In a message dated 9/13/2004 7:05:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:55:25 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 9/13/2004 10:34:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
in what theological relationship?
On Sun, 12 Sep
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:55:25 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 9/13/2004 10:34:10 AM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
in
what theological relationship?
On
Sun, 12 Sep 2004 23:46:20 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated
whilecreatg yourown requirements for
discipleship,you're afollower of whom?
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:40:41 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You quote
Matt 8:21,22 to what purpose?[JCs] requirement is mine? I
think not.
In a message dated 9/12/2004 6:11:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
while creatg your own requirements for discipleship, you're a follower of whom?
Same guy you serve. He's just not a harsh in my presense as he is in yours, apparently.
J
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:14:52
EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..[JCs too].. harsh[for
me]..[?]J
'..anyone who does not carry his cross and follow me cannot
be my disciple.' - Lk 14,
NIV
In a message dated 9/12/2004 6:49:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
'..anyone who does not carry his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.' - Lk 14, NIV
This is just great. No one disagrees with this passage. Why you think it counters the biblical presentation I
In a message dated 9/12/2004 6:49:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:14:52 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..[JCs too].. harsh [for me].. [?]
J
'..anyone who does not carry his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.' - Lk 14, NIV
one
||
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:14:52 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a...[JC, below,is too].. harsh [for me]
b.
[but I'm testing] the effectiveness of
the gospel presentation (whatever that
is)..
ok,
here it is, J:
'..anyone who
In a message dated 9/11/2004 12:47:40 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
not acc to Scripture, J
apparently JC addressed lotsa wannabes who really ain't got a clue what it means; e.g.:
Matt. 8:21 Another disciple said to him, "Lord, first let me go and bury my father."
22
In a message dated 9/8/2004 10:57:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:39:58 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
G:
Reagan's favorite President, Coolidge, said 'the business of America is business', a quote which GWB echoed/redacted in his recent convention
God's reign, accordingto the
gospels, is absolute; that andwhat a seeker, even a pristine seeker of God
(e.g., amonastic nun of the highest order)seeksare
radicallyconflicting notions
consider theconflict (due to
biases) betweven such a nunand her God;
e.g.:
a Psalmistcomments through
In a message dated 9/9/2004 7:52:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
God's reign, according to the gospels, is absolute; that and what a seeker, even a pristine seeker of God (e.g., a monastic nun of the highest order) seeks are radically conflicting notions
consider the
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:19:47 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 9/9/2004 7:52:51 AM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
g:
God's reign,
according to the gospels, is absolute..And how does
this relate to you and me and the gospel
In a message dated 9/9/2004 1:16:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it [the gospel] is not necessarily related to both of us, J; however, the reign of God does not intrinsically exclude anybody--God is thoroughly unbiased toward us
G , that first phrase is something I do
Knp askedme to explain a ttxpress
post; the requestis phrased this way:
And how does this relate to you and me
and the gospel message?
theexplanation, below, is a point of
departure
it recognizes the integrety ofKnp's freedoms, choice/s
it doesn'tpresume anything--"I ain't
lookin' for
In a message dated 9/9/2004 6:01:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Knp asked me to explain a ttxpress post; the request is phrased this way:
And how does this relate to you and me and the gospel message?
the explanation, below, is a point of departure
it recognizes the
Text: Acts 16:14- 40 Paul and Silas in Philippi
Question: at what point in the story does Paul turn to Silas and say, "We gottem right where we wantem?"
Bishop Smitty
Understand that the cultural context of this passage includes a church that enjoyed more of a peaceful existence than most.
Funny, John, thats exactly the same
feeling Ive had about your responses since you went Kruger on us. I cant
even begin to figure out what they mean, or if they were really intended to
answer my questions. Ive about given up. Youve gone
the way of Lance and G Im afraid. Soon youll all be
Smitty, Who are you talking to, and about
what??? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004
7:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
Text: Acts 16:14- 40 Paul
In a message dated 9/9/2004 6:49:49 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funny, John, thats exactly the same feeling Ive had about your responses since you went Kruger on us. I cant even begin to figure out what they mean, or if they were really intended to answer my questions. Ive
In a message dated 9/9/2004 6:56:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Smitty, Who are you talking to, and about what??? Izzy
Et al.
j
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:49:22 -0500
"ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..I cant even begin to figure out ..[the meaning/s of certain
post/s]..
[they say Ivan's movin' North, Iz;fwd
this to your kidsG
] .
In a message dated 9/9/2004 8:33:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what's a disciple of Christ? G
Anyone who's trying.
J
Some questions:
Is biblical biasessentially
'systematic error'? E.g.,
with respect to the Holy Spirit's work relative to (y/our) entering the kingdom
of God, can their be divergent biases(?); e.g.while the Holy Spirit
indicatesthat JCs followersabandonedthe Roman
Empiretoenter the kingdom
In a message dated 9/7/2004 11:08:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some questions:
Is biblical bias essentially 'systematic error'?
No. "biblical bias" is truth. We can only approximate that truth in terms of certainty. ICo 8:1-3.
E.g., with respect to the Holy
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:39:58 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
G:
Reagan's favorite President, Coolidge, said 'the business of
America is business', a quote which GWB
echoed/redacted in his recent convention speech. Doesn't this *indicate* that America's bias is essentially
Does this describe anyone on this list?
J
WHY
MESSIANIC
JEWS?
Rachmiel Frydiand
To ask why we are Jews is to ask why a bagel is a bagel. A bagel tastes like a bagel and not like a doughnut, although one bagelhater defined a bagel as a doughnut dipped in cement. Now a
In a message dated 9/4/2004 8:15:21 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ftr, the US political partying proves that the same is true of both democracies and republics--they got zero tolerance for JC while they dearly love their terminators
G - P235
Absolutely the
you don'topposea
radicalbias toward the kingdom of God?
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 22:29:37 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 9/4/2004 8:15:21 PM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:ftr, the US political partying
proves that the same is true of both democracies
In a message dated 9/6/2004 8:02:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you don't oppose a radical bias toward the kingdom of God?
Only if it seeks to exlude me.
John
how isa legitimate bias properly
formed? what's its relationship to the truth?
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 00:03:33 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 9/6/2004 8:02:03 PM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you
don't oppose a radical bias toward the kingdom of
I think you've got this 'servants/masters' thing
mixed up.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 04, 2004 17:37
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
9/4
..conservatism stands for everything real
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 04, 2004 17:37
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
9/4
..conservatism stands for everything real
Believers believe inincluding freedom from domination by big govt.
Izzy
: September 05, 2004 11:00
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
Insightful, indeed! Izzy's
premise--that conservatism emancipates its adherents--is false (to put it
conservatively:) While, US
conservatives their serve swift-spending expanding intrusiverepublican
government/s
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 04, 2004
17:37
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
The End of Truthtalk
9/4
..conservatism
stands for everything real Believers believe inincluding freedom from
domination by big govt. Izzy
And dont miss the #1 Best Seller, Unfit
for Command! snork, snork! J Bye!!! Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004
9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
not 'run' similarly throughout your current
administration though such as Ashcroft, Powell and Bush claim allegiance to
those same Scriptures.
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 05, 2004 12:16
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
ink you've got this 'servants/masters'
thing mixed up.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 04, 2004 17:37
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
9/4
..co
PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 9:01
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
Insightful, indeed! Izzy's
premise--that conservatism emancipates its adherents--is false (to put it
conservatively:) While, US con
A couple of days after youve paid
your federal taxes for the year. Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004
4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
when's Labor
PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 4:33
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
G:
when's Labor
Day?
||
9/4
..conservat
Give it will be given to you,
pressed down, shaken together, and running over. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004
9:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
g, all these are why God is politically
conservative by the way. J Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004
6:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
Give
Shaken, not stirred??
-- slade
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004
8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
Give it will be
given to you
That was the Off the Top of my Head
version. Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004
7:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
Shaken, not stirred??
-- slade
I was trying to make a James Bond funny.
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004
10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
That was the Off the Top
: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
I was trying to make a James Bond
funny.
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004
10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
September 04, 2004 6:39
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
Give it will be
given to you, pressed down, shaken together, and running over.
Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROT
: Saturday, September 04, 2004
6:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
Give it will be given to you,
pressed down, shaken together, and running over. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
9/4
..conservatism stands for everything real Believers
believe inincluding freedom from domination by big govt.
Izzy
JC stands on his own
merits--conservatism is irrelevant
E.g.,think about that woman he
praised who put ALL her post-taxedcash in the temple
till
JDsimplication is that
No wonder she only had a mite. I
guess Caesar was a Democrat. Izzy
E.g.,think about that woman he
praised who put ALL her post-taxedcash in the temple till
G
you guessed wrong again,
Izzy;'Caesar',JCs nemesis,ruled a
republic, not a democracy; e.g.:
http://www.vroma.org/~bmcmanus/romanpages.html
ftr, the US politicalpartying
proves that the same is true of both democracies and republics--they got zero
tolerance for JC while they dearly
Thats actually what we have,
g. Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004
5:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
you guessed wrong again,
Izzy;'Caesar',JCs
ftr, the US
politicalpartying proves
that the same is true of both democracies and republics--they got zero
tolerance for JC while they dearly lovetheir terminators
G
- P235
Absolutely the most brilliant observation posted in the last month.
Way
Iz:See the 'G' man on this post of yours. Do you
understand his meaning? PS-No, I won't explain it if you don't.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 02, 2004 23:38
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
All I hear is liberal static.I cant
heeear you!!! Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004
5:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
Iz:See the 'G' man
, 2004 5:37
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
Iz:See the 'G' man on this post of
yours. Do you understand his meaning? PS-No, I won't explain it if you
don't.
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004
8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
Iz:This 'liberal' did listen to he of the 'silver spoon in
his mouth' and, what a boorrre!!! Now, if
Miller
:35
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
The eye of the
beholder affects everything, Lance. Perhaps a little Visine would help?
"But if your eye is bad, your whole body will be full
of darkness. If then the light
that is in you is darkness, how
Great, Lance! And now, about your ears..Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004
8:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
Iz:Come to think of it I do need to fill my
Iz:I beg your pardon?
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 03, 2004 10:49
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
Great, Lance!
And now, about your ears
..Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Huh?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004
9:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
Iz:I beg your pardon?
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
Tim, I hope you didnt let Jonathans humor
chase you offare you still with us? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C. Tim Winkley
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004
8:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
d
MuirSent: Friday, September
03, 2004 5:37 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
Iz:See the 'G' man on this post of
yours. Do you understand his meaning? PS-No, I won't explain it if you
don't.
- Original Message -
In grace and mercyyes, and amen. J Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004
8:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
sounds perfect: Godis liberal
G
2004 8:22
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
sounds perfect: Godis
liberal
G
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:09:25 -0500 "ShieldsFamily"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
All I hear is
liberal static
||
LOL
JD :Smitty" Smithson
In a message dated 9/2/2004 7:23:48 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tis Thursday September 2. Today marks the end of the list we have all enjoyed: Truthtalk. Aye, it is my sad duty to tell you all that the list is finished. All emails will
Jonathan, your sense of humor (when
actually engaged) is matchless. For the sake of us Republican blondes from
Missouri: is this your way of telling us (1) we no longer have a moderator (whos
going to spank Lance???), and (2) we have hurt David Millers feeling to the
point that he has
d)
Our newest member, the
gay hating, Roman Catholic hating (especially gay Roman Catholics) Tim 'Baton'
Lawman will convince you all that the posting of pictures of a man in a tutu
are the equivalent of denying the gospel.
Wow!
You have pretty well summed it up about me. I dont
will lovingly correct me, provided my heart is
open to His correction. The same for us all. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C. Tim Winkley
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004
8:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
rt is open
to His correction. The same for us all.
Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of C. Tim
WinkleySent: Thursday,
September 02, 2004 8:45 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End of
Truthtalk
d)
Our
newest member..
In a message dated 9/2/2004 7:48:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
d) Our newest member, the gay hating, Roman Catholic hating (especially gay Roman Catholics) Tim 'Baton' Lawman will convince you all that the posting of pictures of a man in a tutu are the equivalent of
In a message dated 9/2/2004 9:06:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Knpraise writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 9/2/2004 9:06:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Knpraise writes:
In a message dated 9/2/2004 7:48:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
d) Our newest member, the gay hating, Roman Catholic hating (especially gay Roman Catholics) Tim 'Baton' Lawman will convince
Jonathan, well Done. I feel honored to be foremost in your mind that I
should appear first on the list. However, in your humorous descriptions of
the major posters in TT, you omitted someone that also deserves your
blatantly honest appraisal...yourself!
Perry, the absent moderator.
From:
75 matches
Mail list logo
