Wow. What a smarmy little weasel.
I also wish to apologize to you viewers for having precipitated such
anxiety
and unnecessary drama.
That isn't apologizing for his actions. It is apologizing for the
media hype and backlash. He is saying that what he did wasn't bad --
but it led to something
...could be as exciting as its promo:
The Hasselhoffs, coming in December.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnWTwmoUi4c
(Mother J has been gravitating to the AETV-owned channels a lot
lately)
--
BOB
--
TV or Not TV The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are
Big fan of Keith's, eh?
Suspended Keith Olbermann Demanded MSNBC Apology, Will Return Tuesday
http://www.popeater.com/2010/11/08/keith-olbermann-return-MSNBC/?icid=main%7Chtmlws-main-n%7Cdl2%7Csec3_lnk1%7C182920
On Nov 9, 4:13 am, Kevin M. drunkbastar...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow. What a smarmy
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:36 AM, donz5 do...@aol.com wrote:
Big fan of Keith's, eh?
I agree with his point-of-view, but the way he chooses to express it
does not help any of his causes.
The battle between MSNBC and FoxNews is like the battle between Coke
and Pepsi: Too much of either will give
Alan Spencer, a name not heard much lately, is developing with
Canada's Just for Laughs people for Cablevision's younger and maler
arthouse channel an as-yet untitled action series a psychotic
criminal juggling a criminal enterprise and an active social life, on
IFC's slate with an animated series
On Nov 8, 3:02 pm, Mark J. mjeffr...@marcrealty.com wrote:
On Nov 8, 4:56 pm, Jason Carpio jcar...@gmail.com wrote:
Accord to ESPN Sources: Miller and Morgan will not be returning to Sunday
Night Baseball. Morgan out @ ESPN; Miller out of TV; rest TBD.
. . .aka the rich folks who play chess using poor folks..
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/11/01/power-list.html
As described by Newsweek:
In the oversaturated, hypercommodified media culture of 2010, the most
influential political figures are generally the ones who make the most money
peddling
On Nov 9, 2:58 pm, Wesley McGee wesley.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
. . .aka the rich folks who play chess using poor folks..
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/11/01/power-list.html
As described by Newsweek:
In the oversaturated, hypercommodified media culture of 2010, the most
influential political
Sorry I'm slow to get to this.
Let me put it this way: it took me three reads to figure out what the
word in question was, and that's even knowing the site I was on. When
I went even further down the site, there was another word that a
commenter blocked out that took me the same number of reads.
I'm not sure why I'm going to do this, or how, but seeing as I still
can't believe I did not walk down to Borders to pick up the book the
moment I hit the office this morning, I am going to go in the realm of
redemption and do a basic chapter-by-chapter breakdown as much as
possible without really
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:13 PM, donz5 do...@aol.com wrote:
I'm a few chapters ahead of you; just finished Conan's extensive
career background that led him to LN in '93. So far I'm enjoying the
book a hell of a lot, but I'm surprised no copyeditor took notice of
the very first sentence in
It occurs to me that it make very little sense to do this in
individual threads, so I'll just keep going in this one.
Chapter 2 (Sell-By Date) focuses on the machinations of the 2004
negotiations that set all this up, both Jay's sense that he was being
fired but given a five-year severance
On Nov 9, 10:03 pm, Jon Delfin jondel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:13 PM, donz5 do...@aol.com wrote:
I'm a few chapters ahead of you; just finished Conan's extensive
career background that led him to LN in '93. So far I'm enjoying the
book a hell of a lot, but I'm surprised
On Nov 9, 10:25 pm, Joe Hass hassgoc...@gmail.com wrote:
It occurs to me that it make very little sense to do this in
individual threads, so I'll just keep going in this one.
Chapter 2 (Sell-By Date) focuses on the machinations of the 2004
negotiations that set all this up, both Jay's sense
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:51 PM, donz5 do...@aol.com wrote:
Thus, the sentence in the book reads: ...a stream of cabs and limos
was snaking slowly down West Forty-third Street...
No comma in the passage; down should be across.
Not sure where Bill Carter is from, but this may be one of those
Having lived in NYC for 32 years, I can attest that traveling east-
west in this city is considered across, not up or down. The
opening sentence should have read, ... a stream of cabs and limos was
snaking slowly across West Forth-third Street...
On Nov 9, 11:51 pm, Jim Ellwanger
16 matches
Mail list logo
