then rpms are essential unless there is another
program used for managing installation of program from tar/tgz/tar.gz
archives?
I run SuSE v8.0 & 8.1 and there was a kb article that said to use a program
called /
If you have a Linux box and like to keep your installed programs nice and
tidy using the RPM program then rpms are essential unless there is another
program used for managing installation of program from tar/tgz/tar.gz
archives?
I run SuSE v8.0 & 8.1 and there was a kb article that said to u
RPMs provide transaction level control for system modification. When you
install an application manually, you ASSUME that the administrator has
investigated ALL interactions and dependences. Can correctly uninstall the
package when needed, rembers it is installed.
Now rpm puts these details on
Actually, the release builds have moved to a new scenario, basically the
same as Apache HTTP. Tomcat release binaries are available from various
mirror sites. On any given mirror, there are only /bin and /src, and in
/bin there are the full versions and the LE versions. I think RPMs went
away
i think the general tree structure is as follows:
/.../bin
/rpm
/src
different builds move around the tree, and not all builds have rpms (at
least until some one builds them)
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Kevin Wilson wrote:
where are all the RPMs for the 4.1.X versions of Tomcat
where are all the RPMs for the 4.1.X versions of Tomcat?
ter.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Tomcat [mailto:tomcat@;mobile.mp]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:35 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RPMs are quirky, not evil (was RE: Stuck, frustrated and in
> desperate need of help)
>
>
>
> /etc/
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 15:47, Mark Eggers wrote:
> RPMs are evil, RPMs are evil . . .
There definitely are some painful things about the Tomcat rpms, but once
you understand their quirks they are fine. Here are their quirks that I
know of so far:
Tomcat LE doesn't install when using
necessary to run tomcat, the LE version does not include
them.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Baker [mailto:rascharles@;yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 6:23 PM
To: tomcat
Subject: 4.1.12 rpms
What is the difference between the full and le
versions of the 4.1.12 rpms
rpms
What is the difference between the full and le
versions of the 4.1.12 rpms?
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.charleshbaker.com/~chb/
Hacking is a "Good Thing!"
See http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html
__
Do you Yaho
What is the difference between the full and le
versions of the 4.1.12 rpms?
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.charleshbaker.com/~chb/
Hacking is a "Good Thing!"
See http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! W
JK 2.0.1 for Linux i386 binaries and rpms (including sources)
are available :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0.1/bin/linux/i386/
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0.1/rpms/
Regards
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail
h for something
along the lines of "Distribution Policy?"
I don't remember the full topic, but you should find it with that.
HTH,
Eddie
- Original Message -
From: "John C Cartwright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2
Hello All,
Is anyone planning to build RPMs for 4.0.4 like there were for 4.0.3?
Thanks!
-- john
=
John Cartwright
Associate Scientist
Geospatial Data Services Group
CIRES, National Geophysical Data Center/NOAA
(303) 497-6284
[EMAIL
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tomcat Users List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: RE: Distribution Policy? Where did the RPMs go?
I'm working on tomcat 4.0.4 rpms, which need much more externals
rpms (many from comm
>Don't take me as a definitive source as I'm not a commiter (or
>even a developer) but I believe there is work to make the RPMs
>for tomcat4 more FHS compliant. There is also some debate as
>to how FHS compliance should be achieved (proper directory
>structure, s
Don't take me as a definitive source as I'm not a commiter (or even a developer) but I
believe there is work to make the RPMs for tomcat4 more FHS compliant. There is also
some debate as to how FHS compliance should be achieved (proper directory structure,
symlinking in post-in
tributions past 4.0.3. That's the
last version I see one for. I rather like the RPMs myself and would like to see them
continue. Did someone accidentally comment out that part of the Ant script? =) I
certainly hope you all haven't decided to no longer build RPM distributions =(
The TC 4.0.3 rpm have been reuploaded since
there was a nasty problem in previous upload
and only .asc file where present.
Sorry for the disturbance.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
The Tomcat 3.3 rpms has been updated to release 2
to fix a problem with launchers configuration paths.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles w
I've fixed this; a security-aware admin had made /usr read-only ...
- Original Message -
From: "chris brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tomcat-user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:48 AM
Subject: Tomcat 4.0.1 RPMs: installatio
I can't get Tomcat 4 to install under Linux using the 4.0.1 RPMs
(specifically, tomcat4-4.0.1-1.src.rpm).
Even as root, it fails with the following message:
error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/bin: cpio: chown failed -
file system is read only
I'm a bit of a linux no
>
Not sure if anyone might find this useful, but I compiled my own Tomcat 3.3
RPMs for RedHat 7.2 that depend on the IBMJava2-SDK RPM from IBM. I
recognize that there are "official" Tomcat RPMS that can be downloaded from
the Jakarta web site, and I've used the 3.2 ones
Thanks, it would have been nice to have a bit of documentation that referred to these
new RPMs. Since the docs I was using came from the RPMs themselves, they are
obviously outdated.
Happy New Year!!!
-Original Message-
From: Gerrit Kuilder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday
suppose the .conf file is used for setting JAVA_HOME etc.
the rpm's worked (and works) for me , althoug I have to go localhost:8180
HTH
Regards,
Gerrit
Donald Lee wrote:
> I went to
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.1/rpms/
> downloaded tom
I went to
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.1/rpms/
downloaded tomcat4-4.0.1-1.noarch.rpm
installed using rpm -iv tomcat4-4.0.1-1.noarch.rpm
everything appeared to be going ok until I came to the part in the doc
file I found called running.txt
"execute
Magazine_ that
can walk you through the installation.)
Shane
> -Original Message-
> From: Amandeep Jawa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Q] Hard to find Tomcat RPMs on the site?
>
>
> (Ple
ache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/rpms/
What I tried:
If you go to the download section of the site & look for the latest
production quality Tomcat release (say 3.2.3)
You have to choose between binary or source.
If you choose binary - you end up at this link:
http://jakarta.apache
>From: Jonathan Eric Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:43 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: 4.0 RPMs: when
>
>
>What's wrong with the .zip file?
>
>Jon
Problems with license of all the required jar (jta, jmx, ldap, tyrex
What's wrong with the .zip file?
Jon
- Original Message -
From: "Sergey V. Udaltsov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: 4.0 RPMs: when
> Hi
>
> > We still have problems with rela
Hi
> We still have problems with related jars, like jdbc2.0ext, jta,
> jmx, ldap which are copyrigthed by Sun and so couldn't be
> included in RPM
I see. But if you cannot include these jars - you're always able to
include them into dependancies...
What's wrong with this solution?
Regards,
>I heard a lot of good things about 4.0. But there are no RPMs
>released:(
>Can anyone comment the situation with them (or just give URL:)?
We still have problems with related jars, like jdbc2.0ext, jta,
jmx, ldap which are copyrigthed by Sun and so couldn't be
included in RPM
Hi all
I heard a lot of good things about 4.0. But there are no RPMs released:(
Can anyone comment the situation with them (or just give URL:)?
Regards,
Sergey
gt; Provides jaxp 1.1
>Great! This is a way!
>
>> May be next release
>OK
>
>> may be next time crimson. I could add such system at install
>time but what
>> to do when a user got at the same time, crimson and xerces-j ???
>Can two installed RPMs provide jax
is a way!
> May be next release
OK
> may be next time crimson. I could add such system at install time but what
> to do when a user got at the same time, crimson and xerces-j ???
Can two installed RPMs provide jaxp 1.1? Is this valid in RPM world?
If yes, some post-install script should
>> The XML parser should be included in the distro since new and average
>> users MAY never use XML in their apps.
>OK. My vote is for xerces (it is good and has same licence).
>Also, it would be good to have the list of tomcat-compatible parsers.
>At the moment, I tried jaxp 1.1 and latest xerce
> The XML parser should be included in the distro since new and average
> users MAY never use XML in their apps.
OK. My vote is for xerces (it is good and has same licence).
Also, it would be good to have the list of tomcat-compatible parsers.
At the moment, I tried jaxp 1.1 and latest xerces -
>> I launch that poll to see if which XML parser RPMS users want to
>> see included by default.
>Probably no XML parser should be included. . Just document the
>fact that
>admin should synlink necessary jars to the tomcat lib
>directory. IMHO it
>is wrong idea to inclu
> I launch that poll to see if which XML parser RPMS users want to
> see included by default.
Probably no XML parser should be included. . Just document the fact that
admin should synlink necessary jars to the tomcat lib directory. IMHO it
is wrong idea to include parser with any java app
Hi Sergey,
>With Tomcat 3.2.2 RPMS, I got some XML parser.
>I suspect it is sun's JAXP implementation 1.0. It DOES NOT support
>namespaces (I found it from the error messages:) so it is not possible
>to use XSL in JSPs/Beans/servlets.
That's a known problem. I packag
files missing :!
>-Original Message-
>From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:28 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 4 RPMS released
>
>
>Sure
>
>ftp://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/mod_webapp/
&
What problems were you encountering? And I want to try this with TOMCAT 4?
-Thoughts or comments!
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 4 RPMS released
904A 364F 80E6
>-Original Message-
>From: Nael Mohammad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:21 AM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 4 RPMS released
>
>
>Gomez do you have an RPM for mod_webap
Gomez do you have an RPM for mod_webapp ?
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 4 RPMS released
RPM
RPM available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.2-beta-4/rpms/
Linux i386 mod_jk.so (EAPI and STDAPI) at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.2-beta-4/bin/li
nux/i386/
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED
/
I'll be
or move rpms directory in bin to help users find it ?
2) I will provide binary for TC 3.2.1 as I do for TC 3.3-m1 :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3-m1/bin/linux/i3
86/
with both STD API and EAPI. I'll will also add a INFO about
Hi,
Just started to upload my RPMS for jakarta projects :
I followed the general recommandation and create a rpms subdir in each
project subdir.
Each source rpm follow the following rules :
- All binaries are rebuilt from source code. No RPM with just copy of
allready generated jars.
- General
Hi,
Just released RPMs for TOMCAT 3.3 (from CVS).
When installing, this RPM replace TOMCAT 3.2BETA since
it goes in the same area /var/tomcat but as TC 3.2B could
be used at the same time that TC 4.0-m4.
TC 3.3 => http://rpmized.free.fr/rpms/tomcat/
http://rpmized.free.fr/rpms/tomcat/tom
68 matches
Mail list logo
