On 21 May 17:52, Cédric Krier wrote:
> So my idea is to have a configuration section which will provide the
> table name to use for a Model.
>
> Example:
>
> [table]
> account.invoice.payment_term.line.relativedelta = acc_inv_pt_l_reldelta
> account.payment.sepa.message = acc_payment_sepa_msg
He
On 26 May 16:08, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> On 26/05/2015 15:18, Cédric Krier wrote:
> > On 26 May 14:35, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
> >> * Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 13:58 +0200]:
> >>> If the chosen solution is the mapping one, the documentation (core and
> >>> each module) should list the
On 26 May 15:40, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
> If the installation does not crash (can we expect a DBMS to truncate
> silently the name of a table? (MySQL maybe)) then there will be no
> error so maybe we should raise an error ourselves.
How could we know there is a problem if the database doesn't tell
On 26/05/2015 15:18, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 26 May 14:35, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
>> * Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 13:58 +0200]:
>>> If the chosen solution is the mapping one, the documentation (core and
>>> each module) should list the names of the tables.
>>
>> Why should it?
>>
>> If it's
* Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 15:14 +0200]:
On 26/05/2015 14:35, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
* Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 13:58 +0200]:
On 26/05/2015 09:19, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
(It is probably better to use an hexadecimal representation of the
hash in order to reduce its length).
B
On 26 May 14:35, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
> * Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 13:58 +0200]:
> >If the chosen solution is the mapping one, the documentation (core and
> >each module) should list the names of the tables.
>
> Why should it?
>
> If it's up to the administrators of the tryton server t
On 26 May 15:14, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> How will an administrator know that the table used by the model
> 'account.invoice.payment_term.line.relativedelta' should be mapped ?
Easy it will crash otherwise.
> Before a new module installation, knowing only the name of a table which
> should
On 26/05/2015 14:35, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
> * Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 13:58 +0200]:
>> On 26/05/2015 09:19, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
>>> * Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 02:33 +0200]:
On 26/05/2015 00:55, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 25 May 18:00, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
* Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 13:58 +0200]:
On 26/05/2015 09:19, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
* Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 02:33 +0200]:
On 26/05/2015 00:55, Cédric Krier wrote:
On 25 May 18:00, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
On 21/05/2015 17:52, Cédric Krier wrote:
I'm facing a limita
On 26/05/2015 09:20, Jean C wrote:
>
> 2015-05-26 2:33 GMT+02:00 Pierre-Louis Bonicoli
> mailto:pierre-louis.bonic...@ir5.eu>>:
>
> We keep the current behavior (dots replaced by underscore) and use the
> same approach as django (last X characters replaced by
> 'hash(name)[:X]').
>
>
On 26/05/2015 09:19, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
> * Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 02:33 +0200]:
>> On 26/05/2015 00:55, Cédric Krier wrote:
>>> On 25 May 18:00, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
On 21/05/2015 17:52, Cédric Krier wrote:
> I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the tab
On 26 May 02:33, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> On 26/05/2015 00:55, Cédric Krier wrote:
> > On 25 May 18:00, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> >> On 21/05/2015 17:52, Cédric Krier wrote:
> >>> I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the table name for a
> >>> ModelSQL. Databases have differ
2015-05-26 2:33 GMT+02:00 Pierre-Louis Bonicoli <
pierre-louis.bonic...@ir5.eu>:
> We keep the current behavior (dots replaced by underscore) and use the
> same approach as django (last X characters replaced by
> 'hash(name)[:X]').
>
Problem is, tryton sometimes relies on finding the table in the
* Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2015-05-26 02:33 +0200]:
On 26/05/2015 00:55, Cédric Krier wrote:
On 25 May 18:00, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
On 21/05/2015 17:52, Cédric Krier wrote:
I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the table name for a
ModelSQL. Databases have different length li
On 26/05/2015 00:55, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 25 May 18:00, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
>> On 21/05/2015 17:52, Cédric Krier wrote:
>>> I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the table name for a
>>> ModelSQL. Databases have different length limitation for schema name.
>>> For example,
On 25 May 18:00, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> On 21/05/2015 17:52, Cédric Krier wrote:
> > I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the table name for a
> > ModelSQL. Databases have different length limitation for schema name.
> > For example,
> > PostgreSQL has the limit to 64 when Orac
On 25 May 08:34, Raimon Esteve wrote:
> 2015-05-21 17:52 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the table name for a
> > ModelSQL. Databases have different length limitation for schema name.
> > For example,
> > PostgreSQL has the limit to 64
On 25 May 13:07, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton-dev] Database schema name limit" (Sat, 23 May
> 2015 12:18:32 +0200):
>
> > On 23 May 11:01, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > > * Cédric Krier: " [tryton-dev] Database schema name limit&quo
I am not expert but, I agree with Raimon
2015-05-25 1:34 GMT-05:00 Raimon Esteve :
> 2015-05-21 17:52 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the table name for a
> > ModelSQL. Databases have different length limitation for schema name.
> > F
On 21/05/2015 17:52, Cédric Krier wrote:
> I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the table name for a
> ModelSQL. Databases have different length limitation for schema name.
> For example,
> PostgreSQL has the limit to 64 when Oracle has the limit to 30
> (yes I'm working on an Oracle b
* Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton-dev] Database schema name limit" (Sat, 23 May
2015 12:18:32 +0200):
> On 23 May 11:01, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > * Cédric Krier: " [tryton-dev] Database schema name limit" (Thu, 21 May 2015
> > 17:52:57 +0200):
> >
>
2015-05-21 17:52 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the table name for a
> ModelSQL. Databases have different length limitation for schema name.
> For example,
> PostgreSQL has the limit to 64 when Oracle has the limit to 30
> (yes I'm working on
On 23 May 11:01, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Cédric Krier: " [tryton-dev] Database schema name limit" (Thu, 21 May 2015
> 17:52:57 +0200):
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the table name for a
> > ModelSQL. Datab
* Cédric Krier: " [tryton-dev] Database schema name limit" (Thu, 21 May 2015
17:52:57 +0200):
> Hi,
>
> I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the table name for a
> ModelSQL. Databases have different length limitation for schema name.
> For example,
&g
Hi,
I'm facing a limitation with how trytond generate the table name for a
ModelSQL. Databases have different length limitation for schema name.
For example,
PostgreSQL has the limit to 64 when Oracle has the limit to 30
(yes I'm working on an Oracle backend).
I don't want that we change our nami
25 matches
Mail list logo
