RE: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and W2000

2003-11-05 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
03 11:45 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and > W2000 > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/common/AJP v13.html#Questions%20I%20Have "What happens if the request headers > max packet size?

Re: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and W2000

2003-11-04 Thread Robert Leftwich
At 10:57 AM 5/11/2003, I wrote: Some sort of bug in mod_jk? (although it happens using both mod_jk and mod_jk2). Hmm, it looks that way On further investigation the actual problem appears to be with the response size not the request size. The scenario is that after a successful POST a jsp f

Re: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and W2000

2003-11-04 Thread Robert Leftwich
At 10:01 AM 5/11/2003, Christopher Schultz wrote: HTTP POST information doesn't go in the headers, so you should still be okay. As long as you aren't senting huge amounts of information via a GET request, or you are sending like a million cookies or something. True - it is definitely using POST.

Re: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and W2000

2003-11-04 Thread Christopher Schultz
Robert, From http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/common/AJPv13.html#Questions%20I%20Have "What happens if the request headers > max packet size? There is no provision to send a second packet of request headers in case there are more than 8K " So more correctly if the http requ

RE: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and W2000

2003-11-04 Thread Tracy Saward
: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and W2000 I am attempting to get this combination to work correctly using an in process Tomcat *without* using AJP, as the 8k hard limit on total request size imposed by AJP is not viable in my situation. Now, I can get the setup to work

Re: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and W2000

2003-11-04 Thread Robert Leftwich
At 09:37 AM 5/11/2003, Christopher Schultz wrote: Robert, I am attempting to get this combination to work correctly using an in process Tomcat *without* using AJP, as the 8k hard limit on total request size imposed by AJP is not viable in my situation. There's an 8k maximum request size with the

Re: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and W2000

2003-11-04 Thread Christopher Schultz
Robert, I am attempting to get this combination to work correctly using an in process Tomcat *without* using AJP, as the 8k hard limit on total request size imposed by AJP is not viable in my situation. There's an 8k maximum request size with the AJP protocol? Really? I've been uploading files o

Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and W2000

2003-11-04 Thread Robert Leftwich
I am attempting to get this combination to work correctly using an in process Tomcat *without* using AJP, as the 8k hard limit on total request size imposed by AJP is not viable in my situation. Now, I can get the setup to work using AJP, based on the many how-to's contributed by various people