Terry,
David got them from E-Sword. Use this link: http://www.e-sword.net/files/setup752.exe
Then go to this page http://www.e-sword.net/extras.html
and download http://www.e-sword.net/files/extras/ante-nicene.exe.
9 volumes of the Ante-Nicene Fathers await you.
Jonathan
Hi Judy,
If you go way back in the archives you
will see a review that I did for this book. Below are some web resources.
http://cana.userworld.com/cana_DaVinciCode.html
http://www.fpcboulder.org/images/ministries/adult/davinci.pdf
Scroll down to the bottom where they list a n
Click here: http://www.e-sword.net/files/setup752.exe
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005
10:53 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The
Nicene Creed and Truthtalk Members
Okay……
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005
7:32 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] The Nicene
Creed and Truthtalk Members
Welcome to the forum Gregory. You
should know that Judy denies the Nicene Creed mostly based on bad exegesis on
Welcome to the forum Gregory. You
should know that Judy denies the Nicene Creed mostly based on bad exegesis on
her part and a huge misunderstanding of the history behind the creed of all
creeds. Judy is also an Arian with a subtle split between God and
Jesus. She is vehement in denying
Terry, you are such a prick. It is bad enough that Judy monopolizes the
idiot portion of this forum to have you tack on such an insensitive comment.
You are an embarrassment to this forum.
Jonathan 'ticked off at how people have treated Bill, ticked off at how the
hypocrite and lying Judy gets aw
-- slade
-Original
Message-----
From: Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, 12 January, 2005
20.20
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] On Echad
Hi Slade,
I realize that your one word answer is
most likely a result of busyness. If I can tweak any more out of you (or
at a time that is better for you)
Hi Slade,
I realize that your one word answer is
most likely a result of busyness. If I can tweak any more out of you (or at a
time that is better for you) would you agree that the Newer Testament (read
Jesus Christ) gives a fuller revelation of God than the Older Testament?
Jonath
Hi Judy. I admit to being disappointed
that you appear to not have wrestled with my post. I put a lot of work
into that post to help you move from a non-biblical viewpoint to one supported
by scripture. Ah well, two points to me for trying!
You are correct in that I do not think
that
Hi Izzy,
The reason I have not replied to you was because of what you
said at the end of your first request to me on why my belief in the ‘eternal
sonship’ matters. I will quote the ending:
How has it made you a better person? (I can’t
imagine.)
The sarcastic nature of the ‘I
Hi David,
When I was younger there were a few arguments that one used to determine
where one stood on the evangelical spectrum. Ten to fifteen years ago it
was evolution versus creation, the end-times, and the use of the 'sign'
gifts. Nowadays the litmus tests seem to be either abortion or your
The term Father as applied to God that we are referring to is the classical
definition of the Trinity as Father, Son, and Spirit. This is not the
Father you are referring to. I believe you are thinking that God must have
created offspring to be a Father. Jesus Christ and the Spirit were not
creat
Jonathan writes:
The
Trinity is the relationship as
one of the Father, Son and Spirit eternally. It is who God is.
jt: God calls Himself by many titles in
scripture, Elohim is only one of them.
JBH: I would suggest moving away
from titles to who God is inherentl
Hi David,
You are correct in recognizing that I have illustrated a major difference in
our hermeneutic. I begin with Christ, you begin with syntax. I have an
overarching guide to interpretation (it must be consistent with who God is
as He reveals Himself in the Person of Jesus Christ). You have
: [TruthTalk] Why the
Eternal Sonship of Christ Matters to Me
Jonathan Hughes wrote:
Judy,
I believe that there is a barometer built into Christianity
that helps us to identify heresy. I believe that that barometer is the
Trinity. When people deny the eternal sonship of Jesus Christ they
Hi Judy,
Yes the word ‘made’ is past tense but it
is applied to a current situation for why one should not shed another person’s
blood. The author uses it to explain why murder is not right. There is no
logical reason for the author to refer to the image of God if it was no longer
pre
Judy,
When
I was younger I used to like completing mazes. It wasn't long before,
either through someone telling me or through dumb luck, that I figured out that
it was wiser to solve a tough maze by beginning with the end and working one's
way back to the start. It provided a different p
A complete misunderstanding Terry or else a nice sarcastic shot at Lance. I
was hoping that the new year would bring less sarcasm from you and more
beneficial participation. Please don't disappoint me.
We use the Bible today as a source for truth because of the Word who lives
eternally. It is n
Hi Judy,
I would like to think that this email will
solve the ‘image of God for all of humankind’ discussion once and
for all. I am being naïve if I think this. I would ask that you search the
scriptures and allow some credence for my argument below. I used to think that
having ortho
For the record there is nothing in Lance's post that even comes close to
suggesting evolutionary theory.
What Lance is referring to is a point made by Duns Scotus (1266-1308)
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duns_Scotus) who suggested that the
incarnation would still have occurred even if sin had not
I used www.amazon.com.
It was extremely simple but I already had an account set up there.
JBH
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005
9:02 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Tsunami
Disa
David: >Therefore, creeds are immature philosophical steps on the path to
truth.
>They do not represent the actual apprehension of truth, but only the
hopeful
>expectation of what might be found once that truth is fully apprehended.
We
>should not fear deviating from creeds.
>
>
DAVEH: Isn't the
The next person who writes a post with the
subject title ‘Judy’s Plagiarism’ will be subject to my
wrath. The topic was concluded days ago. Please remember that the contents of
one’s post should coordinate with the content of the subject line.
And I am back.
Jonathan
F
Question:
What is the nature of Christ’s sonship?
Answer:
Concerning the eternal Sonship of Christ, Ryrie has this
to say:
I agree with Buswell (A
Systematic Theology of the Christian Religion, pp. 105-12) that
generation is not an exeg
The Divine Processions
and the Eternal Sonship of Christ
with a refutation of
Mormon errors on this subject
Introduction
This
essay looks at the Catholic Doctrines of the Divine Processions and the Eternal
Sonship of Christ, and refutes some Mormon errors in this regard.
The First
s
Taken from http://home.nyc.rr.com/mysticalrose/sonship.html
WHEN DID JESUS BECOME THE SON OF GOD?
For two thousand years, Christians have
always believed that Jesus is the Eternal Son of God. This truth is enshrined
in the Nicene Creed: "I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only
More scriptural evidence for the heresy
rampant on this forum. Taken from http://www.middletownbiblechurch.org/doctrine/sonship.htm
The Eternal Sonship of Christ
1)The
Doctrine of Eternal Sonship
The doctrine of eternal Sonship
declares that the Second Person of the triune
David,
The other day you mentioned that you had read NT Wright on Romans. It is my
opinion that you have deceived the list by implying that you have actually
done this. I do not believe you had even heard of NT Wright until John,
Lance, Bill and I brought him up. Was it a quote of 100 words or
discord
by mishandling both John Smithson and Judy Taylor. John was completely in
the right, Judy completely in the wrong. David has taken the opposite
tack and thus the forum is now in shambles. I hope this is all worked out
and that Christ will again have a place on this forum.
Jonathan Hughes
Jonathan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004
11:25 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy's
Plagiarism
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:08:13 -0500 &
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Are there
any bad Christian's in the House?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004
10:12 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [Trut
Izzy wrote:
Bill, this is NOT something of which one
should accuse a Believer, as Believers do NOT do these things (hypocrisy, the deceit, the dishonesty). Izzy
Jonathan responds, attempting to keep
himself reined in: Are you kidding me? Christians are not hypocrites,
deceitfu
Jonathan in dark blue as JBH.
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:00:29 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I am not speaking of your plagiarism. I really care less about it...
jt: Then why do you
continue to feed comments like Gary's and help to keep the is
Slade is right Terry. You are being
completely pagan here and above all talking absolute nonsense. God is not
violating a rule (as you call it) that humans function under by not having a
mother. That is called anthropological theology (man to God). It
uses what we experience and then sl
Me in Green.
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 19:33:42 -0500 "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Judy,
I wish you had been more forthcoming of
the fact that you are a card carrying cult member of the Jehovah
Witness’. At least your theology now m
. is the "faith" once
delivered to the saints Jonathan. We
ought to be commending David Miller for his faithfulness to the Truth.
jht
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:35:40 -0500 "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dear David Miller,
After weeks
gone.
The Truthtalk Bouncer,
Jonathan Hughes
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.818 / Virus Database: 556 - Release Date: 12/17/2004
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus
Hi Judy,
What follows below is an article/sermon by
John MacArthur. He used to hold the position you espouse below but after much
study changed his mind and affirmed what scripture says about Jesus Christ. I
think you will find it interesting.
REEXAMINING
THE ETERNAL SONSHIP OF JE
Consider them prayed for. Please update
us as soon as you know of their situation.
Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004
3:34 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] emergency
jt: Jesus didn't say
there was no generational sin involved, what he did say was that the problem
was not with the man or his parents and that His (Jesus) priority at that
moment was to work the works of God. Remember? Jesus came to do good and
to heal ALL who were oppressed by the devil
Let me say it again:
King David: Bad Fruit, Good guy, accepted
in Christ.
Abraham: Bad Fruit, Good guy, accepted in
Christ.
Terry (and everyone else on TT including
the sinless one): Bad Fruit, Good guy, accepted in Christ.
Actually, it wasn’t me that said that. I
am just repeati
What a moronic comment Terry. Satan just
loves when people act like you do. (Using the words Satan and love in the same
sentence should touch off another topic).
Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Friday, December 17,
Judy,
If ‘all things live and have their
being’ in Christ do you believe that Satan would be included in ‘all
things’? There must be something (SomeOne) who upholds our existence. This
includes the existence of Satan. I also do not understand how this works but
if Christ is Lord of a
Yes it does exist and I ordered it for you
yesterday. Does this wreck the surprise!
Jonathab
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004
6:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Right Way To Get
My main objection was that Izzy characterized yet again that Lance does not
give a whit about scripture just because what she believed about the answer
to whether Judas is saved or not is made clear in the English version of her
text. Izzy has a bee in her bonnet against anyone that she labels a
l
Ahh the typical Izzy can attack anyone else's character but she is given
free reign? Won't work with me David. Izzy needs to stand up and be
responsible for the words she puts out on this forum. I have made it clear
many times I am sick of her maligning liberals (both politicians and
theologians
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004
8:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Intentional sin -- the Judas factor
Jonathan Hughes wrote:
Hi Izzy,
Now that you realize that Jesus was not
speaking about salvation in this
Hi Izzy,
Your comment below disturbs me.
First you drop a scripture bomb as if that is all that is needed to be said for
the subject to be closed. Then you say that Jesus says that Judas was
lost. Then you imply that Lance has a lower view of scripture than your
own exalted one. It
This is in response to the thread
regarding logic, rationality, and rationalism. I have started a new thread in
case people want to continue with the original. After reading this thread for the
past week I am convinced that what we really need to be speaking of is
revelation or the concep
David,
You continue to help us define anthropological theology. You define all
things in God from a human standpoint instead of allowing God's revelation
in Himself to define all things human (called theological anthropology).
You did it with your word study on 'hate' and you are doing it again n
David,
Well I am sure after my last 3 replies you probably have your persecution
hat on. You usually bring it out when people disagree with you. Oh how we
on the forum hate you right? Sigh. I expect an email dictating how I have
sinned by in any way illustrating the fallacies of your emails.
Possibly one of the stupidest posts I have ever seen on TruthTalk. So much
for being without sin Mr. Miller. John humbly illustrates an example from
his own life and all you have to come back with is that you are so clearly
above us all by not having an ex-wife of your own. Sad. Tactless. John
David,
Please define what the sin in the Garden of Eden was? Attempt to do it
without using the words autonomy or individualism. Then define what
Lucifer's sin was. Then figure out the difference between unity in
diversity and autonomy. They are not equivalent. Consider co-humanity
instead of
Hi Izzy,
I think I remember you mentioning that you
liked Sundar Singh. There is a free audiobook (At the Master’s Feet) of his at
the following address:
http://www.freechristianaudiobooks.com/main.htm
Jonathan
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG a
Here on TruthTalk we talk about
truth. This usually is a dialogue with scripture. Tonight I was struck
by a title of a book, “Beyond the Bible: Moving from Scripture to
Theology”. The word theology means ‘God-talk’.
All of us on this forum in some way (and often in different ways) paint
One way I use (and for the sake of a
disclaimer I do not think this is the only way, nor is it the only way I use)
to determine if what one says is of God is the response I feel within me.
When I read this post all my senses gathered up to a zinging point. And
yes I think I just made up t
Good morning Judy,
A quick note on how we use the word
incarnation (incarnate means to embody in human form). We should have
cleared this up earlier. You are correct in that it is often just used in
association with the birth of Jesus. When I use the word incarnation I am
speaking of
Hi Jeff,
If you ever felt it to be appropriate I would
like to hear the story of your wife.
JBH
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Powers
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004
8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A
birthday
My Experience with Kabbalah
I am a sucker for books on healing. I will buy them by the basketful.
A year and a half ago I ordered a book called 'The 72 Names of God: Technology
for the Soul' by Yehuda Berg. It was recommended to me by a health care
provider that I trusted. I also bo
ps. Based on what I
have said, can you see why Slade's response this morning came out of 'internal
relations'?
Unfortunately my lunch break is over :)
Jonathan Hughes
Jonathan, I’m not sure anyone can use
one theory to unify all know physical information.
Jonathan in Green.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Tearing down?
Jonathan wrote:
> ... the 'I'll just call em liars' post et
A heavily moderated list becomes one man's empire. I would not hang around
here if this list became heavily moderated. We are all adults. The
moderator (in my opinion) should only enter the fray when it is absolutely
called for. This list has been lightly moderated for the last 8-12 months.
The
I would like to see very little from Slade
as Moderator on this list. I would prefer that the list was peer
moderated. When we (including me) step over the line I expect to hear
about it from our/my peers. In times past Lance has often said that I
could have constructed a post differentl
Please replace all references to David
Brook to David Brock. Thank you.
JBH
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004
5:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 613
Commands
Ahh Judge
Jonathan how is it that you never want
to discuss issues and ideas? Your focus seems to be always on the person?
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:52:07 -0500 "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Often on this forum I feel like I am
pointing out the obvious. J
was an evil man. The other was pointless
gossip. If that disturbs you then don’t keep bringing it up.
And put your pointy finger away please. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:21
AM
To: [EMAIL
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004
10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 613
Commands
Ahh the case of the moving points!
Don’t worry. Sherlock Hughes is here to solve the case. The
original point was that you stated you did
pedophilia was mentioned as one of his many traits in that
particular article. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004
10:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 613
Commands
From the archives
thing before I leave
this conversation. David has not posted since you
accused him of being the sainted and that I was one of
his devotees.
Suzy
Suzy
--- Jonathan Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Suzy,
>
> I am not sure what your purpose is here. You have
> been on
ROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 613
Commands
Read it again, Jon. I stated that I
intentionally did not post any articles about his sexual perversity. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004
8:52 AM
To
Often on this forum I feel like I am
pointing out the obvious. Judy, Izzy posted a WorldNetDaily article
dealing with ‘reported’ stories of Arafat being a homosexual.
You then brought this into a conversation with Slade. You admit that it
is something that is just ‘reported’, not necessa
Hi Suzy,
I am not sure what your purpose is here. You have been on the forum for
about 5 or 6 days and have jumped right into a discussion that has a very
long history. A certain edge has built up during this conversation they
have been having. Both of them have to communicate through this edge
I have had to hold my anger in all day
long. Slade you have done a wonderful and graceful job in answering Izzy and
Judy today. When one relies on WorldnetDaily for news one tends to fall into
error. Believing an article from WND (Weapons of News Destruction) as absolute
truth is far fet
I have created a new litmus test for choosing
Supreme Court Judges. Abortion is so passé. Instead I will place a bible and
a picture of Jesus beside one another. I will then ask the applicant if they
believe the word and the Word are equivalent. If they answer yes I will
immediately bra
Jonathan’s useless post of the day:
Ovaltine is created by Satan. That and meatloaf. My wife loves Ovaltine. The
stench drives me insane.
JBH
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004
4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
A few people have asked me to explain what I mean by having passion for
the Person of Jesus Christ. I am going to do something I rarely do on
TruthTalk. Yup, I am going to quote scripture. I usually try to
avoid doing this. I strive to make posts that are biblically based by
picking
Spurgeon's commentary on Romans 9:13. Please note that me quoting it does
not mean I agree with it :)
WHY DID GOD LOVE JACOB AND HATE ESAU? I can tell you why God LOVED Jacob; IT
IS SOVEREIGN GRACE! There was nothing in Jacob that could make God love him;
there was everything about him that might
Izzy, do you think there is anything your own children could do to make you
actually hate or loathe them?
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 8:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Tr
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:08:53 -0500 "Hughes Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Those who are quick to judge others on
this forum include every single member. Not a day goes by without some
judging going on. The problem is, one states that they are not quick
to judge b
Can't wait to see how David tries to spin these stats.
JBH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 11:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] abortion info from a friend to TT =-- J
Hi David,
I seem to push a lot of your buttons. Either that or you just seem to have
a lot of buttons to push. Your questions are quite loaded. You and I
probably have different definitions of terrorism. Please supply yours so I
can see the context you are working out of.
I assume that you
Hi David,
When we say that Izzy is much better than Arafat we are saying that Izzy is
better behaved than Arafat. We are not saying that Izzy is more deserving
of love or the blood of Jesus Christ. Note the last part of my sentence: we
need to realize that God loves both Izzy and Arafat. In tha
Exactly John,
Just because one is in a position of power does not mean that person is
approved by God.
Besides, in a democracy, for God to have a part in it would mean God would
have to place a vote. From what I am hearing He wasn't on the list and was
rejected. He filled out a provisional ball
I made some posts a number of weeks back
on Kerry, Bush and abortion. The following article explains what I was
attempting to say quite well.
Pro-Life...Pro-Kerry?
Why
anti-abortion voters might want to take another look
by Joshua Holland,
Contributor
10.29.04
Sometimes in an elect
The video Izzy should have posted: http://static.vidvote.com/movies/bushuncensored.mov
Happy Halloween folks.
JBH
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004
6:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Truth
Matt Drudge has openly admitted that he
goes to gay bars. Would this be where you are having lunch?
JBH
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004
6:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] To
Jona
Hi Judy,
Not sure why this matters to you so
much. Regardless of his sexuality it is still the best conservative web
site for gossip/news just as buzzflash is the best liberal site for gossip/news.
There are many reports of Drudge’s homosexuality. He has admitted
to dating guys but h
Slade I feel very thankful for your input
on this. Learning how to read such passages is vital to us understanding who
God is. You have much to teach us.
JBH
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004
8:01 PM
ather than slanderous to add to Wikipedia below?
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:48:56 -0400 "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Judy, Bush is not a member of any church
regardless of location. Your lack of knowledge of Karl Rove is rather
astounding. No one currently in po
As a fascinating study of alleged corruption and unchecked ambition, Bush's Brain is anything but balanced,
but it's an important film that invites viewers to draw their own conclusions.
That says it all.
JBH
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Izzy,
Judging me is getting to be a full time
hobby for you. Note how I prefaced the article: I do not agree with
everything written in it. I have made it clear that I do believe that W
is a Christian. I have also made it clear that this does not put him
outside the realm of honest
Judy, Bush is not a member of any church
regardless of location. Your lack of knowledge of Karl Rove is rather
astounding. No one currently in politics is considered to be dirtier. Do some
google searches. You will be amazed at what you find out. I can guarantee you
it won’t be Christi
ete without the others. Judyt
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:17:19 -0400 "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Judy,
I believe that one must hold to a proper
concept of the Trinity. This includes the One and the Three. I do
not believe that the stress on th
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004
8:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Arafat is
Dying
Jonathan Hughes wrote:
Aye I read this today as well and had some
of the same thoughts. He is definitely quite sick if not close
]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
Kryptonite Theory of Sin
Jonathan, do you also see the Godhead as
"broken up" Father, Son, and Holy Spirit? Where's the Hebrew mind's
wholeness there?
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:30:03 -0400 "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL
Aye I read this today as well and had some
of the same thoughts. He is definitely quite sick if not close to death. May
God have mercy on him.
JBH
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004
9:40 PM
To: [EMA
Slade I anxiously await your response to
this one. I am very grateful to a few people in my life (including Lance) who
have pointed out how important the Hebrew mindset is to understanding
Christianity. The concept of wholeness in the human instead of the broken up
spirit, soul, body, min
I would like to see these threads. I look
forward to listening. I do have one book on the subject, “Hebrew Thought
Compared with Greek” by Thorleif Boman.
JBH
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004
8:07
Spontaneous Combustion is a good one. I
have a bottle in my fridge right now. Hot sauces are a bit of a hobby for me.
For flavour I prefer the Original Death Sauce (After Death for more heat) and
Scorned Woman.
Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
http://www.pyropepper.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=1898MD
They say this is the hottest in existence
right now. Boy do I want it.
JBH
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004
5:16 P
1 - 100 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
