Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-06 Thread Debbie Sawczak
Enjoyed this too. Think I'll save it.   Debbie - Original Message - From: Caroline Wong To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 11:08 AM Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth  I sent the Ficti

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-06 Thread Debbie Sawczak
om: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth Debbie wrote: Some things to consider with regard to communication: A text, whether spoken or written, is not itself a message but on

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-06 Thread David Miller
Caroline wrote: > I sent the Fictitious Interview with Karl Barth to my > pastor and here is his response.   Very interesting read, Caroline.  Thanks very much.   Peace be with you.David Miller.

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-06 Thread Lance Muir
Isn't it a shame that there is no Hebrew punctuation? - Original Message - From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: April 06, 2005 10:33 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth > Lance wrote: > > David Miller is per

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-06 Thread Judy Taylor
  On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:08:26 -0500 "Caroline Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>writes: I sent the Fictitious Interview with Karl Barth to my pastor and here is his response. I asked for his permission to post here and he said sure, what's the worse that can happen. Then he said, don't answer that.

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-06 Thread David Miller
Debbie wrote: > Some things to consider with regard to communication: > A text, whether spoken or written, is not itself a message > but only a vehicle for a message. Also, it is not independent > of speaker and hearer. In fact, in any act of discourse, > we have to recognize not only the message b

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-06 Thread David Miller
Lance wrote: > David Miller is perhaps the best one to reference > when making this point. He engages JS and BT > ad nauseum on the smallest of points. He deems > these distinctions to be of great importance. >From my perspective, most of the theology issues are relatively minor. Concepts about t

[TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-06 Thread Caroline Wong
 I sent the Fictitious Interview with Karl Barth to my pastor and here is his response. I asked for his permission to post here and he said sure, what's the worse that can happen. Then he said, don't answer that. I've told him a little about TT.   Just a quickie bio on him. He is a pastor o

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Dave Hansen
t: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:26 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth   ignore the ignorant, pls; this post is v insightful, D; (in its intended context) a valuable reference relative to reading/writing email on TT  

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 4/5/2005 3:29:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ignore the ignorant, pls; this post is v insightful, D; (in its intended context) a valuable reference relative to reading/writing email on TT   thank you v much for this post!     g :: tt moderator   O

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 4/5/2005 2:39:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Debbie Sawczak wrote: Some things to consider with regard to communication:   A text, whether spoken or written, is not itself a message but only a vehicle for a message. Also, it is not independent of speak

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread ttxpress
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:26 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth   ignore the ignorant, pls; this post is v insightful, D; (in its intended context) a valuab

RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread ShieldsFamily
From one of our most astute communicators, indeed…..Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:26 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread ShieldsFamily
: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth   You've got it Terry - why anyone would take such a wonderful and life-giving Word of Truth and try to make it so complicated and convoluted - is a mystery, but certainly not the mystery of godliness  judyt   On Tue, 0

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Debbie Sawczak
@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:55 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth You've got it Terry - why anyone would take such a wonderful and life-giving Word of Truth and try to make

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Debbie Sawczak
t: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:55 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth You've got it Terry - why anyone would take such a wonderful and life-giving Word of Truth and try to make it so complicated and convoluted - is a mystery, but certainly not

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread ttxpress
AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth Q:When we misapprehend the meaning of a fellow TTer, ||

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Judy Taylor
You've got it Terry - why anyone would take such a wonderful and life-giving Word of Truth and try to make it so complicated and convoluted - is a mystery, but certainly not the mystery of godliness  judyt   On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:38:59 -0500 Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Terry Clifton
Debbie Sawczak wrote: Some things to consider with regard to communication:   A text, whether spoken or written, is not itself a message but only a vehicle for a message. Also, it is not independent of speaker and hearer. In fact, in any act of discourse, we have to recognize

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Debbie Sawczak
contexts.   Debbie - Original Message - From: Lance Muir To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:29 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth Q:When we misapprehend the meaning of a fellow TTer, just what is

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Lance Muir
.org Sent: April 05, 2005 07:21 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth Here we go again ... back to the old smoke screen - "different meanings" - "enlightenment thinking".  There are different 'doctrines' of men out there Lanc

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Judy Taylor
Here we go again ... back to the old smoke screen - "different meanings" - "enlightenment thinking".  There are different 'doctrines' of men out there Lance but God's Word says what it says as is and until you are willing to humble yourself and come to the Word of Truth to learn rather than

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Lance Muir
that is the issue at hand. - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: April 05, 2005 06:40 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth I'm interested in what Jes

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Judy Taylor
I'm interested in what Jesus (The Word of God) says Lance, and unlike you I believe He is able to give understanding in spite of all the complicated issues you have raised in the past because His Word says "If any of you lack wisdom let him ask of God that giveth to all men liberally, and upb

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Lance Muir
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: April 05, 2005 06:09 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth Is this actually taken from Barth's theology Lance?   On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:28:19 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Judy Taylor
Is this actually taken from Barth's theology Lance?   On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:28:19 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KB: Likely so, but we are not God, so that the best we can say is that it would seem so. Hebrew 4:12 puts it that the text, under these conditions, is like a dou

[TruthTalk] Fw: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth

2005-04-05 Thread Lance Muir
  - Original Message - From: Jonathan Hughes To: Lance Muir Sent: April 04, 2005 20:09 Subject: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth From: http://rclough.blogspot.com/2005/04/interview-with-barth-on-inerrancy-of_01.htmlStudent: Professor Barth, welcome to the University. I came to g