On 4/13/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
With the current assembly model, how can we tell if a component reference
is
promoted by a comosite reference? I can get all the promoted references
from
CompositeReference but not the other way.
Thanks,
Raymond
On 4/12/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting this error. Do I need to specify a particular repository for
BSF?
Missing:
--
1) org.apache.bsf:bsf-all:jar:3.0-beta1-SNAPSHOT
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
Then, install it
Hi Haleh,
comments inline ...
On 13/04/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kelvin,
I tried: tuscany-sdo-1.0-incubator-M3-bin.zip - ZIP archive, unpacked size
15,444,127 bytes
- ReleaseNotes.txt says: Compatibility Concerns
M2 now uses the SDO 2.1 interfaces whereas M2 used
Haleh,
thanks for this, It would appear that the documentation was wrong in M2
too. I'll fix this.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 13/04/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This file C:\TuscanySDO\tuscany-
Hello Jean-Sebastian,
On 4/6/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- add/update/remove SCA contributions (packages containing composites
and component implementation artifacts) to/from the SCA domain
- add/update/remove deploymentComposites, declaring the top-level
components
I am now going to ask the IPMC to vote to ratify this release.
Cheers,
On 26/03/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should hold off calling this IPMC vote till we can show the
IPMC that we've made a bit of progress on the community issues being
discussed on other threads.
The content in the java-sca-developer-guide looks most up to date to me. I'm
not sure that the first section on principles should really be there in this
developer guide though, and I'd also like to greatly simplify the sections
on coding and testing standards if no one has an objection to that?
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Simon.
For the composite component, it's probably not necessary to attach the
wire.
Can you try to add the following code in DeployerImpl.connect() to see
if it
helps?
public void
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-863:
Attachment: JIRA863-Apr13-Amita.zip
Please see the attached zip. It has a patch related
the 'get involved ' link under development section is the guide for
developers to get involved. Let's keep this consistent across all projects.
There has been multiple discussions for coding/testing in the community. Any
changes you make needs to be agreed to first.
On 4/13/07, Simon Laws
On 4/13/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Simon.
For the composite component, it's probably not necessary to attach the
wire.
Can you try to add the following code in
Hi Simon,
I superficially understood Tuscany architecture by looking at the M2
code and the existing documentation some weeks ago. I'm planning to
start looking the current status of the code in the next days.
I agree with you that it's all good educational stuff, so I would like
to join forces
On 4/13/07, Salvucci, Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I superficially understood Tuscany architecture by looking at the M2
code and the existing documentation some weeks ago. I'm planning to
start looking the current status of the code in the next days.
I agree with you that it's
Service using callback and methods that don't perform callback over WS binding
hangs
Key: TUSCANY-1208
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1208
Hi Sebastien,
This is very good. I'll borrow a few of the slides for the website, but as
Simon mentioned it would be great if we could adjust this to the latest code
and add to Raymond's architecture guide.
I was thinking to add a link at the begining of the architecture guide for
old releases
Simon Laws wrote:
On 4/13/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
With the current assembly model, how can we tell if a component
reference
is
promoted by a comosite reference? I can get all the promoted references
from
CompositeReference but not the other way.
Thanks,
Raymond
On 4/13/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/13/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Simon.
For the composite component, it's probably not necessary to
Hi,
How I can use the build of SCA?
The distribution script and same modules is not complete...
I can use the SNAPSHOT version for tests of my application...
--
Paulo Henrique Trecenti
Hi guys,
I was wondering if there is any way to get a reference
to web service interface using service name (in SCDL
file) only instead of doing
compositeContext.locateService(ClassName.class,composite)
thank you,
muhwas
-
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1171:
Attachment: buildSDORelease.bat
Attaching this script I just made for building an SDO
Thank you for your feedback on RC2. I have created a new release candidate
on the basis of the comments I have received. I'll close this vote and see
how we get on with this next RC before starting another vote.
RC3 is at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/M3/RC3/
the tag, rat
Hi,
With this check-in, the echo binding reference sample is working again. You
can start to try other samples.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 10:49 AM
Subject: svn commit: r528566 - in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino reassigned TUSCANY-1204:
---
Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Support for @requires annotation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488738
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1204:
-
This code will have to be ported to the latest
I'm getting a build failure as IDLTransformerTestCase fails now. Is there
something else needed to be checked in or that I should update?
Running
org.apache.tuscany.core.databinding.transformers.IDLTransformerTestCase
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.109 sec
On 4/13/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/13/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The content in the java-sca-developer-guide looks most up to date to me.
I'm
not sure that the first section on principles should really be there in
this
developer guide though, and I'd also
I'm planning to make some refactoring on the contribution services in order
to follow the same package naming convention as other modules are using, and
to group related things on it's own packages and make things clear on the
contribution service. Below is what I'm thinking as the structure to
Hi,
I'm not sure if I changed the modules/pom.xml by mistake. But the test case
is not passing yet. I'll work on that after I finish the core runtime wiring
fix.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 13,
The simpleRuntime gives you the ability to retrieve SystemServices, but
actually contributionService is not being registered as a systemService.
What should be the right way to retrieve a contributionService in a
Integration Test ? Should I be reusing the available contributionService
that was
Hi,
I think we're now moving to a direction to use ExtensionPointRegistry to
register the extension points (ContributionService is a special extension
point). I can fix the simple runtime to look up the instance by interface.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Luciano
Right now the Axis2 binding needs the WSDL4J Definition object to create an
AxisService but the definition object isn't available to it anywhere. The
Definition is read by the contribution service which creates a
WSDLDefinition, so as a bypass around this I've add a WSDLDefinition field
to the
Hi,
The test case WireObjectFactoryTestCase throws a NEP because the atributo
interfaze is not setted before in the object OperationImpl ... them NEP
in this peace of code when the JavaInterfaceUtil try execute
isRemoteable
public static Method findMethod(Class? implClass, Operation
Hi,
Sorry for the regression and I just fixed it under r528720.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Paulo Henrique Trecenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 5:32 PM
Subject: NEP in WireObjectFactoryTestCase
Hi,
The test case
Ok tank you...
2007/4/13, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Sorry for the regression and I just fixed it under r528720.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Paulo Henrique Trecenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 5:32 PM
Subject: NEP in
Hi,
The erro stay there in same location
public static Method findMethod(Class? implClass, Operation operation)
throws NoSuchMethodException {
String name = operation.getName();
if(operation.getInterface().isRemotable()) {
for(Method m: implClass.getMethods()) {
But now the test case is WireUtilsTestCase
2007/4/13, Paulo Henrique Trecenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The erro stay there in same location
public static Method findMethod(Class? implClass, Operation operation)
throws NoSuchMethodException {
String name = operation.getName();
Ok I'm fix that op.setInterface( new JavaInterfaceImpl());
2007/4/13, Paulo Henrique Trecenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The test case WireObjectFactoryTestCase throws a NEP because the
atributo interfaze is not setted before in the object OperationImpl ...
them NEP
in this peace of code when the
I'll start updating the DAS POMs to reflect the latest version being used on
the parent pom : version1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/version
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
38 matches
Mail list logo
