Do you want me to write up a rough draft?
Awesome! I didn't try out unar because of the gnustep dependencies but this
should be in Ubuntu 12.10 (and Trisquel 6.5) by default due to them possibly
using Gnome 3.6. Hopefully the File Roller support is backported to older
releases too.
The problem with RAR format is it is only partially free. I'd guesstimate
half the situations a GNU/Linux user might actually need / desire it to
communicate data with others the free version doesn't work. It's commonly
complained about in certain scenes.
Good news: FileRoller will have RARv3 support in GNOME 3.6.
http://trisquel.info/sites/default/themes/trisquel3/template.phps
Beware of that truckload of ugly hacks
Better than this, we should have a wiki entry about community guidelines (I'd
rather have something much shorter than the debian ones) and link to them
from the forum headers. That way we can have it translated and updated if
needed.
Ok, I'm closing* the comments on this troll hole. Not only is it mostly
off-topic, but it revolves around bashing a person who isn't even part of the
conversation, and that is just rude.
If you want to discuss whether smelling cut flowers does or not qualify as
necrophilia, go to 4chan.
You pitched your initiative as being based on your disagreement with RMS's
views on s*x(with which, like you, i'm also in total disagreement). But, your
website shows a totally different setup. And when I pointed it out, you have
being going on and on about religion.
Thousand words cannot b
On 07/16/2012 01:22 PM, hos...@gmail.com wrote:
"Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed."
[http://libsf.org/licenses/libsf-gpl-v1.txt LibSF GPL]
oops my mistake, I wrongly read above lines as being the summary of
t
Thanks for starting a module.
On 13/07/2012 13:20, ldu...@member.fsf.org wrote:
> Would you mind sending me a copy of the php template files for your
> custom Drupal theme? This would make it easier to make sure the module
> will work with it (and whatever region/variable is already used in the
>
"Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license
document, but changing it is not allowed."
[http://libsf.org/licenses/libsf-gpl-v1.txt LibSF GPL]
oops my mistake, I wrongly read above lines as being the summary of the
license, instead it is regarding permission
I certainly can separate a man from a group he belongs to (or even a group he
heads). Can't you see the difference between Pie XII, which did not condemn
the Jewish extermination, and the Roman Church? Can't you see the difference
between the Bush administration, which indirectly killed tens
> recently I've been reading *odd* threads on this forum, from
> discussions about religion and free software to rants about a given
> wifi card not being supported by Trisquel (i.e. free software).
>
> I really think it's time to add a sticky post that clearly explains
> what the rules are, what a
+1 thumbs up. I will see if I can get attention to this.
Hi all,
recently I've been reading *odd* threads on this forum, from
discussions about religion and free software to rants about a given
wifi card not being supported by Trisquel (i.e. free software).
I really think it's time to add a sticky post that clearly explains
what the rules are, what adv
On 07/16/2012 10:44 AM, tegskywal...@hotmail.com wrote:
"LibSF was created to be a God-fearing alternative to both the Linux
Foundation and The FSF (Free Software Foundation), because of certain
beliefs held by their founders."
It is not a parody. It is a fundamental difference of foundation.
On 07/16/2012 10:26 AM, hos...@gmail.com wrote:
Repeated jabs at rms about his views on disgusting unnatural s*x acts
compelled me to go searching out on the internet. I am absolutely
shocked to find that the rumors are indeed true. Earlier, i thought
they were just rumors spread by propriety s
"LibSF was created to be a God-fearing alternative to both the Linux
Foundation and The FSF (Free Software Foundation), because of certain beliefs
held by their founders."
I don't know if this is serious or a parody. I'm really curious because this
seems in response to RMS fully supporting
Repeated jabs at rms about his views on disgusting unnatural s*x acts
compelled me to go searching out on the internet. I am absolutely shocked to
find that the rumors are indeed true. Earlier, i thought they were just
rumors spread by propriety software companies.
.[http://en.wikiquote.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/16/2012 09:35 AM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 09:19 AM, magicban...@gmail.com wrote:
>> As you write, those are "personal views" and have absolutely nothing
to do with the FSF. We do not need another foundation.
>
> The two are insepar
On 07/16/2012 09:19 AM, magicban...@gmail.com wrote:
As you write, those are "personal views" and have absolutely nothing
to do with the FSF. We do not need another foundation.
The two are inseparable. You cannot isolate damning components of your
being over here, and then have a set of produ
As you write, those are "personal views" and have absolutely nothing to do
with the FSF. We do not need another foundation.
Do you believe that the president of a foundation should never express
her/his opinions on completely unrelated subjects and on a website that is
completely unrelated
A life's work giving full and proper credit over to God is not for
everybody. No hard feelings. :-)
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
On 07/16/2012 09:03 AM, Michał Masłowski wrote:
RMS also has personal views where he believes pedophilia and
necrophilia should be legalized, provided all parties i
> RMS also has personal views where he believes pedophilia and
> necrophilia should be legalized, provided all parties involved are in
> agreement. I have personally written to him and verified this quote
> is accurate, and not taken out of context. It is his belief.
>
> http://en.wikiquote.org/w
A religious free software foundation is really going to catch on.
RMS also has personal views where he believes pedophilia and necrophilia
should be legalized, provided all parties involved are in agreement. I
have personally written to him and verified this quote is accurate, and
not taken out of context. It is his belief.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ric
This topic is not constructive because you just ignore what people wrote to
you.
RMS is very different from "the CEO of a large proprietary company". His
objective is social/ethical and not financial at all. RMS makes a *very
modest* living by defending his viewpoints. Given his exceptional
"It is a constructive conversation. Don't be jealous because you lack the
power to get 200 replies in a post that you started."
Jeez, you are really a troll aren't you? This topic isn't constructive,
infact much of the replies you refuse to acknowledge and frequently go
off-topic. You hold
Thanks. Don't mind at all.
If you were thinking of linking to us though point people to
http://libre.thinkpenguin.com/. The difference between this and
http://www.thinkpenguin.com/ is the one does not offering any information on
compatibility with non-free operating systems. The
http://li
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:13:26AM +0200, ch...@thinkpenguin.com wrote:
> You reminded me that I sent an email a while back about the
> possibility of funding your project. Don't think there was a
> response though.
I never received such e-mail or it got bulk-deleted when there was too
much unread
You reminded me that I sent an email a while back about the possibility of
funding your project. Don't think there was a response though. In any case I
thought this would be a good time to donate a €100. We might have some more
regular donations coming your way although thats what we have for
31 matches
Mail list logo
