That would be good, there's probably things we could do for databindings as
hinted by Dave in this thread but to start with section 1.6 of the spec does
define a little:
240
So how about we get those first few mayProvides going?
...ant
On Feb 13, 2008 6:14 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi Ant,
How about bringing in some policy handling into our JMS binding ? We could
pick some non-functional characteristic that is typical with use of
messaging. I am not sure what that could be - is it message encryption ?
If you can help a bit with the things to be done from the JMS side, I w
Thanks Venkat! That's the approach I'll take.
On Feb 11, 2008 6:07 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks. Any addition to the tests will be really helpful. To get a
> jumpstart you could copy over one of the existing tests and modify it
> deleting / adding classes and resourc
Great, thanks Ant - I shall take a look and see :)
On Feb 12, 2008 6:02 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2008 4:33 PM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm trying to ascertain whether it is possible to specify a policySet
> > applied to a service
On Feb 12, 2008 4:33 PM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to ascertain whether it is possible to specify a policySet
> applied to a service which would allow us to replace or augment the
> data binding?
>
> The rationale behind this is that we're trying to use a leg
Hi,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts further. My comments inline.
- Venkat
On Feb 12, 2008 9:51 PM, Greg Dritschler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments below.
>
> On Feb 11, 2008 7:36 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Thanks for your observations / sugges
Hi Sebastien,
I have made the changes to the secure-bigbank demo. Let me know if there is
something that looks odd and not practical in a real world scenario.
Thanks.
- Venkat
On Feb 12, 2008 8:23 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > D
Hi,
No there isn't a separate phase. Just that in the current read phase I look
for *.composite files and set those aside in a list without processing them
further. After all artifacts in the contribution have been read I then read
the list of composite URIs, read them and modify them with the a
Hi,
In the WAR-based Tuscany deployment, the TuscanyServletFilter is responsible
to start/stop the SCADomain. At this moment, most of our itest cases create
the SCADomain using SCADomain.newInstance() during the setup. If we run
itests as a webapp, it ends up with two different domain instance
Hi All,
I'm trying to ascertain whether it is possible to specify a policySet
applied to a service which would allow us to replace or augment the
data binding?
The rationale behind this is that we're trying to use a legacy JMS
system as a binding.jms reference, but the TextMessage payload is
mark
+1 on what Sebastien described. In fact, the refactored code already works
this way.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: Tuscany web-apps and jUnit dependencies
Simon Nash
Comments below.
On Feb 11, 2008 7:36 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thanks for your observations / suggestions. Please see my comments
> inline.
> I apologize for making them lengthy in the hope that it would trigger more
> discussions.
>
> - Venkat
>
> On Feb 7,
Raymond,
Your proposal works for me.
On Feb 4, 2008 11:47 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please see my comments below.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 2:09 PM
> S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568126#action_12568126
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
I have applied your 2nd patch, after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajini Sivaram updated TUSCANY-1293:
Attachment: sdo-osgi-export-patch.txt
I have tried to recreate the problem with IBM JDK 1
This commit seems to be causing problems in continuum and elsewhere, but
not in my env. See comments in the JIRA (1293) Investigating.
On 12/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Author: kelvingoodson
> Date: Tue Feb 12 03:13:53 2008
> New Revision: 620763
>
> URL: http://sv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568099#action_12568099
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
So it would seem that the failure is d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar resolved TUSCANY-257.
-
Resolution: Fixed
resolved at rev 620782
> recently added file Interface2JavaGenerator.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568085#action_12568085
]
Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1293:
--
I am not clear about 106 outputs , b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568083#action_12568083
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
Amita, I get clean build from a clea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568078#action_12568078
]
Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1293:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568066#action_12568066
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-1949:
-
There looks like there is a fix required here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568064#action_12568064
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-257:
Thanks Amita, I took a scan of the patch
Fyi, i've added a sandbox module [1] to try out support for Relax WS
interfaces and posted to the Tuscany blog with how to use it:
http://apache-tuscany.blogspot.com/2008/02/tuscany-sca-support-for-relax-ws.html
...ant
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/ant/relax-ws
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1293.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the patch Rajini.
> SDO does not work with OSGi
> ---
snip..
On Feb 12, 2008 8:40 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. Because we are now computing the 'applicablePolicySets' for various
> SCA artifacts and that needs the list of 'all' PolicySets that might be
> applicable ever.
>
>
So, in the code today, how do you know you have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568011#action_12568011
]
Rajini Sivaram commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
The first block tries to run bundle.st
Yes. Because we are now computing the 'applicablePolicySets' for various
SCA artifacts and that needs the list of 'all' PolicySets that might be
applicable ever.
- Venkat
On Feb 12, 2008 2:03 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 8:18 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Feb 12, 2008 8:18 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 1:09 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Venkat
> >
> > A question.
> >
> > snip...
> >
> > >
> > > - In the contribution read phase, we postpone the reading of composite
> > > files
> > > so that
It seems that page is protected from normal users. It appears blank for me.
- Venkat
On Feb 12, 2008 1:50 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, thanks Sebastien.
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2008 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Venkata Krishnan wrote:
>
Sure, thanks Sebastien.
On Feb 12, 2008 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > Thanks. I will ask Sebastien then :)
>
> I'm an administrator on project Tuscany but:
> - you are not in the Tuscany continuum group
> - I don't have seem to have auth
On Feb 12, 2008 1:09 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Venkat
>
> A question.
>
> snip...
>
> >
> > - In the contribution read phase, we postpone the reading of composite
> > files
> > so that all definitions.xml file contents can all be aggregated
> >
>
> Do you mean all the definiti
Hi Sebastien,
Am yet to look into the Bigbank. Will do it soon. But then, I was able to
get the helloworld-ws-secure samples to work with only abstract intents like
authentication, integrity and not custom ones ;-). The policysets
'appliesTo' was use to target them to specific services / refere
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12567999#action_12567999
]
Pete Robbins commented on TUSCANY-2041:
---
I checked in a fix for this into the bran
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pete Robbins reassigned TUSCANY-2041:
-
Assignee: Pete Robbins
> Repeated nill elements of extended type cause "Parser found un
35 matches
Mail list logo
