-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some people are in no church because they are difficult to
get along with.
There
are people who need their butt kicked out of the church
Glenn,
I
hope your little
Obviously
this must mean that Glenn is from now on going to behave in a gentle, kind, and
patient manner! Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002
8:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glenn, One should not base their beliefs
on anyones commentaries; which are as biased as the writers. Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002
8:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Why do you keep insisting
that Marlin is a 7th Day Adventist? Izzy
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002
10:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]Coffman's
Commentary of
Glenn - The first 2 sentences is the basis for the whole article. Your little Sabbath tribe does not have the corner on truth. This is so sad. Jesus paid for unity of all believers.
Marlin - If truly you cherish what Fred Peatross has so beautifully stated, Glen, then you
must really be a nice
Here is your problem, Marlin. You were shown to be wrong on the OT trees passage, you did not refute it, and now you come back to saying the same old same old. You do not learn. YOUR MIND IS MADE UP. THERE IS NO NEED TO CONFUSE YOU WITH THE TRUTH.
You, Marlin, are intellectually dishonest.
Dear
In a message dated 11/19/2002 10:37:34 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, we do not have a Xmass tree. The Adventists here know that I do not partake in this dishonest celebration
Can you explain why it is dishonest? Laura
Of course, if you don't play my way, I will take my marbles and go home. LOL I like you, but you are in need of truth, but you refuse to listen.
Your statement below is false. The "doctrine of origins" is not in the Bible. "They know better", you say. You are a bully. The Bible talks about
I've don't recall saying you DaveL, are dishonest. I recall saying you are sincerely honestly wrong. :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is why I ignore most of what you say. YOU MARLIN, ACCUSE PEOPLE WHO DISAGREE WITH YOU AS DISHONEST.
DAVEH: Hmwhere've I heard that before!?!?!?!?
Agreed, but these an intelligent people. You need to refute what they say, which has not been done.
Glenn, One should not base their beliefs on anyone’s commentaries; which are as biased as the writers. Izzy
I didn't know I was doing that. Marlin can't get along with anyone, even the 7th Day Adventist. I don't think he is a 7th Day Adventist. He's going to take his marbles and go home if they make too much of the Christmas tree. LOL I would be highly surprised if they would allow him to be a member.
Does anyone know anything about these discoveries?
In a message dated 11/20/2002 4:07:10 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subj:FROM NOAH`S ARK TO JESUS CHRIST
Date:11/20/2002 4:07:10 AM Eastern Standard Time
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL
Izzy wrote:
Glenn, One should not base their beliefs on
anyone’s commentaries; which are as biased
as the writers.
Glenn wrote:
Agreed, but these an intelligent people. You
need to refute what they say, which has not
been done.
I thought Marlin did an excellent job refuting it. The
Sure, move on, but Saturday night is Sunday by Jewish time. Nothing was refuted.
Clearly, Coffman's commentary was refuted and shown
to be wrong, so can we move on now?
Fred Peatross was a denominationalist. I have
not held that egocentric attitude. Thus I cannot have shared his personal
experience in this regard. Thus the first two sentences must be his own,
not my own. --Marlin
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
So this means the purpose of the crooked political Mormons selling the property was to stop free speech. And they were dishonest in removing the free speech. MONEY TALKS WITH MORMONS.
If most of the people figure the city would be better off with the money in its pocket, and a nice plaza without
DaveH wrote:
... as an LDS person, it seems crazy to me for
the Church to buy a piece of property without
obtaining some measure of control over that
piece of real estate.
Too late for this criticism. That's exactly what they did. They bought
land and accepted the public easement that went
No, but my wife has been there. She sang at a very large Evangelical Free Church in SLC. I have mentioned this before, but many were saved. More and more people in SLC are refusing to knuckle under to Mormonism. It is getting easier every year to convert people to Christ in SLC I am told. The
Jerry Falwell welcomes sinners outside his church to protest. In fact, his members even take them refreshments, donuts and offer spiritual materials, Bibles, etc,. His members go out and invite them inside to hear the Gospel. If they don't want to go inside, they are still welcome to protest on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
problem is that the city council (Mormons) pulled a shady deal to start
with by selling the property. SECOND, THE DEAL WITH THE SALE WAS
RIGHT OF WAY. Right of ways are legal are common by the millions.
DAVEH: I'm not a lawyer, but I suspect "RIGHT
OF WAY" involves
Yes, it does make sense. See how Falwell does it.
DAVEH: H"crooked deal"? I don't see it that way, Glenn. You might claim a misunderstanding, but why would the Church want to provide a soapbox for their enemies? Does that make sense to you? BTW..What previous deals do you
I have seen land owners do this many times. Change a zoning just a little by claiming to build a doctors office. The office never gets built. Land owner comes back in a year and wants another rezoning to build a huge hotel in the middle of private homes. IT happens all the time with sinners and I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes,
it does make sense. See how Falwell does it.
DAVEH: Hmm..this doesn't make much sense to me.
I confess that I don't know much about Farwell.
DAVEH:
H"crooked deal"?
I don't see it that way, Glenn. You might claim a misunderstanding,
but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No,
but my wife has been there. She sang at a very large Evangelical
Free Church in SLC. I have mentioned this before, but many were saved.
More and more people in SLC are refusing to knuckle under to Mormonism.
It is getting easier every year to convert people to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So
this means the purpose of the crooked political Mormons selling the property
was to stop free speech.
DAVEH: LOL...You do have a way of spinning the thread, Brother
Glenn! Are you suggesting the Church is buying a street
block at a time just to "stop
free
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of
course, not. Mormonism is against free speech in SLC.
DAVEH: ROTFLOLGo ahead and believe what you want, Brother
Glenn. As I mentioned before, the Church is not trying to control
"free
speech in SLC", but rather the Church just wants
control of what happens on
26 matches
Mail list logo
