Re: [tor-talk] Revolt Against Tor Over Rape Claims, Process, Board, Etc

ou and your purported principles shall forever be "the ones who fell from grace, disgraced themselves and disgraced the community, spitting on the very principles we all held to be sacred and inviolable". Your time is close to running out. Your sincerely, With absolute, unequivocal, and unsh

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Project Corporate Document FOI Request

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:01:58AM -0400, z9wahqvh wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote: > > > Nope, you can make an FOI request of anyone. You can make an FOIA > > request of any government agency and they have certain statu

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Project Corporate Document FOI Request

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 08:03:49AM -0400, Allen wrote: > > > > One can request anything. > > For starters, you can't legally request that someone assassinate the > President, send you child pornography, provide you with weapons of mass > destruction, etc. So definitely not anything. So

Re: [tor-talk] Recent news stories regarding Tor

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 05:23:48PM -0700, Spencer wrote: > Hi, > > > > >Zenaan Harkness: > >tor-talk is about to be replaced with tor-users. > > > > Tor-users sounds like a usability list. > > > > >[criticism on] tor-talk is going away. >

Re: [tor-talk] Tor is anti-censorship software

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 03:10:42PM -0400, Paul Syverson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:54:04AM -0400, Mansour Moufid wrote: > > The advertising doesn't correspond to reality, because it's false > > and dishonest, not because the user is dumb. > > Why do you imply the user is dumb? I

Re: [tor-talk] Recent news stories regarding Tor

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 04:56:57AM +, cicada_3...@riseup.net wrote: > On 2016-06-30 01:49, Mirimir wrote: > >On 06/29/2016 01:14 PM, Allen wrote: > >>> > If it were up to me, I would vote at this point to ban grarpamp from > this > list for at least a month for keeping this topic

Re: [tor-talk] Reminder to stay on-topic

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:37:08PM -0400, Griffin Boyce wrote: > I've been fairly surprised that the response has been almost entirely > positive. The 45-post thread on cypherpunks where Zenaan Harkness called me > a "fake man" (classy) notwithstanding. Taking out of co

Re: [tor-talk] Day of Action: Is the FBI targeting YOU??

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:49:44PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote: > On 6/21/2016 11:58 AM, Kate Krauss wrote: > >Greetings, Tor Talkers! > > > >The US Department of Justice is trying to institute new rules that would > >let the FBI hack computers that use Tor and other > >privacy-protecting

Re: [tor-talk] Reminder to stay on-topic

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 04:14:02PM -, Ben wrote: > > Rules or policies should be enforced equally in an unbiased way. Even > > moderated forums allow certain "unpermitted" discussions while deleting > > / closing others immediately. +100 And, any individual to be banned, when their posts

Re: [tor-talk] Design of next-generation Tor systems

FYI - Forwarded message from carlo von lynX <l...@time.to.get.psyced.org> - On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:05:27PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Great discussion, great questions, fascinating to read! Thx > If building a new physical layer network (neighbour to neighbour), w

Re: [tor-talk] Question for those who say "Tor is pwned"

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 07:12:31PM -0700, Ted Smith wrote: > Paul, it pains me to see someone, who has contributed so much to > humanity through a long and celebrated career as a scientist, feel the > need to engage with what is at worst an agent of some oppressive > government hoping to scare

Re: [tor-talk] Food for thought

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 09:31:12PM -0300, juan wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:12:51 +1000 > Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote: > > > > Those who remain there and genuinely thought/ think they were "for the > > cause" prolly have some serious soul

Re: [tor-talk] Food for thought

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 05:07:30PM -0300, juan wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:00:25 -0600 > Mirimir wrote: > > Do you actually understand Tor's design? > Yes. Do you? > And do you understand why the US military created tor? > > >> For links, check out /r/Tor. >

Re: [tor-talk] "But he does good work." *Appelbaum*

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:19:59PM +, Tempest wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > thomas.hluch...@netcologne.de: > > You have. You might consider that intelligent services have large > > amounts of resources. If this is a planned attack from a group of > >

Re: [tor-talk] Debian Developer, removed since 2016-06-18 *Appelbaum*

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:36:54PM +0300, ja.talk wrote: > https://nm.debian.org/public/person/error > > Jacob Appelbaum > > Account name > error > > OpenPGP fingerprint > 043E 0E69 DD56 BA59 5905 8756 90BC 9192 B062 91B2 > > Status > Debian Developer, removed since 2016-06-18 Debian is

Re: [tor-talk] "But he does good work." *Appelbaum*

> Indeed, Jake's dementi is consistent with many of the allegations. dict dementi does not turn up a definition - ?? -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] Fw: FOAD argentina scum

Hey hey, you've hit the big time! Amazing that anyone could even begin to think that such eloquent discourse with yourself would have any outcome approximating their own idea of "utility". Epitomes of self parodying irony come to mind ... gee, dunno why :D Methinks a button pushed doth fire,

Re: [tor-talk] Bittorrent starting to move entirely within anonymous overlay nets

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:20:16PM +0200, Aymeric Vitte wrote: > Le 17/06/2016 à 12:51, Zenaan Harkness a écrit : > >> Even if an interesting move as you described (ie onions + onioncat) I > >> > don't really think that it can scale to the extent required by a bt p2p >

Re: [tor-talk] Bittorrent starting to move entirely within anonymous overlay nets

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:41:51PM +0200, Aymeric Vitte wrote: > Le 17/06/2016 à 06:55, grarpamp a écrit : > > On 6/10/16, Mirimir wrote: > >> But there's still the traffic load. Or maybe, one could consider it as > >> chaff. Just sort of, though. Right? > > If that's the old

Re: [tor-talk] Food for thought

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:05:23PM -, foodforthou...@sigaint.org wrote: > Things are never black and white, there are always two sides of a story > and people are never only good or bad. > > But was it really our first and foremost concern to find out the "truth"? > Is the lesson to be

Re: [tor-talk] Please suggest domain registrats that are Tor (and bitcoin) friendly.

> Here's the point: in a VPS situation, you are, absolutely, at the mercy of > the provider of the VPSes, and possibly to the providers of the data > center. And here's a topical article if you ain't seen it yet:

Re: [tor-talk] Jake Fan-Fic

Well this is useful, it highlights how someone, perhaps more than one, may well got their nickers in a real tight not over Jake. And given that any of the below is true (don't know, never met the guy), such provocative, bluntly sexual, tacky gutter "humour" as he probably intended it (and hey,

Re: [tor-talk] Please filter "Appelbaum"!!!!!

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:47:34PM +0300, 4torlist2 wrote: > Tired of reading bullsh*t about Appelbaum! If he did what it is said, should > In my mail program I setup a filter on the word "Appelbaum", messages with > it are automatically trashed. But that should have been done by the Tor-List >

Re: [tor-talk] Please suggest domain registrats that are Tor (and bitcoin) friendly.

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 08:55:18AM +, contact_...@nirgal.com wrote: > ng0 wrote: > > I am not 100% sure about the tor part, but OrangeWebsite[0] supports > > 2 kinds of coins. > > You could get in touch with support to ask about the tor part of the > > question. > > I strongly advise against

Re: [tor-talk] Can we have less of Jacob Appelbaum here, please?

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:38:46PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > SJW tactics were well known since years. Mechanisms thus > should have been put in place to communicate, listen, early > intercept and resolve professionally / legally. It and others like > it should never have been here or on the net in

Re: [tor-talk] Graffiti "rapist lives here" at Jacob Appelbaum's house

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 06:42:04PM -0400, Kevin wrote: > We talk about how internet bullying is wrong. Well, this is internet > bullying. This is internet bullying, descended into an internet lynch mobbing, descended further into physical net vigilante crimes. The mindset allowing for such

Re: [tor-talk] Can we have less of Jacob Appelbaum here, please?

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:23:16PM +, df. wrote: > Agreed Mirimir, it is VERY difficult to avoid or ignore talking about > someone who at the time of there collaboration with the tor project was > allegedly involved in some type of "sexual misconduct". > > Just for the record: > Actually I

Re: [tor-talk] Statement by Jill Bähring regarding Jacob Appelbaum

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:09:20AM +, df. wrote: > > Mirimir: > > | On June 7, 2016, Gizmodo published a story in which “eyewitnesses” - > > | Emerson Tan, Meredith Paterson, and Andrea Shepard - supposedly > > | “recount” Jacob Applebaum’s “unwanted sexual advances”. The article > > | was

Re: [tor-talk] CULT OF THE DEAD COW Statement on Jacob Appelbaum / ioerror

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:23:52PM +0200, carlo von lynX wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:16:24AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > I agree with you. Some say "naming and shaming" is the way - I say naming > > bad behaviour, publicly, is not shaming. > > > >

Re: [tor-talk] Sorry Jake I know you are innocent

Notwithstanding the veracity of the sender of the email you replied to, your english is more than good enough, and thank you for being succinct, on topic of the thread and relevant. On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 10:29:49AM +0200, tom wrote: > Hello ja.talk, > > if you are a man, then block yourself.

Re: [tor-talk] Bittorrent starting to move entirely within anonymous overlay nets

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:52:35AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > First come the clearnet indexes... > > # kickass torrents ... Before I blinmked I read that as "first they came for the clearnet torrents" as a riff on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came... Might be topical at this moment:

Re: [tor-talk] Jacob Appelbaum Has Allegedly Engaged in Sexual Misconduct for Over a Decade

Cecilia, you are an amazing person, to transform the experiences you have had and to be able to come to this conversation with the love and gentleness - this brings a tear to my eye. Thank you. Truly, you are an inspiration, Zenaan On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:58:49PM -0300, Cecilia Tanaka

Re: [tor-talk] CULT OF THE DEAD COW Statement on Jacob Appelbaum / ioerror

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:32:31PM +0200, carlo von lynX wrote: > > Fistly, identify if someone is being bullied, and second, if the target of > > the bully appears strong enough to handle the "bully". > > Even if the target is strong enough, the constellation will still cause > damage I believe.

Re: [tor-talk] CULT OF THE DEAD COW Statement on Jacob Appelbaum / ioerror

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:47:15PM +0200, ma...@wk3.org wrote: > Quoting carlo von lynX (2016-06-08 08:28:23) > > The problem is, if the victims have committed crimes themselves > > by making their stories public, then going before a judge may > > backfire on them. Not just fake victims, also real

Re: [tor-talk] fwd: FBI Is Pushing Back Against Judge's Order to Reveal Tor Browser Exploit

On 5/19/16, Joe Btfsplk wrote: > bad ideas. It just struck me as odd that this topic was one of very few > when most tor-talk subscribers decided to adhere to communication > silence. That's potentially inflammatory. I have not chosen to "adhere to communication silence", I

Re: [tor-talk] fwd: FBI Is Pushing Back Against Judge's Order to Reveal Tor Browser Exploit

On 5/19/16, krishna e bera wrote: > On 05/18/2016 11:40 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote: >> I'm surprised there are no discussions or questions on tor-talk about >> this issue . >> Since any exploits - whether due to "flaws" in Firefox or TBB, or not - >> potentially have broader

Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

On 2/7/16, grarpamp wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Tom A. wrote: >> Yes take care and look yourself or believe so called experts or >> multiplicators. > > Fine example of the classic passive shilling for GoldBug / BitMail, etc. > >> I

Re: [tor-talk] There might be someone who needs help

cypherpu...@cpunks.org might have more posts and discussion you like including general crypto and privacy, unless you specifically want to talk tor. Excellent is good :) On 3/13/16, tor_t...@arcor.de wrote: > Hi Tor Talkers, > >

[tor-talk] does TBB 'advertise' the list of actual plug-ins, or only a static/fixed list?

Since this is a significant privacy/ anonymity issue, and we are generally recommended to not install any plugins into TBB at all, due to these reasons/ problems, can someone tell us please: does TBB 'advertise' the list of actual plug-ins (like I assume Firefox does), or only a static/fixed

Re: [tor-talk] Time for p2p, content addressed, pre-emptively cached web pages - Tor Project Accuses CloudFlare of Mass Surveillance, Sabotaging Traffic

On 2/28/16, Jason Turning wrote: > I'd bet if you took a hard look at their venture capitalist > funding some interesting links would emerge. And with significant funding comes board seats; same as Facebook - a bunch of "ex-" CIA and NSA guys jumped on the Facebook board

[tor-talk] Time for p2p, content addressed, pre-emptively cached web pages - Tor Project Accuses CloudFlare of Mass Surveillance, Sabotaging Traffic

Perhaps someone can design something to counteract the CIA and NSA's Cloudflare tool? Evidently we need a better way to read our news and blogs. Cloudflare is getting to pervasive.

Re: [tor-talk] Tor for everyone; introducing Eccentric Authentication

On 2/26/16, Guido Witmond wrote: > On 02/25/16 01:58, Paul Syverson wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Guido Witmond wrote: >>> I don't want *people* to exchange keys. I envision people to exchange >>> names and let computers do the key lookup. That's fine but

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: Cryptopolitik and the Darknet

On 2/25/16, Yaron Goland wrote: > Tor has argued that we have the right to listen without being forced to > expose our identity. Don't we also have the right to be heard without being > forced to expose our identity? This can only partially be achieved at the moment - think

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: Cryptopolitik and the Darknet

On 2/25/16, eliaz wrote: > Elaboration: I said in my previous post that I never quite believed that > "there are more good than bad people." I think it's more to the point > of upgrading tor architecture to say that I don't feel comfortable > relying on "there are more good

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: Cryptopolitik and the Darknet

On 2/25/16, eliaz wrote: > Elaboration: I said in my previous post that I never quite believed that > "there are more good than bad people." I think it's more to the point > of upgrading tor architecture to say that I don't feel comfortable > relying on "there are more good

[tor-talk] Saving images from TBB

Sadly I'm stuck on gmail at the moment. Happily it works fine in TBB. Sadly when I click to save an image from an email, that image gets re-downloaded. Is this latter problem a Firefox thing, or a TBB thing? In either case, is there an about:config setting to override the behaviour, so that I

Re: [tor-talk] ru news

Well if nation-states can compete against each other in this way, perhaps this is the best overall outcome we can hope for? On 11/25/15, Vladimir Teplouhov wrote: > http://www.securitylab.ru/news/476982.php > > > Должен заметить, что сумма контракта была по

Re: [tor-talk] ru news

erov <koma...@openmailbox.org> wrote: > Compete against each other in mass surveillance? Well, no, I don't see > any overall outcome in this. > > Zenaan Harkness: >> Well if nation-states can compete against each other in this way, >> perhaps this is the best overall outco

Re: [tor-talk] KARMA POLICE

On 10/1/15, Ryan Carboni wrote: > http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/06/exclusive-in-2009-ed-snowden-said-leakers-should-be-shot-then-he-became-one/ > > https://theintercept.com/2015/09/25/gchq-radio-porn-spies-track-web-users-online-identities/ > > Yep. > > Time to create

Re: [tor-talk] Detritus

On 9/18/15, Lara wrote: > paul.cra...@sdf.org: >> I'd like to ask individuals to take a moment to erase the detritus of >> earlier messages before hitting "Send". Otherwise, I'm going to get >> carpel tunnel syndrome hitting "Page Down" to get to the meat in the

[tor-talk] TBB update using offline/ downloaded tarball?

Is there an upgrade process for TBB by e.g. unpacking the tarball over the existing installation directory, or does one have to use the in-browser upgrade-in-place option or install to a separate directory? TIA Zenaan -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

On 7/31/15, Cari Machet carimac...@gmail.com wrote: dear roger that is your opinion Roger D: ... please think through whether it contributes usefully to the topic at hand, and whether it contributes *sufficiently* for many thousands of people to read it. Roger asked us to think, before we

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

On 7/30/15, Alexandre Guillioud guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com wrote: To Zenaan : I havn't enough grasp on english language (i have a hell of time to debunk sarcastics comment in my own language, let alone english) to determine if you are backing me or are pushing me into the cliff. Don't

[tor-talk] TBB image cache bug?

Anyone else seeing this?: For a couple weeks now, with sites like gizmag.com, but also others, TBB seems to mix up some of the images, where Firefox does not. Eg http://www.gizmag.com/bionicon-e-ram/38687/ Right now for me contains a side image with this caption: Age-related macular degeneration

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

On 7/29/15, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 + Virgil Griffith i...@virgil.gr wrote: Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military ntending to use Tor for? me: Exactly the same things they use it for right now. Communications for their

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

On 7/29/15, Lara lara@emails.veryspeedy.net wrote: Alexandre Guillioud: People which need tor for security, anonymity, can and will inform themselves.. If they don't, they risk exactly what they were risking withiut it. But if that's so, than the sky is not falling. Won't Jeebus come on

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

On 7/30/15, Alexandre Guillioud guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com wrote: Reread a few post back. First you are whining about tor being misused, and after being put in place by Lara, you say internet is full of ressources anyway ? Plain nonsense. Plus, making citation on two weird sentences i

Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

On 7/30/15, Alexandre Guillioud guillioud.alexan...@gmail.com wrote: Guy, this could be reversed. Tor has limitations ? Make a pretty infographics on the subject and move on. It's not by using these kind of epistomologique principle that you'll educate the mass. My point is you are putting

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't amoral?

On 7/10/15, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:35:04 -0500 Drew Fustini pdp7p...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings - I am a Tor Browser user and also an operator of a couple Tor relays. I believe the Tor Project has a noble mission. An online friend recently claimed to me that

[tor-talk] TBB: on/offline button in toolbar

Hi, I am familiar and very content with the Firefox toolbar-buttons plugin - which provides a couple of key toolbar buttons, such as: - work on/offline This allows e.g. for sites which insist on messing with my cache settings/ sanity and reloading the dang page when I go back and or forward in

[tor-talk] torproject.org being redirected/ DNS multi link paged to ww2.torpoject.org

going to torproject.org, redirects to http://ww2.torpoject.org/ , which comes up with what appears to have a link at the bottom to: http://www.gstatic.com/domainads/privacy/ It should instead redirect to this page: https://www.torproject.org/index.html.en Just a config oversight, or an

Re: [tor-talk] Matryoshka (fill traffic in networks?) [was: Are TOR holes intentional?]

On 6/18/15, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote: but it sure looks like another case of somebody not understanding the research field, and thinking that solving the traffic confirmation attack is easy, without actually

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browsers on SourceForge

On 6/7/15, Griffin Boyce grif...@cryptolab.net wrote: Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists wrote: Given that there could be sketchy reasons to distribute Tor Browser unofficially and that Tor it's a copyright of Tor Project, shouldn't the Tor Project ask to SourceForge to act to: a) Or Remove

Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web

On 5/29/15, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote: On 5/28/15, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: to be taken other than filling your unused capacity with fill traffic. No network to date appears to be developing or using

Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web

On 5/28/15, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker ph...@hallambaker.com wrote: Tor certainly works for some of its intended uses. If you are in a repressive state and want to get access to CNN or the like, Tor is your friend. It isn't going

Re: [tor-talk] New Astoria Tor client is said to be better than plain Tor

NOTE, if you want newbies (and occasionally potential contributors) to not be really frustrated with your communciation, perhaps define your key terms on first use. Since AS has not been defined anywhere in this thread (yet), I downloaded the paper (OK, that might be a reasonable desire - get

Re: [tor-talk] Use of TOR [sic] for illegal activities

On 5/21/15, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Paul A. Crable p...@crable.us wrote: I'd support censorship if I was in charge of it You won't be. but I doubt most others would go along with my idea. No one here will be either. As you've discovered, it's

Re: [tor-talk] Meeting Snowden in Princeton

March 1st Tor cooperates with LEO Tor has been giving talks to LEOs since its initial release as a public software project. Pretty impressive software. IBM might be interested in that one, assuming the talks have been two-way things of course ... -- tor-talk mailing list -

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

The GNS/ alternate distributed DNS thing is the bit I was specifically referring to. I do share your assessment that Gnunet does not provide anything like adequate anonymity. GnuNet's GNS could be (I assume) run across TOR or I2P - this is what might be interesting to explore (for someone who

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

On 4/25/15, goofyzrn...@vfemail.net goofyzrn...@vfemail.net wrote: Roger Dingledine: And to be clear, I think this is a great trend: we need to make onion services easier to understand and more accessible (and faster and more robust) for ordinary people, or we'll remain stuck with all the

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

On 4/24/15, Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de wrote: On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:31:18 +, benjamin barber wrote: ... ... , and actively steering people away from tor, if they are looking for real anonymity or security. Where do you steer them *to*? At this point in time, there's no I2PBrowser for

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

On 4/24/15, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote: On 4/24/15, Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de wrote: On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:31:18 +, benjamin barber wrote: ... ... , and actively steering people away from tor, if they are looking for real anonymity or security. Where do you steer them

Re: [tor-talk] Hi!

On 4/8/15, gary02121...@openmailbox.org gary02121...@openmailbox.org wrote: How do I anonymize my phone? Yeah I have heard that phones are tracking devices. I have to use my phone right now. If I have the money to buy a replicant compatible phone, I will. I'm running on Android OS and I as

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Summer of Privacy

On 4/8/15, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 20:35:44 -0400 Paul Syverson paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil wrote: More details on the history at https://www.acsac.org/2011/program/keynotes/ I mean we don't need to repeat yet again that tor is a project of the US military.

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Summer of Privacy

On 4/8/15, Speak Freely when2plus2...@riseup.net wrote: Holy fuck you're still talking? Give it a rest buddy. Gold! Absolute gold. We do have freedom of speech, at least to this limited degree. I am grateful. Thanks all, and keep it up eh, Zenaan -- tor-talk mailing list -

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Summer of Privacy

On 4/7/15, Moritz Bartl mor...@torservers.net wrote: On 04/06/2015 05:44 AM, Juan wrote: I doubt that's something the US military is going to favor. I'm guessing that having a bunch of 'directory authorities' under their full control was one of the basic design requirements.

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Summer of Privacy

On 4/6/15, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 12:51:31 +1000 Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote: - full decentralization model for TOR I doubt that's something the US military is going to favor. I'm I too seriously doubt that. guessing that having a bunch

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Summer of Privacy

On 4/6/15, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote: On 4/6/15, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote: Until then, I do (hint hint, nudge nudge), encourage you to write up your TSOC project proposal :) :) The point being, a project proposal, for others to take by the horns, unless of course you

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Summer of Privacy

On 4/6/15, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 18:25:59 -0700 Damian Johnson ata...@torproject.org wrote: Thanks to Google, http://www.wikileaks.org/Op-ed-Google-and-the-NSA-Who-s.html //rest of establishment vomit snipped Ahh, Juan, dear Juan - a breath of fresh air

[tor-talk] rant - just want a bit of music

I am presently in New Zealand, and when I try to view in firefox or download with youtube-dl, some a Capella music, half the time I get a message from Google saying SME (Sony Music Entertainment) has blocked this track in my country. Surely solving the ready-access to censored content problem

Re: [tor-talk] Hi!

On 4/5/15, goofyzrn...@vfemail.net goofyzrn...@vfemail.net wrote: gary02121993, Perhaps the relationships between the various legal definitions of 'malice' and 'restraint' would be somewhat instructive? Touche :) -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or

Re: [tor-talk] Hi!

On 4/4/15, blo...@openmailbox.org blo...@openmailbox.org wrote: On 2015-04-03 20:13, Alexis Wattel wrote: Sure! Glad to help! PS. I know this is vague but please ask away for anything you guys are not clear about or something. Malicious uses of Tor include child raping through the use of an

Re: [tor-talk] Hi!

On 4/5/15, luis lu...@riseup.net wrote: On 04/04/2015 11:30 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: On 4/4/15, blo...@openmailbox.org blo...@openmailbox.org wrote: On 2015-04-03 20:13, Alexis Wattel wrote: Sure! Glad to help! PS. I know this is vague but please ask away for anything you guys

Re: [tor-talk] Why corrupt government officials blah blah bleh blah

On 3/9/15, Travis Bean tlb...@tlbean.com wrote: On 03/07/2015 08:37 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: On 3/8/15, Travis Bean tlb...@tlbean.com wrote: ... What I have for download on my website, especially the version for Linux, makes it very simple for an individual with zero computer knowledge

Re: [tor-talk] Why corrupt government officials blah blah bleh blah

On 3/8/15, Travis Bean tlb...@tlbean.com wrote: ... What I have for download on my website, especially the version for Linux, makes it very simple for an individual with zero computer knowledge My mom showed me how ta turn it on, but I might need some help with that step next time tha power

Re: [tor-talk] Tor as a network filter

On 2/8/15, spencer...@openmailbox.org spencer...@openmailbox.org wrote: Can Tor be used as a system-wide network filter? Wordlife, SpencerOne Some questions belie a lack of understanding of Tor, and/ or a lack of understanding of your own question. This is possibly one of those times. --

Re: [tor-talk] Confidant Mail

On 2/4/15, Mike Ingle m...@confidantmail.org wrote: On 2/3/2015 10:31 AM, Kevin wrote: On 2/3/2015 12:33 PM, krishna e bera wrote: On 15-02-02 09:57 PM, Mike Ingle wrote: http://www.confidantmail.org Mike Ingle m...@confidantmail.org d2b89e6f95e72e26e0c917d02d1847dfecfcd0c2 I am curious why

Re: [tor-talk] Tor - VPN Clarification

On 2/2/15, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote: On 2/1/2015 4:11 AM, Bill Berry wrote: My take (on his take :) ) was that; a) trusting a VPN for security is a bad idea because no VPN operator is going to go to jail for you (see HideMyAss and Sabu etc) More details about the reference to

Re: [tor-talk] Tor - VPN Clarification

On 2/2/15, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote: On 2/1/2015 4:17 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: Good luck, Zenaan Thanks Zenaan, for detailed reply. Knowing that this is only a mailing list - not a Tor or VPN wiki, your diagrams scenarios further show (to me) how complex these issues

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and solidarity against online harassment

I was interested in hearing what he had to say. You folks may argue against him/her but it seems to me he had some valid points though the poster probably knows that no one will listen to his frustration. Juan's voice is an important voice, as he is hard-core BE CAREFUL, and this is a very

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and solidarity against online harassment

On 12/16/14, Juan juan@gmail.com wrote: And, newcomers, who aren't likely to know too much about security take a look at https://www.torproject.org/ and see Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Traffic analysis?

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and solidarity against online harassment

On 12/14/14, andr...@fastmail.fm andr...@fastmail.fm wrote: On Sat, Dec 13, 2014, at 03:30 AM, kendrick eastes wrote: dont feed the troll. If you ignore them they go away faster. I was interested in hearing what he had to say. You folks may argue against him/her but it seems to me he had some

Re: [tor-talk] Operation Onymous against hidden services, most DarkNet markets are down

On 11/8/14, Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote: obvious cointelpro: Could you please stop calling people that. Its rude. As rude as it may be, is it wise to keep people alert and on their toes, rather than lolled into a false sense of 'perceived security'? Think if you yourself

Re: [tor-talk] Operation Onymous against hidden services, most DarkNet markets are down

On 11/8/14, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote: On 11/8/14, Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote: obvious cointelpro: Could you please stop calling people that. Its rude. As rude as it may be, is it wise to keep people alert and on their toes, rather than lolled

Re: [tor-talk] TBB 4.0 allowing scripts globally

On 10/29/14, Moritz Bartl mor...@torservers.net wrote: On 10/29/2014 09:54 AM, C B wrote: I was shocked to see when I upgraded to 4.0 that scripts were allowed globally. How did that happen? Pardon me if this has already been discussed. There has not been a release of TBB that had scripting

Re: [tor-talk] Bitcoin over Tor isn’t a good idea (Alex Biryukov / Ivan Pustogarov story)

On 10/28/14, s7r s...@sky-ip.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Seth, Totally agree about undermining decentralization by having to trust a single provider. Nobody recommended that, the addresses were for informative purpose only, to be used in parallel with other

Re: [tor-talk] updating Tor

On 10/19/14, Lunar lu...@torproject.org wrote: Hartmut Haase: how do I update Tor in Linux without loosing my data? InWin7 it is quite easy. Tor Browser 4.0 now contains an automated upgrade system. To start the update, go to the Help menu, open About Tor Browser. If there's an upgrade

Re: [tor-talk] List Administrivia

Some people are genuinely naive on a topic, yet get overly enthusiastic about $RANDOM_IDEA that they have, then share it immediately with the world. Yes, it's very close to spam, but just in case the author of it was just misguided, yet good hearted: Ben, go do a _lot_ of reading. Crypto, as in

Re: [tor-talk] How does Tor help abuse victims?

On 10/7/14, gary...@safe-mail.net gary...@safe-mail.net wrote: The reason people find problems with Tor is because the importance of privacy is hidden in a mystery. Most people don't understand the reason Tor exist so, how can they judge it? Ack! And unfortunately some people get defensive

Re: [tor-talk] How does Tor help abuse victims?

On 10/7/14, Mirimir miri...@riseup.net wrote: On 10/06/2014 04:43 PM, gary...@safe-mail.net wrote: The reason people find problems with Tor is because the importance of privacy is hidden in a mystery. Most people don't understand the reason Tor exist so, how can they judge it? The problem is

  1   2   >