Can I volunteer?
-Original Message-
From: Venkata Krishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 September 2006 06:52
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sample components
+1. This really makes a great deal of sense to me. Infact this will
+get
the 'solution assembly' message a l
One clarification of a typo:
And then, most testcases did work successfully but for the ones
that asserted if the created proxy was an instance of
java.lang.reflect.Proxy. I could have change all them as well,
but did not
want to go with too may changes all over the place until you
confirme
On Sep 10, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
HI Jim,
Thanks. I have responded below. Please let me know how to go
forward with
this.
- Venkat
On 9/9/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Venkat,
Thanks for jumping in and doing this.
I was thinking the JDK proxy wire s
+1. This really makes a great deal of sense to me. Infact this will get
the 'solution assembly' message a lot clear.
- Venkat
On 9/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have quite a few samples that have copies of the same components
and the services that they implement. I think
Any more thoughts on this? Most popular so far is 1.0-incubator-M2
--
Jeremy
On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Before publishing artifacts to the snapshot repo I need to make
sure all the versions contain "incubator" which means updating all
the POMs. I would like to change t
On Sep 10, 2006, at 12:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rfeng
Date: Sun Sep 10 12:01:37 2006
New Revision: 441986
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=441986
Log:
Add XML schema loading with Apache XmlSchema to WSDL IDL to
introspect JAX-WS Wrapper Style operation
We had a
We have quite a few samples that have copies of the same components
and the services that they implement. I think we should separate the
components from the samples themselves and move them to a common
"sample-components" project that just contains the implementations;
this could then be us
HI Jim,
Thanks. I have responded below. Please let me know how to go forward with
this.
- Venkat
On 9/9/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Venkat,
Thanks for jumping in and doing this.
I was thinking the JDK proxy wire service would still remain as one
implementation of WireServ
On Sep 9, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
I thought we were working off snapshots of SDO and that we had
decoupled the build process? If not, can we remove this from the
main build?
That's the plan but we need to finalize the release version id before
we can do so. Until then you st
