Hi Haleh, thanks for all the work.
I also propose that on the home page we have information on 'Releases'.
Infact, after a brief summary of Tuscany I'd prefer the first heading to be
'Releases' wherein we should be mentioning about the most recent release
with a link to pages related to the prev.
Hi,
First I wish we just had just about a couple of documents instead of many.
At the present moment I can just think of a 'Architecture and Programming
Model' document. The first part of the document talks about the
architecture which will also include the various modules and what each ones
rol
Thanks for doing this :). +1 for separating out SCA, SDO and DAS builds
- Venkat
On 5/23/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm starting to pursue a nightly build for Apache Tuscany with the
Apache Infra guys, and I just want to double check what people think
it's the best build la
Hello Everybody,
I would like to contribute to Tuscany Java implementation (runtime and
tools). To start with I would like to help with some Tool Development.
Looking up the Jira I found an item "Add Java2WSDL Tools" - (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-103) in the context of Java
/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/samples/helloworld/helloworldws/src/main/resources/wsdl/helloworld.wsdl
> >
> >
> > Our Java2WSDL needs to take into account the SCA annotations. That
> > HelloWorldServiceComponentImpl.java has the annotation @Service(
> > HelloWorldServi
Hi
I have been looking into the Java2WSDL tool implementation in
Axis. The generated WSDL for the Helloworld service seems to be
comparable with what is there in the samples. There are
some differences between the two though. Also when the
targetnamespace is not input (i.e. user specified) th
classes that make up the wrapper... I have
downloaded the Axis2 Source release as the binary release does not
contain Java2WSDL. Please let me know your opinions on this... thanks.
- KrishOn 4/5/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:> Hi>> I h
+1 to "I guess the best would be to refactor the Axis2 implementation
> > and contribute it back to Axis2"
> >
> > Jira is the best way to get eyeballs on your problem :)
> >
> > -- dims
> >
> > On 4/6/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
files
being used - remember I earlier posted that all this mess up with the
namespaces was the doing of a transformer in rt.jar.
Anyways... to be on the safer side I have tested this patch under sca-tools
as well as outside it and it works for both.
On 4/10/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTEC
dy
help me on how I can get the jar for this... from where? Thanks.
- Krish
On 4/13/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> HI...
> I am going to post a patch up the JIRA for Tuscany Java2WSDL. While I
> was doing some variations of testing I figured out the f
I will look into this rightaway..
- Venkat
On 5/8/06, Rick Rineholt (JIRA) wrote:
No maven plugin for Java2WSDL
-
Key: TUSCANY-331
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-331
Project: Tuscany
Type: New Feature
Components
Hi,
I pulled down the revision 406865 from SVN and tried a build. I did have
problems with doxia and org.mortbay.jetty which I resolved in the way you
have mentioned. But then am stuck with the following when the module
"Tuscany BigBank Web Client Module" is being built. Any clues?
[INFO]
--
Hi,
Can we update the page
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/userguidejava.html with information for
the "Your First Tuscany Application" and "FAQ". These sections have been
empty for a while now. To start with we could point to the pdf on
Simplified Big Bank application on the 'documenation'
to build, deploy and run the
BigBank application in the Tuscany environment. As well as
pointing to this document, it might be helpful to go slightly
beyond this by also including some Tuscany-specific "how to"
information.
Simon
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi,
> Can we u
Hello Frank, Raymond and Jean
I have attached a first cut of the XSD Generator under JIRA-120 and am
looking for some comments on the approach therein. For the SDOs I have used
the XSD2JavaGenerator from the sdo-tools project using the sequences.xsd as
input.
I am simply following what is laid
Hi,
With respect to submitting it as patch for the SDO XSDHelper.generate(Types),
yes that is what I plan to do ultimately. Though my objective is to bring
in SDO type support into the java2WSDL tool, I wish to be able to abstract
this out in a way that it contributes to the SDO XSDHelper and al
Hi
I have found the chat logs useful to catch up with the discussions. But
then we must be more choosy about the sort of topics we discuss.
In my opinion the chat must be reserved for subjects that simply cannot be
allowed to drag over for days, over the mailing lists. It would be good if
we c
+1
and I stick to my earlier suggestion that the topics of discussion be fixed
ahead over the mailing list instead of choosing the topics over the list and
then actually picking them up for discussion only in the IRC. Choosing them
ahead brings in a committment that a topic would surely get disc
I have a call late tonight. Hence I should be able to catch up with you on
the IRC. Thanks.
Venkat
On 7/7/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Venkat,
I know I said on IRC this morning I would try an post some comments
on migrating this but I am afraid that things today have kept m
Hi
I want to get hold of the SDO.Type given the class of the SDO Type. For
example given com.examples.sdo.Customer.class I need to get the Type
instance to work around with the SDOs metadata. Presently I am
instantiating the SDO and then calling the getType() method.
I checked the TypeHelper
Hi Frank and others familiar with SDOs, could you please comment on the
following: -
Based on some experiences with the first cut of Java2WSDL enhanced for SDOs
posted in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-120, I propose...
- Not to generate XSDs for SDOs that have been originally gen
Does the current
implementation
> of SDO take care of this?
Yes.
Frank.
"Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/11/2006 01:06:21
PM:
> Hi Frank and others familiar with SDOs, could you please comment on the
> following: -
>
> Based on some experiences
D from the Type or just
> produce "xsd:import".
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:21 AM
> Subject: Re: SDO support for Java2WS
".
Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/13/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank, I entirely endorse your viewpoint about the schemalocation. Yes, I
think this must be input during deployment or during the time of running
Java2WSDL. This would be more reliable than 'assuming&#
Hi Jeremy,
On 7/18/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With the vote in favour of switching, I am about to start moving
chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch
(branches/pre-chianti) and move the chianti code into trunk. I will
make the version in the pom
Hi Jeremy, I have two patches one in SDO-Impl and another in SCA-Tools
(Java2WSDL tooling) that need to be reviewed and applied to M1+. The Jiras
are Tuscany-535 and Tuscany-120 respectively. But then they are to applied
over M1+. Also, what is the plan for sca-tools in Chianti?
Thanks
Ven
/wiki.apache.org/ws-data/attachments/Tuscany%282f%29SCADiagram/attachments/sca.htm
>
> the other one is for tuscany architectural layers, I
guess
> yes - high level - was attached as a zip to a mail
> can somebody upload it to WIKI as well?
>
Yes, that would be very useful. Also we could make up some design
documentation from abstracts of this discussion.
Also, I am wondering if it would make sense to move Chianti in phases as the
design issues are discussed, sorted out and implemented. For example we
could target to have a basic He
Try zipping it and then attaching the zip. It worked this way for me when I
tried to attach a gif for our website.
Venkat
On 7/19/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks like the mailing list strips attachments. Is there a way to
send this and not have it removed?
Jim
On Jul 18, 20
Hi Jeremy / Jim,
Where can I get hold of the specs in its current version which is under
development? Could you point me to it?
Thanks
- Venkat
Hi... How do you get a membership at http://www.osoa.org.
- Venkat
On 7/19/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right now Jeremy and I have been doing this as we are members of the
spec group as well. However, there is no reason others can't do this
as well. There will be a new OSOA webs
David, this looks a really very nice arial view :-)
I agree that the DAS, SDO and Tools blocks should not overlay the core and
hosting platform blocks.
Now, if you look the diagram, it gives an impression of one huge middleware
that encapsulates all sorts of containers. The aspect of being able
Hi Jim / Jeremy & others familiar with Chianti,
I have just started with Chianti. Am looking at the SPI first and in that
the model. I have some questions on the classes there. Please help me
understand with your answers. As answers you may even point me to other
portions of the codebase lo
more than Java. Do you have the original source. What app did you use?
Am
> just making changes in a bit editor at the mo so I remember what I want
but
> would be good to do it properly.
>
> S
>
>
> On 7/11/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
Jeremy, thanks :-) and I am going to take more help like this to graduate
into Tuscany-Java.
- Comments Inline
- Venkat
On 7/20/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Comments inline...
On Jul 20, 2006, at 1:03 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Jim / Jeremy & others
Frank,
I must fully agree with your standpoint on not flooding Tuscany with
dependencies especially if they are duplicating functionality already
present. I don't think it is a right approach to oversee this just for the
sake of encouraging community participation.
If there is a competing depend
helpful. Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/7/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a call late tonight. Hence I should be able to catch up with you
on the IRC. Thanks.
Venkat
On 7/7/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Venkat,
>
> I know I said on IRC
Hi Jeremy,
It seems you have implemented the RMI Binding :-). I am looking at it
to get an understanding of it. Please help me with the following: -
- Is there a testcase or a sample that I can try out using this RMI
binding.?
- From another discussion that you folks are having in the context
Hi Jeremy,
I will start looking at these and take your help as I go along.
Thanks.
- Venkat
On 7/31/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 31, 2006, at 6:28 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>It seems you have implemented the RMI Binding :-).
Not re
Hi,
How do you plan to generate the classes? Do you intend using the WSDL2Java
tools we used to have in M1?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 8/1/06, David Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I've been working, with Raymond's help, on a system to generate a test
based around a given wsdl. The system woul
Hi Jeremy / Jim / Rick / Ant and others
What is the decision about the sca-tools that existed in M1? Do we plan to
make it a part of the current Tuscany-Java as well? There is another thread
where David Wheeler was talking about samples around the Axis2 binding.
Wouldn't the sca tools, Java2WS
31, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Jeremy / Jim / Rick / Ant and others
>
> What is the decision about the sca-tools that existed in M1? Do we
> plan to
> make it a part of the current Tuscany-Java as well?
I think tooling in general is a good thing to have (as long
Hi Ant,
I can help you wherever you might need an additional hand (in testing,
samples, documentation, website updates etc.).
- Venkat
On 8/1/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've had a look at this code now I think we should be able to get it going
on the new code base, so I'll star
ice's interfaces and semantics?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 8/1/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 7:27 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2006, at 12:43 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
>
>> Jim :-)))..
>>
>> Please help me understand the scope of
Hi Jeremy,
Why not name them as extension.scdl. Though for most parts they might be
treated as any other scdl some where we treat them a little differently as
in adding them to extensions and so on. Infact a solution developer could
develop some extensions and applications and keep them all bu
Hi Jeremy,
I am trying to get a sample up for the RMI Binding and I am also stuck with
the inbound wire not being set (i.e. it is null). Could you please help me
identify what I could be missing out here? Thanks.
- Venkat
On 7/31/06, Scott Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to und
ht? What purpose does it server if it is indeed right?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/31/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:16 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> I will start looking at these and take your help as I go along.
Cool - thanks.
--
Je
about this? If so I think there 'might' be some
common code that can be factored out so that it applies to all bindings.
Comments?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 8/2/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
I am trying to get a sample up for the RMI Binding and I am als
Hi,
I was imagining a case where there might be other types that might belong to
the namespace http://www.example.com/simple and for which the XSDs might
need to be generated. In that case I might have to generate a schema for
this namespace anyways. So if there are some Sdo types that fall int
Hi,
Now that the OSOA site is open to all and it has all specs, could we link
the spec documents posted on the page
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/documentation.html to the corresponding
ones on the OSOA site. We could probably get rid of some duplication and
confusions as it will be clear
Hi Jeremy,
Is what you have written out here captured somewhere. I wish we could do
that on the Wiki. I went there to do it, but could not Edit.
We must have page on Tuscany Architecture and Design and what you have
mentioned here I would like to put under a sub-heading called 'Tuscany
Extensi
Hi Jeremy / Jim,
Is there something called a 'default sca binding'. For example is the
following composite valid? So does it mean that in the absence of bindings
the default binding is in place which is 'default sca binding'?
http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0";
name="CalculatorCompos
Hi Jeremy / Jim,
1) Not being able to make much progress with RMI Binding as SCA service I
am trying the other way SCA RMI Reference. In that I discovered that the
ComponentLoader's loadReference expects a 'target' attribute similar to the
case of service. I supposed this is also going to go -
Rick,
Well, that's the problem that I started with and am yet to figure out
something. I ended up creating wires in the 'build' and it crossed this.
But then that might not be the right thing to do.
I went ahead a bit but in vain, I am finally stuck with 'target invokers'
not being set and am
Hi,
Thanks to Ant, now I have added some minimal content to the Wiki for
SCA. Hope to add more as I get along with the understanding.
- Venkat
On 8/4/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Is what you have written out here captured somewhere. I wish we could d
Sure yes :-)
- Venkat
On 8/4/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good idea - can you do a patch for this?
--
Jeremy
On Aug 4, 2006, at 12:18 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that the OSOA site is open to all and it has all specs, could
> we link
> the
right (or click here http://
wiki.apache.org/ws/UserPreferences), enter name password and email
and CreateProfile - you should be good to go.
-
Jeremy
On Aug 4, 2006, at 1:04 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Is what you have written out here captured somewhere. I wish we
&g
Hi,
In the XSD in the prev. mails I see the sdo annotation called
sdoXML:name. Is this in the specs? To the best of my knowledge the
annotation to be used there, as per the specs is 'sdoJava:instanceClass'.
Please clarify.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 8/5/06, Yang ZHONG (JIRA) wrote:
[
http:/
ht get confused with why it is different than the latest
spec.
On 8/4/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sure yes :-)
>
> - Venkat
>
> On 8/4/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Good idea - can you do a patch for this?
>
Hi,
Though this is very tempting, I am not comfortable about moving this
'specific' (yet generic to webservices) stuff to the spi. My understanding
is that what one would find in spi is the base common functionality that
'all' other extensions would take off from. Adding a layer of 'webservice
ism or through a contained composite.
Jim
On Aug 7, 2006, at 11:19 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi,
> Though this is very tempting, I am not comfortable about moving this
> 'specific' (yet generic to webservices) stuff to the spi. My
> understanding
> is that what on
Hi Jim / Jeremy / Axis2 & Celtix binding folks
Continuing with the simple RMI Binding that I am working on... here are the
things that I have done to move it forward in steps... (from a null inbound
wire to being able to host the RMI Service. Now I am on the path to
invoking the service). Here
Thanks Joel, will look that up soon. Meanwhile I've manage to pull of the
RMI Binding with quite a few hacks around. I'll post it soon over a JIRA
for others to take a look.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 8/9/06, Hawkins, Joel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JIRA is in. Looking forward to working with Tusca
I too ended up downloading an available version of the snapshot jar from the
codehaus site and renamed it to 1.0-alpha-7-SNAPSHOT after which the build
has gone thro
- Venkat
On 8/10/06, Liu, Jervis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
well, not a big issue, but the snapshot version have to be downloade
Hi Jeremy,
(I will most certainly spend some effort looking up the code myself :-) but
just wanted to validate some thoughts)
Are there SCDL readers? For example I imagine that there is a
scdl-file-reader that reads an scdl file and creates an scdl object model.
So the deployer starts by invok
Thanks Ant and Jim.
Ant, I shall certainly work on the formatting and a couple of other issues
and posted an updated patch asap.
Jim, you point was something that I did vacillate about. I was wondering if
the registry should be started by the binding or should it be done offline.
My imaginati
Hi Jeremy / Jim,
Thanks for continuing to guide me on this :-)
- Jim, the concern you raised about the business interface not inheriting
from Remote and the need to do some sort of mediation has been a primary
concern to me since M1. I have been able to get that working now. Now
there is no re
shall work to get over this and see if
I can post a patch tonight.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 8/14/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 13, 2006, at 11:00 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
>> - each registry is identif
TED]> wrote:
On Aug 14, 2006, at 10:41 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Jim / Jeremy,
> I have been able to go forward quite a bit.
Cool
> - Which is the scdl into which I must add the RMIHost component. I
> added it
> first to the system.scdl in SCA-API project. But that di
Hi,
I was wonder if something like TUSCANY_HOME and then all other directories
relative to this would make sense. So there will be a 'lib' subdir which
will have all dependent stuff either as jars or classes expanded according
to their package directory structure. Similarly there could be a
'ex
Hi,
This is more or less what it done on Eclipse as well.
David, I have quietly pasted whatever you have mentioned here onto
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/SCA_Java_Overview?action=show.
I have created a Java SCA Overview page for now. I hope to add my learnings
there as I go alo
Hi Jim,
I found ServletHost under org.apache.tuscany.spi.host and thought it to be a
good place to add RMIHost.
I have added the interface RMIHost which is the interface the bindings will
use to register and look up RMI services. With some initial thoughts I also
put in a RMIHostAdmin interface
Hi,
Is the loading and building problem something that we can achieve out of
what will evolve out of the other discussion that Raymond, Jeremy and Jim
are having related to SCDL Extensions?
Can we look at binding.ws.axis2 and binding.ws.celtix as other forms of
extensions to the SCDL?
How about
Congratulations & Welcome Giorgio ! :)
- Venkat
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:31 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Giorgio Zoppi to become
> a
> Tuscany committer.
>
> Could you submit an Apache CLA so i can get your userid and access sorted
Hi,
I don't seem to see the definitions.xml attached. If its not too big you
could paste it in the mail itself.
Thanks
- Venkat
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Sandeep Raman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On using requires = "integrity" on a component service and invoking it i
> get
Hi,
Here is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2112 where Vamsi is
describing the following : -
*"I have been doing some digging into the conversational semantics. One of
the things I have noticed is that when the service is marked with
conversational intent, the reference created for
Hi Mark,
Now that the security things are integrated into the bigbank demo itself, I
wish to remove the secure bigbank demo. I have already done that for our
1.2 release. I wanted to do it for the trunk but find this recent update
from you. So am trying to find out if there is anything you are
Hi,
The prev. mail seemed to have a chewed up subject. So resending with a
better subject line.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:50 PM
Subject: [Discussion] Conversational Polic
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.or
Hi Ramkumar,
Welcome to Tuscany! Yes, this is a good simple start. Please go ahead and
create a JIRA for this. Also would like to see you discuss the alternatives
you have in mind for this.
Thanks
- Venkat
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/27/08,
Hi Greg,
This itest needs to be re-written after the changes to the PolicyHandling
story for the java implementation extension.
Also I put in this itest to get some cases of policy annotations verified at
a rudimentary level - like checking to see if the annotations ever get
picked up and applied
Hi Adriano,
The SCADefinitionsProviderExtensionPoint has been moved out of the
'definitions' module and into the core-spi module. So you should not be
seeing
org.apache.tuscany.sca.definitions.SCADefinitionsProviderExtensionPoint
anywhere. Could you please point me to where you are observing t
rt from scratch.
>
Yes, this makes sense. We should have all sorts of test for policies in
this itest module.
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > This itest needs to be re-written afte
Hi Sandeep,
The java implementation class is something that typically contains business
logic. The SCDL file is where you compose applications that 'use' this java
implementation. In this way you could have the same java implementation
being 're-used' in different application scenarios.
Now, gi
Hi,
This is good idea. I''ve tried to make some minor changes to the page.
Thanks
- Venkat
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> > I have noticed that the approach we used for GSoC, where we described
> > small project ideas, with
Hi,
+1 for moving the trunk to 2.0 and working on all the changes that we have
been wanted to make to the SPIs, distribution packaging, runtimes etc.
+1 for having 1.2 as maintenance branch and keeping it stable. Any
improvements keeping this as base could continue on the branch and maybe if
ou
+1 from me. Eclipse update is going fine. Samples are ok. Could not spot
any problems with licenses.
Luciano, thanks a ton for all the hard work.
- Venkat
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tusc
Congratulations Wang Feng! Welcome! :)
- Venkat
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:25 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Wang Feng to become a
> Tuscany committer.
>
> Congratulations and welcome Wang Feng!
>
> ...ant
>
Hi,
With specific reference to the inheritance of intents and policysets across
the SCDL-XML hierarchy i.e. the one by which child elements inherit that
which is specified in the parent element I have a question as follows :-
Do we need to bother about the validity of what a child element actuall
Hi Kevin,
Yes, we do support this although there isn't extensive testing of this.
There is some rudimenatary testing that I have done in itest/policy but the
method that I've had to use there for verification is not a happy one i.e.
verification through the calling of policy handlers. So, if you
e be aware there is an errata associated with the authorization
> elements.
> http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-26
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1. I will start looking into this after I am done with some
&g
I agree with Luciano's perspective.
- Venkat
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Considering this has been there in several files for a while, and it
> really does not affect anyone that does not want to use the extra one
> line of information on the top
Congratulations Mario and welcome onboard !! :)
- Venkat
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Mario Antollini to
> become a Tuscany committer.
>
> Please spend sometime to get familiar with Apache develope
ank Budinsky
> - Ignacio Silva-Lepe
> - Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> - kelvin goodson
> - Luciano Resende
> - Mark Combellack
> - Matthieu Riou
> - Mike Edwards
> - Paul Fremantle
> - Pete Robbins
> - Raymond Feng
> - Simon Laws
> - S
Hi,
Please find my comments inline.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In the SCA Policy framework spec there is a section that talks about
> bindingType as it appears in the definitions.xml file(s). It says...
>
> 702 The bindingType element is used to decla
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Please find my comments inline.
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTEC
al members of the
> Apache Tuscany Project:
>
>* Adriano Crestani
>* ant elder
>* Brady Johnson
>* Frank Budinsky
>* Ignacio Silva-Lepe
>* Jean-Sebastien Delfino
>* kelvin goodson
>* Luciano Resende
>* Mark Combellack
>
gt;
> > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:02 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Venkata Krishnan <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:56 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Declaring extensions as being available in the
> domain
>
>
> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ant,
> > >
> > > Yes, this sounds good to me - that will mak
embly Model
specs. Right now its vice-versa.
Maybe some Specs folks should give us their perspective on this.
- Venkat
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yes, I think each of those specific ones should be allowed to have its own
> defini
+1 to Simon's view point. I also see this good from one of our earlier
objective to keep our trunk stable. I'd prefer that we evolve the
(potentially breaking) changes that we want to do in our road to 2.0
initially in a branch.
Just a worry - would it be challenging to keep the branch and trunk
701 - 800 of 802 matches
Mail list logo
