Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
Yes it does help! I need to go and read the Assembly spec again ;0)
But for now I think the change I put in is fine.
Cheers,
Pete,
I thought that your change was OK too, but I just rebuilt everything
after updating from SVN and
I think we should revert that change I made then but it would be nice to get
it to compile on windows ;-)
I'm still not happy with Composite constructor passing it's this pointer to
it's parent ComponentType. Is this not wrong? Is it saying I am a Composite
and I am contained in myself?? In
Pete Robbins wrote:
I think we should revert that change I made then but it would be nice
to get
it to compile on windows ;-)
I'm still not happy with Composite constructor passing it's this
pointer to
it's parent ComponentType. Is this not wrong? Is it saying I am a
Composite
and I am
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
I think we should revert that change I made then but it would be nice
to get
it to compile on windows ;-)
I'm still not happy with Composite constructor passing it's this
pointer to
it's parent ComponentType. Is this not wrong? Is it saying
OK, I'll revert the change. Is there an easy way to do that in svn?
Cheers,
On 06/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
I think we should revert that change I made then but it would be nice
to get
it to compile on
On 06/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'll revert the change. Is there an easy way to do that in svn?
Cheers,
Yes there is using TortoiseSVN ;-)
--
Pete
OK... change made in 798 is backed out and CompositeConstructor passes 0 to
it's parent ComponentType.
Ruby builds fine now.
Cheers,
On 06/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'll revert the change. Is there an easy way to
I think it does not. I raised TUSCANY-798 as I was getting a windows compile
warning when Composite constructor was passing it's this pointer to the
ComponentType constructor. ComponentType saves away the pointer to a
Composite but never uses it, nor is the getComposite() method ever called.
My
I attached a patch of my proposed fix to the Jira
On 05/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it does not. I raised TUSCANY-798 as I was getting a windows
compile warning when Composite constructor was passing it's this pointer to
the ComponentType constructor. ComponentType
I tested the patch briefly on windows/VC7 - everything builds fine and the
Calculator sample is happy.
Cheers
Andy
On 10/5/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I attached a patch of my proposed fix to the Jira
On 05/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it does not. I
Andrew Borley wrote:
I tested the patch briefly on windows/VC7 - everything builds fine and
the
Calculator sample is happy.
Cheers
Andy
On 10/5/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I attached a patch of my proposed fix to the Jira
On 05/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
On 05/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that a ComponentType would need to know the composite it lives
in, to reflect interfaces, or use complex data types for properties,
which are currently packaged with a composite.
But in the model Composite is a
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 05/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that a ComponentType would need to know the composite it lives
in, to reflect interfaces, or use complex data types for properties,
which are currently packaged with a composite.
But in the model
Yes it does help! I need to go and read the Assembly spec again ;0)
But for now I think the change I put in is fine.
Cheers,
On 05/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 05/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that a
Pete Robbins wrote:
Yes it does help! I need to go and read the Assembly spec again ;0)
But for now I think the change I put in is fine.
Cheers,
Pete,
I thought that your change was OK too, but I just rebuilt everything
after updating from SVN and unfortunately this change breaks the Ruby
15 matches
Mail list logo