Re: [U-Boot] NetConsole and network API

2010-10-25 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
Hi: On Viernes, 22 de Octubre de 2010 22:14:45 Joe Hershberger escribió: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:23 AM, RaúlSánchez Siles > > wrote: > > Hello Joe: > > > > I've also bumped into this issue and I'm not familiar enough with U-Boot > > to properly think of a solution fixing the issue. Howe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm1176: fix relocation

2010-10-25 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Darius, Darius Augulis wrote: > On 10/24/2010 11:08 PM, Darius Augulis wrote: >> Fix relocation code for arm1176, do it like other ARM >> CPU's are doing. >> Tested only with CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT defined >> and using nand_spl (booting from nand). Test done on >> s3c6410 based board (no

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm1176: fix relocation

2010-10-25 Thread Darius Augulis
Hello Heiko, thanks for reviewing. ok, I will make patch to fix this bug in all arm*/start.S. Darius. On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Darius, > > Darius Augulis wrote: >> On 10/24/2010 11:08 PM, Darius Augulis wrote: >>> Fix relocation code for arm1176, do it lik

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: set tran_speed intead of hard setting

2010-10-25 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Wolfgang Denk, On 25 October 2010 13:19, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > This patch use card's tran_speed instead of hard setting value. > I think mmc_set_clock(mmc, 5200) is not good idea. > because this is hard setting. we need use card's tran_speed. > > So If card_caps did't support High speed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: do not fixup NULL ptrs

2010-10-25 Thread Schwarz,Andre
Jocke, [snip]  > > You still haven't reported weather the 4 nop's helped or not, yet you > seek my help. I am just going to ignore you until you do test it.  of course. Will give it a try as soon as I'll be back to office and have a board at hand ...   Just wanted to collect some more feedback.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] [NEXT] da830: fixup ARM relocation support

2010-10-25 Thread Nick Thompson
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/84921 There have been no further comments since I posted v3 of this patch 4 weeks ago. It still applies cleanly to my newly updated tree of u-boot. da830evm will not build without it. Can this patch be commited? Thanks, Nick. On 23/09/10 1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] [NEXT] da830: fixup ARM relocation support

2010-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Nick Thompson, In message <4cc53f29.2050...@ge.com> you wrote: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/84921 > > There have been no further comments since I posted v3 of this > patch 4 weeks ago. It still applies cleanly to my newly updated > tree of u-boot. da830evm will n

Re: [U-Boot] ppc4xx:tftp error

2010-10-25 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Tim, On Sunday 24 October 2010 11:42:51 Tim Rachman wrote: > According to your useful guides in our previous Emails, I examined again my > ddr sdram parameters that i had set in u-boot. I'm interfacing > HYB25D512160AT–7 to PPC440EP, with 133MHz plb frequency. What SDRAM/DDR init code are you

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/2] Freescale 85xx/P1/P2 eSPI controller driver

2010-10-25 Thread caydinc
From: Can Aydin Driver for the Freescale eSPI controller found in 85xx, P1/P2 and P4xx SoCs. Signed-off-by: Can Aydin --- Changes for v2: - Coding style cleanup - Removed modifications to common code Changes for v3: - fixed whitespace between function calls and paramete

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] Freescale 85xx/P1/P2 eSPI controller driver

2010-10-25 Thread caydinc
From: Can Aydin Add support for Freescale eSPI driver in P1/P2 board configuration Signed-off-by: Can Aydin --- Changes for v2: - Coding style cleanup - Removed modifications to common code Changes for v3: - fixed whitespace between function calls and parameters

[U-Boot] [PATCH][v0]p1_p2_rdb: to set SQW/INT pin of RTC as INT line

2010-10-25 Thread Priyanka Jain
p1_p2_rdb : SQW/INT pin in RTC can be used for generating square wave(by default) or as interrupt line. U-boot is registering this pin for interrupts. Configuring SQW/INT bit as interrupt line during board initialization to avoid spurious interrupts generated by square wave. Signed-off-by: Priy

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: Fix build for non-OMAP3 boards

2010-10-25 Thread Premi, Sanjeev
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Steve Sakoman > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 2:20 AM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: Fix build for non-OMAP3 boards > > Commit c3d3a54 uses CONF

[U-Boot] imx31 USB OTG support?

2010-10-25 Thread Abbas Raza
Hello, Is there any support in uboot for USB OTG of imx31? I am trying to configure USB OTG in device mode for imx31. Any one worked on it or any ideas. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks -- Abbas Raza ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de h

[U-Boot] NAND support on AVR32

2010-10-25 Thread David Collier
If you've seen this before, my apologies - this is my 3rd attempt to post this - it doesn't appear in anything I've downloaded, so I assume it's not getting posted. -- I thought the whole point of using this linux and u-boot stuff was th

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: fix address setup in start.S

2010-10-25 Thread Darius Augulis
Fix address setup bug for ARM. This bug stops u-boot booting if CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT is defined. Signed-off-by: Darius Augulis --- arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S |6 -- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S |6 -- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S |6 -- arch/arm/cpu/pxa/star

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm1176: fix relocation

2010-10-25 Thread Darius Augulis
Fix relocation code for arm1176, do it like other ARM CPU's are doing. Tested only with CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT defined and using nand_spl (booting from nand). Test done on s3c6410 based board (not yet supported in main line). Signed-off-by: Darius Augulis --- Changes since v1: - Heiko comme

[U-Boot] SPI on PPC MPC85xx

2010-10-25 Thread Matthias
Hi all, I've been trying to setup SPI on our MPC85xx based board. Unfortunately, compilation of mpc8xxx_spi.c fails due to a missing immap_t datatype. I see, that this datatype is defined in the headers immap_83xx.h and immap_86xx.h but it is not in immap_85xx.h. I am using u-boot-2009.11.1 b

[U-Boot] how to configure my "ipaddr" through a external switch

2010-10-25 Thread yaojin liu
hi,all. I have a switch (dip16,up to 255 devices) on my board. So I can decide the ipaddr when boot. The ipaddr is set in misc_initr() function, use method: setenv("ipaddr",xxx). when I use tftp, it displays the correct ipaddr i set. for example: TFTP from server 192.168.98.138; our IP address is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sparc: add asm/unaligned.h

2010-10-25 Thread Daniel Hellstrom
Mike Frysinger wrote: >It isn't possible to build any sparc boards without this ... > > I'm working on a new patch set with some of the patches going through the net repo instead, according to Wolfgangs comments. It is probably easier for me to make fewer commits every time submitting, and s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] imx: Get fec mac address from fuse

2010-10-25 Thread Shawn Guo
I was not in the mail list when Jason posted the patch, so I emulated the reply message. > diff --git a/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c b/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c > index 3f09c2b..e8d7b98 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c > +++ b/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c > @@ -312,21 +312,17 @@ static void fec_rbd_clean(int la

[U-Boot] Versatile PB compilation problem

2010-10-25 Thread Himanshu Chauhan
I am compiling u-boot for ARM versatile-PB board. But the compilation fails with this error: board.c: In function ‘__dram_init_banksize’: board.c:459: error: ‘CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE’ undeclared (first use in this function) board.c:459: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once board.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: Fix build for non-OMAP3 boards

2010-10-25 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:28 +0530, Premi, Sanjeev wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Steve Sakoman > > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 2:20 AM > > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH

Re: [U-Boot] NAND support on AVR32

2010-10-25 Thread David Collier
OK - my apologies I've now used the web browser, and my post is there - the problem is obviously with my download from the mailing list. I still don't see any relies though - so if you cn help I'd be truly grateful :-) David ___ U-Boot mailing list U-B

Re: [U-Boot] NAND support on AVR32

2010-10-25 Thread David Collier
> *From:* Damien Dusha > *To:* from_denx_ub...@dexdyne.com > *Date:* Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:55:23 +1000 > > HI David, > > > If you've seen this before, my apologies - this is my 3rd attempt > > to post > > this - it doesn't appear in anything I've downloaded, so I assume > > it's > > not getting

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 03/10] 83xx/85xx/86xx: LBC register cleanup

2010-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Becky, In message <1276792647-4563-4-git-send-email-bec...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > Currently, 83xx, 86xx, and 85xx have a lot of duplicated code > dedicated to defining and manipulating the LBC registers. Merge > this into a single spot. > > To do this, we have to decide on a com

Re: [U-Boot] NAND support on AVR32

2010-10-25 Thread David Collier
In article , from_denx_ub...@dexdyne.com (David Collier) wrote: > *From:* "David Collier" > *To:* u-boot@lists.denx.de > *Date:* Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:21 +0100 (BST) > > OK - my apologies > > I've now used the web browser, and my post is there - the problem is > obviously with my download from th

[U-Boot] U-boot versions - reply to RM + SW

2010-10-25 Thread David Collier
I posted a question about NAND on AVR32, and both Reinhard Meyer and Scott Wood said "why aren't you using the latest source" The reason of course is that from 2008:10 until very recently, the AVR32 version didn't work - some issue to do with the memory mapping when writing flash. So I've been st

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: do not fixup NULL ptrs

2010-10-25 Thread Andre Schwarz
Jocke, [snip] > You still haven't reported weather the 4 nop's helped or not, yet you > seek my help. I am just going to ignore you until you do test it. > > finally I got both some time and hardware : 4 nops after _start does the trick, i.e. the board is up and running fine. Diffing both Sys

Re: [U-Boot] Versatile PB compilation problem

2010-10-25 Thread sughosh ganu
hi Himanshu, On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Himanshu Chauhan wrote: > I am compiling u-boot for ARM versatile-PB board. But the compilation > fails with this error: > > board.c: In function ‘__dram_init_banksize’: > board.c:459: error: ‘CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE’ undeclared (first use in > this fun

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: do not fixup NULL ptrs

2010-10-25 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Andre Schwarz wrote on 2010/10/25 15:50:19: > > Jocke, > > [snip] > > > You still haven't reported weather the 4 nop's helped or not, yet you > > seek my help. I am just going to ignore you until you do test it. > > > > > > finally I got both some time and hardware : > > 4 nops after _start does t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: Fix build for non-OMAP3 boards

2010-10-25 Thread Premi, Sanjeev
> -Original Message- > From: Steve Sakoman [mailto:st...@sakoman.com] > Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 6:52 PM > To: Premi, Sanjeev > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: Fix build for non-OMAP3 boards > > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:28 +0530, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: do not fixup NULL ptrs

2010-10-25 Thread Andre Schwarz
Jocke, > Andre Schwarz wrote on 2010/10/25 15:50:19: > >> Jocke, >> >> [snip] >> >> >>> You still haven't reported weather the 4 nop's helped or not, yet you >>> seek my help. I am just going to ignore you until you do test it. >>> >>> >>> >> finally I got both some time and har

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: Fix build for non-OMAP3 boards

2010-10-25 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:10 +0530, Premi, Sanjeev wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Steve Sakoman [mailto:st...@sakoman.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 6:52 PM > > To: Premi, Sanjeev > > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: Fix build for non-OMAP3

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: support new relocation scheme

2010-10-25 Thread Shawn Guo
The patchset is to support new relocation scheme and fix the build breakage on master introduced by the relocation scheme. It depends on the following patch from Jason to fix build error introduced by incorrect u-boot.lds. MX5: use common u-boot.lds of cpu layer http://lists.denx.de/piper

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mx51evk: support new relocation scheme

2010-10-25 Thread Shawn Guo
This patch is to fix build breakage and support new relocatoin scheme for mx51evk. - It includes imx-regs.h in mx51evk.h, so that CSD0_BASE_ADDR and IRAM_BASE_ADDR can be referred to. - It uses i.mx51 internal RAM as the init stack, as the internal RAM is totally free from ROM code when u-

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM base address

2010-10-25 Thread Shawn Guo
i.mx51 internal RAM starts from 0x1FFE than 0x1FFE8000 Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h index 3d

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: consolidate env for mmcboot and netboot

2010-10-25 Thread Shawn Guo
This patch is to consolidate default mx51evk env for two primary boot modes, mmcboot and netboot. It also cleans some unused env like netdev, uboot and redundant env like loadaddr since CONFIG_LOADADDR already defines it. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo --- include/configs/mx51evk.h | 50 +++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ppc4xx: Add Io and IoCon 405EP board support

2010-10-25 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 21 October 2010 10:50:05 Dirk Eibach wrote: > Board support for the Guntermann & Drunck CATCenter Io. > Board support for the Guntermann & Drunck IoCon. Applied to u-boot-ppc4xx/master. Thanks. Cheers, Stefan -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ppc4xx/master

2010-10-25 Thread Stefan Roese
The following changes since commit c163f4478ca72f51b28b55f74addc8fe029d7b83: Merge branch 'master' of ssh://gemini/home/wd/git/u-boot/master (2010-10-25 08:06:52 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git master Dirk Eibach (1): ppc4xx: Add

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: do not fixup NULL ptrs

2010-10-25 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Andre Schwarz wrote on 2010/10/25 16:46:42: > > Jocke, > > > Andre Schwarz wrote on 2010/10/25 15:50:19: > > > >> Jocke, > >> > >> [snip] > >> > >> > >>> You still haven't reported weather the 4 nop's helped or not, yet you > >>> seek my help. I am just going to ignore you until you do test it. >

[U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: add header file for the Shutdown Controller

2010-10-25 Thread Reinhard Meyer
and SHDWN address entry in at91sam9260.h Signed-off-by: Reinhard Meyer --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_shdwn.h | 38 ++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91sam9260.h |1 + 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/include

[U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: add 2nd SPI to 9260/9XE/9G20

2010-10-25 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Signed-off-by: Reinhard Meyer --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/hardware.h |1 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/memory-map.h |1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/hardware.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/hardware.h index

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Add board support for hawkboard

2010-10-25 Thread sughosh ganu
hi Wolfgang, On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Sughosh Ganu wrote: > hi Wolfgang, > > On Fri Oct 22, 2010 at 10:05:43AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > > > #if defined(CONFIG_ARM) && !defined(CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC) > > > > > -void board_init_f (ulong bootflag) > > > > > +void __board_ini

[U-Boot] [PATCH] cfi_flash: Fix problems with status/id read mode

2010-10-25 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch adds some calls to set the flash chip in the read-status- register- or read-id-mode before the corresponding register is read back. This problem was detected while porting the common CFI driver to support the Xilinx DS617 flash chips. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese --- drivers/mtd/cfi_fl

[U-Boot] [PATCH] cfi_flash: Use flash_read32() in sector_erased()

2010-10-25 Thread Stefan Roese
The function sector_erased() is modified to not use pointer access, but to use the correct accessor functions. This fixes a problem on the t3corp board with the Xilinx DS617 flash chips. Here a board specific accessor function is needed to read from flash in 32bit mode. This patch enables such an o

[U-Boot] [PATCH] cfi_flash: Add optional config register write to cfi-detection

2010-10-25 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch adds the possibility to (optinally) write to the flash configuration register. The Intel style CFI chips support such a register that can be used to configure the operation mode to a non-default value. This method will be used by the t3corp board, which needs to configure the DS617 Xili

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: t3corp: Add support for the Xilinx DS617 flash chip

2010-10-25 Thread Stefan Roese
The t3corp board has an Xilinx DS617 flash chip connected to the onboard FPGA. This patch adds support for these chips. Board specific flash accessor functions are needed, since the chips can only be read correctly in 16bit mode. Additionally the FPGA chip-selects are configured for device-paced t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM base address

2010-10-25 Thread Jason Liu
HI, Shawn 2010/10/25 Shawn Guo : > i.mx51 internal RAM starts from 0x1FFE than 0x1FFE8000 Correctly speaking, i.mx51 TO1 SCCv2 RAM strart from 0x1FF8 TO3 should be starting from 0x1FFE Maybe you need fix the commit log and state it clearly. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo > --- >  arc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: do not fixup NULL ptrs

2010-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Andre Schwarz, In message <4cc58b1b.8040...@matrix-vision.de> you wrote: > > finally I got both some time and hardware : > > 4 nops after _start does the trick, i.e. the board is up and running fine. This is probably completely unrelated - but check your CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE setting an

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] MMC Multi-block Support

2010-10-25 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ghorai, Sukumar wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] >> On Behalf Of Steve Sakoman >> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 3:14 AM >> To: John Rigby >> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Alagu Sankar;

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: do not fixup NULL ptrs

2010-10-25 Thread Andre Schwarz
Wolfgang, > Dear Andre Schwarz, > > In message<4cc58b1b.8040...@matrix-vision.de> you wrote: > >> finally I got both some time and hardware : >> >> 4 nops after _start does the trick, i.e. the board is up and running fine. >> > This is probably completely unrelated - but check your > CON

Re: [U-Boot] NAND support on AVR32

2010-10-25 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:21:00 +0100 David Collier wrote: > OK - my apologies > > I've now used the web browser, and my post is there - the problem is > obviously with my download from the mailing list. > > I still don't see any relies though - so if you cn help I'd be truly > grateful :-) There

Re: [U-Boot] Versatile PB compilation problem

2010-10-25 Thread Himanshu Chauhan
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:55 PM, sughosh ganu wrote: > hi Himanshu, > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Himanshu Chauhan > wrote: >> >> I am compiling u-boot for ARM versatile-PB board. But the compilation >> fails with this error: >> >> board.c: In function ‘__dram_init_banksize’: >> board.c:45

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] VoVPN-GW_100MHz: drop unsupported board configuration

2010-10-25 Thread Rogan Dawes
On 2010/10/24 4:00 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > The 100MHz configuation of the VoVPN-GW has never been supported, so > drop it now. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk > --- > > This commit shows a problem with the concept of the "README.scrapyard" > file: I'm supposed to enter the commit ID for the

Re: [U-Boot] Versatile PB compilation problem

2010-10-25 Thread Himanshu Chauhan
>> >>   Looks like the board you are compiling does not have support for the ARM >> relocation added recently. You would need to add valid entries to the board >> config file. >> >> Check this patch as an example >> http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg36109.html >> >> -sughosh The

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] MMC Multi-block Support

2010-10-25 Thread Ghorai, Sukumar
> -Original Message- > From: Steve Sakoman [mailto:sako...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 11:00 PM > To: Ghorai, Sukumar > Cc: John Rigby; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Alagu Sankar; Andy Fleming > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] MMC Multi-block Support > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V4] mmc: seperate block number into small parts for multi-write cmd

2010-10-25 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Lei Wen wrote: > Constraint the mmc framework to only send no more than 65535 > blocks in one go during the multi-write command. This constraint > comes due to the limitation of 16bit width block counter register > at some hardware. > > Signed-off-by: Lei Wen > C

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sh: serial: Update serial driver for SH

2010-10-25 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
I copied the setting of CPU from Linux kernel and commonized it. By this, we can communalize a kernel and information. And added the serial setting of many CPU's. Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu --- drivers/serial/serial_sh.c | 199 + drivers/serial/serial_sh.h | 689 +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/10 v2] net: rtl8169: Add initialized eth_device structure

2010-10-25 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, Ben and Wolfgang. Could you take in these patches? Best regards, Nobuhiro 2010/10/19 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu : > rtl8169 does not have write_hwaddr function. > However, eth stuff executes write_hwaddr function > because eth_device structure has not been initialized. > > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: do not fixup NULL ptrs

2010-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Andre Schwarz, In message <4cc5c226.8080...@matrix-vision.de> you wrote: > > Having a look at include/asm/global_data.h gives some 40 ulongs for my > MPC8377 system. > Current CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE= 0x100 which should be enough. Indeed. I was asking because I just discovered that most of

[U-Boot] ALERT! >90% of all board configurations BROKEN

2010-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hello, this is an ALERT! I just noticed (when debugging a strage phenomenon) that most of the board configurations (170 out of 191 for PowerPC, _ALL_ for ARM) are broken, because the size of struct global_data has grown but CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE has not been adapted (commit 91a7675 added 32 by

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 V2] Move and rename common headers from under board/davinci.

2010-10-25 Thread Sughosh Ganu
Move the davinci common headers to the architecture specific include file path. Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu --- V2: Based on comments from Wolfgang, move the headers under asm/arch-davinci/. .../arm/include/asm/arch-davinci/da8xx_common.h|0 .../arm/include/asm/arch-davinci/davinc

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 V2] Make board_init_f under nand_boot.c a weak function.

2010-10-25 Thread Sughosh Ganu
Enable board_init_f to be overridden with a board specific funtion. Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu --- V2: Splitting this change as a separate patch. nand_spl/nand_boot.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/nand_spl/nand_boot.c b/nand_spl/nand_boot.c inde

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3 V2] Add support for hawkboard

2010-10-25 Thread Sughosh Ganu
The patch adds basic board support for TI's OMAP-L138 based Hawkboard. This board is pretty similar to the da850 EVM. Support for nand and network access is added in this version. The following bootup procedure is used. At reset, the Rom Boot Loader(RBL), initialises the ddr and the nand controll

[U-Boot] [PATCH] omap4: board: change global data pointer to file scope

2010-10-25 Thread Nishanth Menon
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR is currently defined within the scope of function while it is a global pointer. Change the scope of definition to replicate it's global scope. This seems to help gcc 4.5 optimizations as well. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/board.c |3 ++-

Re: [U-Boot] ALERT! >90% of all board configurations BROKEN

2010-10-25 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > this is an ALERT! > > I just noticed (when debugging a strage phenomenon) that most of the > board configurations (170 out of 191 for PowerPC, _ALL_ for ARM) are > broken, because the size of struct global_data has grown but > CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE has not been adapted (com

[U-Boot] Massage Therapists marketing email list

2010-10-25 Thread magisterial
Prices below are only valid until Friday VOLUME PRICING 2 lists - $99 each 3 lists - $75 each 5 lists - $64 each 7 lists - $52 each Choose from any list below: [ HEALTHCARE ] > Complete US Physicians Database > Chiropractic Doctors in the USA > American Holistic Medicine Providers/Clinics > Ge

Re: [U-Boot] ALERT! >90% of all board configurations BROKEN

2010-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4cc5e865.70...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > Grep-ing for CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE in *.[chsS] Makefile *.ld it > seems to me that with "ELF-reloc" active that define is not used > anywhere at least in ARM. Are you sure? My very first smaple sees: "arch/arm/c

[U-Boot] u-boot text console

2010-10-25 Thread Kallol Biswas
Hi, I have a customer request to build BIOS like user interface(UI) for u-boot over serial port? Something like text console with tabs on the top. Each tab will have sub-items just like BIOS. This is for a PPC platform. Is there any existing software/code base that can be used? Regards, Kall

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Nishanth Menon
Having a loop with a counter is no timing guarentee for timing accuracy or compiler optimizations. For e.g. the same loop counter which runs when the MPU is running at 600MHz will timeout in around half the time when running at 1GHz. or the example where GCC 4.5 compiles with different optimization

Re: [U-Boot] ALERT! >90% of all board configurations BROKEN

2010-10-25 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > In message<4cc5e865.70...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: >> >> Grep-ing for CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE in *.[chsS] Makefile *.ld it >> seems to me that with "ELF-reloc" active that define is not used >> anywhere at least in ARM. > > Are you sure? My very first smaple sees: > > "

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Nishanth Menon
Menon, Nishanth had written, on 10/25/2010 06:33 PM, the following: > Having a loop with a counter is no timing guarentee for timing > accuracy or compiler optimizations. For e.g. the same loop counter > which runs when the MPU is running at 600MHz will timeout in around > half the time when runnin

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Nishanth Menon
Having a loop with a counter is no timing guarentee for timing accuracy or compiler optimizations. For e.g. the same loop counter which runs when the MPU is running at 600MHz will timeout in around half the time when running at 1GHz. or the example where GCC 4.5 compiles with different optimization

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Nishanth Menon, > Having a loop with a counter is no timing guarentee for timing > accuracy or compiler optimizations. For e.g. the same loop counter > which runs when the MPU is running at 600MHz will timeout in around > half the time when running at 1GHz. or the example where GCC 4.5 > compi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Nishanth Menon
Reinhard Meyer had written, on 10/25/2010 08:14 PM, the following: > Dear Nishanth Menon, >> Having a loop with a counter is no timing guarentee for timing >> accuracy or compiler optimizations. For e.g. the same loop counter >> which runs when the MPU is running at 600MHz will timeout in around >>

[U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git

2010-10-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
The following changes since commit c163f4478ca72f51b28b55f74addc8fe029d7b83: Merge branch 'master' of ssh://gemini/home/wd/git/u-boot/master (2010-10-25 08:06:52 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git master Mike Frysinger (2): Blackf

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM base address

2010-10-25 Thread Shawn Guo
The internal RAM starts from 0x1FFE on final revsion i.mx51 than 0x1FFE8000 which is for older revision. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo --- Changes for v2: Rewrite the commit message for a better change log. arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1

[U-Boot] Mail list threading problem or mailer problem?

2010-10-25 Thread Shawn Guo
Let's look at this example. Here is what I see on http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-October/thread.html. [U-Boot] U-boot versions - reply to RM + SW David Collier [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: support new relocation scheme Shawn Guo [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mx

[U-Boot] Report ready to go

2010-10-25 Thread Entourage Group Inc
Fellow investors, AVEW closed out the day Monday (10/25/10) with a reduction in p r i c e per s h a r e of -25%. The p r i c e per s h a r e of AVEW is now $0.0075 per s h a r e. For those of you who have been following AVEW, you already know that this is a gr8t p r i c e per s h a r e! Hav

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Nishanth Menon, In message <1288054924-24989-1-git-send-email...@ti.com> you wrote: > Having a loop with a counter is no timing guarentee for timing > accuracy or compiler optimizations. For e.g. the same loop counter > which runs when the MPU is running at 600MHz will timeout in around > hal

[U-Boot] Account Verification

2010-10-25 Thread Webmail Support Team
This is to inform you that we are of current plan to upgrade our email account and You have to confirm and upgrade your account by replying to this mail with your username () and password() for confirmation of account. Webmail Support Team. __

Re: [U-Boot] Mail list threading problem or mailer problem?

2010-10-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Shawn Guo wrote: > But I really expect something like below (added In-Reply-To ID). gmail does not respect the reply-to headers when threading stuff in its web client if you have any questions beyond that, look at the raw e-mail and make sure the message id and i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Ghorai, Sukumar
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] > On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:06 AM > To: Menon, Nishanth > Cc: u-boot > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix > > Dear Nishanth M

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4cc62b6c.30...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > In such cases I prefer to use: > > uint64_t etime; > ... > etime = get_ticks() + get_tbclk(); /* 1 second */ > do { > whatever; > udelay (xx); > } while (condition

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] NDS32: Add N1213 cpu core related stuff.

2010-10-25 Thread Macpaul Lin
These patch set have been refreshed and created against mainline master branch. These patches changes from previous "PATCH v3: NDS32: Add NDS32 architecture support to u-boot." In order to make these patches could be easily review and maintained, I've split the original Patch v3 into small piece

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Nishanth Menon, In message <4cc62c81.8000...@ti.com> you wrote: > > > You can still call udelay inside the loop if you don't want > > to poll the condition too tightly... > hmmm.. almost like the jiffies in kernel ;).. timing wise, I see that Yes, except for the bugs... ;-) Best regards,

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] nds32: add NDS32 support into common header file

2010-10-25 Thread Macpaul Lin
Add NDS32 support into common header file. Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin --- include/common.h |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/common.h b/include/common.h index 6a79ec2..1f3bc32 100644 --- a/include/common.h +++ b/include/common.h @@ -274,6 +274,10

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] nds32/Core_N1213: add N1213 cpu core support for NDS32 arch

2010-10-25 Thread Macpaul Lin
Add N1213 cpu core support for NDS32 arch. Included lowlevel_init procedures, and linker scripts. NDS32 Core N1213 has the following features. Core: - 16-/32-bit mixable instruction format - 32 general-purpose 32-bit registers - 8-stage pipeline - Dynamic branch prediction - 32/64/128/256 BT

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Ghorai, Sukumar
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] > On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:59 AM > To: Reinhard Meyer > Cc: Menon, Nishanth; u-boot > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix > >

Re: [U-Boot] Mail list threading problem or mailer problem?

2010-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Shawn Guo, In message you wrote: > > Is this some problem with u-boot mail list threading itself or the gmail > mailer? As Mike already pointed out, this appears to be a problem with the gmail'w web interface. At http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/87453 you can see h

Re: [U-Boot] Mail list threading problem or mailer problem?

2010-10-25 Thread Shawn Guo
Hi Mike, I did not mean the threading view in gmail web client, but http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-October/thread.html The message-id and in-reply-to matches, and the same way works good with linux-arm-kernel list. I also see others' messages having same problem in u-boot list. On

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > In message<4cc62b6c.30...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: >> >> In such cases I prefer to use: >> >> uint64_t etime; >> ... >> etime = get_ticks() + get_tbclk(); /* 1 second */ >> do { >> whatever; >> udelay (xx); >> } while (condit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4cc66a67.4000...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > > It fails in case the timer wraps around. > > > > Assume 32 bit counters, start time = 0xFFF0, delay = 0x20. It > > will compute end = 0x10, the while codition is immediately false, and > > you don't have any

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-10-25 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > Dear Reinhard Meyer, > > In message<4cc66a67.4000...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: >> >>> It fails in case the timer wraps around. >>> >>> Assume 32 bit counters, start time = 0xFFF0, delay = 0x20. It >>> will compute end = 0x10, the while codition is immediately false, a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH][v0]p1_p2_rdb: to set SQW/INT pin of RTC as INT line

2010-10-25 Thread Jain Priyanka-B32167
Dear Kumar, As there is no feedback on this patch in the maillist. Please pull this upstream. Thanks Priyanka -Original Message- From: Jain Priyanka-B32167 Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:53 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Jain Priyanka-B32167; Gala Kumar-B11780 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATC

Re: [U-Boot] ALERT! >90% of all board configurations BROKEN

2010-10-25 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 26/10/2010 02:11, Reinhard Meyer a écrit : > That is #ifdef-ed away in case of ARM-relocation. Perhaps we should remove > all code that pertains to "WITHOUT_RELOC"... Would make the rest of the code > less obscure... > I changed my board.config like this: > ... > /*#define CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH][v2] RTC driver for PT7C4338 chip.

2010-10-25 Thread Jain Priyanka-B32167
Dear Kumar, As there is no feedback on this patch in the maillist. Please pull this upstream. Thanks Priyanka -Original Message- From: Jain Priyanka-B32167 Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:22 AM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Jain Priyanka-B32167 Subject: [PATCH][v2] RTC driver for PT7

Re: [U-Boot] ALERT! >90% of all board configurations BROKEN

2010-10-25 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Reinhard, Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear Wolfgang Denk, >> this is an ALERT! >> >> I just noticed (when debugging a strage phenomenon) that most of the >> board configurations (170 out of 191 for PowerPC, _ALL_ for ARM) are >> broken, because the size of struct global_data has grown but >> CON

Re: [U-Boot] Mail list threading problem or mailer problem?

2010-10-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > Hi Mike, please do not top post > I did not mean the threading view in gmail web client, but > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-October/thread.html so you're just talking about how pipermail is archiving things ? gmane seems to do it