Blaine wrote:
Perry, your messages go to an attachment whenever I try to reply tothem. Yours are the only ones that do that. Any idea why?
Blaine, I have not had anyone else report this particular problem, and I have no idea why they are doing that. Rather than hit "reply" on your last post I gr
Perry, your messages go to an attachment whenever I try to reply to
them. Yours are the only ones that do that. Any idea why?
On a short leash? Hmmm, well she has a healthy sense of self esteem. I
prefer her that way.
BlaineRB:
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:49:03 -0800 "irebukeu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Blaine:
> Is that a promise? I would love that!! The last name
> is BORROWMAN.
>
> Ruben:
> Done.
BlaineRB: Uh oh!! Me and my big mouth. I may end up being a Bishop over
this. LOL
>
> Blain
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:41:42 -0600 "Terry Clifton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>
> See John 4:24. God is a Spirit.
> Terry
**BlaineRB: Terry, I am also a spirit. Just as you are too. This has
nothing to say about what else we are--our bodies are the temples of our
spirit selves. As Jesus s
On a short leash, Blaine?
>
>Blaine:
>As for my "lack of Bible knowledge," as you may remember, I was pressed
>for time (my wife was circling the block, and was on her fifth or sixth
>circle, and staring daggers at me--I was afraid to get into an extended
>conversation w
Mormon myth: "As god is man shall become." Sounds like the Mormons expect to be equal to their god at the very least.
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Will we be gods?
>Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:12:21 -0700
>
>BlaineRB: I
Blaine:
Is that a promise? I would love that!! The last name
is BORROWMAN.
Ruben:
Done.
Blaine:
As for my "lack of Bible knowledge," as you may remember, I was pressed
for time (my wife was circling the block, and was on her fifth or sixth
circle, and staring daggers at m
BlaineRB: I THINK we agree here, but MAYBE NOT No authoritative Mormon
ever taught THAT we intend to be equal with God, or the trinity, or
whatever you choose to call it.
We believe that Jesus Christ as the SON is subordinate to the FATHER, and
that we are and always will be subordinate to Both.
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:22:38 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *** Actually Judy, from my point of view, it seems you are doing
> the
> same think (I misspelled "thing" but decided the new word fit
> better)--reading your own interpretation into it. Did you get y
Hi Dean, You wrote, "Are you really worried about our relationship
DaveH-or is this an
> edge to use in this debate-to confuse truth. Must you always
> manipulate some young ignorant Christian to defend you-is that a
> smile I see on your face?"
I think it is time for me to say to you that Ju
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 06:55:13 -0800 "irebukeu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Blaine, I did find that post of our meeting each other at your
> temple, at
> the present time I have well over 600 E-mails that I have not even
> opened,
> with several thousand open and working on. So I did not know
BlaineRB
AMEN!!!
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:47:00 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Dean wrote:
> > I am Commanded to love a believer in Christ -
> > not those of the world nor wordily things-
>
> Brother Dean, you know we think alike in many ways. Here is a
> passage
> for you t
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]***
Actually Judy, from my point of view, it seems you are doing the same
think (I misspelled "thing" but decided the new word fit better)--reading
your own interpretation into it. Did you get your interpretation from your
minister, or is this your very own origina
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***Hi Judy, It is always a delight to read your stuff, but you seem to be
speaking more from traditional Christianity than from the original
teachings of the Bible. In Genesis (first book, second page, so you need
not search too hard)ch1 verse 26 it uses the plural to tel
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Kevin
Deegan writes: The scripture says we shall be LIKE him. It does not
say we shall be equal to him! That is what Mormonism teaches. There
was another fellow that taught this too. His name is SATAN. Gen 3:5
"ye shall be AS gods"
Blainer: Satan does tell the truth
From: "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
$ Judy why is it so hard for you to
understand what I am saying-
I am speaking of being in their
presence for a extended length of time-
Yes we must be a wittiness to the
world-one doesn't hide a light under the
bed we have to let our light shine-to a
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 05:53:44 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> From: Blaine R Borrowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Ruben wrote: Then we arrive at Salt Lake city in the same fashion,
> where we exhort those that have perverted God, teaching that he was
> once
> like us.or we will be gods.
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 05:51:16 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Was it a ceremony, in the Temple?
> A Temple sealing to a man? I thought they stopped those years ago.
>
> Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DAVEH: Forgive me for jumping into this discussion, Kevin. I don't
>
BlaineRB: "For envy they had delivered him, . . . " Matt 27:18
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:54:26 -0500 "Dean Moore"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12/17/2003 8:32:53 AM
> Subject: [TruthTalk] Just the BIBLE Dave
>
>
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:39:24 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The Mormons on TT are probably aware that Joseph Smith was heavily
> into Freemasonry among other things and this is where the lie
> originates
> because Freemasonry today represents the ancient mystery religions -
> In
> his book M
Hi Dean, Hey is this really what you mean? Not to be antagonistic, but
this sounds like YOU have a devil in YOU. Dave is always so calm, and
collected, and REASOBABLE, above all!! I get the feeling you are
frustrated because . . . ?
BlainerB
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 07:45:14 -0500 "Dean Moore
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:18:28 -0500 "Dean Moore"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12/17/2003 5:58:28 AM
> Subject: [TruthTalk] Love or Rebuke?
>
> BlainerB:
Luke 6:27 "BUT I SAY UNTO YOU WHICH HEAR: LOVE YOUR ENEMI
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 05:46:45 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The scripture says we shall be LIKE him.
> It does not say we shall be equal to him! That is what Mormonism
> teaches.
>
> There was another fellow that taught this too.
> His name is SATAN.
> Gen 3:5 "ye shall
The Bible commands me to REBUKE FALSE TEACHERS!
I can not let them go on in error. Who would let them alone, knowing of a horrible Hell they are headed for?
What I want to know is why do they keep coming back for more?
Dave what other reason than they know that I have the TRUTH, keeps them coming b
DaveH
Perry brings up a good point. Can you show us any other, usage of the word damnation in a similar sense to how LDS want to use it?
How can you take DAM & Nation put them together and come up with stoppage of progression?Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DavidH wrote:
"Fir
Dean wrote:
> I consider the fact the DaveH is allowed to dwell among
> the brethren as sin, David. To me it is a clear violation
> of the Bible-as it also was to J. Wesley.
It still seems to me that you are thinking of this list like a church or
someone's home where we all live together. Many
David,
I was wondering how much interaction you have had with LDS.?
How well would you say you know their doctrine?
As far as the Doctrine question.
False doctrine sends people to Hell
Gal 5:19-21 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lascivi
Judy:
You are mixing up the world and the Church Dean. 2 Thess 3:14,15 is for the Church
(brothers/sisters). If God dosen't want us to overcome in the midst of unbelievers then
why didn't he just take us all on to glory just as soon as we became born again? Why
leave us here as a remnant in the
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Hi Judy. I
was thinking to take a break from all the activity on TruthTalk today, but I
can't help myself. I have to respond to some of what you have
written. I hope things do slow down a little on TruthTalk because I can't
keep up with it all. I d
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:42:14 -0800
"irebukeu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> Ttxpress writes:> (but)
the connotation, ff., is intimidation:> > Ruben responds:>
That is a quotation, if you have a problem with that you must take > it
up..
i'm takin' it up with you--you wrote it
precisely t
- Original Message -
From:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/19/2003 11:28:22 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Izzy -You are right.
From: "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't think TT should exist in this form-I believe there should be limits on
the length of time one of another doc
Dean, I have found that the big Liberals that I come in
contact with in this community have a rabid hatred of all things truly good
(such as family values and President Bush for example.) So I have an inkling of
what you are up against. Would you mind explaining what “warnings”
are there?
Dean wrote:
> * No Izzy I don't think TT should exist in this form-
> I believe there should be limits on the length of time
> one of another doctrine should be allowed to stay here,
> 2 thess 3:14. Those that walk disorderly are to be warned
> (admonish)...and have no company with him- This was
From: "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't think TT
should exist in this form-I believe there should be limits on
the length of
time one of another doctrine should be allowed to stay here,
2 thess 3:14.
Those that walk disorderly are to be warned (admonish)...and
have no company
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/18/2003 9:59:03 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Izzy -You are right.
Brother Dean,
Okay, Im again asking you to spell this out in plain language. Are you saying that TT is satans domain, and that David M
- Original Message -
From:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/18/2003 9:44:27 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: RE: [TruthTalk] Love or Rebuke?
whose sin did the Ap Paul 'stand against'; in the NT, how did he go about it?
Dean writes:
All manner of sin and he went about it by publicly declaring
Hi Judy. I was thinking to take a break from all the activity on
TruthTalk today, but I can't help myself. I have to respond to some of
what you have written. I hope things do slow down a little on TruthTalk
because I can't keep up with it all. I do have some work to do around
here. :-) If you
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>David Miller
wrote:>> Is sin the object of God's wrath or are people the
object of God's wrath?
Judy wrote:> God's wrath is revealed from heaven against
all ungodliness and unrighteousness
> of men (so it is against men's sin)
I feel like you are
> [Original Message]
> From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 12/18/2003 9:09:50 PM
> Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] *Rebuke should be specific-Yes I agree.
>
> Dean wrote:
> > I am sorry you cannot see that and as I haven't made
> > it to heaven yet I will hav
- Original Message -
From:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/18/2003 11:39:11 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Love or Rebuke?
thx jt.
'ff.' means, basically,'as follows' --a common Eng. abbrev. :)
(i think it's in DavidMs list of such abbreviations at http://innglory.org)
ftr,
From: "irebukeu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Judy, if
I may let me try to expound and clarify on this public rebukingwhile
preaching because I suspect you might have a chip on your shoulderregarding
it and it might help others too.
**Thank you for your intent but what would make you
think I have
From: "irebukeu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Ttxpress
writes:(but) the connotation, ff., is intimidation:
Ruben responds: What is ff?
Judy: Gary explained to me that ff means 'as follows'
so he is saying that
this scripture (2 Cor 5:11 "Knowing therefore the
terror of the Lord, we
persuade men") t
42 matches
Mail list logo
