Hi.
We have a new board which we are suing with U-boot. The CPU is a P2020.
I am having a few minor problems, and I was hoping to get some help.
- Boot Count. We are keen to use the boot counter feature, but I
am struggling to find a suitable register in the P2020. The file
Andy Fleming aflem...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/08/22 23:08:45:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
PowerPC mandates SP to be 16 bytes aligned.
Furthermore, a stack frame is added, pointing to the reset vector
which may in the way when gdb
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/08/23 18:53:14:
On 08/23/2012 02:21 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Andy Fleming aflem...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/08/22 23:08:45:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
PowerPC mandates SP
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/08/14 23:01:47:
On 08/14/2012 03:55 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ping?
PowerPC mandates SP to be 16 bytes aligned.
Furthermore, a stack frame is added, pointing to the reset vector
which may in the way when gdb is walking the stack
Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote on 2012/08/14 23:28:45:
On Jul 23, 2012, at 3:58 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
PowerPC mandates SP to be 16 bytes aligned.
Furthermore, a stack frame is added, pointing to the reset vector
which may in the way when gdb is walking the stack because
intermediate values.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
v2 - Address Scott Wood's comments
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S | 16 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S arch/powerpc
Ping?
The code first aligns the SP to 16 then subtract 8, making it
8 bytes aligned. Furthermore the initial stack frame not
quite correct either.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
v2 - Address Scott Wood's comments
arch/powerpc/lib/board.c |5
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/07/20 23:11:33:
On 07/20/2012 04:20 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
PowerPC mandates SP to be 16 bytes aligned.
Furthermore, a stack frame is added, pointing to the reset vector
which is just get in the way when gdb is walking the stack
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/07/23 18:52:28:
From: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
To: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se,
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Date: 2012/07/23 18:52
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mpc85xx: Initial SP alignment is wrong.
On 07/21
values.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
v2 - Address Scott Wood's comments
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S | 16 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S
The code first aligns the SP to 16 then subtract 8, making it
8 bytes aligned. Furthermore the initial stack frame not
quite correct either.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
v2 - Address Scott Wood's comments
arch/powerpc/lib/board.c |5 ++---
1 files
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/07/23 19:28:20:
On 07/23/2012 12:11 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
...but I was a bit confused when I thought it would help terminate
things. The NULL LR only helps prevent finding something worse, if
something happens to do a backtrace
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/07/20 23:11:33:
On 07/20/2012 04:20 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
PowerPC mandates SP to be 16 bytes aligned.
Furthermore, a stack frame is added, pointing to the reset vector
which is just get in the way when gdb is walking the stack because
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/07/20 23:12:49:
From: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
To: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se,
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Date: 2012/07/20 23:12
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: Stack Pointer must be 16 aligned
On 07
The PowerPC ABI mandates the SP to be 16 bytes aligned, make is so.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
arch/powerpc/lib/board.c |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git arch/powerpc/lib/board.c arch/powerpc/lib/board.c
index
intermediate values.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S | 16 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S
index 8d66cf1..8c75af9 100644
wait_ticks() calls get_ticks() without building a back chain which
makes gdb unhappy when doing back trace. This can also cause
improper memory accesses.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
arch/powerpc/lib/ticks.S |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2
Just stumbled on a (mis) feature in gdb that I figured u-boot devs should know
about:
powerpc-softfloat_4.5.3-linux-gnu-gdb u-boot
GNU gdb (Gentoo 7.4 p1) 7.4
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is
Hello Marek,
On 5/25/2012 7:44 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
This patch conditionally defines flush_dcache_range() and
invalidate_dcache_range() on MPC8xxx, to avoid EHCI complaining,
resulting in the following output:
snip
+
+void invalidate_dcache_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long
Schneider, Kolja kolja.schnei...@men.de wrote on 2012/05/03 10:46:55:
If you mean the BDI is trying to initialize things rather than leave the
system in its default state, don't do that.
Yes, trying to get there.
Easily done, just throw out everything in the [init] section. Or is
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2012/05/03 15:11:33:
Dear Joakim,
In message
of35057017.5788f889-onc12579f3.00427b35-c12579f3.00442...@transmode.se you
wrote:
I found the problem, u-boot is somewhat flawed, it requires
CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE
to be base 2 even, must land on a
...@freescale.com
Loks good
Acked-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Still trying to wrap my head around the P2010 cpu and its boot sequence(NOR)
We can run the full u-boot it we use the BDI emulator but without emulator it
won't boot.
We have 64 MB NOR flash and have based out design on the P1020RDB and we boot
from NOR.
Using the emulator but with minimal
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/05/02 21:34:18:
On 05/02/2012 02:04 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Still trying to wrap my head around the P2010 cpu and its boot sequence(NOR)
Yeah, it's a bit convoluted.
Yes, fully agreed. I miss the sane 0 address boot vector too.
We
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/04/26 23:26:52:
On 04/26/2012 01:53 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/04/25 21:01:00:
On 04/18/2012 05:07 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Your linker file is buggy I think. I found u-boot-nand_spl.lds
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/04/26 23:26:52:
On 04/26/2012 01:53 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/04/25 21:01:00:
On 04/18/2012 05:07 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Your linker file is buggy I think. I found u-boot
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/04/25 21:01:00:
On 04/18/2012 05:07 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Your linker file is buggy I think. I found u-boot-nand_spl.lds, is that the
one?
That's the one for the SPL part.
OK, good.
Check out that files reloc part:
.reloc
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/04/25 20:59:22:
On 04/25/2012 01:55 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/04/25 20:43:22:
On 04/25/2012 05:57 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Debugging of e500 and e500v1 processer requires MSR[DE
Debugging of e500 and e500v1 processer requires MSR[DE] bit to be set always.
Where MSR = Machine State register
Make sure of MSR[DE] bit is set uniformaly across the different execution
address space i.e. AS0 and AS1.
Hi
We are trying to bring up our custom P2010 RDB based board. boot is
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2012/04/25 20:43:22:
On 04/25/2012 05:57 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Debugging of e500 and e500v1 processer requires MSR[DE] bit to be set
always.
Where MSR = Machine State register
Make sure of MSR[DE] bit is set uniformaly across
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Chunhe Lan,
In message 1334719161-3500-1-git-send-email-chunhe@freescale.com
you wrote:
The -fPIC/-fpic flag belongs with -mrelocatable. The -fpic flag can
limit the size of the GOT and produce smaller binaries, so it causes
some GOT entries to be
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 05:05:51:
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
Hi Marek,
Bottom line is, we could do either and we would be 100% compliant with the
C standard
The question is,
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Mike Frysinger,
On Sunday 01 April 2012 20:25:44 Graeme Russ wrote:
b) The code calling malloc(0) is making a perfectly legitimate assumption
based on how glibc handles malloc(0)
not
Hi Grame
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 09:17:44:
Hi Joakim,
On Apr 2, 2012 4:55 PM, Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
wrote:
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Mike Frysinger
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 16:05:13:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Hi Grame
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 09:17:44:
Hi Joakim,
On Apr 2, 2012 4:55 PM, Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
wrote:
Hi Marek
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 16:42:30:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 16:05:13:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Hi Grame
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 09:17:44:
Hi Joakim
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 17:23:03:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 16:42:30:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 16:05:13:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Hi
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 18:39:33:
From: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 17:23:03:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 16:42:30
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 20:00:03:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 18:39:33:
From: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 17:23:03
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 22:28:46:
From: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
On 04/02/2012 05:40 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Hi Grame
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 09:17:44:
Hi Joakim,
On Apr 2, 2012 4:55 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
vapierfil...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 21:14:14:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 14:40, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 20:00:03:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Depends, if writing generic code for lots of OS:es you cannot rely
malloc(0). Writing kernel
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 22:59:57:
On Apr 3, 2012 6:57 AM, Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
wrote:
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 22:28:46:
From: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
On 04/02/2012 05:40 PM, Joakim
Dear Mike Frysinger,
On Thursday, October 21, 2010 17:10:31 Graeme Russ wrote:
On 22/10/10 06:51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
have u-boot return an error.
Is NULL what you consider to be an error
yes
Besides, is not free(NULL) valid (does nothing) as well?
yes, free(NULL)
Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/01 16:01:56:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Dear Mike Frysinger,
On Thursday, October 21, 2010 17:10:31 Graeme Russ wrote:
On 22/10/10 06:51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
have u-boot return an error.
Is NULL what you consider
From: chang-ming.hu...@freescale.com
From: Jerry Huang chang-ming.hu...@freescale.com
It is sometimes necessary to force the I2C module to become the I2C bus master
out of reset and drive SCL(even though SDA may already be driven,
which indicates that the bus is busy). This can occur when a
Huang Changming-R66093 r66...@freescale.com wrote on 2011/10/27 09:40:23:
Thanks and Best Regards
Jerry Huang
-Original Message-
From: Joakim Tjernlund [mailto:joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 3:26 PM
To: Huang Changming-R66093
Cc: u-boot
PM
To: Joakim Tjernlund
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] Powerpc/i2c: Force i2c to become bus
master out of reset
Thanks and Best Regards
Jerry Huang
-Original Message-
From: Joakim Tjernlund [mailto:joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Huang Changming-R66093 r66...@freescale.com wrote on 2011/10/27 11:26:04:
The above sequence is different than the kernel version, why?
I don't know the kernel version, but I write the u-boot code
according
to the Reference Manual of PowerPC, e.g p1022:
11.5.6 Generation of
unsigned long get_tbus (void)
{
unsigned long tbl=0;
unsigned long tbu1=0, tbu2=0;
unsigned long us=0;
unsigned long long tmp=0;
unsigned long tbclk = os_get_tbclk();
// get the timebase ticks
do {
__asm__ __volatile__ (mftbu %0:=r (tbu1):);
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/05/01 16:35:06:
Commit 9d8fbd1 powerpc, 8xx: Fixup all 8xx u-boot.lds scripts broke
building of the MPC8260 based hymod board. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
Cc: Murray Jensen murray.jen...@csiro.au
Cc: Joakim Tjernlund
vapierfil...@gmail.com wrote on 2011/04/25 06:13:20:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
vapierfil...@gmail.com wrote on 2011/04/25 00:38:31:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
--- a/examples/standalone/timer.c
+++ b
vapierfil...@gmail.com wrote on 2011/04/25 07:40:00:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
however, that doesnt change my original point ... we shouldnt be
fixing things like this that have no relevance in the u-boot world.
disable the warning flags in the build system.
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/04/25 10:35:25:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of102cc99d.b86b21b6-onc125787c.007cb439-c125787c.0080f...@transmode.se you
wrote:
Well, your gcc is different from mine and I know nothing about it as
you won't say anything about
':
codec.c:585: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
codec.c: In function 'codsp_write_sop_int':
codec.c:512: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
-V3 use puts() and constify usage string in timer.c
board/netta
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/04/25 12:17:11:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of522299d7.a02484a0-onc125787d.003187d6-c125787d.0032f...@transmode.se you
wrote:
If in doubt, use ELDK. All examples were compiled with ELDK 4.2 (GCC
4.2.2) for ppc_8xx.
Have you tried
vapierfil...@gmail.com wrote on 2011/04/25 19:53:50:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 13:45, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:13:20 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
vapierfil...@gmail.com wrote on 2011/04/25 00:38:31:
probably want
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote on 2011/04/25 20:06:40:
Some toolchains enable security warning flags by default, but these don't
really make sense in the u-boot world. Such as forcing changes like:
-printf(foo);
+printf(%s, foo);
So disable the flags when the compiler
With these patches 8xx willbuild again for me
with a number of gcc's even with Add support for -msingle-pic-base
I hope WD's gcc will also work.
Joakim Tjernlund (3):
powerpc, 8xx: Fix fallout from Fixup all 8xx u-boot.lds scripts
Fix a few gcc warnings.
powerpc, 8xx: adapt a few linker
Two linker scripts for 8xx was missed.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
board/matrix_vision/mvsmr/u-boot.lds |2 +-
board/rsdproto/u-boot.lds|7 ---
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/matrix_vision/mvsmr/u
Noticed while building all of mpc8xx
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
board/netta/codec.c |6 +++---
board/siemens/IAD210/atm.c |4 ++--
examples/standalone/timer.c |4 ++--
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board
Seems like recent linker/fpic changes broke a few 8xx boards.
This makes them build again.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
board/LEOX/elpt860/u-boot.lds |2 +-
board/etx094/u-boot.lds |2 +-
board/svm_sc8xx/u-boot.lds|2 +-
board/tqc/tqm8xx
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/04/24 16:30:14:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message 1303633774-22961-1-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
you wrote:
With these patches 8xx willbuild again for me
with a number of gcc's even with Add support for -msingle-pic-base
I hope
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/04/24 22:48:09:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message 1303633774-22961-4-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
you wrote:
Seems like recent linker/fpic changes broke a few 8xx boards.
This makes them build again.
Signed-off-by: Joakim
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/04/25 00:14:58:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message 1303633774-22961-3-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
you wrote:
Noticed while building all of mpc8xx
Please include in the commit message what the compiler warnings were,
and which
vapierfil...@gmail.com wrote on 2011/04/25 00:38:31:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
--- a/examples/standalone/timer.c
+++ b/examples/standalone/timer.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ int timer (int argc, char * const argv[])
/* clear all events
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/04/20 22:13:35:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of8b32e14f.150b51b9-onc1257878.0044927e-c1257878.00452...@transmode.se you
wrote:
OK, I managed to script the change, patch last in mail.
Thanks.
However CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-softfloat
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/04/20 00:41:01:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
ofbc9c03bc.436c27c7-onc1257877.00797190-c1257877.007a0...@transmode.se you
wrote:
Yes, but you yorself pointed out that commit 337f5f5 missed a large
number of boards, leaving the tree
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/04/19 22:25:25:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of484eff4d.45d9734b-onc1257870.002e25b2-c1257870.002f0...@transmode.se you
wrote:
It seems this change increases the code size somehow - which I would
not expect from your comment above
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/04/19 23:35:40:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
ofc3d6185b.85dce339-onc1257877.007406b0-c1257877.00746...@transmode.se you
wrote:
Can you please provide a fix? I'd like to get rid of this build error
ASAP. We could, of course, simply
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/04/20 00:05:27:
From: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
To: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Date: 2011/04/20 00:05
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] PowerPC: Move -fPIC flag to common place
Dear Joakim Tjernlund
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/04/20 00:41:01:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
ofbc9c03bc.436c27c7-onc1257877.00797190-c1257877.007a0...@transmode.se you
wrote:
Yes, but you yorself pointed out that commit 337f5f5 missed a large
number of boards, leaving the tree
Hi Baidu,
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c
index dfb1745..f38f755 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c
@@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ dump_dirents(struct b_lists *pL)
}
#endif
-#define DEFAULT_EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE 4096
+#define
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message 1291642606-4290-1-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
you wrote:
The -fPIC flag belongs with -mrelocatable, move it there.
Also change -fPIC to -fpic as this produces smaller
binaries.
However, currently -mrelocatable promotes -fpic to -fPIC
Dear Nicholas Kinar,
In message 4d92428e.6030...@usask.ca you wrote:
(1) Does replacing jffs2_1pass.c with jffs2_nand_1pass.c in the fs/jffs2
directory influence the robustness of the fsload code?
JFFS2 is more or less deprecated these days. FOr new projects, we
recommend to use UBI/
-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/speed.c | 15 ---
include/mpc83xx.h|7 +++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/speed.c
b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/speed.c
Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de wrote on 2011/01/31 08:18:56:
Hello Joakim,
Joakim Tjernlund write:
According to the i2c command alen 0 should be allowed
but this is not allowed in the implementation, fix.
Also cleanup all cmd_usage cases while at it. It is cleaner
to return cmd_usage
According to the i2c command alen 0 should be allowed
but this is not allowed in the implementation, fix.
Also cleanup all cmd_usage cases while at it. It is cleaner
to return cmd_usage(cmdtp); instead of
{
cmd_usage(cmdtp);
return 1;
}
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl
Use SPMR instead of HRCWL when calculating clocks as HCRWL
may be changed and the CPU will not pick up all changes
until there is a POR. u-boot will think SPMF has changed and get
the clocks wrong.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/speed.c
Seems to that the top level config.mk should include
the auto generated include/config.mk so that all Makefile's
pickup those definitions.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
config.mk |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/01/23 20:35:48:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of749bbc82.7aa2f037-onc1257821.0069eda0-c1257821.0069f...@transmode.se you
wrote:
Seems to that the top level config.mk should include
the auto generated include/config.mk so that all
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/01/23 23:50:03:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of0949c72e.59c831f7-onc1257821.006ee01d-c1257821.006ff...@transmode.se you
wrote:
What is the exact problem you are trying to fix? Do you have a test
case?
Example from my board/config.mk
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2011/01/18 18:27:49:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:18:34 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
How do you think a solution for all boards would look like?
The only other method is can think of is some MMU trickery and
I don't even
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2011/01/18 21:24:16:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:06:34 +0100
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of287114d8.013b6e51-onc125781c.00667dcd-c125781c.00673...@transmode.se
you wrote:
boards which I don't think
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/01/18 21:06:34:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of287114d8.013b6e51-onc125781c.00667dcd-c125781c.00673...@transmode.se you
wrote:
You don't need to make the MMU trick work on all boards, just your board
(or cpu family), because it wouldn't
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/01/18 22:25:04:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
ofbbe91305.b19350d9-onc125781c.007192fc-c125781c.00742...@transmode.se you
wrote:
Ah, finally you make sense to me. I actually tested this with mainline
on my board so it is not completely
Seems to that the top level config.mk should include
the auto generated include/config.mk so that all Makefile's
pickup those definitions.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
config.mk |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/01/17 23:11:59:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of6a573b77.9119deb0-onc1257814.0069a574-c1257814.00753...@transmode.se you
wrote:
It would break only if link address != load address. That is, if you
want to use my new CONFIG_SYS_TRUE_PIC
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/01/18 00:42:10:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of71b40f2e.5c935ba8-onc125781b.007cb9e6-c125781b.007e5...@transmode.se you
wrote:
No other board is broken. This new function is neutral to other boards.
Well, I see this differntly
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/12/17 17:13:47:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of3301f88e.e61f6369-onc12577fc.00573ebc-c12577fc.00576...@transmode.se
you wrote:
Great! then we got:
[PATCH] PowerPC: Move -fPIC flag to common place
[PATCH] PowerPC: Add
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2011/01/10 19:24:02:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 21:48:47 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/01/09 21:29:04:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
1292838435-14958-4-git-send
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/01/09 21:44:08:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message 1292838435-14958-1-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
you wrote:
Remove dependencies on link address. Use GOT and
add an new function to calculate the actual address.
Signed-off
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/01/09 21:54:34:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message 1292838435-14958-3-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
you wrote:
By copying the GOT to the end of the INIT_RAM(dcache)
and relocating it there, it is much esier to
support true PIC on u
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2011/01/10 00:25:59:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of7f8bae70.ce1486c7-onc1257813.00727b82-c1257813.0072b...@transmode.se you
wrote:
But your new code does not reference CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE at all,
but uses CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE instead
Le 08/01/2011 11:49, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
In my investigations for 'NULL fixup' (- see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/89864/focus=89906)
pointed out that only symbols in 'absolute fixup' loop could be 'NULL'
if there is a not aliased/empty weakly linked
Need to check that location is valid on RAM before the fixup.
Why this change? The [PATCH RFC] armv7: fixloop: don't fixup if location is NULL
should be what you need.
You could mention what causes these NULL fixups, here is commit
entry for powerpc:
powerpc: do not fixup NULL ptrs
The
Minkyu Kang proms...@gmail.com wrote on 2011/01/04 11:04:57:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
On 4 January 2011 18:49, Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
wrote:
Need to check that location is valid on RAM before the fixup.
Why this change? The [PATCH RFC] armv7: fixloop: don't
Minkyu Kang proms...@gmail.com wrote on 2011/01/04 12:02:29:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
On 4 January 2011 19:31, Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
wrote:
Minkyu Kang proms...@gmail.com wrote on 2011/01/04 11:04:57:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
On 4 January 2011 18:49, Joakim
Remove dependencies on link address. Use GOT and
add an new function to calculate the actual address.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 35 +++
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions
-base option
to gcc.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 36
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
link_off calculates the difference between link address and
actual load address. This is a must for true PIC u-boot.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 26 ++
include/common.h |7
201 - 300 of 715 matches
Mail list logo
