Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpx85xx/fdt: Add cpu-release-addr for all cores

2010-08-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 18, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: > We currently do not add a cpu-release-addr for core 0, this is needed > when we want to reset core 0 and later restart it from Linux > --- > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c | 21 - > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13

Re: [U-Boot] commit f51cdaf1 breaks ve8313 board

2010-08-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 18, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Becky, > > your commit f51cdaf1: "83xx/85xx/86xx: LBC register cleanup" breaks > building of the ve8313 board which now fails like this: > > fsl_elbc_nand.c: In function 'fsl_elbc_run_command': > fsl_elbc_nand.c:231: error: 'fsl_lbc_t' ha

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/8xxx: Fix quad-rank DIMMs support on corenet_ds board.

2010-08-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: york > > The board specific parameters associated with quad rank dimms where > missing. This fixes it so the board will function if quad rank dimms > are placed in it. > > Signed-off-by: York Sun > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > boa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Rename Security Engine Job Queue to Job Ring to match docs

2010-08-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:21 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Official docs call it the Job Ring not Job Queue for the p4080 security > block. Match the docs to reduce confusion. > > Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/p4080_ids.c |8 > ar

[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/83xx: Fix build issue with ve8313 board due to lbus changes

2010-08-18 Thread Kumar Gala
We get two build errors: fsl_elbc_nand.c: In function 'fsl_elbc_run_command': fsl_elbc_nand.c:231: error: 'fsl_lbc_t' has no member named 'lsor' make[1]: *** [/work/wd/tmp-ppc/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.o] Error 1 and ve8313.c: In function 'initdram': ve8313.c:104: error: expected '=', ',',

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] non-working dns323 config

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Rogan Dawes, In message <4c6cd111.4070...@dawes.za.net> you wrote: > > > Then please mark it as such in the subject - adding a "[RFC]" or > > similar tag would help. > > Sorry, git-send-email newbie here. > > Will figure it out for the next time around. You can manually edit the patch befo

Re: [U-Boot] commit a37c36f4 breaks several non-85xx boards

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message you wrote: > > Sorry, I had a few other fixes I was queuing up for a pull request. Please do, as I want to get a -rc1 out asap (tonight?) Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Off

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] non-working dns323 config

2010-08-18 Thread Rogan Dawes
On 2010/08/19 7:35 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Rogan Dawes, > > In message <4c6cc059.4080...@dawes.za.net> you wrote: >> >> The patch was simply to allow people to see my non-working config, in >> the hope of getting suggestions on how to improve it. > > Then please mark it as such in the sub

Re: [U-Boot] commit a37c36f4 breaks several non-85xx boards

2010-08-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 18, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:50:26 +0200 > Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> your commit a37c36f4: "powerpc/8xxx: query feature reporting register >> for num cores on unknown cpus" breaks a number of boards with error >> messages like here: > >> Please fix.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] [TESTING] da8xx: fixup ARM relocation support

2010-08-18 Thread Sudhakar Rajashekhara
Ben Gardiner nanometrics.ca> writes: [...] snip > + > +void dram_init_banksize (void) > +{ > + gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start = CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE; > + gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size = gd->ram_size; > +} > +#endif > dram_init() gets called from arch/arm/lib/board.c and initializes gd->ram_size

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Align linebuf to avoid misaligned aliases of it

2010-08-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday, August 18, 2010 16:36:39 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 18/08/2010 19:54, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >> Le 18/08/2010 18:46, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > >>> you need to include linux/compiler.h first ... but i would have > >>> thou

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] non-working dns323 config

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Rogan Dawes, In message <4c6cc059.4080...@dawes.za.net> you wrote: > > The patch was simply to allow people to see my non-working config, in > the hope of getting suggestions on how to improve it. Then please mark it as such in the subject - adding a "[RFC]" or similar tag would help. Best

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] non-working dns323 config

2010-08-18 Thread Rogan Dawes
On 2010/08/19 12:23 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > But this is an attempt to sneak in an incomplete (no entries to > MAKEALL or MAINTAINER, for example) board when no MW is open. > > NAK for this part. Hi Wolfgang, The patch was simply to allow people to see my non-working config, in the hope of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] TI: DaVinci DA850 EVM: support passing maximum allowed cpu clock rate information to kernel

2010-08-18 Thread Nori, Sekhar
Hi Detlev, On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 21:23:46, Detlev Zundel wrote: > Hi Sekhar, > > > The TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x EVM can be populated with devices > > having different maximum allowed CPU clock rating. > > > > The maximum clock the chip can support can only be determined from > > the label on th

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARMV7: S5P: make s5p-common for sharing the code between s5pc1xx and s5pc2xx

2010-08-18 Thread Minkyu Kang
This patch adds basic support for s5pc210. s5p-common will be used by all of s5p SoCs. Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- Makefile |7 + arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/Makefile | 46 +++ arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/cpu_info.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] ARMV7: S5P: rename from s5pc1xx to s5p

2010-08-18 Thread Minkyu Kang
Because of these are common files around s5p Socs, rename from s5pc1xx to s5p. And getting cpu_id is SoC specific, so move to SoC's header file. Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/cpu_info.c | 11 +-- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] omap2: i2c: remove redundant header definitions

2010-08-18 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 19:39 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Remove the register offset and common defines which are > already present in drivers/i2c/omap24xx.h. All of these > defines carry the same value even. > > Cc: Steve Sakoman > Cc: Heiko > Cc: Sandeep Paulraj > Cc: Wolfang Denk > > Sign

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] i2c: omap2+: change header guard to be generic

2010-08-18 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 19:39 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Make the header guard to be generic to stop conflicting with > omap2 i2c header file arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap24xx/i2c.h > > Cc: Steve Sakoman > Cc: Heiko > Cc: Sandeep Paulraj > Cc: Wolfang Denk > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] omap2: i2c: add syss offset

2010-08-18 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 19:39 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > OMAP2420 ES2.3 trm defines syss register offset as 0x10. Add it. > > Cc: Steve Sakoman > Cc: Heiko > Cc: Sandeep Paulraj > Cc: Wolfang Denk > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon Acked-by: Steve Sakoman Steve > --- > arch/arm/include

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] omap2: i2c: minor cleanup

2010-08-18 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 19:39 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > As reported by wolfgang [1] sdp2420 platform build is broken atm > > looking at the same showed some potential cleanups possible > in addition to fixing the problem Thanks Nishanth! You beat me to it. These look fine to me, I'll add my

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] omap2: i2c: remove redundant header definitions

2010-08-18 Thread Nishanth Menon
Remove the register offset and common defines which are already present in drivers/i2c/omap24xx.h. All of these defines carry the same value even. Cc: Steve Sakoman Cc: Heiko Cc: Sandeep Paulraj Cc: Wolfang Denk Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap24xx/i2c.h | 1

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] i2c: omap2+: change header guard to be generic

2010-08-18 Thread Nishanth Menon
Make the header guard to be generic to stop conflicting with omap2 i2c header file arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap24xx/i2c.h Cc: Steve Sakoman Cc: Heiko Cc: Sandeep Paulraj Cc: Wolfang Denk Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon --- drivers/i2c/omap24xx_i2c.h |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertion

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] omap2: i2c: minor cleanup

2010-08-18 Thread Nishanth Menon
As reported by wolfgang [1] sdp2420 platform build is broken atm looking at the same showed some potential cleanups possible in addition to fixing the problem Warning: i dont have a board around, so only build tested for omap2, tested for omap3 Nishanth Menon (3): i2c: omap2+: change header g

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] omap2: i2c: add syss offset

2010-08-18 Thread Nishanth Menon
OMAP2420 ES2.3 trm defines syss register offset as 0x10. Add it. Cc: Steve Sakoman Cc: Heiko Cc: Sandeep Paulraj Cc: Wolfang Denk Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap24xx/i2c.h |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/i

Re: [U-Boot] commit a37c36f4 breaks several non-85xx boards

2010-08-18 Thread Kim Phillips
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:50:26 +0200 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > your commit a37c36f4: "powerpc/8xxx: query feature reporting register > for num cores on unknown cpus" breaks a number of boards with error > messages like here: > Please fix. I posted a fix when you first brought this up. Whilst I sent

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] bedbug_860.c, bedbug_603e.c: Fix return type to silence compile warnings.

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
commit 47e26b1b "cmd_usage(): simplify return code handling" caused the following compile warnings: bedbug_860.c: In function 'bedbug860_do_break': bedbug_860.c:73: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void bedbug_860.c:121: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning vo

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arch/arm/include/asm/arch-orion5x/cpu.h: fix incorrect comment

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
The typo caused build issues like these: Configuring for edminiv2 board... In file included from /work/wd/tmp-arm/include2/asm/arch/orion5x.h:39, from cpu.c:32: /work/wd/tmp-arm/include2/asm/arch/cpu.h:79:1: warning: "/*" within comment In file included from /work/wd/tmp-arm/inclu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] non-working dns323 config

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Rogan Dawes, In message <1281993065-19803-1-git-send-email-u...@aphrodite> you wrote: > From: Rogan Dawes > > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-orion5x/cpu.h |2 +- This is a fix that is good... If there only was a SoB line... > board/D-Link/dns323_b1/Makefile | 53 ++

[U-Boot] Commit d708395d breaks omap2420h4 board...

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Steve, your commit d708395d "ARMV7: Modify i2c driver for more reliable operation on OMAP4" breaks building of the omap2420h4 board: omap24xx_i2c.c: In function 'i2c_init': omap24xx_i2c.c:117: error: 'struct i2c' has no member named 'syss' omap24xx_i2c.c:117: error: 'I2C_SYSS_RDONE' undeclar

[U-Boot] QorIQ NAND-Boot configs not building

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Andy & Kumar, all QorIQ NAND-Boot configurations are apeareantly failing to build. I get ld: NAND bootstrap too big error messages for these board configurations: P1011RDB_NAND, P1020RDB_NAND, P2010RDB_NAND, and P2020RDB_NAND Please fix. Thanks in advance. Best regards, Wolfgan

[U-Boot] commit a37c36f4 breaks several non-85xx boards

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kim, your commit a37c36f4: "powerpc/8xxx: query feature reporting register for num cores on unknown cpus" breaks a number of boards with error messages like here: cpu.c: In function 'cpu_numcores': cpu.c:113: error: 'CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_PIC_ADDR' undeclared (first use in this function) cpu.c

[U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] mkimage: Add compatibility option for legacy Multi-File images

2010-08-18 Thread Thibaut Girka
During a few months, offsets of files in multi-file images were miscalculated, this has been fixed by 02b9b22446e3d7ad6a6382be17a1ce79a7de589b, but unfortunatly, some devices (I'm thinking of the Neo FreeRunner) are using a broken version of U-Boot. This problem can easily be worked around at imag

[U-Boot] commit f51cdaf1 breaks ve8313 board

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Becky, your commit f51cdaf1: "83xx/85xx/86xx: LBC register cleanup" breaks building of the ve8313 board which now fails like this: fsl_elbc_nand.c: In function 'fsl_elbc_run_command': fsl_elbc_nand.c:231: error: 'fsl_lbc_t' has no member named 'lsor' make[1]: *** [/work/wd/tmp-ppc/drivers/mt

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Align linebuf to avoid misaligned aliases of it

2010-08-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 18/08/2010 19:54, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Le 18/08/2010 18:46, Mike Frysinger a écrit : >>> you need to include linux/compiler.h first ... but i would have >>> thought this be a header already included globally. maybe that's a >>> new

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpx85xx/fdt: Add cpu-release-addr for all cores

2010-08-18 Thread Matthew McClintock
We currently do not add a cpu-release-addr for core 0, this is needed when we want to reset core 0 and later restart it from Linux --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c | 21 - 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c b/arch/

[U-Boot] Italienische Geselschaft sucht sichere Partner.

2010-08-18 Thread wel014
Hallo! Leider, konnte ich nicht bei Ihnen ich melden, weil ich ihre E-Mail-Adresse nicht finden konnte. Ich habe eine gute Nachricht fur Sie. Wir haben einen geeigneten Job in Deutschland fur Sie qusgesucht. Das ist ein Arbeit nach freier Zeitplan. Mindestlohn ist Euro 2.000. Ingesamt 3 bi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2 v5][U-BOOT] Zoom3: Add support for OMAP3630 Zoom3 board.

2010-08-18 Thread Martinez, Aldo
> > > >> I wonder what is the status of this patch? > > > > As someone trying to do development on a 3630, this would be helpful > > to have in the upstream tree. > > I'm preparing a patch series to support 37XX versions of Beagle and > Overo. It includes enhancements to the existing code in > a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2 v5][U-BOOT] Zoom3: Add support for OMAP3630 Zoom3 board.

2010-08-18 Thread Martinez, Aldo
Hi Jeff, > >> I tried this patch today and DRAM seems to not work after u-boot > > > I'll take a look at this, thanks for noting it. > > > > Best regards, > > Aldo Brett > > It dawns on me that I didn't ask what toolchain you are using. I've been > using > gcc version 4.3.2 (Sourcery G++ Lite 20

Re: [U-Boot] which protocol do I use to send S-record files when using the loads command ?

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jef, In message <226bc4afa29fc24789dfd00dff3084c2524247e...@safemail.safetran.railad.com> you wrote: > > Why did you not follow the description in the Manual? > > Did you mean: > http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/SystemSetup Yes. > I can't get Kermit for Windows to work with U-boot. Why

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Update ARM mach-types

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4c6c3133.4000...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > I see. I was assuming that one downloads the text file to ones > own kernel tree and let the auto-magic work to create the latest > mach-types.h. I can try to do that but I have not yet > started to try to compile

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Update ARM mach-types

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear s-paul...@ti.com, In message <1282142754-15756-1-git-send-email-s-paul...@ti.com> you wrote: > From: Sandeep Paulraj > > This patch updates the mach-types.h based on the latest linux kernel > > Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj > --- > > Wolfgang Please pull this. Tom used to do thsi regula

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Update ARM mach-types

2010-08-18 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Paulraj, Sandeep, > 3026 actually Yep, changed after I loaded the page today... > The patch was against linus's master. > > Have all these made it to some kernel tree yet? > > It is not un common for kernel to be a little behind. I see. I was assuming that one downloads the text file to one

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Update ARM mach-types

2010-08-18 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Update ARM mach-types > > Dear s-paul...@ti.com, > > +#define MACH_TYPE_FLEXIBITY2965 > > +#define MACH_TYPE_WLAN_COMPUTER2966 > Thanks for the patch, however the latest number in > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/ > is 3025 302

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Update ARM mach-types

2010-08-18 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear s-paul...@ti.com, > +#define MACH_TYPE_FLEXIBITY2965 > +#define MACH_TYPE_WLAN_COMPUTER2966 Thanks for the patch, however the latest number in http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/ is 3025 Reinhard ___ U-Boot mailin

[U-Boot] [PATCH] bedbug_860.c: Fix return type to silence compile warnings.

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
commit 47e26b1b "cmd_usage(): simplify return code handling" caused the following compile warnings: bedbug_860.c: In function 'bedbug860_do_break': bedbug_860.c:73: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void bedbug_860.c:121: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning vo

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-cfi-flash/master (update)

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefan Roese, In message <201008180930.17192...@denx.de> you wrote: > The following changes since commit 962ad59e25640e586e2bceabf67a628a27f8f508: > > env_nand: return error when no device is found (2010-08-13 13:32:42 -0500) > > are available in the git repository at: > git://www.denx.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Align linebuf to avoid misaligned aliases of it

2010-08-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 18/08/2010 18:46, Mike Frysinger a écrit : >> you need to include linux/compiler.h first ... but i would have >> thought this be a header already included globally.  maybe that's a >> new topic to start. > > I don't understand why I should

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Align linebuf to avoid misaligned aliases of it

2010-08-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 18/08/2010 18:46, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Le 14/08/2010 19:42, Mike Frysinger a écrit : >>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 14/08/2010 10:25, Mike Frysinger a écrit : >> int print_buffer (ulong addr

Re: [U-Boot] which protocol do I use to send S-record files when using the loads command ?

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter Barada, In message <1282151376.23742.30.ca...@thunk> you wrote: > > Hmm, sounds like you don't use any flow-control on the serial port so > when u-boot goes away to do work it signals the other end(your host > running Terraterm/HyperTerminal) to stop transmitting until u-boot's > seria

Re: [U-Boot] which protocol do I use to send S-record files when using the loads command ?

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Mangelschots, Jef", In message <226bc4afa29fc24789dfd00dff3084c2524247e...@safemail.safetran.railad.com> you wrote: > What file transfer protocol do I use when sending an S-record file when I > issue the loads command ? There is no protoco. You just send line by line... > I tried with b

Re: [U-Boot] which protocol do I use to send S-record files when using the loads command ?

2010-08-18 Thread Peter Barada
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:11 -0700, Mangelschots, Jef wrote: > What file transfer protocol do I use when sending an S-record file when I > issue the loads command ? > > I tried with both TerraTerm and Hyperterminal. > > In Terraterm, when I use File | Send File ..., > In HyperTerminal, I use the

[U-Boot] which protocol do I use to send S-record files when using the loads command ?

2010-08-18 Thread Mangelschots, Jef
What file transfer protocol do I use when sending an S-record file when I issue the loads command ? I tried with both TerraTerm and Hyperterminal. In Terraterm, when I use File | Send File ..., In HyperTerminal, I use the menu Transfer | Send Text File ... In both these cases, it reads the firs

Re: [U-Boot] Debugging why my kernel won't start

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Rogan Dawes, In message <4c6c0b33.8090...@dawes.za.net> you wrote: > > Well, I thought that was the point of the "mkimage" header, with the > Load Address and Entry Point fields. Although, of course, you'll never These fields are only relevant for executable images, not for data like ramdisk

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Align linebuf to avoid misaligned aliases of it

2010-08-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 14/08/2010 19:42, Mike Frysinger a écrit : >> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Le 14/08/2010 10:25, Mike Frysinger a écrit : >  int print_buffer (ulong addr, void* data, uint width, uint count, uint > line

Re: [U-Boot] Debugging why my kernel won't start

2010-08-18 Thread Rogan Dawes
On 2010/08/18 5:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Rogan Dawes, > > Your kernel may not be able to pick up a ramdisk image in flash. > > Mainline ARM cannot do that, for example. > > [Patches to support that have been submitted, but rejected.] > >> Surely that should be Ok? Besides, U-boot is s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] hmi1001, mucmc52, uc100, uc101: move boards to vendor directory

2010-08-18 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Wolfgang, > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: Heiko Schocher > Cc: Stefan Roese > Cc: Roderik Wildenburg Acked-By: Detlev Zundel Thanks! Detlev -- But in terms of creative information, information that people can use or enjoy, and that will be used and enjoyed more the more peopl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] TI: DaVinci DA850 EVM: support passing maximum allowed cpu clock rate information to kernel

2010-08-18 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Sekhar, > The TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x EVM can be populated with devices > having different maximum allowed CPU clock rating. > > The maximum clock the chip can support can only be determined from > the label on the package (not software readable). > > Introduce a method to pass the maximum all

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] TI: DaVinci DA850 EVM: support passing maximum allowed cpu clock rate information to kernel

2010-08-18 Thread Sekhar Nori
The TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x EVM can be populated with devices having different maximum allowed CPU clock rating. The maximum clock the chip can support can only be determined from the label on the package (not software readable). Introduce a method to pass the maximum allowed clock rate informat

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] TI: DaVinci DA850 EVM: add information regarding DA850 in README.davinci

2010-08-18 Thread Sekhar Nori
The README.davinci in documentation folder is missing information regarding DA850 which is a supported DaVinci device. Add this information. Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori --- Applies to latest of U-Boot mainline. doc/README.davinci | 11 +++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletion

Re: [U-Boot] Debugging why my kernel won't start

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Rogan Dawes, In message <4c6bf138.20...@dawes.za.net> you wrote: > > > Try copying the raw ramdisk image (i. e. without the U-Boot header) to > > RAM, and try that one, i. e. something like > > > > => cp.b ff9a0040 0160 ...size... > > ... > > => bootm ff82 160 > > Un

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Update ARM mach-types

2010-08-18 Thread s-paulraj
From: Sandeep Paulraj This patch updates the mach-types.h based on the latest linux kernel Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj --- Wolfgang Please pull this. Tom used to do thsi regularly arch/arm/include/asm/mach-types.h | 1140 - 1 files changed, 1116 inserti

Re: [U-Boot] Debugging why my kernel won't start

2010-08-18 Thread Rogan Dawes
On 2010/08/18 12:54 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Rogan Dawes, > > In message <4c6bac5a.6060...@dawes.za.net> you wrote: >> >> Thanks for the suggestion. It did make a slight difference in the boot >> logs. bootcmd uses the default (in flash) location for the ramdisk, > > Actually it's a pretty

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fix SRIO LAW setup on corenet_ds boards

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message <1282139990-17758-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > From: Lian Minghuan > > In funciton board_early_init_r(), serdes does not initialize yet. > variable "serdes_prtcl_map" in function is_serdes_configured() does > not initialize. sRIO will alw

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2 v5][U-BOOT] Zoom3: Add support for OMAP3630 Zoom3 board.

2010-08-18 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> Dear Sandeep, > > In message <0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5d9fffc...@dlee01.ent.ti.com> > you wrote: > > > > I am not supposed to be adding this patch below > > http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg34906.html > > > > I will need an ACK from the responsible custodian. > > Who

[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fix SRIO LAW setup on corenet_ds boards

2010-08-18 Thread Kumar Gala
From: Lian Minghuan In funciton board_early_init_r(), serdes does not initialize yet. variable "serdes_prtcl_map" in function is_serdes_configured() does not initialize. sRIO will always be disable. In the original code, there is a undefined variable gur if SRIO is not defined. Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Align linebuf to avoid misaligned aliases of it

2010-08-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 14/08/2010 19:42, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Le 14/08/2010 10:25, Mike Frysinger a écrit : int print_buffer (ulong addr, void* data, uint width, uint count, uint linelen) { - uint8_t linebuf[MAX_LINE_LENGTH_B

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] hmi1001, mucmc52, uc100, uc101: move boards to vendor directory

2010-08-18 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 18 August 2010 14:14:17 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: Heiko Schocher > Cc: Stefan Roese > Cc: Roderik Wildenburg Acked-by: Stefan Roese Thanks. Cheers, Stefan -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munic

[U-Boot] [PATCH] hmi1001, mucmc52, uc100, uc101: move boards to vendor directory

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Heiko Schocher Cc: Stefan Roese Cc: Roderik Wildenburg --- board/{ => manroland}/hmi1001/Makefile |0 board/{ => manroland}/hmi1001/config.mk |0 board/{ => manroland}/hmi1001/hmi1001.c |0 board/{ => manroland}/mucmc52/Makefile

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] TI: DaVinci DA850 EVM: support passing device speed grade information to kernel

2010-08-18 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Wolfgang, > Dear Detlev Zundel, > > In message you wrote: >> >> > Even though its pretty descriptive - for the sake of consistency I >> > recommend to omit the "_mhz" part. >> >> I know that I will mutter a not so nice remark every time I use the >> variable and am forced to look up the doc

Re: [U-Boot] Debugging why my kernel won't start

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Rogan Dawes, In message <4c6bac5a.6060...@dawes.za.net> you wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion. It did make a slight difference in the boot > logs. bootcmd uses the default (in flash) location for the ramdisk, Actually it's a pretty significant difference, as for the first time you actuall

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] TI: DaVinci DA850 EVM: support passing device speed grade information to kernel

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Detlev Zundel, In message you wrote: > > > Even though its pretty descriptive - for the sake of consistency I > > recommend to omit the "_mhz" part. > > I know that I will mutter a not so nice remark every time I use the > variable and am forced to look up the documentation for a single s

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] CONFIG_RESET_PHY_R feature is broken

2010-08-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 18/08/2010 10:47, Ilya Yanok a écrit : > Hello Albert, > > Albert ARIBAUD free.fr> writes: > >> At the moment your problem is not being able to reset the PHY at times >> other than boot, i.e. the 'PHY API' would be limited to reset_phy() >> which is pretty much board-specific anyway. > > The p

Re: [U-Boot] Debugging why my kernel won't start

2010-08-18 Thread Rogan Dawes
On 2010/08/18 7:51 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Rogan Dawes, > > In message <4c6b08f1.9000...@dawes.za.net> you wrote: >> >> The ramdisk is located at ff9a (in flash). Its image header >> relocates it to 0080: > > Try to copy the ramdisk to RAM, and pass the Linux kernl an address in >

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] fdt_support: support adding EDID property to FDT display nodes

2010-08-18 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Boards can pass display timing info for drivers using EDID block. Provide common function to add board specific EDID data to the device tree. Subsequent patch makes use of this functionality. Detailed timing descriptor data from EDID is used for programming the display controller. This is currentl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] TI: DaVinci DA850 EVM: support passing device speed grade information to kernel

2010-08-18 Thread Nori, Sekhar
Hi Detlev, On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 20:46:16, Detlev Zundel wrote: > And by the way, if you still fail to see any point in my reasoning, then > remember that I never NAKed your patches - I was only trying to help. > The repsective custodians have the final word over acceptance. Thanks for the rev

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] CONFIG_RESET_PHY_R feature is broken

2010-08-18 Thread Ilya Yanok
Hello Albert, Albert ARIBAUD free.fr> writes: > At the moment your problem is not being able to reset the PHY at times > other than boot, i.e. the 'PHY API' would be limited to reset_phy() > which is pretty much board-specific anyway. The problem is the PHY being reseted by the driver and goi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] fdt_support: support adding EDID property to FDT display nodes

2010-08-18 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Anatolij, > Boards can pass display timing info for drivers using EDID > block. Provide common function to add board specific EDID > data to the device tree. Subsequent patch makes use of this > functionality. You could mention that this is currently implemented on the Linux side by the fsl-di

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] at91: Enabeling USB host on meesc board

2010-08-18 Thread Xu, Hong
Hi Daniel, > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Gorsulowski [mailto:daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu] > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:17 PM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Xu, Hong; Daniel Gorsulowski > Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] at91: Enabeling USB host on meesc board > > There was an redesign

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access

2010-08-18 Thread Xu, Hong
Hi Daniel, > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Gorsulowski [mailto:daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu] > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:17 PM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Xu, Hong; Daniel Gorsulowski > Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access > > * convert meesc boa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] pdm360ng: add EDID property to FDT display node

2010-08-18 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Anatolij, > PDM360NG board uses this functionality to pass display > timing info to the Linux Framebuffer driver. > > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin Acked-by: Detlev Zundel Thanks! Detlev -- Der erfahrene Politiker hantiert mit Werten wie mit Fahnen. Man tut so, als ob klar sei, was

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on esd at91 boards

2010-08-18 Thread Xu, Hong
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Gorsulowski [mailto:daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu] > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:17 PM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Xu, Hong; Daniel Gorsulowski > Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on > esd at91 boards > > Autodetection

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] TI: DaVinci DA850 EVM: support passing device speed grade information to kernel

2010-08-18 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Wolfgang, > Dear Detlev Zundel, > > In message you wrote: >> >> > You mean replace "maxspeed" by "cpuclk"? As I have noted a number of times >> > before, we are not passing the cpu clock speed here. That information >> > kernel >> > directly reads from system registers. No need to pass it fr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] UEC: Don't udelay needlessly

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Joakim Tjernlund, In message you wrote: > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > uec_init() adds an udelay(10) even though > > > the PHY status read went well, don't do that. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund > > > --- > > Acked-by: Kim Phillips > > hmm, who gets this into t

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] CONFIG_RESET_PHY_R feature is broken

2010-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4c6b858f.9060...@free.fr> you wrote: > > At the moment your problem is not being able to reset the PHY at times > other than boot, i.e. the 'PHY API' would be limited to reset_phy() > which is pretty much board-specific anyway. What prevents simply adding > calls t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] UEC PHY: Remove strange 0.5 sec delay

2010-08-18 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> > Kim Phillips wrote on 2010/08/12 07:17:49: > > > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:44:22 +0200 > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > This udelay looks bogus and doesn't help my board. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund > > > --- > > > > > > This delay was introduced by ee62ed3286f83b98b7785

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] UEC PHY: Remove strange 0.5 sec delay

2010-08-18 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:44:22 +0200 > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > This udelay looks bogus and doesn't help my board. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund > > --- > > > > This delay was introduced by ee62ed3286f83b98b7785e0318dc6379e78f7ff6 > > Kim, is this really needed for you? > > not

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-cfi-flash/master (update)

2010-08-18 Thread Stefan Roese
The following changes since commit 962ad59e25640e586e2bceabf67a628a27f8f508: env_nand: return error when no device is found (2010-08-13 13:32:42 -0500) are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git master Kim Phillips (1): cfi_flash: flinfo: allow u

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] UEC: Don't udelay needlessly

2010-08-18 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:44:21 +0200 > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > uec_init() adds an udelay(10) even though > > the PHY status read went well, don't do that. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund > > --- > Acked-by: Kim Phillips > > Kim hmm, who gets this into the tree?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cfi_flash: Cleanup flash_print_info()

2010-08-18 Thread Stefan Roese
On Friday 13 August 2010 12:43:02 Stefan Roese wrote: > This patch does the following: > > - Extract code to detect if sector is erased into function > sector_erased(). > - Because of this, we don't have variable declarations inside the > sector loop in flash_print_info() > - Change "return" t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCHv5 CFI flash] Work around bug in Numonyx P33/P30 256-Mbit 65nm flash chips.

2010-08-18 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 17 August 2010 18:40:25 Philippe De Muyter wrote: > I have "ported" U-boot to a in house made board with Numonyx Axcell P33/P30 > 256-Mbit 65nm flash chips. > > After some time :( searching for bugs in our board or soft, we have > discovered that those chips have a small but annoying bu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk

2010-08-18 Thread Xu, Hong
Hi Alex, > -Original Message- > From: Alexander Stein [mailto:alexander.st...@systec-electronic.com] > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 2:35 PM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Jens Scharsig; Xu, Hong > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk > > Hello, > > Am

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] CONFIG_RESET_PHY_R feature is broken

2010-08-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 18/08/2010 01:16, Ilya Yanok a écrit : > Hello Ben, Everybody, > > some boards used to have their PHY quirks in board-specific reset_phy() > function. This used to work because of reset_phy() being called later > than Ethernet drivers initialization during startup. > But nowadays some drivers (i