Mnyb wrote:
> Some of the smartphone apps could also help with controll ,without the
> TV on , as long as the server is running and is connected to your lan
> and your able to to connect a phone pod or pad to it .
yes, I forgot to say that I do use an old iphone as a controller. I even
paid for
th00ht wrote:
> Definitely! But it depends a bit on your listening behaviour. If you
> always listen to music with your computer switched on, or always keep
> your computer switched on than there is no need. Just imaging what mains
> power your computer is using when it is switched on. The Touch'
Mnyb wrote:
> Do you got any iPhone or android app to control your softplayer ?
> Turning on the TV to control music is a bit awkward imo .
>
> There are some streaming service that are only supported on a real
> squeezebox .
>
> Depending on squeezeplay version it could be issues with hirez f
ralphpnj wrote:
>
> However, that said, the main reason to get a Touch would be use the
> Touch rather than your current computer/Squeezeplay combo to play your
> music. This would mean that you would no longer need a computer as part
> of your music playback system.
>
So it's pretty much what
I know Logitech is moving away from the squeezebox/LMS ecosystem (for
lack of a better term) but I'm a recent convert to this system and the
way I use it, it shouldn't matter if Logitech eventually abandons the
web services.
My question is based on how I currently use the system to listen to
musi
