Actually I did see the irony David ... but thanks for
this - I'm not offended
Did I miss the chance to ROTFL? :)
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Judy wrote:> I'm surprised DavidM would be laughing> over
such an ad hominem put down -> where is the moderater?
A soft answer turns
Judy wrote:
> I'm surprised DavidM would be laughing
> over such an ad hominem put down -
> where is the moderater?
A soft answer turns away wrath.
Don't you see the irony of Gary instructing you to ask them an intelligent
question, then he words it, "you'll US ASK an intelligent question"? It
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:15:09 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it's not necessary--JCs
theological views are remarkably clear enough; otherwise, or lacking
certain clarity as you appear to allege, the NT has had no meaningful
purpose
You're lost from
the start GO because H
: [TruthTalk] Blessing vs
Curses
I'm surprised DavidM would be laughing over such an ad
hominem put down - where is the moderater?
Not to worry though since God in His wisdom is prone to
hide things from the wise, prudent, and self
proclaimed
"intelligentsia" jt
On Fri,
I'm surprised DavidM would be laughing over such an ad
hominem put down - where is the moderater?
Not to worry though since God in His wisdom is prone to
hide things from the wise, prudent, and self
proclaimed
"intelligentsia" jt
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:18:53 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Blessing vs Curses
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:18:53 -0600
(a tip of the top hat to Wm Shakespeare and KJ; I'm no respecter of
persons:)<--->LOL
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:38:48 -0400 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Gary w
(a tip of
the top hat to Wm Shakespeare and KJ; I'm no respecter of
persons:)<--->LOL
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:38:48 -0400 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:> Gary wrote:> > ... you'll us ask an intelligent
question> > LOL.
Gary wrote:
> ... you'll us ask an intelligent question
LOL. Brain malfunction Gary?
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do
it's not
necessary--JCs theological views are remarkably clear enough; otherwise,
or lacking certain clarity as you appear to allege, the NT has had no
meaningful purpose
also, your views
are clear enough, too--the issue is the divergence/s you choose to maintain from
the NT as it is--the
p.
JD -Original Message-From: Judy
Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:22:36
-0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Blessing vs Curses
I think I should let this go JD because I haven't
Oh! So we have two finger pointers who are
obsessed with "legalism" or "legalist logic" whatever that is.
Looks like some will have to wait till Jesus returns to
see what he was talking about then You may get a shock.
jt
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:30:28 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ho have their own pet doctrines. It is they who refuse to put their rules of fellowship into writing. It is they who want to control others rather than depending upon the Living Christ and His workings in the inner man.
Jd
From: Terry Clifton <wabbits1234@earthlink.net>To: TruthTalk@m
myth (your twist,
that you take the WoG at 'face value', is false--legalist logic loves
twisting and twisted truth)
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:48:39 -0400 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:29:43 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So IYO it is lega
n the Living Christ
and His workings in the inner man.
Jd
From: Terry Clifton <wabbits1234@earthlink.net>To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:33:14
-0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Blessing vs Curses
Wow!
Amazing! You go
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:48:39 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Blessing vs Curses
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:29:43 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am t
ll I guess it all depends
what one is willing to unify around. If it's doing your own thing - then
go
for it - but I for one will never be unifying
around that with you.
From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 1
e the word "others." A legalist is the enemy of unity and I have
no respect for them at all. Intolerance is not to be tolerated !!!
JD
-Original Message-
From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:33:14 -
A legalist is the enemy of unity and I have no respect for them at all. Intolerance is not to be tolerated !!!
JD -Original Message-From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:33:14 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Blessing vs Curses
Wow! Amazing! You got all that about all of us from one comment from
Judy. Which gift enables you to discern these things so accurately
with such scanty informatiom from which to draw a conclusion?
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
l.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent:
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:24:34 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Blessing vs
Curses
Why are you so focused on the "demon" aspect JD. I
say - according to Deuteronomy 27 that cancer
belongs in the category of "curse"
lor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:24:34 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Blessing vs Curses
Why are you so focused on the "demon" aspect JD. I say - according to Deuteronomy 27 that cancer
belongs in the c
Why are you so focused on the "demon" aspect JD.
I say - according to Deuteronomy 27 that cancer
belongs in the category of "curse" rather than
"blessing" - would you agree or are you under the impression that
cancer is a blessing from the Lord? Once we get
things in the right category then
22 matches
Mail list logo
