They've been around for ages, but for a number of years now, they've only
appeared in costume with the helmets. And they've not done broadcast
interviews. They've given written interviews - but that's all from what I
can tell.
Their new album is excellent though, and Get Lucky isn't even the best
The short version: Daft Punk was known for their house and electronica
music (I have a couple of their CD and they make regular appearances on my
playlists). They wrote and recorded the score for the Tron remake in 2010.
For "Random Access Memory", they decided to make a shift and pull off a
pretty
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:17 AM, David Bruggeman wrote:
> This NYT blog post suggests the dispute was legit.
>
>
> http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/07/things-get-kind-of-crazy-among-colbert-daft-punk-and-mtv
>
Interesting note: "Daft Punk’s planned appearance had already been a source
o
t; *From:* PGage
> *To:* tvornottv@googlegroups.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 7, 2013 1:28 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [TV orNotTV] The Story Of MTV And Stephen Colbert
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Bruggeman wrote:
>
> The show started promoting Colbchella '013 on the ai
orNotTV] The Story Of MTV And Stephen Colbert
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Bruggeman wrote:
The show started promoting Colbchella '013 on the air last week, so I think it
reasonable that there's been some work on at least some part of last night's
performance well in advan
That was why I separated the two. I agree with the thinking the second
segment was set up well in advance. Colbert tends to use very deliberate
language (similar to Dave Berry using the phrase "I am not making this up")
when he's telling the truth. If you remember the Wheat Thins bit, when he
read
No, the real question is "When did original Stig clone himself and start an
electronica band?"
On Wednesday, August 7, 2013 1:28:35 PM UTC-4, PGage wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Bruggeman
>
> > wrote:
>
>> The show started promoting Colbchella '013 on the air last week, so I
I was wondering the same thing, but given the amount of setup required for
that montage - past guests, visits to Charlie Rose/Fallon/AGT, the
Rockettes in their rehearsal studio, Jon Stewart via Skype, HENRY
KISSINGER! - I had assumed it was always the setup for Daft Punk's 'live'
performance.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Bruggeman wrote:
> The show started promoting Colbchella '013 on the air last week, so I
> think it reasonable that there's been some work on at least some part of
> last night's performance well in advance. Heck, last year Colbert did
> Colbchella '012 fro
From: PGage
To: tvornottv@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] The Story Of MTV And Stephen Colbert
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jon Delfin wrote:
Except.
>
>
>While I enjoy a Colbert evisceration as much as anyone, I began to
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jon Delfin wrote:
> Except.
>
> While I enjoy a Colbert evisceration as much as anyone, I began to have my
> doubts as the subsequent musical video montage unfolded, one which was
> clearly created with much planning over the past month or more. So ... they
> were
Except.
While I enjoy a Colbert evisceration as much as anyone, I began to have my
doubts as the subsequent musical video montage unfolded, one which was
clearly created with much planning over the past month or more. So ... they
were planning that all along, and just changed the setup?
On Wed
So Daft Punk was supposed to appear on Colbert last night when their Viacom
brethren got wind of it. And Stephen handed it about as well as Stephen
possibly could.
http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/428371/august-06-2013/stephest-colbchella--013---special-guest-stephen-colbert-
13 matches
Mail list logo
