arrassment? Rowan Williams is not embarrassed concerning our Lord ANYWHERE. He, not unlike many, are embarrassed over believers turning non-issues into 'issues'. (i.e. creationISM)- Original Message - From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: March 21, 2006 13
Well what are you about Lance Muir
Are you doing what God has called someone else to
do?
Are you criticizing what you think someone else is
doing that God didn't tell them to do?
Are you hearing God as to what he wants you to
do?
How do you know you are hearing God since noone can
know truth
e - > From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: > Sent: March 22, 2006 13:44 > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism > > > > David Miller wrote: > >>> Have you read Creation's Tiny > >>> Mystery, by Robert Gentry? &
>To: Sent: March 21, 2006 21:48Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism> If fundamental Christianity is a problem for you, of what spirit are you? > iz>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan>
eldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But its so much easier to sit on ones tuffet and criticize the work of others. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy TaylorSent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 1:25 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Truth
Paul opposed the intolerant legalists in the church and so will I while, at the same time, writing the words of Romans 14. He is one of my mentors -- I will do the same.
A Rad Fundy is not defined by the words she reads but by the froth of mouth as she "evangelizes" the lost.
If the
Do you even know what this thread is about, Judy? WHICH VIEW OF CREATIONISM GOES INTO THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM -- HUH ??!! Be sure to answer with "the right one, John -- duh !!" or will that be Linda's piece of intellectual contribuation for the day?
jd
-- Original message --
Do you even know what this thread is about, Judy? WHICH VIEW OF CREATIONISM GETS INTO THE CIRRICULUM -- HUH ???
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So?
There isn't a single fiew of the whole church that is agreed upon
by the whole church e
I will give it a read, David.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 22, 2006 13:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David Miller wrote:
Have you read Creation's Tiny
Mystery, by Robert Gentry?
L
Iz:You slipped! David agreed with this 'hair-splitting' as you call it. Do
you wish to apologize to your mentor?
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 22, 2006 14:21
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creati
About as much as your husband's patients have learned from his care, Iz.
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 22, 2006 14:44
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
What would anyone learn from all the t
Operative _expression_ 'what they believe God has
called them to do'?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 14:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Let me get this straigh
But it’s so much easier to sit on
one’s tuffet and criticize the work of others. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006
1:25 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on
What would anyone learn from all the tomes you've suggested over the years,
Lance??? iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 12:18 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTal
The problem is when any belief held by a fundamental Christian is labeled
"Fundamentalism". izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 9:28 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re:
Let me get this straight JD.
By Rad Fundies you are talking about people who believe
Genesis as it is
written - Right??
PS What is wrong with the Carroll Dean's and the Pat
Robertsons of this
world? You may have to eat those words one day because
both are busy
about what they believe God ha
So?
There isn't a single fiew of the whole church that is
agreed upon
by the whole church either. What does that
prove? judyt
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:27:56 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I do. I know
this --
there isn't a single view
Only in your hair-splitting mentality. iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 7:03 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Iz:Fundamental Christianity
It is a shame we will not be able to finish this thread, I suppose, but I must say something here -- the conflict (speaking for myself) is not between science and religion. It is between religion and fundamentalism (radical fundamentalism, if you will.) Knowing that the first step will
David Miller wrote:
>> Have you read Creation's Tiny
>> Mystery, by Robert Gentry?
Lance wrote:
> No, I've not but, what would I learn
> were I to do so, David?
I'm glad you asked.
There are several things you would learn:
1. You would learn about the evidence for polonium halos indicating tha
No, I've not but, what would I learn were I to do so, David?
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 22, 2006 10:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Lance wrote:
One's time would be better spe
Lance wrote:
> One's time would be better spent reading
> some noteworthy novelists than noteworthy
> creationists. Lift up Jesus and, creationISM,
> will fall away as it should.
I can't say that I agree with you here. Have you read Creation's Tiny
Mystery, by Robert Gentry?
David Miller
-
Lance wrote:
> Fundamental Christianity is [fine]...
> FundamentalISM ought not be
> believed by anyone.
FWIW: I can appreciate this distinction Lance makes.
David Miller
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man
one to you
and, what you now do to others.Yikes! Yikes! Yikes (that'd be triple yikes)
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 22, 2006 10:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Lance wrote:
If Williams is a
Lance wrote:
> If Williams is a 'liberal loonie' then
> you are a 'sectarian loonie' , David.
I'm sectarian only in the sense that the holy and the profane ought to be
separate. I am not sectarian within the group of those who have submitted
unto Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.
Lance wr
you agnostic as to Dr. McGrath's
credentials and his teaching on both science & theology? How is it that one
could not appreciate your scholarship on this?
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 22, 2006 09:45
Subject: R
vid Miller
- Original Message -
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David:
I'll take a pass on the ad-homs in your post as they simply illustrate what
I've said
ECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 22, 2006 08:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David Miller wrote:
I hate it when theologians are embarrassed
of giving glory to the Creator in school.
Lance wrote:
You do KNOW, do you not David, that
that's NOT the source of his embarra
David Miller wrote:
>> I hate it when theologians are embarrassed
>> of giving glory to the Creator in school.
Lance wrote:
> You do KNOW, do you not David, that
> that's NOT the source of his embarrassment?
> Rowan Williams is not embarrassed concerning
> our Lord ANYWHERE. He, not unlike many,
>
r believers turning non-issues into 'issues'. (i.e. creationISM)- Original Message - From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: March 21, 2006 13:12Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism> Yup is right, but how does he get from this thought to
08:00
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
There is room for us to have different perspectives about how God
created, but none of us should disagree with the notion that God is the
Creator. To suggest that schools not teach even the possibility that God
is the Creator
- Original Message -
From: Taylor
To: Lance Muir
Sent: March 21, 2006 14:34
Subject: Re: TT's future?
Hi Lance,
You may forward this onto the group at TT. I want
to wish the best to everyone of you and am confident that we will meet
again on the other side. TruthTalk was a big
Iz:Fundamental Christianity is that which John believes. FundamentalISM
ought not be believed by anyone.
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 21, 2006 21:48
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
If fundamen
about this or that you
would defend this Bishop. Deception is the only word for it.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 8:27
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTal
avid Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 21, 2006 15:21
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
John wrote:
> The world in which we live would reject
> any mention of God in the evolutionary process,
> IMO. But creationism in the
-
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 21, 2006 13:12
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Yup is right, but how does he get from this thought to the idea that
creationism should not be considered in schools? I hate it when
theologians
ar
DeeganSent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 9:21 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Whom do you ask the guys who think DM & Judy are Fundies?ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If fundamental Christianity is a problem for you, of wha
Anyone who has a problem with it. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 9:21
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on Creationism
Whom do you ask the guys who think
, March 21, 2006 4:15 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on CreationismDM says In case you did not notice, the fundamentalists are not causingthe acknowledgement of our Creator to be forbidden in schools. It isthe liberal loonies like this Archbishop of Canterbu
If fundamental Christianity is a problem for you, of what spirit are you? iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 4:15 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Well --- I really do not know his reasoning.. hence the wording "perhaps " I have a friend, a math teacher in high school. He had to teach biology for a semester. He decided he was put his career on the line and make a statement , in class, that was pro-creation. Befo
JD says Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I do. He too is afraid of fundamentalists? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I do. I know this -- there isn't a single view of creationism that is agreed upon by the whole church. jd -
Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I do. I know this -- there isn't a single view of creationism that is agreed upon by the whole church.
jd
-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John wrote:
> The world in which we live wou
DM says In case you did not notice, the fundamentalists are not causing
the acknowledgement of our Creator to be forbidden in schools. It is
the liberal loonies like this Archbishop of Canterbury who are doing
this.
Some around here are concerned that there are "FUNDIES" lurking around
every keyb
John wrote:
> The world in which we live would reject
> any mention of God in the evolutionary process,
> IMO. But creationism in the schools?
Could
> that not be considered the beginnings of a fanatical
> fundamentalist take-over of the culture?
ROTFLOL. I sure hope you were being
#x27;
Sent: March 21, 2006 12:15
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
"And for most of the history of Christianity ... there's been an awareness
that a belief that everything depends on the creative act of God is quite
compatible with a degree of uncertainty or latitude abou
The world in which we live would reject any mention of God in the evolutionary process, IMO. But creationism in the schools? Could that not be considered the beginnings of a fanatical fundamentalist take-over of the culture?
But to allow a mere statement that suggests God is somehow in
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 21, 2006 12:15
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
"And for most of the history of Christianity ... there's
been an awareness that a belief that everything depends on the
- Original Message -
From: Hughes Jonathan
To: Lance Muir
Sent: March 21, 2006 10:45
Subject: Williams on Creationism
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/03/21/britain.williams.ap/index.html
Jonathan Hughes
Supervisor of Application
Support
Kingsway Financial
905-629-7888
- Original Message -
From: David
Peck
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 21, 2006 10:01
Subject: RE: Fw: understanding, believing, knowing,
doing
This seems dangerously
close to analytic philosophy and you know how I feel about that
I tried to call
you yesterday, but you had already
'All the better to paint you with', Little Red Riding Hood!
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Deegan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 20, 2006 11:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: [Wrightsaid] Digest Number 1245
My what a Broad Brush you have!
--- La
My what a Broad Brush you have!
--- Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RE: [Wrightsaid] Digest Number 1245
> - Original Message -
> From: Debbie Sawczak
> To: 'Lance Muir'
> Sent: March 19, 2006 14:24
> Subject: RE: [Wrightsaid] Digest Number 1245
>
>
> I took note of the follow
I'm curious, Judy. Have you read 1984 by George
Orwell?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 20, 2006 08:30
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: and
now
Strange friend you have Lance; she has her own
definition
Strange friend you have Lance; she has her own
definitions for everything. If something false that
sounds logical is the criteria then we should begin to
censure everyone who speaks the truth, it sure
would be a lot less work for the moderator. 1984
has arrived.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:43:
Title: RE: [Wrightsaid] Digest Number 1245
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 19, 2006 14:24
Subject: RE: [Wrightsaid] Digest Number 1245
I took note of the
following:
Ian noted from Wrights response to
Barnett: >> >> > declare that if the Ref
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 19, 2006 16:02
Subject: but of course
that makes 80% of the
communication on TT, from all quarters, ad hom rather than actual argument. We
all do it.
D
--No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AV
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 19, 2006 15:56
Subject: and now
sectarianism. Is
nobody safe from your ignorance
and bigotry?
DM has never really understood what an ad hominem is.
It has nothing to do with rudeness. All ad homs, as a form
Title: It just SEEMS patronizing!
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 19, 2006 15:37
Subject: It just SEEMS patronizing!
…this of DM's, to
"Don't-confuse-me-with-the-facts" Lance:
I could be wrong, but
as best I can tell, in theological circles
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 15, 2006 22:14
Subject: having finished V's postmodernism lecture
I
mentioned the relational bit in my reply to your forwarded Wrightsaid post. For
the rest: having been able to listen to it in context, and w
Title: A few lines from Gilead
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 15, 2006 21:41
Subject: A few lines from Gilead
I am currently reading it, and it's
wonderful. In case you don't know or have forgotten, it's a letter written by a
dying father,
Title: PALM Report Vol 4 Issue 9
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Fligg PALM
Ministries
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 16, 2006 07:52
Subject: PALM Alert!
PALM Alert!
Lifting up Mississauga in
Prayer
John 17:21 May they be brought to complete unity
PALM -Pray ALways
Missis
..yo DaveH, send this to Bob & ask
him where he got the idea:)
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:22:43 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"..There's always some new stranger
sneakin' glancesSome trigger-happy fool willin' to take chancesAnd
some old whore from San Pedro to make advancesAdvance
Thanks for your example of as you say "a carnal reply" Now that I see your response I am a BELIEVER!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An example of a carnal reply. Does anyone doubt the sincerity of Linda's faith -- yet we have something that could not sound more worldly. I think this
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 2:26 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: excerpt redux
An example of a carnal reply. Does anyone doubt the sincerity of Linda's faith -- yet we have something that could not sound m
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw:
excerpt redux
An example of a carnal reply. Does
anyone doubt the sincerity of Linda's faith -- yet we have
something that could not sound more worldly. I think this has to do with
I Cor 3:1ff.
jd
Doesn’t
An example of a carnal reply. Does anyone doubt the sincerity of Linda's faith -- yet we have something that could not sound more worldly. I think this has to do with I Cor 3:1ff.
jd
Doesnt that prove that 60 Minutes doesnt know a __ thing? iz
Doesn’t that prove that 60 Minutes doesn’t
know a __ thing? iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006
9:11 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
excerpt redux
Because I
BE WARNED!!!
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:21:33 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps only the definition of sin exists in the
abstract. We I speak of "hating the sin" I only mean that I
am displeased with the effects sin is having on his person. I think it a perversion to hate the a
NO Jd
Some of us believe the scriptural account which teaches
us that as a person He was "begotten" not made
The word JD is "monogenes" and it means one of a kind
and different from the rest of us who were conceived in
in sin and iniquity.
YES Jd
He did die unjustly and if you believe
the s
How can you relate the two was Job and now Zacchaeus a FORNICATOR also?Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Original Message - From: "Debbie Sawczak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "'Lance Muir'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: March 15, 2006 08:20Su
Great post. I would include David's response but I am still working on his comments.
Perhaps only the definition of sin exists in the abstract. We I speak of "hating the sin" I only mean that I am displeased with the effects sin is having on his person. I think it a perversion to ha
Because I believe that homosexuality is preventable and
curable.
DAVEH: Did you/anybody happen to watch 60 MINUTES a few days ago?
It had a very interesting segment on homosexuality. And as I
understood the story, they seemed to be neutral in their
examination.which was inconclusive
- Original Message -
From: "Debbie Sawczak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Lance Muir'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: March 15, 2006 08:20
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: excerpt redux
My, that was fast!
I guess we have to take his word for it. I
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 5:31 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw: excerpt redux
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 14, 2006 22:04
Subject: excerpt redux
Lance, I was just printing out the next raw chapter (on "Two Kinds
Lance's
friend writes:
It's
Q&A, and the point I was noticing was that sin has no existence apart
from sinners
What about the
angels who sinned and are held in chains of darkness - are they persons
also? And
BTW what is
personhood anyway? Last time I looked angels were ministering
spi
For someone whose expertise is with words Lance,
your friend sure plays fast and loose with them.
Nowhere does scripture say "Christ
became sin or a sinner" - Remember? He was "begotten not
made,
of one substance with the Father" - so
even Orthodoxy disputes her thesis.
It was on the cr
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 14, 2006 22:04
Subject: excerpt redux
Lance, I was just printing out the next raw chapter (on
"Two Kinds of Righteousness" and "A Meditation on Christ's Passion") in
preparation for editing, and my eye lit on
Praise The Lord! No I am not leaving.Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Man this is where the rubber meets the roadDAVEH: Does that mean you are leaving TT, Kevin???PTLDAVEH: Please define. (I did not find it in the INNGLORY list of acronyms.)Kevin Deegan wrote: I am sure this is gonna hel
ve him for breakfast at whim. Calvinism has bound
his mind and prevented truth from entering in-But if he ever got over that he would indeed be a Philosopher to reckon with-but as is he is only a babe in Christ.- Original Message ----- From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
and, David Miller. (honourable mention to the dearly departed: Debbie, Caroline and Jonathan) Lastly, the demeanour of Dave Hansen is a model that IFO appreciate.- Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 11, 2006 06:38 Subject: Re: [
The lesson we all must learn to grow up in
Christ, for sure. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 2:32
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Dylan
Timely reminder KD
I've just been reading the testimony of another
"music star" and his wife, one who struggled to free himself
and
their marriage from his addiction to
pornography. The wife wrote: Whenever we traveled, I was a sucker for
magazines that had stories with titles such as "10 W
"..There's always some new stranger
sneakin' glancesSome trigger-happy fool willin' to take chancesAnd some
old whore from San Pedro to make advancesAdvances on your spirit and your
soul.
The businessmen from Taos want you to go
downThey've hired Pat Garrett to force a showdown._Billy_, do
know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Original Message - From: Debbie Sawczak To: 'Lance Muir' Sent: March 11, 2006 22:35 Subject: Dylan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 2:05
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw: Blue Man
Group
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 11, 2006 22:35
Subject: Dylan
Watching the Dylan
documentary reminded me how much I like that music. Not just Dylan but Pete
Seeger (what a wonderful voice!), Woody Guthrie, Joan Baez. On the way downtown
Fri
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 11, 2006 22:20
Subject: Blue Man Group
Like I
said, it was amazing. (I told you I was prepared to dislike it, but behind the
advance guard I put up sometimes, my mind is usually open. Sancho Panza comes
back
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: March 11, 2006 21:06
Subject: Stone Reader
I liked it. I was going to say I loved it, but then I
realized that what I loved wasn’t it but the
ideas and impressions it evoked in me—especially the memory of the
expe
Man this is where the rubber meets the road
DAVEH: Does that mean you are leaving TT, Kevin???
PTL
DAVEH: Please define. (I did not find it in the INNGLORY list of
acronyms.)
Kevin Deegan wrote:
I am sure this is gonna help me be a better christian
TODAY!
Man this is where the rub
Judy, since you have decided not to answer my questoins about intellect, I was wondering if you would take time to present Calvin's words that gave rise to Bill's discussion below. I know Bill rather well so your observation is of interest to me.
jd
-- Original message -
Patience John I will honor you request soon-but at the moment my schedule is full.
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/11/2006 11:30:11 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: JOHN: An extended discussion on Person/Persons
age -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/11/2006 7:06:22 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: JOHN: An extended discussion on Person/Persons/Personhood including you, BT and, DM
Judy: Bill's 'concept of humanity' is biblical. IFF it in any way concur
Your discontent is duly noted.
jd
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
She is not claiming any such thing, the victory always belongs to Christ and those who say what He
says. You obviously have not read the "whole archives" JD. She did jus
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/11/2006 7:06:22 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: JOHN: An extended discussion on Person/Persons/Personhood including you, BT and, DM
Judy: Bill's 'concept of humanity' is biblical. IF
No more than his “pains” us,
Lance. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006
6:06 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: JOHN:
An extended discussion on Person/Persons/Personhood
e Hansen is a model that IFO
appreciate.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 11, 2006 06:38
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: JOHN: An
extended discussion on Person/Persons/Personhood including you, BT and,
DM
She is not claiming any such thing, the victory
always belongs to Christ and those who say what He
says. You obviously have not read the "whole
archives" JD. She did just what she said and the amazing
thing (to me) was that Bill stuck around at least
until this point. But this did not exhau
Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, March 10, 2006 11:02 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk] Fw: JOHN: An extended discussion on Person/Persons/Personhood including you, BT and, DM
FYI: Izzy, Judy, Kevin & Dean.
THANKS TO THE BISHOP FOR THIS FINE WORK!
- Origina
10, 2006 11:02
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw: JOHN: An
extended discussion on Person/Persons/Personhood including you, BT and, DM
FYI: Izzy, Judy, Kevin & Dean.
THANKS TO THE BISHOP FOR THIS FINE WORK!
- Original Mes
I am sure this is gonna help me be a better christian TODAY! Man this is where the rubber meets the road. PTL!Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FYI: Izzy, Judy, Kevin & Dean. THANKS TO THE BISHOP FOR THIS FINE WORK! - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Lance M
201 - 300 of 1582 matches
Mail list logo
