onduit
for Christianity?
Christians get so EXCITED about a Movie, do they get so excited about
Jesus?
Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The more I read about this
fellow the more alarming it becomes. Of course none of it would matter to
Lance,
but t
The more I read about this fellow
the more alarming it becomes. Of course none of it would matter to
Lance,
but there is much more mixture
than I had previously suspected.
C. S. Lewis SuperstarHow a reserved British intellectual with a checkered pedigree
became a rock star for evangelicals
Here is one review from Amazon:
Every Christian I've ever heard or read has condemned
Judas to hell...until Anderson. Anderson's examination of both the
Biblical story of Judas and Jesus' teaching on forgiveness demonstrate two
things. Christians should have undying hope for everyone, even th
roding of the family unit, the confusion of
gender roles, the rise of moral relativism and humanism, the rise of sexual
promescuity, etc.
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:38:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes: Feminists! Don't you read what she
writes?
From: Ju
, she will find
herself stunted. I know of many who , after coming to the
Lord, have refused their own experiences with retardation as a their
finale. Thank God we don't have to be right. jd From: Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christine is mature spiritually wha
I didn't see Christine putting anyone down. Who
exactly do you reference?
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:23:43 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Why go to all that bother when you can just join
Christine in 'putting them down'? Duh!
From
You got the subject like right this time Lance.
Put down has become your forte
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:49:35 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Indeed Judy!! Anyone old enough to recall Edgar Bergen &
Charley McCarthy?
From: Judy Taylor
me of those feminists that either/both of you have
befriended, listened to and,
prayed with. (Please, no signs!)
From: Judy Taylor
So where are the grounds for your accusation -
where does it come from?
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:24:30 -0500 "Lance Muir&qu
TED]>
writes:
I'm sure you don't!
From: Judy Taylor
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Lance not
having anything to contribute is back to his old word games
I don't recall pronouncing anything at all having
to do with evangelism...
-0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With great ease and conviction of heart. Christine is a
kid . Timothy was discipled by Paul.
:-) jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't hold her in less esteem because of her
age. Timothy was a pastor wasn't he?
So where are the grounds for your accusation - where
does it come from?
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:24:30 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm sure you don't!
From: Judy Taylor
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Lance not
having anything to
To test them DaveH. Faith is ALWAYS
tested.
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 07:24:10 -0800 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
He did not plan for them to fall.DAVEH: If that is
so, then why do you think he placed the tree of knowledge of good and evil in
the Garden of Eden, Terry? Rath
You are at least being honest about this JD - Excellent
trait .
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:13:33 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Forget it Lance, I've been there and it's a one way
street to nowhere
big waste of time. = "I haven't a clue."
Don't hold her in less esteem because of her age.
Timothy was a pastor wasn't he? I see it the same
way she does and I have children who are older than 20
something. You don't understand her POV JD
Kevin is for the Truth. How can you argue with
that???
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:03:03 -0500
I don't recall pronouncing anything at all having to do
with evangelism...
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:57:12 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Judy pronounces relational evangelism with feminists A WASTE OF TIME!
Want to add anyone else to the list?
The difference is in the way we read. You do not
respect/revere me in the way you do your
favorite theologians and authors and that makes all the
difference. They are your teachers...
and they are who you will become like
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:55:16 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Forget it Lance, I've been there and it's a one way
street to nowhere big waste of time.
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:27:01 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Have either of you examined the role of your
churches vis a vis that horrid 'feminism'?
Let me hear from either
If you want to look like Lewis & Tolkien read them -
If you want to look like Jesus - Selah!! Let them "humanize" you or trust
Jesus to send the Promise and make you part of a "New Creation" in
Him.
C.S. Lewis, the Sneaky PaganThe author of A Field Guide to Narnia says
Lewis wove pre-Christ
Amen Christine!! Agreed ...
Back in the 1960's misguided soul that I was, I
was looking for truth in all the wrong places and as a mother
of
two young daughters found myself with a friend in her
rcc church on Sundays (while living in the Bible Belt no less).
Betty Friedan's book The Femin
Traditions have replaced the Word of God
...
People whose hearts are set on the flesh nature need a
physical tangible God ...
Today this need is fulfilled through a form of
godliness manifested by many religious organizations and doctrinal structures
...
These like the golden calf, h
And of course me too!! judyt
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:26:21 -0800 (PST) Christine Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JD wrote:You have allies on this forum but no real
brethren I consider Kevin a dear brother and a man of God. You do not
speak for me on this, JD. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
Judy says:'I don't read novels, we are cautioned to guard our hearts
with all diligence...
Well at least you got that right; (my stand that
is, you can do what you like) I don't sit under false prophets either
As for Wagner and Wimber. I don't mind telling -
that is, after you tell Iz
You haven't heard that from me Lance; actually it is
one of your favorite lines and it probably
doesn't hurt bookselling in the least.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 06:34:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Don't criticize what you
haven't read, Iz (Judy). Wait a sec, where did I hea
Judy says 'SINCE SO MUCH OTHER NONSENSE COMES OUT OF
THAT PLACE (FULLER SEMINARY)
I don't read novels; we are cautioned to guard our
hearts with all diligence - As for Fuller, part of their teaching
staff
did not believe in the inerrance of scripture - also
this is where Wagner gave the Ro
Yes, Jesus was longsuffering with him all along because
He knew but let him hold the purse anyway.
Now that's faith.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 04:06:58 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Jesus Loved him but He did not win
him.Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Oh now that makes a bit more sense - since so much
other nonsense comes out of that place.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 04:01:45 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Consider the source.
Fuller Theo.Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Two excellent books
So, is Anderson's thesis that because Jesus put up with
a false disciple that the wheat should be chummy
with all the tares which would be contradictory to
Kevin's scriptural evidence for separation/sanctification.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 06:00:41 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
think God
created A&E while knowing that they would definitely transgress, or do you
think there was a possibility that they would not transgress?Judy
Taylor wrote:
You have brought this up in the past on TT DaveH
but it didn't last long because there is no place
Wow Kevin - You've found a man after Gary's own heart
... Definitely nothing new under the sun... :)
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:45:57 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Thoytom Asse Coria
Tushrump codsheadirustie,Mungrellimo whish whap ragge dicete
tottrie,Mangelusq
Are you enjoying reading your words and responding
to yourself Gary?
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:04:33 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..parrots
proud like peacox parading a proof/text reflex: 'no Rock
rocks unxeroxd'
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:52:11 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
teachers in Berea? You think this was a bunch of people without
leadership Get real. And what if apostles,
prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers?? Why are they
in the church. To help us understand scripture, among other
things. Barth is just another teacher.
I agree that this particular thought is out in
left field; the scripture does say that God would have killed Moses but does
not
tell us how he would have done it. It
appears the wife was the one standing in the way and that Moses must have
wanted to take care of it. earlier. The wife was
a
Terry,
What do you believe was out in left field about that
fellow's response? There was another incident
with Moses when he struck the rock twice after God told him to speak to the rock. For this he was not permitted to enter
the Promised Land with the ppl he had been leading
for all tho
le when Paul wrote I
Co -- only Jewish scripture and the church did not have ready
access to most of those document copies.
jd From: Judy Taylor
<jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
And I will simply say once more that the Word of God
needs no "INTERPRETATION"
David who? This is just one more of JD's
accusations. David has better sense
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:23:26 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WHEN OPINION IS KING...SOME OF JUDY'S & DAVID'S CITATIONS
From: Judy Taylor
On Mon
t the NT they searched the scriptures daily to see whether what Paul was
teaching them was valid - What's more he called them "more honorable" for
doing this. I think you go
around looking for excuses and problems
JD.
From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.co
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:06:52 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Says one "King" to another
"King." From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is so silly Lance?
From what you write I get the impression that your
own opinion is King... pr
dy) if the teaching is only taught on a
single occasion. jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read 1 Cor 2:12-16, this is the teaching and this is
what I believe. Understanding rather than
some man's natural or carnal interpretation is the
problem.
On Mon, 5 De
they are
a part of the "old system?" Houston, we have a
problem. Judy cannot square her doctrine of "infallible
understanding" with the fact that God set evangelists, teachers and pastors in
the church ! jd From
the same Jesus. jdFrom:
Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
And which Jesus is this?
The Mormon Jesus?
Jesus God's Word?
The "incarnational" Jesus?
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:22:33 -0600 Terry Clifton <wabbits1234@earthlink.net> writes:
Lance
ot; with the fact that God set evangelists, teachers and pastors in
the church !!!!!
jd From: Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes and under the old system he provided Moses seat
and who sat there?
Did Jesus encourage the ppl to follow
E NEITHER EXHAUSTIVE NOR INFALLIBLE. That then,
would include your interpretation(s) of Scripture would it
not?
- Original Message -
From: Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
What is so silly Lance?
From what you write I get the impression that your own
opinion is King... prove me wrong. please!!
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:55:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Judy:You are just being silly, silly, silly!!
Wasnew?
F
No fear: Overcoming Bible trauma
By Bob
Just
I've been a writer for many years, working on all kinds of projects from
screenplays to corporate speeches to playwriting to academic essays to
journalism and commentary. As a former English teacher, I've read all kinds of
writing but never any
he placed apostles, evangelists, prophets,
pastors and teachers in the Chruch.
Barth would be a teacher. You would be a member.
jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did Jesus say that after He had gone to the Father he
would send a real smart theologian by the name of
PS: Which Jesus did you evaluate Francis Schaeffers
teachings in the light of?
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:36:39 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
And which Jesus is this?
The Mormon Jesus?
Jesus God's Word?
The "incarnational" Jesus?
On Mon, 05 De
And which Jesus is this?
The Mormon Jesus?
Jesus God's Word?
The "incarnational" Jesus?
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:22:33 -0600 Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Lance Muir wrote:
I shall venture an answer and, would like to
hear from all on this. JESUS IS THE ST
Read 1 Cor 2:12-16, this is the teaching and this is
what I believe. Understanding rather than
some man's natural or carnal interpretation is the
problem.
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:53:42 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
These are two rather large
observations/statements. PLE
f blasphemy by
David, I'll simply say that ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SCRIPTURE ARE NEITHER
EXHAUSTIVE NOR INFALLIBLE. That then, would include your interpretation(s) of
Scripture would it not?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@
You have brought this up in the past on TT DaveH but it
didn't last long because there is no place to go with it.
By definition all anyone could come up with is their
own speculation. God wasn't caught blindsided. He knew
and prepared for this "BEFORE the foundation of the
world" so it's too
Meaning that everyone has their own Jesus and there is
no standard of Truth?
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:16:42 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The definitive answer to your query concerning
'your own Jesus' is...well...YES.
judyt
So now we are back to your old question - Who is
Jesus? and which Jesus is the Standard/Plumbline?
Is He God the Word as in Scripture or is he the figment
of your or some theologian's prolific imagination?
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:54:16 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I shall
From:
ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Judy, would you say
that the less you have the Holy Spirit to teach and guide you, the more you
need Barth and others? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Judy
Taylor Was Barth inspired or
You call what you do here "interacting with others"
Gary? Now this is really interesting.
I'd say Lance is the voice from above and Kevin's is
like "regular folk" even if his subject matter is re another
Kingdom.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:53:03 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
apparently Jes
MAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
From: Judy Taylor
Did Jesus say that after
He had gone to the Father he would send a real smart theologian by the name
of
Barth to "unfold the revealed work attested in the
scriptures" JD?. Of course not - and we have the Be
others are not; e.g., not Izzy.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:18
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Emailing:
sda.htm
So now you have taken to clipping sentences and putting
words in my mouth which
indicates the working of deceit.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 12:32:57 -0700 "Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
to live there ie "If you abide in Me and My
Words abide in you"
I have no reason to consider Gal 3:26, 27 again, for example, if
this revisiting of the text does not provide me the opportunity to hear the
voice of the Living God work in my heart as I consider the biblical
you say
that the less you have the Holy Spirit to teach and guide you, the more you
need Barth and others? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Judy
Taylor Was Barth inspired or misguided in his belief that
the "task of theology is t
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Judy
Taylor Was Barth inspired or misguided in his belief that
the "task of theology is to unfold the revealed word attested in the Bible"
when Jesus' own Words teach us that this is the work of the Holy Spirit in the
lives of those w
When did I ever say she is irrelevant Bill? These
are your words not mine, please retract them.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:40:22 -0700 "Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Imagine that! I've already read this. Judy is
right: you are irrelevant.
Bill
- Original Message -
d Barth smarten them up?
Or should we listen to Paul who writes that we
already have the mind of Christ?
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 08:35:22 -0700 "Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
It's not God's fault.
t God's fault.
From: Judy Taylor
Not a very loving evaluation of God's workmanship
Bill
Lots of men have spent a "lifetime" preaching some
agenda or another - only those who 'in obedience' are speaking God's oracles
will receiv
d maybe, just maybe, be considered a great man of
God (although that is even doubtful). But put those words in a book
and Oh NO! now he's a theologian. Christians are
so stupid.
Bill
From: Judy Taylor
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 07:36:51 -0700 "Taylor" <[EMAIL PR
prepared to give account for the hope
that is in you with regard to Barth Bill? Everything I have read about
him so far has been dialectic and nothing is definitive. Hardly the kind
of atmosphere where faith grows.
From: Judy Taylor
Bill
writes: "It will t
igion.
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill writes: "It will take many years,
I'm sure, before Barth will be allowed to speak for himself to the
conservative community. In the meantime Evangelical Christians will be missing
out on one of the greatest voices the Chu
I will say. Off line, please. jd -----Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
<< SPAN class=correction id="">jandgtaylor1@juno.com>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005
04:09:26 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once
Bill writes: "It will take many years, I'm
sure, before Barth will be allowed to speak for himself to the conservative
community. In the meantime Evangelical Christians will be missing out on one of the greatest voices the Church has ever
known.
I'm curious about what you find so great Bill..
to gratify a perverted taste was presented to me by a Catholic woman,
kneeling at my feet, I felt ashamed and I distressedI saw it in a new
light, and I said, I will no longer patronize the butchers. I will not
have the flesh of corpses on my table. Prophetess of Health;
will take many
years, I'm sure, before Barth will be allowed to speak for himself to the
conservative community. In the meantime Evangelical Christians will be missing
out on one of the greatest voices the Church has ever known. Bill
From: Judy Taylor
JD writes: Stop with t
line. From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do JD; no mystery here you and Kevin are on another
list where apparently you discussed the young homosexual
you were trying to help; apparently Kevin discerns
some problem with your method of evangelizing because there
is no
Some things don't ever date - Truth being one of
them.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 03:36:27 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Other than being about 25 years out of date
(Francis Schaeffer a 'giant'?) it is good to note that people know who he
was.
From: ShieldsFamily
in the NT; its the fount of Am Fundamentalist cultic legalism--its
how legalism works to maintain partic racist exclusivity..its why evangelism
in Fundamentalism equates to church s/hopping..and its
one obvious reaosn why there's an ACLU)
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 23:50:51 -0500 Judy
ot; Pastoring in another list: "You
are a Judaizing punk and an embarrassment to your parents. You have
proven that in spades. I no longer believe that you would
benefit from man to boy confrontation."
knpraise@aol.com
wrote:
Hey Iz where you been? You were missed today
:)
If I were to guess I'd say that Lance is wide open
to everything EXCEPT what he sees as
fundamentalism and fundamentalists. Included in
both former and latter are George W.
along with you and I
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:31:34 -0600 "ShieldsFami
;Reply-To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org> >To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org> >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy
once again employing the ad hom (Barf > >for Karl Barth)>
>Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:12:22 -0500> >> >Total
chunky style barny
Barf >for Karl
Barth) >Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:12:22
-0500 > >Total chunky style barnyard. By the same
lo gic, I can call you Jezebel
>Taylor and Kevin "Dunce Deegan"
and and so on. And "ad hom" has no such >limitations exc
Once sufficient doubt is cast upon the Bible as a body of
objective truth, it will cease to be either an instrument of faith or a standard
of practice. It can be cherished as literature, adorning our tables and filling
our libraries; yet it will be no more authoritative
than Aesop's Fables
nd as such the attestation of Jesus Christ as
he showed himself alive after his death. It is ancillary to this attestation.
The one can be as little verified "historically" as the other. Certainly the
empty tomb cannot serve as an "historical" proof (IV, 1, 341).
The
the issues presented in past postings.
The myth that you function off the Holy Spirit in the interpretation of
scripture is herein debunked. Adoptionism is not a
bibllical doctrine when applied to Christ. So what's your
problem? jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROT
It would seem that
way. >From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I
get the impression Perry that Lance thinks himself as way above us
on >an intellectual >level and that most of the time
he just plays with us here on TT.
jt > > >On Sat, 03 Dec 200
n of the
issues. Not even a good try. jd
Your response is as expected JD. But allow me to
remind you that the scriptures are "spiritually discerned" rather
than intellectually apprehended as you are attempting
to do and so long as you persist the voices will be eve
>Taylor
and Kevin "Dunce Deegan" and and so on.
And "ad hom" has no such >limitations except here on TT. Ad hom is an attack on the person or words >of an
individual "rather than an appeal to pure reason" (Webster's >Encyclopedic
Dictionary.)
brand of
s-called interpretation!!
From: Judy Taylor
Filthiness is only a joke to those who lack
understanding Lance.
You and others plagued by what is known as the
"liberal" taint have been robbed blind by your mentors.
Jesus told His disciples that they w
Filthiness is only a joke to those who lack
understanding Lance.
You and others plagued by what is known as the
"liberal" taint have been robbed blind by your mentors.
Jesus told His disciples that they were clean through
the Words he had spoken (they received them as is)
Paul also uses this
es:
The inerrancy debate and the search for Emus are
on a par with one another.(Extinction is the word)
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:40:34 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
JD writes: Stop with the lie,
Judy. You have nothing to back up yo
tal 'pass'. Happily, David Miller did not. Kudos to
you, David.
From: Judy Taylor
Why would I waste God's time reading some
theologian who with all his great learning did not believe the
scriptures to be
inerrant? Obviously he wa
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:40:34 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JD writes: Stop with the lie, Judy.
You have nothing to back up your claim but when has that slowed you down in
the past. You want Barth to be a threat THEREFORE
he is. He spent
his li
hrough his "dogmatics" to find something like that for you to
shoot down JD?
From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
I know he would not pledge allegiance to Hitler which
is noteworthy but the very fact that Hitler and his occult socialist
syste
JD writes: By the same logic, I can call you Jezebel Taylor and Kevin "Dunce Deegan" and and so on. And "ad
hom" has no such limitations except here on
TT. Ad hom is an attack on the person or words
of an individual "rather than an appeal to pure reason" (Webster's
Encyclopedic
Dicti
material)
footnote:Same question of John
Calvin
footnote:Does it matter?
From:
Judy Taylor
Just because I have used a few of Hunt's
footnoted quotes in an online thread r
judge Barth and a clear statement to the fact that you know nothing of what
this man believes and the concerns he dealt with in his battle against liberal
theologies (among other considerations.)
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
<jandgtaylor1@juno.com>To:
TruthTal
Oh Dean,
Tell me it isn't so I for one will really
miss you here and hope you will be back ASAP
judyt
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:03:01 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
cd:
I have come to realize my passion are to much for extended stay on TT. To
've also seen it and, didn't
much care for it.
Didja ever think that you so readily assume the
'accusatory' 'cause that's what y'all do?
From: Judy Taylor
Do you know why they went? Were they going
for sheer entertainment or to kee
Did you think this a non ad hominem Lance or don't
you really care??
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:16:44 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Vacuity thy name is JUDY!
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and
s:
Two words in one day, kids! Can we all say
EVASIVE? Keep this up Judy and you're going to change my mind concerning you
and 'intentionality'. No, I don't think you'd care but, it'd say something
quite important about the 'reading' of you by John,
-0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The same that David & Christine went to see
in SWIII. Ya him!
From: Judy Taylor
Yoda - you mean that little wizened up devil in the
Star Wars movies
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:39:10 -0500 "Lanc
I get the impression Perry that Lance thinks himself as
way above us on an intellectual
level and that most of the time he just plays with us
here on TT. jt
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:44:52 -0800 "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:>
Okay, then the question remains why you po
Yoda - you mean that little wizened up devil in the
Star Wars movies
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:39:10 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Garden variety Christian am I. (How
yoda-like).
judyt
He t
Title: SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH
I haven't a clue why Lance sent this, I asked him about
it myself.
Don't know what Dave Hunt is, if anything but I do know
he is NOT SDA and I don't believe Lance is either.
He couldn't be universalist if he were. I have a
friend who began attending a SDA
901 - 1000 of 4892 matches
Mail list logo
