Hi,
Is there any way I can control the order in which the WirePostProcessors are
loaded. For example I would always want the PassByValue processor to be
called last so that I ensure that the PassByValue interceptor is at the head
of the invocation chain.
Thanks.
- Venkat
On 12/6/06, Venkata
HI... I figure this out as something that can be done by setting the 'init'
attribute. But then what is a safe value to ensure that this is the last
processor called. Right now, ( to be very safe) I have put it as '10'. Now
this processor gets invoked lastly.
Thanks.
- Venkat
On 12/6/06,
On Dec 6, 2006, at 1:52 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way I can control the order in which the
WirePostProcessors are
loaded. For example I would always want the PassByValue processor
to be
called last so that I ensure that the PassByValue interceptor is at
the head
of
I checked out the M2 branch, cleaned out my local Maven .m2 repo,
built the runtime using -Prelease, built the samples, and ran all
the samples. The main purpose of doing this was to ensure that
the -Prelease flag had not removed any artifacts that were needed
to successfully build and run the
On further investigation, this is caused by a mismatch betweeen the
sample instructions in readme.html and the artifacts built by the sample.
The instructions give the following command to run:
java -jar target/distribution/bin/launcher.jar
I have done this for parent pom and buildtools.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 05/12/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 1:38 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
I had a little dig around and I'm tring to work out if the purpose
of the
people.apache.org m2-snapshot-repository is right
I have now run all the samples successfully, using only the jars that
are deployed to maven when using the -Prelease flag.
The only other issue I had with the previous release candidate was the
packaging and formal release voting for the spec APIs that we need from
org.osoa and commonj. These
I pressed send too early on my last note.
So now we have a version of the parent pom with the 2-incubator-SNAPSHOT
version tag and a version of buildtools with the
1.0-incubator-SNAPSHOTavailable from the m2-snapshot-repository,
meaning that you no longer need
to do a source build on these
HttpSessionScopeContainer should use the HttpSession for session persistance
Key: TUSCANY-973
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-973
Project: Tuscany
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-973?page=all ]
ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-973:
-
Assignee: ant elder
HttpSessionScopeContainer should use the HttpSession for session persistance
Bring PHP extension up to date with latest core and new build files
---
Key: TUSCANY-974
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-974
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-974?page=all ]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-974:
---
Attachment: phpextension-JIRA974.txt
Bring the PHP extension up to date. Apply to cpp project.
Bring PHP extension up to date with latest core and new build
As one of the maintainers of the SCA_SDO PECL project I've naturally started
thinking about how we build a PHP extension for the C++ SCA runtime based on
the PHP SCA implementation we have recently released (
http://pecl.php.net/package/sca_sdo). I'm cross posting this as it involves
both Tuscany
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-521?page=all ]
Kapil Katyal updated TUSCANY-521:
-
Attachment: hideprops_tools.patch
Hi Frank / Yang,
I manually merged the code gen changes for the hidden properties fix with the
latest Tuscany revision
Hi Adriano!
I had alredy talked with Luciano about uploading the librarys in a link.
He said that it's better to give the link to the downloads area from Tuscany
Project.
This is the link to the wiki page:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 3:57 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
I pressed send too early on my last note.
So now we have a version of the parent pom with the 2-incubator-
SNAPSHOT
version tag and a version of buildtools with the
1.0-incubator-SNAPSHOTavailable from the m2-snapshot-repository,
meaning that
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-713?page=all ]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-713:
---
Attachment: SDOUtil.java
SchemaLocationTestCase.java
SchemaLocationTestCase.xml
The SDOUtil.java attachment contains a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-521?page=comments#action_12456105
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-521:
Thanks Kapil. I'll apply both patches and see how it works, but I probably
won't get to it for a couple of
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-973?page=comments#action_12456118
]
Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-973:
This needs to implement semantics similar to conversational persistence and not
just use the ServletContext as a
On Dec 6, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Jim Marino (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-973?
page=comments#action_12456118 ]
Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-973:
This needs to implement semantics similar to conversational
persistence and
On Dec 6, 2006, at 8:26 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Jeremy.
I'm not sure if you use the sca/distribution/build.xml to create
distros for M2. The build.xml tagged for M2 still has references to
svn M2 branches. Attached is a patch to fix it (I'll let you decide
if we commit it).
I think
On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Jim Marino (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-973?
page=comments#action_12456118 ]
Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-973:
This needs to implement
On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Jim Marino (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-973?
page=comments#action_12456118 ]
Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-973:
Hi,
I attach it again in .txt suffix. Please let me know if you get it.
Otherwise I'll create a JIRA to attach it.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: svn
Hi,
I have made changes locally to switch to SDO 2.1 HelperContext to replace some
deprecated SDOUtil APIs. If there are no other concerns, I'll commit them into
trunk.
Thanks,
Raymond
Multiple Callbacks fail
---
Key: TUSCANY-976
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-976
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core
Reporter: Lou Amodeo
I have a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-976?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe reassigned TUSCANY-976:
--
Assignee: Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Multiple Callbacks fail
---
Key: TUSCANY-976
URL:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-976?page=comments#action_12456163
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe commented on TUSCANY-976:
Can you attach a trace and possibly some additional relevant code? Thanks
Multiple Callbacks fail
Amita,
Thanks for working on this. One thing I would like to see is the
DataSource properties seperated from the J2SE Connection properties.
Maybe something like:
ConnectionInfo managedtx=true
DataSource jndiName=jdbc/myDataSource/
/ConnectionInfo
or
ConnectionInfo
ConnectionProperties
Hi,
We used to have a shortcut for null value to by pass data transformation
which had caused problems in document-literal wrapped WSDL operations with
empty input or output. With the fixes, we try to set the null value back
even it's not changed and that's why you got the exception.
What's
NoRegisteredCallbackException not thrown to client
--
Key: TUSCANY-977
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-977
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA
Luciano,
I'm referring to the changes to the DAS config model in Amita's patch.
Brent
On 12/6/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brent, are you recommending these changes in the SCDL ? Or in the DAS
config itself to better handle other types of connections in J2SE
environments ?
You could check for operation.isNonBlocking and
operation.getCallbackName != null.
On 12/6/06, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We used to have a shortcut for null value to by pass data transformation
which had caused problems in document-literal wrapped WSDL operations with
empty
Done at revision : 483195
On 12/4/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As discussed on the following thread, the DAS samples that explore DAS as
an SCA integration were generating a circular reference
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg10662.html
If people
Looks like there is only a 0.8.0 snapshot available there...
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/felix/felix/
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-972?page=all ]
Yang ZHONG updated TUSCANY-972:
---
Attachment: TypeHelperImpl.972
newMainSrc.zip
The attached implementation of this feature has passed all build tests.
commonj.sdo/xml
I'd like to help, so which other SDO defects are holding folk up?
On 12/5/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just checked in a new fix for 963.
Which other SDO defects are holfing folk up?
Cheers,
--
Pete
--
Yang ZHONG
Yep 0.8.0 seems to be the latest - do you know which pom is looking
for 0.9.0?
--
Jeremy
On Dec 6, 2006, at 11:57 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Looks like there is only a 0.8.0 snapshot available there...
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
felix/felix/
[INFO]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-976?page=all ]
Lou Amodeo updated TUSCANY-976:
---
Attachment: test-CallBackBasic.zip
I have attached my test case. Thank You.
Multiple Callbacks fail
---
Key:
Thanks Yang. I'm going to have a trawl throught the Jiras and prioritise.
There are some I know about that I haven't raised yet that could be quite
large pieces of work, for instance there seems to be a performance issue
loading large schema which contain lots of ref=... elements. I'll post a
I'm not sure... i searched all our pom files and does not look like we have
explicitly set 0.9.0 as the dependency version...
Here is some more info...
[INFO] Tuscany Standalone Distribution
[INFO] Tuscany Project
Downloading:
There is a restriction in the current implementation that forces all
DataObjects in a graph to belong to the same DataFactory. I'm not convinced
we need this. Currently if you create a DataObject (do1) from a DataFactory
(df1) and then set that as a property on DataObject (do2) that was created
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-928?page=comments#action_12456240
]
Yang ZHONG commented on TUSCANY-928:
To brainstorm, where to host the options and which are the options?
How about XMLHelperImpl/XMLDocumentImpl to host the
I agree we don't need the same-DataFactory restriction.
There might be historical reason(s) for such implementation.
Without knowing the details, I don't see the restriction make sense from
modeling perspective.
A Type's Property's Type may come from a different DataFactory/scope,
and it may
Tuscany WSDL2Java can't handle WSDL fault messages
--
Key: TUSCANY-978
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-978
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-978?page=all ]
Matthew Sykes updated TUSCANY-978:
--
Attachment: AccountService.wsdl
WSDL in a more convenient form...
Tuscany WSDL2Java can't handle WSDL fault messages
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-852?page=all ]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-852.
Resolution: Fixed
Verified that the integration with HTTPD works (had to fix a few bugs in our
code) and added a sample
[snip]
Pete Robbins wrote:
I'm in the process of porting Tuscany C++ to Mac OSX continuing the work
that Oisin started.
Pete,
I am trying to clean up our JIRA backlog and wondering if TUSCANY-681
can be closed now (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-681).
What is the status of
On 07/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Pete Robbins wrote:
I'm in the process of porting Tuscany C++ to Mac OSX continuing the work
that Oisin started.
Pete,
I am trying to clean up our JIRA backlog and wondering if TUSCANY-681
can be closed now
49 matches
Mail list logo