I've just put up a patch on TUSCANY-613 for MSVC7. Includes SCA, BigBank and
Calculator projects.
Cheers
Andy
On 8/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
[snip]
> I have checked in code for TUSCANY-613 to build the new sca code on
> windows
> MSVC6. Calcu
I've followed the code through - it basically walks the .composite and
.componentType files and then the header files, converts this info into an
xml doc and the runs a set of stylesheets to create the proxy and wrapper
files.
I can take a look at this when I get time - it doesn't seem to be hurti
I have to say I have never looked at the Java code but I have editted the
stylesheets to fix problems.
Cheers,
--
Pete
I'm getting the same NPE, didn't notice it before. If I comment out
AccountDataService in the .composite file I'm not getting the NPE so it
must be specific to this particular service or AccountDataService.h
maybe? I have no idea why Options.set(...) would throw an NPE on ly with
AccountDataServ
Pete Robbins wrote:
[snip]
I have checked in code for TUSCANY-613 to build the new sca code on
windows
MSVC6. Calculator also builds and runs.
I had to make one change to ModelLoader where I have changed the logic to
load all .composite files in the folder rather than just the one that
matches
Andrew Borley wrote:
Also, I get a NPE when running SCAGEN on the BigBank sample - everything
seems to get happily generated though. The output is below - anyone
else see
this?
Pete - are you still using VC++6 for windows development? I have a
VC++7 SCA
build working happily here if you want
I have checked in code for TUSCANY-613 to build the new sca code on windows
MSVC6. Calculator also builds and runs.
I had to make one change to ModelLoader where I have changed the logic to
load all .composite files in the folder rather than just the one that
matches the folder name. The filename
OK. I have the sca runtime building on vc6 fine. Calculator project builds
fine too. Having some teething problems getting it running.
On 10/08/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not many - it was mostly a case of putting the new files in and taking the
old ones out.
Saying that, I ha
Not many - it was mostly a case of putting the new files in and taking the
old ones out.
Saying that, I haven't actually got the samples going yet - BigBank falls
over for some reason, currently getting Calculator going.
When I've got stuff going I'll raise a Jira and put up a patch.
Cheers
On
I haven't seen the NPE. I'm currently trying to get the scatest program
working on linux. I'm happy to leave VC6 broken for now until the changes
settle down. If you are happy with the VC7 then please submit the patch.
Were there many changes?
Cheers,
On 10/08/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Also, I get a NPE when running SCAGEN on the BigBank sample - everything
seems to get happily generated though. The output is below - anyone else see
this?
Pete - are you still using VC++6 for windows development? I have a VC++7 SCA
build working happily here if you want the patch.
Andy
On 8/1
Similar question from me - do similar things apply for the subsystem
.composite file that replace sca.subsystem?
Andy
On 8/10/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... also are we enforcing the directory containing the composite to also
be
named after the composite?
On 10/08/06, Pete R
... also are we enforcing the directory containing the composite to also be
named after the composite?
On 10/08/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Deployment question: Does the name of the .composite file HAVE to match
the name of the composite? Previously we just loaded any sca.modu
Deployment question: Does the name of the .composite file HAVE to match the
name of the composite? Previously we just loaded any sca.module file and the
name="" parameter gave the module name. There is still a name="" parameter
so we end up with a file called CalculatorComposite.composite with
ht
I'll take a look at the windows side of things.
Cheers,
On 09/08/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> Pete Robbins wrote:
>> So are you changing the loader to load the schema from xsd/new
>> instead of
>> xsd? Personally I would just "go for it
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
So are you changing the loader to load the schema from xsd/new
instead of
xsd? Personally I would just "go for it" and check in the new xsds as we
need to get this working anyway.
Cheers,
So I just went for it and made a set of changes to p
16 matches
Mail list logo