America, the land of the free and lawless. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlin halverson
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 9:56
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Land of the
Free
"Land of the Free
Just some interesting facto
g
evening news from Detroit.
Blessings, Lance
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 16, 2004 08:58
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Land of the
Free
America,
the land of the free and lawless. Izzy
From: [EMAIL P
lf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 6:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Land of
the Free
America, the land
of the free and lawless. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlin halverson
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 9:56
Izzy: I don't believe that punishment, though
necessary, ever changes hearts. Lance
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 16, 2004 09:16
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Land of the
Free
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/nat
] Land of
the Free
Izzy: I don't believe that punishment, though necessary,
ever changes hearts. Lance
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 16, 2004 09:16
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Land of the Free
Izzy: smiley face?? Kidding?? Maybe attitude is
tougher to "read" in print than I sometimes acknowledge.Lance
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 16, 2004 10:11
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Land of the
Free
U
judgments
in my life have had that effect.
Sometimes it makes a light bulb go on. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 8:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Land of
the Free
Izzy: smiley face
ldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 16, 2004 11:12
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Land of the
Free
Lance,
No I am definitely not kidding.
Anyone who is a threat to society (ie: thief, rapist, etc.) should be
behind bars as long as legally possible. Is that contra
: Sunday, May 16, 2004 9:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Land of
the Free
Izzy: No, its not. For some time now I've believed that God
privileges the ear over the eye. Its the perceived tone that gave me pause, not
the content of your post.
Most of the judgment
Lance wrote:
> I don't believe that punishment, though necessary,
> ever changes hearts.
It sure seems to change the hearts of my kids. Just today one of my
girls was acting inappropriately in church. After a trip outside to the
woodshed so to speak, she came back in with a completely different
That "change" is temporary.
Lance
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: May 16, 2004 22:20
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Land of the Free
> Lance wrote:
> > I don't believe that punishment, though nece
David: I believe that you've just illustrated how the conscience becomes
socialized.
Lance
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: May 16, 2004 22:20
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Land of the Free
> Lance w
Lance wrote:
> As I've quoted so many times: "no syntactics contains
> ITS OWN semantics".
You dropped the discussion on this topic, so I'm not sure what your
peculiar understanding of this is. I hate guessing at what people are
thinking, but in this case, I think I must offer some comments. If
Lance wrote:
> I believe that you've just illustrated how
> the conscience becomes socialized.
No, I don't believe that I have. I was not a child that long ago. When
I misbehaved, I did not do so because my conscience told me too. I knew
I was doing wrong. I acted against my conscience, and t
uot; Lance
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: May 17, 2004 09:08
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Land of the Free
Lance wrote:
> As I've quoted so many times: "no syntactics contains
> ITS OWN semantics".
David: Were you and, are people globally born with veridical access? Lance
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: May 17, 2004 09:20
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Land of the Free
> Lance wrote:
> > I belie
Lance wrote:
> What does that paragraph mean to you?
>
> "...its own semantics. That is to say, the referential
> relations of language must be given priority over
> syntactical relations, while it is only as syntactical
> relations are themselves open through their boundary
> conditions to a c
why
not *perfect*?
G ~ P 235
On Mon, 17 May 2004 09:58:35 -0400 "Lance
Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:||
> - Original Message - >
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Sent: May 17, 2004 09:20>
Sounds perfect to me. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 7:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Land of
the Free
why not *perfect*?
G ~ P 235
Gary wrote:
> why not *perfect*?
Exactly! Why not? She is perfect, isn't she.
Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.Inn
20 matches
Mail list logo
