used to explain the existing truth-it is not only not
dangerous but divine Lance.I am not the first to make the below
statement.
Lance wrote:
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
The rationality o
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 18, 2006 09:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The rationality
of "God" -- nonsense
Well that is your own personal opinion
Lance. How is it you expect perfection from DavidM?
Why not give him some space? There is just onc
but divine Lance.I am not the first to make the below
statement.
Lance wrote:
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
rationality of "God" -- nonsense
You are the ONLY ONE I have ever met who
belie
@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 18, 2006 08:48
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The rationality
of "God" -- nonsense
I believe them rather than constantly wrest
them like some on this list do Lance.
You have a whole list of things that should
be of con
ure is wrong and
takes away from what the words mean-but if it is used to
explain the existing truth-it is not only not dangerous but divine
Lance.I am not the first to make the below
statement.
Lance wrote:
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
bject: Re: [TruthTalk] The rationality
of "God" -- nonsense
Oh Lance, the apple doesn't fall too far from
the tree does it. You are a true child of the Orthodoxy you serve.
This anxiety about some ppl not
being able to handle scripture is what led to the "
ipture is wrong and takes
away from what the words mean-but if it is used to explain the
existing truth-it is not only not dangerous but divine Lance.I am not the
first to make the below statement.
Lance wrote:
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
rationality of "
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/18/2006 6:32:03 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The rationality of "God" -- nonsense
It may be 'that no (wo)man is an island' yet, does every 'island' produce its own th
l.innglory.org
Sent: January 18, 2006 06:18
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The rationality
of "God" -- nonsense
You are the ONLY ONE I have ever met who believes that Adam and Eve
were not flesh and
blood but "spirit beings" be
You are the ONLY ONE I have ever met who believes that Adam and Eve were not flesh and
blood but "spirit beings" before the fall the only one.
cd: John I contend that A&E were more than just flesh before the fall-I view them as being's of light.The same light that show
John writes:
It is you who says He is not God in the flesh. It is you who teaches that He was only a similar man.
Judy , forgetting her own words, even her own beliefs, makes this demand ---
Show me JD, in my words please?
So John abliges
Like us is "similitude" Bill - it does
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:51:56 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bring down? Me saying that He is God in carnate? Surely
you jest !!
admitting the plain truth of scripture, that He was a man in every respect such as I
?
He looked as you do "YET WAS WITHOUT SIN" and this i
Bring down? Me saying that He is God in carnate? Surely you jest !!
admitting the plain truth of scripture, that He was a man in every respect such as I ?
It is you who says He is not God in the flesh. It is you who teaches that He was only a similar man.
You criticize me and in so
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/17/2006 2:55:06 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The rationality of "God" -- nonsense
I am in the office for only a few minutes. See my comments below.
cd:
2006 10:21:29 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The rationality of "God" -- nonsense
Dean, don't get too excited , here.
cd: I admit to being slightly excited but a long way from overly excited:-) For some reason David has that effect on me-maybe it is because I like him so much-brothers f
You try to bring the Lord Jesus Christ
down to your level JD, rather than allow God to conform
you
to His Image as you work out your own salvation
with fear and trembling. It's just easier if He does it
all
Right? No sweat!!!
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:29:38 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/16/2006 10:21:29 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The rationality of "God" -- nonsense
Dean, don't get too excited , here.
cd: I admit to being slightly excited but
I will repeat what you have spoken, Judy Taylor.
jd
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:21:28 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dean, don't get too excited , here. Judy does not use the word "human" as the rest of us
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:21:28 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dean, don't get too excited , here. Judy does not use the
word "human" as the rest of use that word.
Nor does she believe that Christ was God in the flesh
I would ask you once more to control yourself JD a
Dean, don't get too excited , here. Judy does not use the word "human" as the rest of use that word. Nor does she believe that Christ was God in the flesh unless you ,too, believe that could be God while being something less than God at the same time.
If Christ is God in the flesh,
20 matches
Mail list logo
