> >From: Stewart, Daniel J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:34 PM
> >To: Tomcat Users List
> >Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
> >
> >Since I will be occasionally receiving messages in the
> 10Mbyte range, I
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:34 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
>
>Since I will be occasionally receiving messages in the 10Mbyte range, I
>can't read in a line at a time - it takes too long.
>
AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
Hi,
I should have thought that as a general principle it's not a good idea
to try to store the response in a byte array. I recently worked on a
piece of code that did just that (worse, actually, it then c
s on the use of the standard
library are welcome.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:30 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
Howdy,
>public void service(HttpServlet
ssage-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 September 2003 19:30
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
Howdy,
>public void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res) {
> BufferedReader reader = req.getReader(
Howdy,
>public void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res) {
> BufferedReader reader = req.getReader();
> try {
>char [] charArr = new char[req.getContentLength()];
>reader.read(charArr);
>String str = new String(charArr);
>
>try {
> File f = new File("ser
rr.println(err.toString()); }
}
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:34 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
Howdy,
Perhaps if you share your servlet which writes the message body
31 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Tomcat sucks at receiving large messages
>
>
>When receiving a HTTP 1.0 POST with a 10kbyte payload, my doPost()
>method writes the message body to a file. The file is the right size,
>but my data is nulled out (set to 0) after correctly r
When receiving a HTTP 1.0 POST with a 10kbyte payload, my doPost()
method writes the message body to a file. The file is the right size,
but my data is nulled out (set to 0) after correctly receiving about
2kbytes.
In frustration, I set the Connector bufferSize parameter to "100",
to discove
Hi Frans!
Frans Thamura wrote:
> I think, Gomez must create tomcat-doc ASAP.
I agree completely! Let people do what they do best.
Un saludo,
Alex.
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Peter
> Mutsaers
> Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 2:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: TOMCAT SUCKS
>
> ... On Tomcat specifically, I can only say that I'm
> running Tomcat4 beta-5
>
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter
Mutsaers
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 2:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TOMCAT SUCKS
... On Tomcat specifically, I can only say that I'm running Tomcat4 beta-5
for a critical Intranet server. It replaced JRUN some ti
>> "Nick" == Nick Stoianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nick> I really think that TOMCAT SUCKS so bad. I'm not against the
Nick> open source community but this is why I think that TOMCAT
Nick> sucks:
Some of the points you're mentioning are n
documentation is focus in English first, and follow
with any other language.
Frans
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Stoop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Tomcat Documentation Redactors To Hire] - WAS: T
une 29, 2001 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: TOMCAT SUCKS
> Hi Jeff!
>
> "Noll, Jeff HS" wrote:
> > Not to get into a great big argument over OS version commercial
> > products, but if OS projects expect to be taken with the same
consideration
> > as commercial t
Ich bin bis 9.7.2001 auf Urlaub. Bitte wenden Sie sich in dieser Zeit an meine
Kollegen im Team EW2
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Petra Hora
he divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.filip.net
>-Original Message-
>From: Simon Brooke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 5:22 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Re[2]: TomcatBook - was TOMCAT SU
in others like bug finding we excel).
> Because its free might be the reason the documentation sucks, it
> shouldn't be a justification. (not that i'm saying tomcat sucks, just
> argueing the point).
Un saludo,
Alex.
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> [...]
> We all know that tomcat documentation is incomplete and we need help
> in that area.
>
> Tomcat IS AN OPENSOURCE project with a big user community,
> Jon Stevens recently reported more than 50-100k downloads / month.
>
> Everybody could be involved in the project, and
Ich bin bis 9.7.2001 auf Urlaub. Bitte wenden Sie sich in dieser Zeit an meine
Kollegen im Team EW2
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Petra Hora
Ich bin bis 9.7.2001 auf Urlaub. Bitte wenden Sie sich in dieser Zeit an meine
Kollegen im Team EW2
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Petra Hora
On Friday 29 June 2001 11:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A few months ago a project to write a Tomcat book was started (check:
> http://www.sourgeforge.org search for tomcatbook)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/tomcatbook/>
> Haven't heard a lot about it since. Wouldn't it be an good idea to
> s
gt;
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Tomcat Documentation Redactors To Hire] - WAS: TOMCAT SUCKS
> i could help with translations: french, german, portuguese
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> So who will be interested in working on the Tomcat Documentation ?
I am highly interested. I am writing a french tutorial about servlets (which
can be found at http://darktigrou.free.fr/). It's a work in progress.
I am also involved in the french python translation group
(http://frpython.source
se respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Wilko Hische/HADV/NL)
Subject: Re: TomcatBook - was TOMCAT SUCKS
[IMAGE]
I think tomcatbook "must" be a sub project of tomcat.
Like it or not, we have to overdrive tomcat expert for
t
n times packaging and presentation, and a
> >finished looka nd
> >feel are the key to getting in the door and this is where most
> >OS projects
> >fail miserably.
> > Because its free might be the reason the documentation sucks, it
> >shouldn't be a justification. (not that i'm saying tomcat sucks, just
> >argueing the point).
> >
goes against
> some very basic
> > rules of Software Engineering. In the real world
> does this really matter? I
> > dunno, but often times packaging and presentation,
> and a finished looka nd
> > feel are the key to getting in the door and this
> is where most OS pr
Carlos Ferreira wrote:
>
> i could help with translations: french, german, portuguese
And I with the Dutch version. I'd also be willing to write, but I'm
quite new with Tomcat and since I started with JServ a year and a half
ago, Tomcat isn't very transparant for me, I'm afraid...
i could help with translations: french, german, portuguese
- Original Message -
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:41 AM
Subject: [Tomcat Documentation Redactors To Hire] -
>I'd be willing to proofread and validate any docs for the j-t-c (i.e.
>Apache/Tomcat integration). I don't have time to actually write the
>docs, but I could conceivably help those who don't understand how it
>works, but do have the time and patience to learn it and write docs
>for it.
Be ou
neering. In the real world does this
>>really matter? I
>>dunno, but often times packaging and presentation, and a
>>finished looka nd
>>feel are the key to getting in the door and this is where most
>>OS projects
>>fail miserably.
>> Because its fre
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:41:52AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> So who will be interested in working on the Tomcat Documentation ?
I'd be willing to proofread and validate any docs for the j-t-c (i.e.
Apache/Tomcat integration). I don't have time to actually write the
docs, but I could conceivabl
e door and this is where most
>OS projects
>fail miserably.
> Because its free might be the reason the documentation sucks, it
>shouldn't be a justification. (not that i'm saying tomcat sucks, just
>argueing the point).
>
At 04:18 PM 6/28/2001, you wrote:
>I believe there is a project (yes there is, I thought I'd check before
>sending this) called tomcatbook at sourceforge
>(http://tomcatbook.sourceforge.net). Perhaps that would be a good place to
>a) look for advanced answers, and b) suggest questions.
Its not a
the door and this is where most OS projects
> fail miserably.
> Because its free might be the reason the documentation sucks, it
> shouldn't be a justification. (not that i'm saying tomcat sucks, just
> argueing the point).
n the documentation sucks, it
shouldn't be a justification. (not that i'm saying tomcat sucks, just
argueing the point).
e-
> From: James Radvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 June 2001 10:56
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: TOMCAT SUCKS
>
>
> I think openly criticising a product that many people have
> worked hard to
> create and provide for your FREE use sho
> 3. The integration with apache (using mod_jk) sucks. It slows down the
> productivity of the web server with at least 1000%
?? i'm running a fairly complex website (very drastic flash frontend/java backend) and
it works fine. big server though, but it really runs quite fine.
> I really think
TED]]
Sent: 28 June 2001 02:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nick Stoianov
Subject: Re: TOMCAT SUCKS
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:10, Nick Stoianov wrote:
> 5th - I haven't met anybody in this mailing list who has a complex
> installation of Tomcat with a lot of virtual hosts , different ports and
>
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:10, Nick Stoianov wrote:
> 5th - I haven't met anybody in this mailing list who has a complex
> installation of Tomcat with a lot of virtual hosts , different ports and
> load balancers. So - who will help me in situation like this? No books , no
> support, no help from the
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Arnold Shore wrote:
> Well, you can always ask for your money back.
>
> But I note that per the Tomcat intro, "... Tomcat is the official
> Reference Implementation ..."
>
> A reference implementation has never been intended as a production
> version, but rather a version fro
lite well placed
question goes pretty far around here.
Cheers,
Todd V.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Stoianov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 6:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pete
Subject: Re: TOMCAT SUCKS
To all of you "tomcat fans",
Attacking me with th
crew, IMO.
Arnold Shore
Annapolis, MD USA
-Original Message-
From: Nick Stoianov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TOMCAT SUCKS
Hi guys,
I really think that TOMCAT SUCKS so bad. I'm not against the open source
communit
ercial product with
> support may be a better choice for you. But it's going to cost you
> (whereas Tomcat is free). But that's a choice you're making as to how
> best to allocate your resources (and it may perfectly well be a
> legitimate choice). Again, it doesn&#x
out of the box, or have someone else
figure it out for you. So a heavy duty commercial product with
support may be a better choice for you. But it's going to cost you
(whereas Tomcat is free). But that's a choice you're making as to how
best to allocate your resources (and it may pe
in problem' or 'weblogic problem' into it.
>
> If Tomcat does not fit your needs, or you are unable to configure it
> correctly, by all means, ask for help. But don't claim it SUCKs just
> because you can't solve your own problems, or phrase your questions in
>
tion.
FYI, Free means free (i.e., you get what you pay for) and at Jcafeinc.com it
works wonderfully for us and the price is right.
kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Stoianov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:53 PM
S
weblogic problem' into it.
>
> If Tomcat does not fit your needs, or you are unable
> to configure it
> correctly, by all means, ask for help. But don't
> claim it SUCKs just
> because you can't solve your own problems, or phrase
> your questions in
> suc
Nick,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 06:53, Nick Stoianov wrote:
> 2. Virtual hosting for Tomcat is almost impossible - especially if you have
> a load balancer in front of the web server.
I find the virtual hosts work fine with the exception of port based virtuals
(same ip/name different port). Where exa
t claim it SUCKs just
because you can't solve your own problems, or phrase your questions in
such an obnoxious manner that help is unlikely to be willingly provided.
-Pete
> Hi guys,
>
> I really think that TOMCAT SUCKS so bad. I'm not against the open source
> commu
> Hi guys,
>
> I really think that TOMCAT SUCKS so bad. I'm not against the open source
> community but this is why I think that TOMCAT sucks:
>
> 1. The documentation for Tomcat is so bad and it covers only the basic
> server installation. HELL - usually for produ
> 5. And what if you have a problem that is not in the
> documentation (99% of
> the problem with Tomcat are not even mentioned in the
> documentation)? I guess
> the only way is to post in the mailing list. And guess what
> happens if nobody
> has experienced this problem before? You have t
Wednesday, June 27, 2001 09:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TOMCAT SUCKS
Hi guys,
I really think that TOMCAT SUCKS so bad. I'm not against the open source
community but this is why I think that TOMCAT sucks:
1. The documentation for Tomcat is so bad and it covers only the basic
server
At 01:53 PM 6/27/2001, Nick wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>I really think that TOMCAT SUCKS so bad. I'm not against the open source
>community but this is why I think that TOMCAT sucks:
>
>1. The documentation for Tomcat is so bad and it covers only the basic
>server installati
Hi guys,
I really think that TOMCAT SUCKS so bad. I'm not against the open source
community but this is why I think that TOMCAT sucks:
1. The documentation for Tomcat is so bad and it covers only the basic
server installation. HELL - usually for production purposes people have
55 matches
Mail list logo
